Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Same!
Thankfully not everything I do is wrong… I typically do not go long on pinks but this one for some reason I thought had a shot. I needed the tax help so I had to let this go.
I’m out… should have gotten out when I was ahead. I will be watching from the sidelines for now. Good luck everyone.
It depends on the state you live in. For sure it worked when I sent it to Florida.
I know.. Sarcasm...
Uhg… wtf Marani team!? I get the companies out there that are just selling a pipe dream… but I know they have a good product. Why not do something with it???
I asked this before but... why is the last news item on this board from 10-3? We have had stuff since then.
Two bottles arrived at my sister's house. Hopefully there will be some left for thanksgiving. Not sure how to add a saved pic here.
Each one is worth 1 billion common shares… Somehow something magic happens to let us transfer the them… then something else happens.. and we wait like 6 months to sell them for millions of dollars… Isn’t that the way this works??? It has been so long now.
why aren't the MRIB PR links being put up here anymore? The last one up there is from the 3rd?
Finally got some of this ordered. Two 750s. I won’t see it for some time since I had to ship it to my sister. (which also means I may never see it..)
Still WAY down on this bad boy. I hope that it takes off. At this point I’m in it for the long haul… either to the bank, or to the IRS with the total loss form.
How late did they report last time? Wasn't it like 20 days or something??... which is ridiculous but I don't see why we should anticipate anything better than that...From them anyway...
Did you say you spoke to Rick?? Do you have his phone number? I would love to actually get in contact with him.
Don’t know tape.. that is for sure what I would have done.
What is stated is 100% accurate as shown by the links. You are asserting that my post somehow makes it impossible that back in Feb MRIB and ECO’s officers had the same address listed. I for sure did not say that.
15941 Red Hill Ave, Tustin, CA 92780 is a mid-sized commercial building (or buildings). So if what you are telling me is that ECO at one point listed the Tustin address in February and now they don’t, then I guess I would not be surprised by that. I imagine there are several companies in those buildings. I have rented office space in a building where the suite is divided by two companies and they share a receptionist. I’m not saying you are not on to something. Just saying what I know.
You can find phone numbers on google street view for the people who rent office space out there. maybe somebody should call them.
Just fyi for everyone.. I have not dug into the ECO INVESTMENT PROPERTIES CORP relationship to see if one even exists… but a quick search of the Nevada SOC website will reveal that over 1800 companies of varying different backgrounds and status levels have used the same address because they use NEVADA PROCESSING CENTER, INC as an agent. https://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/RACorps.aspx?fsnain=c12KYV5qJGTyAS5EANJyrw%253d%253d&RAName=NEVADA+PROCESSING+CENTER%2c+INC
NEVADA PROCESSING CENTER, INC is a company that assists in registration and offers agent services: http://npcworld.com/ (hint look at their address)
Contingency does not mean they have to receive money for the attorney to be paid. It could be something like: If you get our credit vs. Bodie down to less than $2,000 we will pay you $1,000 or any variation similar to that. I am in no way saying that your reading of the complaint, and or application of it in a court, is correct. My point simply is that the assertion that they will be broke due to litigation expenses is not based on the actual knowledge of the agreement between MRIB and their attorney.
So you know with 100% certainty then that Marani is paying upfront for attorney’s fees instead of contingency or free from a friend…and is not going to request that fees be paid for by Bodie if they win?
This lawsuit has been discussed multiple times on this board. I have viewed the documents as I am sure others have. Your point that it is not a sticky or available to view here is valid. It would be ideal to have it available so everyone can see it. Personally I am not worried by it. Companies win and lose in court every day, some even smaller than Marani, and yet many survive and even thrive.
My comment had nothing to do with the validity of the case, but rather the presentation of it as “breaking news.”
I appreciate your concern. I think I will let this one play out for a while longer.
Good luck to you.
LOL… breaking news? I think we should reserve that phrase for news that hasn’t already been broken… like months ago.
I’m saying my comment was a joke. Correct. MRIB on the other hand is not.
Eleventy billion bills of lading emailed to me this morning… I think I’m getting the hang of this??
Very thorough response, thank you. Even though we do not agree here I appreciate your standpoint. I keep mixing up the bottle designs myself. I like the older bottle's look better. Still I stand by my previous statement. I don’t really care what bottles are being sold. Fact is they are being sold. Having owned enough garbage in pinky town that fact by itself will help keep me here as a long.
Thank you for your response. I guess I reach a different conclusion than you do about bottles being new, and any perceived misinformation. In my opinion the new bottle looks a good deal different than the previous bottle. Does that mean the new bottle is not from the end of Marani V1?.. I’m not sure I would go that far. However, it is clear they are different bottles. Since the new bottle has not been used it is new to the market… IMO don’t really care that much... but I was curious... Thank you for your post.
LOL.. my estimates put it at no more than 8 million…
Are you talking about the paper strip that goes over the top of the bottle cap? I am no expert in revenue stamps, but they do not look like one to me. First from the Taber pics it doesn’t look like they are in English. Second aren’t revenue stamps green and a good deal more elaborate than these? I got my google on and could not find a single one that looked like the paper strips on the new bottle. If what you are saying is true, then wouldn't a place like Costco realize this and question it? Further, assuming they did question it, would they proceed with putting it on their shelves if they had concerns?
I wish MN would let me order from Hi-Times.
Don't see a problem as long as we are selling inventory new/old either way it is getting sold.
Was glad to see the filing! Good luck all!! Go MRIB
Correct.
The video link I saw didn’t have a date on it. The release itself says Today’s date. So did she mean Monday like today or Monday like the 16th? It seems weird that the video would be released after the weekend that she refers to and also literally on the Monday morning she speaks of.
Does anyone know when the video was made, and or when it was supposed to be released?
Both fair points... but does a scam usually sell vodka? Late filing is not cool I would agree… We need to see Q1… However, I have seen scam companies release numbers on time in pink land..
Doesn’t it take a day for the OTC to post after the deadline? Somebody who saw late filings on other pinks could maybe answer that. Did the filing come out on the exact date that it was filed? If true, then we wouldn’t see them until today/tonight sometime.
Agree, good post.
“The numbers of otc companies that fraudulently announce huge contracts and enormous revenues knowing they have 90 days before the TRUTH is revealed is staggering.”
Absolutely true!… and I am not saying MRIB isn’t doing just that… but take your above statement subtract out all the companies with literally nothing to sell… then from those that remain subtract companies where shareholders have not been able to purchase said product… and I think most will find that this is a little different…or at the very least in a much smaller subset of Pinks.
Not saying you are wrong… just saying this one seems different IMO
Good luck too you whatever your game is here.
I 2nd this!!!
I wouldn’t say I disagree with you there. Advertising and marketing are going to be needed for this to take off. That said, I doubt anyone would be second guessing the decision if the price shot up right after.
These aren’t CEOs of Multibillion dollar companies we are dealing with here. Just the fact that they have managed to get a product in a bottle to distributors and for sale makes them better than most in Pink land.
“Haven't seen a single sale or report of such.” You are asserting that anyone who has claimed to have purchased this product is lying? The product is selling. Is there a super flashy add campaign with Jay Z spraying it all over the place?... No… although I did see a pic with TI holding a bottle. Does this need to improve?… absolutely!
I totally agree we need to see financials, as I am sure most do. I think they will be underwhelming for Q1 simply because there was not much in Q1. I do think that Q2 and Q3 will be where it is at.
Having a fake product that is intangible is the way to go in Pink Land. As soon as you have a real product the ability to pick apart the company becomes easier, and the expectations of success become greater. People have pointed out many times on this board that stocks with nothing to them go to .10 or .50 while this struggles. Many of us have seen that and all of us are witnessing it with MRIB. Kudos to MRIB on trying to have an actual product in a land of miracle vaccines, phone apps, future underwater logging equipment, speculative mining operations, Bitcoin processing, and those companies that are just inserting MJ into whatever they said they did before.
LOL...You do know that if a bank owns shares of a company and that bank later gets sued/found guilty that said company that it owns shares of doesn't "get caught up" in it right?? That really is not how that works.
I mean that would be like saying:
-you owned a company
-you had an IPO
-US Bank bought a bunch of shares and then got busted for robo signing mortgages
-your company was now suddenly caught up in that somehow..
To take it even further: Since a company is treated as an individual, that would be the same as saying; when your defaming ways catch up with you all the companies that you own stock of are somehow now caught up in that.
Just FYI Ms. Tanna
oh $hit we are in February. LOL... sorry my bad.
Thank You Taber. I did see the glossary of terms. While it does have a definition of Status, it does not explain what the date implies. Given that the date is a future date I would guess that it represents when the current status is either set to be reviewed, or is set to expire due to a different status.
Interesting…. Does anyone here know what the “Status Date” represents? On the document Avtges and Taber posted the Status Date is January 6th 2014, which is Thursday. It clearly can not be the date of submittal, or the date of its current state, as the date is in the future. I have an email in to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
lol...awe common now. You would give away "millions" of "future gains" just to undercut me?