Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not a 'conspiracy theory' at all.
Merely one interpretation of the preponderance of Neomedia Europe AG related legal language within NEOM's own website. They said that 'stuff' , I didn't.
Do you have any specific comment on my post or thoughts on why the legal language on the new website is what it is?
Time will tell as drmyke says , for the rest of the story truly hasn't been written. But I do remember when I started my analysis of scores of other YAGI clients and showed factually how those clients' shareholders fared in the end .... the very thought or mention that this very same thing (shareholder value destruction and transfer of ownership of NEOM from us to YAGI) could happen to Neomedia was regarded as a black-helicopter conspiracy theory.
And we now see exactly how it all played out.
jonesie
p.s. I have to wonder why it is that only a YAGI-implanted YAGI-agent and head of Neomedia Europe AG can legally represent our U.S.-traded public company.
neom2006, how accurate do you think ...
... this post (from another NEOM discussion forum) about info on the new NEOM website is?
I've excerpted and paraphrased pertinent comments, added a comment here and there, if I get some time later I'll look into it in more detail than I already have , has anyone already done this?
I'd be interested in what you think, neom2006.
****************************************
the new web site was developed by and is copyrighted by Gavitec which is now being called Neomedia Europe AG.
If you look at the legal section of that new web site, over and over again throughout the entire document, it states Neomedia Europe.
http://neom.com/legal.php
Amazing how many times NeoMedia Europe AG is mentioned, vs NeoMedia Inc.
Are phrases like this disturbing?
"Applicable Law and Venue
These terms and conditions are governed by the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. Venue shall be Aachen."
How about who can legally represent the company?
"Names of those entitled legally to represent the company
Member of the board: Dr. Christian Steinborn
Supervisory board: George O'Leary"
Neomedias operations center is now in Germany, not the USA.
"In early 2009, Gavitec AG – mobile digit became the European headquarters for NeoMedia and is now named NeoMedia Europe AG. Its main function is the front-end development for all NeoMedia products as well as being the centre for operational activities."
The CEO is overseas
Operations have been moved overseas
Is Atlanta now merely a sales office?
re: the case studies conducted. over 90 percent are Gavitec studies using scanners for coupons period, which is mostly hardware sales.
3 (?) case studies involving Neomedia USA and not one of them was using the NEOREADER or the back end platform. The last one listed was using QODE and the two before that were paperclick and the autopaint business.
No case studies involving NeoReader that the public is aware of except maybe Papa Johns? (that got them in legal trouble with Scanbuy.?)
Is it possible that NEOMEDIA EUROPE could be separated from the sales operation now existing in the US?
Operations and the CEO are outside the US jurisdiction, and now Neomedia Europe AG is a legitimate company in Germany, which if necessary could go it on its own.
The site seems to be geared more toward Neomedia Europe than Neomedia INC, the legal language on the site certainly emphasizes that.
***************************************************
Someone mentioned the new website possibly being "a sign".
I hope it's a sign of something good for common shareholders , vs total abandonment of same.
jonesie
"or for a MWC launch?"
Instead of fostering endless supposition, speculation and dot connecting it would be nice if someone at NeoMedia would do something that would lead to at least one customer in this "nascent industry" (lol) doing something as incredibly simple and straightforward as .... oh let's see .... buying something from us or paying us to do something for them.
Neomedia has been going to 'launch' several times before according to the most ardent company apologists. If they ever did actually 'launch' anything the firecracker they were using for a rocket motor was too weak to get anybody to buy anything.
jonesie
p.s. Or maybe the only 'launches' have been fueled by ignition of all the hot gas emanating from revolving-door management and greedy pennystockscam rip-off artists like Chas Fritz?
SHORT INTEREST AS OF JanB Report Date
JanB Short Interest for TIV , as of late-January 2009:
1,856,100
Up less than 20,000 since previous report, ~1% change.
Higher prices during the period.
jonesie
Who said NEOM would never go ...
... below a nickel?
Pretty risky saying 'never' when it comes to NeoMedia lol, they've found just about every way possible to screw up (or us), and more than likely they've found a few ways we don't even know about yet.
<EOM>
as in , End Of Message
jonesie
So , is the fat lady clearing her throat?
Or is she warbling full tilt?
Perhaps Microsoft KNOWS they're going to have to pay NEOM pretty soon , so they're accruing the "NEOM Royalty Fund"?
Yeah , that's it.
jonesie
Test Rates news
Tri-Valley Wells Each Post 1,000 Oil per Day Flowing Test Rates
Monday February 2, 3:04 pm ET
BAKERSFIELD, CA--(MARKET WIRE)--
Feb 2, 2009 --
Tri-Valley Corporation (AMEX:TIV - News) announced that production tests, on three of its horizontal wells into the Vaca Tar Sands at its Pleasant Valley site in the Oxnard, California oilfield have flow tested at rates considerably above 1,000 barrels oil per day per well. There are four other such wells on that same lease, in addition to the newly completed horizontal well at Pleasant Valley's Lenox Ranch Lease, all of which have also been completed in the same shallow Vaca zone. The Company is continuing to install new infrastructure to handle much greater production volumes than had been originally planned in its initial conservative forecast for well delivery rates.
Using some of the 40 years of industry experience in Canada's Athabasca Tar Sand development, Tri-Valley began drilling the Vaca Tar Sands first horizontal wells in late 2007, then steaming and cautiously producing them initially at low rates to avoid sand build up. After several months with no evidence of sand entry into the bores, intermittent tests of the wells showed a potential of much higher production rates and, subsequently, Tri-Valley began completely re-configuring its production facilities accordingly.
A landmark study in 2000 by the late Dr. Roger Butler, the so-called father of the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) technique, postulated that horizontally drilled wells with companion steam injector bores could produce at sustained rates of 500-700 barrels of oil per day for seven to ten years without decline. Tri-Valley now believes those estimates may in fact be too low in the Vaca zone it is now producing.
At present, Tri-Valley engages in alternating steam/soak/production cycles in advance of drilling dedicated well bores for continuous steaming of the formation and may drill one such dedicated steaming well bore this year to test the efficacy of that approach. However, it is now confirmed that the Company's methods under the cyclic approach can deliver well beyond the initial design of the project. Tri-Valley has just completed its eighth horizontal Vaca Tar Sands well and is preparing to drill several more in 2009.
"Much higher production rates per well can significantly lower the per barrel lifting costs which are critical to maintaining a positive margin, especially when oil prices are lower, and they can result in huge upside for Tri-Valley and its Opus partners once oil prices increase again. We are confident we can very substantially increase well production rates and that oil prices will resume going up on the overall trend to better reward the investors and the Company in the coming months and years, and that these wells are good for many decades of strong production to build substantial share value," said F. Lynn Blystone, president and chief executive officer.
Tri-Valley is developing the Vaca Tar Sand Project with its investment partner, the TVOG Opus I Drilling Program LP, and ultimately expects to produce in excess of 10,000 barrels of oil per day after drilling more wells through 2010.
Tri-Valley has been in business as a successful operating company since 1963, and has been a full reporting 12 (g) publicly traded Delaware Corporation since 1972. Tri-Valley Corporation stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange Alternext US under the symbol "TIV." Our company website, which includes all SEC filings, is www.tri-valleycorp.com.
This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results, events and performance could vary materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements which includes such words and phrases as exploratory, wildcat, prospect, speculates, unproved, prospective, very large, expect, potential, etc. Among the factors that could cause actual results, events and performance to differ materially are risks and uncertainties discussed in the company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, and the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Contact:
Contact:
Egan Gost
Director of Public and Investor Relations
1-800-579-9314
re: amended 2007 10/K
It would be nice if there was a summary section noting what components were amended. What a pain to have to peruse the entire 10/K and try to compare with one of the previous iterations looking for changes. Who has the time?
Is there such a summary? Has anyone even looked at the thing?
jonesie
TOP INSTITUTIONAL & MUTUAL FUND HOLDERS
# of institutions holding shares climbed from 28 to 42 in the July/September time frame. (Russell bagholders)
Now: Number of Institutions Holding Shares: 45
Just FYI , interesting.
jonesie
"Its not about the current revenue of Texas Nameplate Inc"
That's a good thing because after 62 years in business they're doing $3MM in sales ... we just hooked up with a sweet little family business , but a gnat nonetheless.
Good luck to us all! With all the Bertelsman's(sic?) and Whampoa's(sic?) and the myriad other 'biggies' (you know who they are) to which many dotted lines have been drawn out there , what the heck is NeoMedia doing messing with gnats? We've been touted as being 'behind closed doors' with giants , as being 3 minutes from AT&T's conference room ("see that building right over there Bruce?" "Yes Chip, so?") and we're PR'ing some revenue-less 'partnership' with a gnat?
If I ever find it worthwhile to spend the time again , I'll calculate how much Iain has cost us so far ... and perhaps we can compare that with what he's actually done ... I mean REAL stuff he's done.
You are absolutely correct drmyke ...
... and they keep it going because there is some interest out there in 2d barcodes, and as long as NeoMedia pretends to be in that business someone will keep buying shares from YAGI.
Business people don't call Ft. Myers Ft. Liars for nothing lol.
jonesie
p.s. Put out some more PRs NeoMedia, if you put out enough you might be able to get this over .002.
Yeah, we'll make a bundle with that $3MM/yr in sales company
Yeah baby, hey if we had ALL of their sales we'd have $3MM more in sales than we do now. LOL
How much do we get paid per click on this deal? Anything?
Does NeoMedia even have a revenue-generating model any more? Have they verbalized it? Or are they happy simply being he 'global leader' in their own minds?
Texas Nameplate, neat story, neat owner, nice awards he's received, but still ... they're a $3MM/yr company who just aligned themselves with a nearly bankrupt one, and there doesn't seem to be any info on how NeoMedia makes any money on this deal.
D-U-N-S Number 007319023
Company Type Private
Single Location
Year Of Founding or Change In Control 1946
State of Incorporation TX
Key Numbers
Annual Sales (mil.) $3.0
Total Employees 63
Employees At This Location 63
jonesie
"Sabotage" ???
Nah , just plain old greed , stuffing their own pockets at the expense of shareholders , while feeding the shareholders a constant stream of pinkyland-type PRs and "we're gonna dos".
and re beam's: "none of us ever believed that we would all be in a sinking ship/boat/tub together heading adrift, way "off shore" to be rescued or imprisoned by silent and unknown foreign partners." ... none of us? hmmm , I think by now it might have been 'years' ago that I started posting tables showing 90+% of Cornell's clients getting slammed just like this , and I do believe I showed the offshore component of Cornell/YA quite a long time ago and suggested this Cayman Island connection was probably detrimental to us shareholders.
Just sayin'
jonesie
sunset , I'll have to go back and look ...
... I think they did mention PV. I just scanned it , it's really sickening to read the same old 'stuff' letter after letter , when the 'stuff' from previous letters failed to materialize.
They're sending them out in .pdf format now so you can't really copy and paste. Probably on purpose lol. That excerpt I posted was from a screen shot. When I get time I suppose I could post the whole thing that way.
jonesie
Shareholder Letter out 1/27/09
I felt like I needed some high water boots to wade through some of the flowery b.s.
Lynn is selling off more of the company to raise money , and he's going to buy more properties. Excerpt:
JMHO
jonesie
SHORT INTEREST AS OF JanA Report Date
JanA Short Interest for TIV , as of mid-January 2009:
1,836,400 shares
Short interest was down 160,000 shares during the most recent reporting period , another 8% covered.
Instead of a past (and very theoretical LOL) 'months and months to cover' talked about by a few uninformed folks , the 'days to cover' is down to less than three weeks.
So much for 'rocket fuel' Lynn. The short interest is as low as it's been since May 2005 , and the price , well it's been a long long time since TIV saw $0.97. Historical low share price , even in the midst of the shorts covering 2.2 million shares in 6 months. Good thing the shorts were buying.
Lower highs and lower lows , and shorts covering.
4 months to Russell Dump time.
Month-----Shares Short---- % Change
---------------------------------
Jan 2009 - 1,836,400 ---- (-8.01%)
Dec 2008 - 1,996,400 --- (-13.69%)
Dec 2008 - 2,312,938 ---- (-3.20%)
Nov 2008 - 2,389,300 ---- (-6.26%)
Nov 2008 - 2,548,933 ---- (-3.10%)
Oct 2008 - 2,630,394 --- (-11.09%)
Oct 2008 - 2,958,391 --- (-11.20%)
Sep 2008 - 3,331,603 ---- (-5.78%)
Sep 2008 - 3,535,801 ----- +1.85%
Aug 2008 - 3,471,407 ---- (-2.99%)
Aug 2008 - 3,578,462 ----- (-8.41%)
Jul 2008 - 3,907,211 ----- (-4.45%)
Jul 2008 - 4,089,234 ----- +59.96%
Jun 2008 - 2,556,428 ------ +9.99%
Jun 2008 - 2,324,030 ------ +1.21%
May 2008 - 2,296,132 ----- (-1.90%)
May 2008 - 2,340,630 ------ +0.86%
Apr 2008 - 2,320,625 ----- (-1.61%)
Apr 2008 - 2,358,507 ----- (-1.16%)
Mar 2008 - 2,386,251 ----- (-0.30%)
Mar 2008 - 2,393,494 ----- (-0.37%)
Feb 2008 - 2,402,283 ----- (-0.43%)
Feb 2008 - 2,412,708 ----- (-0.17%)
Jan 2008 - 2,416,782 ------ +1.88%
Jan 2008 - 2,372,266 ----- (-0.40%)
Dec 2007 - 2,381,745 ------ +0.02%
Dec 2007 - 2,381,262 ----- (-0.02%)
Nov 2007 - 2,381,837 ----- (-0.83%)
Nov 2007 - 2,401,841 ----- (-3.97%)
Oct 2007 - 2,501,137 ------ +0.71%
Oct 2007 - 2,483,500 ----- (-0.30%)
Sep 2007 - 2,490,932 ----- (-0.84%)
Sep 2007 - 2,511,943 ----- (-0.56%)
Aug 2007 - 2,526,079 ----- (-3.35%)
Jul 2007 - 2,613,736 ----- (-4.92%)
Jun 2007 - 2,749,037 ----- (-0.42%)
May 2007 - 2,760,565 ----- (-0.39%)
Apr 2007 - 2,771,400 ------ +1.82%
Mar 2007 - 2,721,853 ----- (-0.57%)
Feb 2007 - 2,737,463 ------ +1.64%
Jan 2007 - 2,693,334 ----- (-2.77%)
Dec 2006 - 2,770,185 ----- (-1.5%)
Nov 2006 - 2,811,009 ---- (-11.9%)
Oct 2006 - 3,192,293 ---- (-2.27%)
Sep 2006 - 3,266,297 ----- +0.09%
Aug 2006 - 3,263,093 ---- (-5.04%)
Jul 2006 -- 3,436,104 ---- (-17.3%)
Jun 2006 - 4,156,544 ---- +13.87%
May 2006- 3,650,143 ------ +1.83%
Apr 2006 - 3,584,379 ----- (-5.41%)
Mar 2006 - 3,789,445 ----- (-4.23%)
Feb 2006 - 3,956,897 ----- (-3.56%)
Jan 2006 - 4,102,837 ------ +3.86%
Dec 2005 - 3,950,446 ----- (-1.88%)
Nov 2005 - 4,025,937 ------ +5.01%
Oct 2005 - 3,833,789 ------ +1.39%
Sep 2005 - 3,781,376 ------ +9.56%
Aug 2005 - 3,451,421 ----- +24.25%
Jul 2005 - 2,777,900 ----- +39.66%
Jun 2005 - 1,989,039 ----- +20.65%
May 2005 - 1,648,631 ----- +40.68%
Apr 2005 - 1,171,931 ---- +113.52%
Mar 2005 --- 548,854 ----- +86.95%
Feb 2005 --- 293,590 ---- +327.46%
Jan 2005 ---- 68,682 ----- +96.67%
Dec 2004 ---- 34,923 ----- +37.38%
Nov 2004 ---- 25,421 ----- +10.40%
Oct 2004 ---- 23,027 ---- +408.66%
Sep 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-59.68%)
Aug 2004 ---- 11,227 ---- +132.59%
Jul 2004 ----- 4,827 ---- (-31.31%)
Jun 2004 ----- 7,027 ----- +55.22%
May 2004 ----- 4,527 ------ TWBFTS-
Apr 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-94.73%)
Mar 2004 ---- 85,881 ---- (-13.21%)
Feb 2004 ---- 98,951 ---- (-00.88%)
Jan 2004 ---- 99,833 ----- +00.89%
Dec 2003 ---- 98,951 ---- (-18.30%)
I kinda have to agree ...
... because they would get so little for Gavitec it would be peanuts compared to NEOM's debt , and it would be peanuts compared to even one tranche of YA financing.
I'm sure IM would love to sell it to insure his salary payments for a bit longer , but YA wouldn't let him lol.
Besides , if NEOM held true to form , they'd sell it for a couple million and somehow owe someone another 4 mill for taking it off their hands.
lol drmyke ...
... that guy (gal?) acts like he just discovered something.
Scanbuy and Neomedia are going to 'allow' small barcodes to be placed and blah blah .... uh, has he looked at any products lately? LOL
'Imagine' being able to scan a barcode and get info on local outlets .... wow , what will they think of next?
Is this guy for real? Or just 'real behind'?
Thanks for the early morning chuckle.
jonesie
DOGGR OPI SITE SHOWING OCTOBER PRODUCTION ...
... with tables showing the newly revised OPI site table as well as the original OPI site table.
It would appear that TIV has taken the Confidential designation off some or all of the previously 'C' wells. It would also appear that when that happens , DOGGR adds the formerly 'C' production , in this case from the Oxnard wells , into the OPI site tables. It will be interesting to look at some of the individual well production (anybody got time?).
I think if we go back and compare these revised numbers (the upper table) they will correspond pretty well with the DOGGR FTP site numbers we've been reporting here all along ... the ones showing Confidential wells' production as well as the non-confidential wells' production.
Lastly , there is still a big difference in the gas production numbers on OPI vs FTP so TIV may not have taken the 'C' designation off the Moffat well(s?).
DOGGR FTP SITE TABLE SHOWING OCTOBER PRODUCTION
The numbers in the table below include all Tri-Valley oil and gas wells.
The drop-off in production from September to October is substantial.
(Note: the table in the post replied to is what was on the DOGGR OPI site for October when I first posted it , on January 7. Next post will show the numbers on the OPI site having been revised.)
And I assume he gets paid, every week, every month ...
... ALL of these guys get paid. And shareholders aren't even given the scrap of a shareholders' meeting , must less anything of substance to cause some share price appreciation.
How long did we hover at .012-.015 before breaking below a penny?
How long have we been hovering at .0012-.0015?
I've never actually owned a stock before that traded at something like .0009 or .0007. One thing you can say for NEOM ... it's the stock/company/management that consistently continues in a downward death spiral.
They don't call it death spiral financing for nothing.
jonesie
"as only the USPTO reexamination has the authority to resolve that issue"
Well , not really.
"A party may challenge the validity of a patent in a federal court, or through reexamination before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), or both. If the validity of a patent is contested in a federal court, the judge determines validity if there is no factual dispute. Otherwise, the jury decides validity."
http://www.finnegan.com/resources/articles/articlesdetail.aspx?news=a81eef1b-f6e2-4303-b2a3-0c75c6f74dc4
Good to see you now understand who is making the mistakes ...
... NeoMedia's attorney, not Scanbuy or the EFF.
"Remember when - close to 3 years ago, we lost close to 1 mil. (inventory never paid for), by insulting and misspelling a Chinese partner's name (twice, in the original and the correction of the original misspelled name which translated to do do)! I thought we were going to be run out of China on that one."
We 'lost' those monies because of a conflict of interest surrounding David Dodge's complicity, serving on the board of the company who stiffed us, while being our CFO. It was all planned, Neomedia said it was okay, it was just a way of 'spreading the wealth' around amongst the arrogant players in this otcbb game, the wealth being those monies scammed from shareholders. Misspelling? Hardly LOL
jonesie
It has been an entire era of errors.
And of course this 'corrected' version ...
... is still wrong LOL
In one place it says NeoMedia is the defendant , and in another spot it says they are the plaintiff.
Okay , who is checking these and signing them. Is this generated by OUR attorney?
Hey beam, you said: "Just more EFF stuff pushing this. Can't you tell? They can't even get the names of the plaintiff and defendant correct."
Isn't it the NeoMedia attorney who is having a problem getting this straight? Or am I reading it wrong.
Here is a "corrected" filing
Maybe they got it all right this time and NeoMedia's attorney didn't sign factually incorrect papers.
jonesie
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
SCANBUY, INC. AND MARSHALL FEATURE
RECOGNITION, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
V.
NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
Civil Action No. 08 CV 199
The Honorable David J. Folsom
Jury Trial Demanded
REVISED RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned attorney
Of record for plaintiff NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., certifies that:
(1) NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. Is a publicly-held corporation; and
(2) There are no publicly-held corporate parents, subsidiaries or affiliates of
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. That own 10% or more of the stock of NeoMedia
Technologies, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: January 22, 2009 /s/Robert W. Schroeder III
Robert W. Schroeder III
tschroeder@texarkanalaw.com
Texas Bar No. 24029190
PATTON, TIDWELL & SCHROEDER, LLP
4605 Texas Boulevard
Post Office Box 5398
Texarkana, Texas 75505-5398
(903) 792-7080 Telephone
(903) 792-8233 Facsimile
Counsel for NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.
Of counsel:
Michael H. Baniak
baniak@mbhb.com
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3100
Chicago, Illinois 60606
(312) 913-0001 Telephone
(312) 913-0002 Facsimile
Jeffrey A. Pine
pine@vp-law.com
Allison M. Corder
corder@vp-law.com
VALAUSKAS & PINE LLC
150 South Wacker Drive, Suite 620
Chicago, Illinois 60606
(312) 673-0360 Telephone
(312) 673-0361 Facsimile
Case 5:08-cv-00199-DF Document 13 Filed 01/22/2009 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
REVISED RULE 7.1. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT was served upon the following
Attorneys of record:
John Mercy
jmercy@texarkanalawyers.com
MERCY CARTER TIDWELL, L.L.P.
1724 Galleria Oaks Drive
Texarkana, Texas 75503
(903) 794-9419 Telephone
(903) 794-1268 Facsimile
John M. Hintz
john.hintz@wilmerhale.com
Laura A. Sheridan
laura.sheridan@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 230-8800 Telephone
(212) 230-8888 Facsimile
Via ECF, this 22nd day of January, 2009.
/s/Robert W. Schroeder III
Robert W. Schroeder III
tschroeder@texarkanalaw.com
Texas Bar No. 24029190
PATTON, TIDWELL & SCHROEDER, LLP
4605 Texas Boulevard
Post Office Box 5398
Texarkana, Texas 75505-5398
(903) 792-7080 Telephone
(903) 792-8233 Facsimile
Well spoken and well said.
5 star post. Good drilldown and logical analysis of the actual facts.
jonesie
Why must the only thing that will work ...
... be secret?
I mean, 'secret' could work as well as anything I suppose, but why would it HAVE to be secret?
"has to have been building a huge platform"
Yep , that sounds like the NEOM we know LOL. Whenever we thought they were doing something huge behind the scenes , they sure were ... wait ... they never actually were. Sorry.
jonesie
Thanks fla124 ...
... and yes,they did reduce the number of shares. Of course, since they don't report, we have no idea what the share count is now, they probably print and sell them at will, or use them to 'buy' these other 'who are they?' companies.
I love these pinkyland LOI's lol
Hopefully they'll actually do something and the stock price will go up. Hard to believe this POS was near 2 bucks a while back. I hope those who bought up there are excited now.
jonesie
Did this ever happen?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=22552314
Do we have a Universal Reader? Is it on many phones? Does it really read 1D barcodes?
Are we still a public company or do we just have an idiot for a lawyer?
That news sounds a lot like the last news ...
... in a lot of ways. So I guess I'll say the same thing I said when the last 'news' came out.
"No acquisition price, no info on what they bought them with. Did they buy them with a lot of shares which they will dump on the open market at every opportunity? Did they buy them with Arby's coupons? For a company which has "said" they wanted to get back to being a reporting company, SUPI doesn't seem to really want to do anything at all.
No quote from SUPI pres/ceo? What does that guy do? How long can these guys be a public company and get to dump shares, without actually telling shareholders anything significant?"
What does this mean? "Ad Systems Inc., a Praebius subsidiary, which owns and operates more than 250,000 cable TV ad insertion subscribers."
How do you own and operate a subscriber? I'm a cable TV subscriber, how do I get owned? Or operated? What is an "ad insertion subscriber"?
What does this mean? "nearly two million additional subscribers under contract which SuperWire plans to install in 2009"
How do you install a subscriber? Exactly what does that mean?
Why no 'About Praebius' blurb at the end?
These posts are interesting as well:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbyboard.asp?boardID=4029&srchyr=2008&SearchStr=Praebius
Hey Heil, what the Heil are you doing?
jonesie
Thanks smoke, very much.
A blogger. Kind of like Jeff Mould was a blogger for so long, promoting NeoMedia.
jonesie
Who wrote this Mike?
Is it an article? A blog post? Do you have a link? TIA
jonesie
Thank you Howard.
I think that reply makes it absolutely clear now (not like it wasn't clear before lol) the lengths Lynn will apparently go to in his parsing of words and misleading semantics.
They're always 'scrambling' to do something. I'll bet it's a 'scramble' every now and then when certain angry shareholders show up at the door LOL.
jonesie
edinvestit:
For your sake I hope you are right, and for the sake of a lot of TIV investors who are down millions and huge percentages of their investments have evaporated like many past PRs.
Perhaps it is worthy of remembering that you said the very same thing in October of 2007 when the PPS was $7.66/share.
Posted by: edinvestit Date: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:12:33 PM
In reply to: jonesieatl who wrote msg# 2884 Post # of 4702 [Send a link via email]
I am a long time hoder of this stork (4+ year ) and cain't believe the people they are adding wouldn't associate with TIV unless they see something big down the road the the average investor doesn't have insight to.....
I think things are taaaking longer than they planned but are still on track..
JOMO..
Long and Strong...
Ed
Good luck to all. $1 could turn out to be a good place to buy , but only in hindsight would that be known for sure. Certainly every other price folks have bought (and held) TIV at has proven to be a bad deal for the buyer.
jonesie
Nice find aztreedoc ....
... thanks for posting.
IMO tidbits of reality will continue to surface over time , showing more and more suppositions and claims as being lies.
"Hey, if I have to I'll buy the company myself for $10,000,000" -Jeff Mould
lol , what a show this has been and is going to be.
jonesie
"I'm sure the finger of blame is pointed at everyone/everything else but in reality ..... "
LOL , if nothing has changed from times past , I would imagine that you are being blamed , shorts are being blamed , bashers are being blamed , I am being blamed , the specialist is being blamed ....
As you say , everyone/everything other than where the bottom line responsibility lies.
Speaking of lies ... it still amazes me to think of those sequential PRs TIV put out touting ever-larger daily production rates. I think that was back in May. What's amazing is that when the actual DOGGR reports became public , showing ALL of TIV's production on the FTP site ... those claims were shown to be vapor.
Just as we pointed out on the very days those PRs were released.
I hope that somewhere out there a few past or would-be investors in TIV were guided to some extent by the objective posting and discussion of verifiable facts and analysis here on this board. By being shown the history of disconnects between years of claims and the ultimate realities , many probably acted on the facts and saved themselves much financial pain by avoiding riding this thing down. Obviously SOMEbody has been selling , otherwise the price wouldn't go down. And with the shorts covering , and it not making much sense to short more at these low levels , it's obvious who's been doing the selling.
I know boards like this don't have huge audiences , but this has to have been a better place for discussion of the facts than the trashheap Y board (did it ever change?) or some secretive give-the-secret-handshake and pass-the-purple-Koolaid lala land governed by perpetual TIV sycophants and apologists.
jonesie
That IS pretty amazing ...
... and you're right , short covering has provided a lot of support to the stock price. But not enough to keep TIV from printing new multi-year lows on a regular basis.
I keep thinking that sooner or later TIV will surely pony up and show actual sales levels commensurate with all of the money they've spent buying things. As the years go by one has to wonder.
jonesie
The dilution derived from ...
... the entity who SOLD the shares to you.
Because they converted preferred to get those shares cheaper than you or I can, and they sold them to you.
Like personalizit said ... thanks for buying.
D I L U T I O N doesn't care who's buying. D I L U T I O N comes from selling freshly printed shares.
jonesie
SHORT INTEREST AS OF TRADE DATE 12/26/08
Short Interest for TIV as of Trade Date 12/26/08:
1,996,400 shares
Short interest was down a whopping 316,538 shares during the most recent reporting period , which covers trading from 12/11 through 12/26.
During this period TIV saw a high of $2.06 (previous period's high was $3.35) on 12/17 and a low of $1.51 (previous period's low was $1.62) on 12/18.
A lower high than in the last reporting period , and a lower low than in the last reporting period , and the shorts still covered another 13% of the short interest.
Lower highs and lower lows , and shorts covering. That's some really watered down rocket fuel. Good call suggesting TIV shareholders get their certs and stuff them under their mattresses , really good call. How far is TIV down since TIV management made THAT suggestion?
Month-----Shares Short---- % Change
---------------------------------
Dec 2008 - 1,996,400 --- (-13.69%)
Dec 2008 - 2,312,938 ---- (-3.20%)
Nov 2008 - 2,389,300 ---- (-6.26%)
Nov 2008 - 2,548,933 ---- (-3.10%)
Oct 2008 - 2,630,394 --- (-11.09%)
Oct 2008 - 2,958,391 --- (-11.20%)
Sep 2008 - 3,331,603 ---- (-5.78%)
Sep 2008 - 3,535,801 ----- +1.85%
Aug 2008 - 3,471,407 ---- (-2.99%)
Aug 2008 - 3,578,462 ----- (-8.41%)
Jul 2008 - 3,907,211 ----- (-4.45%)
Jul 2008 - 4,089,234 ----- +59.96%
Jun 2008 - 2,556,428 ------ +9.99%
Jun 2008 - 2,324,030 ------ +1.21%
May 2008 - 2,296,132 ----- (-1.90%)
May 2008 - 2,340,630 ------ +0.86%
Apr 2008 - 2,320,625 ----- (-1.61%)
Apr 2008 - 2,358,507 ----- (-1.16%)
Mar 2008 - 2,386,251 ----- (-0.30%)
Mar 2008 - 2,393,494 ----- (-0.37%)
Feb 2008 - 2,402,283 ----- (-0.43%)
Feb 2008 - 2,412,708 ----- (-0.17%)
Jan 2008 - 2,416,782 ------ +1.88%
Jan 2008 - 2,372,266 ----- (-0.40%)
Dec 2007 - 2,381,745 ------ +0.02%
Dec 2007 - 2,381,262 ----- (-0.02%)
Nov 2007 - 2,381,837 ----- (-0.83%)
Nov 2007 - 2,401,841 ----- (-3.97%)
Oct 2007 - 2,501,137 ------ +0.71%
Oct 2007 - 2,483,500 ----- (-0.30%)
Sep 2007 - 2,490,932 ----- (-0.84%)
Sep 2007 - 2,511,943 ----- (-0.56%)
Aug 2007 - 2,526,079 ----- (-3.35%)
Jul 2007 - 2,613,736 ----- (-4.92%)
Jun 2007 - 2,749,037 ----- (-0.42%)
May 2007 - 2,760,565 ----- (-0.39%)
Apr 2007 - 2,771,400 ------ +1.82%
Mar 2007 - 2,721,853 ----- (-0.57%)
Feb 2007 - 2,737,463 ------ +1.64%
Jan 2007 - 2,693,334 ----- (-2.77%)
Dec 2006 - 2,770,185 ----- (-1.5%)
Nov 2006 - 2,811,009 ---- (-11.9%)
Oct 2006 - 3,192,293 ---- (-2.27%)
Sep 2006 - 3,266,297 ----- +0.09%
Aug 2006 - 3,263,093 ---- (-5.04%)
Jul 2006 -- 3,436,104 ---- (-17.3%)
Jun 2006 - 4,156,544 ---- +13.87%
May 2006- 3,650,143 ------ +1.83%
Apr 2006 - 3,584,379 ----- (-5.41%)
Mar 2006 - 3,789,445 ----- (-4.23%)
Feb 2006 - 3,956,897 ----- (-3.56%)
Jan 2006 - 4,102,837 ------ +3.86%
Dec 2005 - 3,950,446 ----- (-1.88%)
Nov 2005 - 4,025,937 ------ +5.01%
Oct 2005 - 3,833,789 ------ +1.39%
Sep 2005 - 3,781,376 ------ +9.56%
Aug 2005 - 3,451,421 ----- +24.25%
Jul 2005 - 2,777,900 ----- +39.66%
Jun 2005 - 1,989,039 ----- +20.65%
May 2005 - 1,648,631 ----- +40.68%
Apr 2005 - 1,171,931 ---- +113.52%
Mar 2005 --- 548,854 ----- +86.95%
Feb 2005 --- 293,590 ---- +327.46%
Jan 2005 ---- 68,682 ----- +96.67%
Dec 2004 ---- 34,923 ----- +37.38%
Nov 2004 ---- 25,421 ----- +10.40%
Oct 2004 ---- 23,027 ---- +408.66%
Sep 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-59.68%)
Aug 2004 ---- 11,227 ---- +132.59%
Jul 2004 ----- 4,827 ---- (-31.31%)
Jun 2004 ----- 7,027 ----- +55.22%
May 2004 ----- 4,527 ------ TWBFTS-
Apr 2004 ----- 4,527 ---- (-94.73%)
Mar 2004 ---- 85,881 ---- (-13.21%)
Feb 2004 ---- 98,951 ---- (-00.88%)
Jan 2004 ---- 99,833 ----- +00.89%
Dec 2003 ---- 98,951 ---- (-18.30%)