Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
alwaysliquid
here is a link for you that includes Green Leaf Farms - Gorilla Glue #, Acapulco Gold, Juicy Fruit, and Blue Dream Rosin available
Product Description
Cultivated By Green Leaf Farms /// *STRAINS AND AVAILABILITY VARY* /// *TAXES NOT INCLUDED IN ALL PRICES*
https://shop.essencevegas.com/menu/dispensary/essence-the-strip?category_id%5B%5D=2&q=rosin&sort_by_sort_type=points%3Bdesc&price=1%3B200
There are is absolutely no reason PNTV continues to file late Quarterly Reports.
With the recent new hires I was hopeful that late filing would be a thing of the past, as it affects credibility, accountability, and sends the wrong message that they cant even report a simple filing on time.
NO EXCUSES, JUST SOLUTIONS!
At the end of the day, PNTVs share increases have and will continue to be news generated.
With the hype and mystery of July 1st mj in Vegas coming and going, substantial news from the corporation will keep the party going, or momentum will slow if material news gets scarce.
A press release announcing Greenleaf was partnering or taking out a dispensary chain would send this one to new highs, but I am not sure that's on the table right now.
An announcement of a spinout of Greenleaf would also gain some attention imo, as many including myself would like to see separate entities between the media and the mj businesses.
The rosin revolution is here!
http://hightimes.com/grow/why-the-rosin-revolution-is-real/
Nevada sales should eventually exceed those in Colorado, Oregon and Washington state because of the 45 million tourists who annually visit Las Vegas. Regulators anticipate 63 percent of customers will be tourists.
"I don't think we've ever seen anything quite like what Nevada is going to look like just because of the sheer volume of tourism in the state," said Nancy Whiteman, co-owner of the Colorado-based Wana Brands, which makes edible pot products
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/welcome-to-legal-pot-las-vegas-style/
Dear PNTV Friends & Shareholders,
We hope you are doing well and we appreciate having you part of our shareholder family! In an effort to always provide you the most up to date information on our progress, we want to give you the first opportunity to be a part of our Live 2nd Quarter Online Shareholder Update and Q & A with CEO Mark Bradley and myself, Brett H. Pojunis.
Mark and I will provide an overview of PNTV as well as all our holdings as we have a lot of exciting things going on! Following the update, Mark and I will host an unfiltered, "ask us anything" style video Q & A. You will have the opportunity to ask us whatever is on your mind pertaining any aspect of the company!
The Live Update has room for only 100 attendees. Registration is on a first come, first serve basis which is why you are receiving this invitation first.
Please help us spread the word about PNTV and tell your friends, family, and co-workers about us. Feel free to forward this email and/or share this link with them so they too can learn more about PNTV.
Sign up for the PNTV Webinar
Registration:
In order to participate, you must be one of the first 100 people to RSVP. Please visit this link and register now to reserve your space:
Get ready for Blast Off
RENO, Nev. (AP) - Nevada's marijuana regulators may have found a way around a judge's order that threatens to block the state's first recreational pot sales scheduled to begin next month.
Gov. Brian Sandoval has signed onto an emergency regulation intended to allow recreational sales to begin July 1 at some existing medical dispensaries.
Nevada Department of Taxation spokeswoman Stephanie Klapstein says the agency plans to issue recreational retail licenses next week even if it doesn't approve any distribution licenses caught up in a Carson City judge's court order.
She told The Associated Press that under the emergency regulation, any legally licensed retailer that has inventory left over from the medical program would be allowed to sell the pot products for recreational use effective July 1.
http://www.ktnv.com/news/marijuana/nevadas-onagain-offagain-marijuana-sales-back-on_62645468
Easy solution would be to give the one alcohol advocate that stated in court that his company alone could deliver all of the dispensaries delivery requirements in his sleep.
Allan Nassau, president of Red Rock Wines, a Las Vegas-area liquor distributor with over 300 customers, who said he could do the distribution work “in my sleep.”
It would not be a challenge to provide the product in the greater Las Vegas area, Nassau told the court.
Let the rest of the alcohol guys fight amongst themselves that they are not included.
Carson City District Judges chambers are likely lively with debate trying come to a last minute agreement both sides can live with until Jan 1, 2018.
The Independent Alcohol Distributors of Nevada and State of Nevada attorneys need to get something worked out, as it is highly unlikely a piece of paper from any judge is going to stop the big VEGAS July 1st coming out party for recreational MJ.
History in the making, folks
Interesting article out today
Someone is always sitting with a hand out
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/jun/09/nevada-pot-industry-still-hoping-july-1-kickoff/
Interesting read
Just goes to show how fast Government bureaucracy can move if there are tax dollars attached.
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/jun/07/recreational-pot-advocates-praise-legislatures-str/
Hawk, 25 cents by Fridays close may be tough to reach, but anyone care to guess where the share price is going to be on June 30, leading into the big day in Vegas July 1st. And better yet, July 1st is a Saturday
Friends of mine that indulge in the MJ scene have already booked flights to Vegas for that weekend, as they want to be a part of that historical day for Sin City.
That town should be rockin come the July 1st weekend, and a catalyst for all things marijuana to be put on center stage.
Hard to believe it is only 3 weeks away.
A guy may also want to invest in a company that supply munchies, lol
good luck everyone
next logical step in the progression, as they have received production and cultivation licenses, city and state approval to operate, recreational licences to sell marijuana in Vegas, and it would not surprise me to hear of a dispensary licence approved by July 1st, so Mark and the boys may as well get the store ready, as you know its coming.
Tough to stop the PNTV express once it gets rolling.
Now that PNTV has everything in line to accelerate growth in everything marijuana sales in Vegas, does this recent rise to fame put them on a takeover list by someone with deep pockets wanting to get into this space by taking out a turn key operation.
The PNTV Market Cap is still low for a company already producing and about to take advantage of the Vegas MJ grand opening in 21 days.
I would imagine these guys are scrambling to find a nice storefront location close to the strip, and get it ready for July 1st
Vegas and its latest new toy will make headlines around the world, and Greenleaf should be right smack in the middle of it all.
Puts a big target on their back for a take out attempt by big money.
It is no secret that the potential if all goes well, is absolutely massive in the Vegas market, and establishing a presence early enough is often the hardest part.
Some feel that is exactly the reason a Greenleaf spin off would separate the confusion, and add more potential to promotion of this company.
Players Network TV does not exactly lead to thoughts of a Marijuana mega giant in the new Vegas dot bong craze.
We are going much higher but it may take a little longer to get the message out that PNTV is in fact the next best thing to step onto the MJ stage.
Nelly, it will be nice to see PNTV graduate to a better regulated exchange once the company starts generating revenue.
Far to many games played on the OTC that generally do not benefit the little guys.
This link might help with your question
http://dpbh.nv.gov/Reg/MME/MME_-_Home/
Scroll down to:
Provisional Certificates Awarded in November, 2014:
Scores and Rankings
Cultivation Facilities
Dispensaries
Independent Testing Laboratories
Production Facilities
Pretty weak argument by The Independent Alcohol Distributors of Nevada considering only one alcohol wholesaler even bothered to submit an application, knowing the deadline was yesterday.
The timing of this order seems suspect, at best.....
"The order issued Tuesday means the department cannot issue licenses to anyone except licensed liquor wholesalers.
Tax department spokeswoman Stephanie Klapstein said that only one licensed alcohol wholesaler had applied for a marijuana distribution license, and that the application came in Wednesday morning"
Importance of receiving at least one recreational license going forward
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/may/31/with-recreational-weed-sales-coming-what-will-happ/
Nice cash infusion for the State of Nevada through early licensing applications.
143 applications at $5000 a pop, and those that are successful will have to pony up much more
Those additional fees range from:
$20,000 for retail stores
$30,000 for cultivation facilities
$10,000 for production facilities
$15,000 for testing labs
$15,000 for distributors
Nag, it is possible the approval came in after market close on Friday, so they decided to wait until after the holiday to announce it.
Good thing is if they knew they had it on Friday, Mark had a few extra days to prepare for a recreation strategy to meet tomorrows deadline.
Should be interesting to see this play out, as you know they are working on every angle to make it happen.
Interesting statement in the 8K - "On May 26, 2017, Green Leaf Farms Holdings, LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of Player’s Network, Inc., was licensed by the State of Nevada, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public and Behavioral Health, as both a Medical Marijuana Production Establishment and a Medical Marijuana Cultivation Establishment."
Thanks Micro
Interesting body language from Mark when asked the Rec licence question.
He was quick to discuss the benefit of the next round of Rec licensing if they don't get one this time. Not exactly displaying as much confidence as I had hoped, compared to previous interviews.
He also looks worn out.
It is not a question of when, as they already qualify, is I believe what he said regarding the next licensing round.
There are only a few days remaining to get a Dispensary License this go round, and to do that, a taxable sale must occur to qualify.
May 31st is just around the corner, and I assume the State of Nevada Officials do not work on Memorial Day, so the clock is ticking............
good luck
Nevada Starts Recreational Marijuana Applications Period
By Monterey Bud on May 16th, 2017 at 8:08 am
Ready. Set. Apply.
Nevada’s medical marijuana dispensaries eager to participate in the state’s “early start” recreational program can now apply.
On Monday, Nevada’s Department of Taxation began accepting applications from existing medical marijuana dispensaries wanting to cultivate, manufacture and distribute recreational marijuana in the Silver State.
Scheduled to end May 31, the application period has sparked a rush to obtain the proper authorization to sell recreational marijuana to adults 21 over.
Anticipated to start their recreational sales on July 1, below are Nevada’s application guidelines:
Must be an existing Nevada Medical Marijuana Establishment with valid registration and certificates, in good standing with the state as defined by marijuana regulation T002 – 17
All licenses, certificates, and fees are current and paid
No registration certificate suspension for enforcement violations since January 1, 2017
No citations for illegal activity or criminal conduct
Have filed a medical marijuana tax return and paid the tax on or before May 31, 2017
How to apply: Qualifying medical marijuana establishments must complete a “Nevada State Marijuana Establishment License Application.”
Distributors, dealers and those currently in the business of transporting medical marijuana must complete a “Nevada State Marijuana Distribution License Application.”
Qualified applicants are required to pay a “one time,” non refundable application fee of $5,000, plus an additional licensing fee. Dependent on their intended role within Nevada’s newest industry, participants will be required pay the following fees:
$20,000 for a Retail Establishment
$30,000 for a Cultivation Facility
$10,000 for a Production/Manufacturing Facility
$15,000 for a Testing Facility
$15,000 for a Marijuana Distributor
If denied a license by the state, the Department will refund the license fee paid but not the $5,000 application fee.
https://www.marijuana.com/news/2017/05/nevada-starts-recreational-marijuana-applications-period/
Hawk, this little company has a ton of potential to make it big in Vegas, but the days of "Hey dude pass that sparky my way" are long gone.
The MJ space is now filled with well educated, sophisticated businessmen looking to be the next big one, and over promising and under delivering usually results in failure or at very least creates doubt in the abilities of those under delivering.
Once that reputation is established, it is expected, which is not good.
These guys are on the right track, and have a fantastic opportunity in front of them, so honing up on their business 101 skills would not be a bad idea. Constructive criticism is not a piling on thing, and those who are able to apply that principle without becoming offended, are generally the guys that prevail in the end.
Time to get completely professional leading into the next phase, as the Spicoli days of falling out of a haze filled van, are long gone.
good luck
Thank you Zen, for taking the initiative to get answers from the source.
You need not apologize for asking any questions of management, they work for shareholders of the corporation, and in order to gain credibility in the market place, they need to honor promises.
I thought maybe you were joking, but I slept all day is possibly the lamest excuse I have ever heard from someone in an executive position.
NEWS FLASH - Promises should never be made publically if you cant back them up regardless of the reason. WHY? It comes across completely unprofessional.
That said, timelines do not seem to mean much to these guys, and it may come back to bite them in the backside. Financials, updates, all seem to come down the pipe on their own schedule.
Tons of potential with Green Leaf, but in my opinion these guys need to get on top of a few things, and the first would be honoring promises on time, or don't make them in the first place.
Not bashing either, its called creating a strong foundation on the way to building a succesful business plan.
good luck to everyone!
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/pot-news/nevada-marijuana-sales-permit-application-period-begins/
License to sell
How much a 6-month recreational marijuana licenses will costs businesses:
$5,000 to apply for a license, plus an additional fee if the company is awarded a license.
Those additional fees range from:
$20,000 for retail stores
$30,000 for cultivation facilities
$10,000 for production facilities
$15,000 for testing labs
$15,000 for distributors
Thanks mrPink for the summary explanation.
Like many, I am here for the unbelievable Green Leaf potential, but there was a lot of posts regarding the lawsuit and perceived multi million dollar settlement with Comcast.
After researching all I could find on the subject, I tend to agree with you that although it would be nice to see a $$$$ judgement in favor of PNTV, reality would suggest that shareholders should not count on seeing any settlement dollars, any time soon.
Thanks mrPink for the summary explanation.
Like many, I am here for the unbelievable Green Leaf potential, but there was a lot of posts regarding the lawsuit and perceived multi million dollar settlement with Comcast.
After researching all I could find on the subject, I tend to agree with you that although it would be nice to see a $$$$ judgement in favor of PNTV, reality would suggest that shareholders should not count on seeing any settlement dollars, any time soon.
Thanks for the private message
Here is some shared information that would imply there is still ongoing litigation between Comcast and PNTV as recent as last August
Tuesday, August 09, 2016
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Settlement Conference held on 8/9/2016 before Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Ivy Hensel ; Pla Counsel: Barney C. Ales, Esq. ; Def Counsel: Lindsay Demaree, Esq. and Geoffrey Kahn, Esq. ; Time of Hearing: 9:00 am . No settlement was reached. Accordingly, the Court finds this case should be returned to the normal litigation track.
Friday, July 08, 2016
REPLY to Response to63 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Comcast Programming Development, Inc..(Igoe, William
Friday, May 06, 2016
ORDER Scheduling Settlement Conference: Settlement Conference set for 8/9/2016 at 09:00 AM in LV Chambers, Room 3099, before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 05/05/2016.
Wednesday, May 04, 2016
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro, on 5/4/2016. By Deputy Clerk: Aaron Blazevich. Pursuant to LR 16-5, this case is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, Jr. for a settlement conference. (no image attached)
Hawk, I am going to guess that most speculators including myself, are in PNTV for the Vegas mj potential.
In my opinion the media side of the business appears to have dragged along for the past decade with little to no revenue.
Once the news starts to roll in regarding the production, cultivation, etc, the share price should logically rise, but here we are mid December still waiting for construction updates.
I could not access your link to court ordered mediation. Could you please repost it
Thanks again and glta
mrPink, I hope your math turns out to be right, but I count 2 claims dismissed in the initial court order, and 5 dismissed in the second amended complaint order.
There should have been 6 claims in total, but PNTV stuck an additional claim in the second amended complaint, which the courts denied as applicable.
What is interesting, is the potential teeny weeny wiggle room allowed in the language of the first claim judgement ...."insomuch as is premised on an implied contractual obligation that Defendants utilize dynamic ad insertion";
Is that what mediation is being based on?
As far as the other 4 are concerned, they appear to be dead in the water along with the first 2 claims dismissed in the first court order.
"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED. The following claims are dismissed with prejudice: (1) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing insomuch as is premised on an implied contractual obligation that Defendants utilize dynamic ad insertion; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (4) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage: and (5) fraudulent misrepresentation"
Les, thank you very much for your reply and trying to figure this out
I was trying to go through these court docs in chronological order, and your link appears to be the initial February court decision in that PNTV is given an opportunity to argue the merit of 4 of the 6 claims by filing additional facts in a second amended complaint on or before March 5, 2015, which PNTV did.
This is the link to the March 5 amended complaint filed by PNTV.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020150813B23/PLAYERS%20NETWORK,%20INC.%20v.%20COMCAST%20CORPORATION
Of the initial six claims that the Court has granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, the Courts order two that are dismissed with prejudice.
........"First, the Court finds that leave to amend Plaintiff's claim of fraudulent inducement would be futile. Second, the Court finds that leave to amend Plaintiff's claim of declaratory judgment would also be futile. Accordingly, these two claims are dismissed with prejudice.
On the other hand, the Court finds that Plaintiff may be able to plead additional facts to support the following causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (4) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage.
Accordingly, because the Court finds that Plaintiff may be able to plead additional facts to support these causes of action, the Court will grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint.
Plaintiff shall file its second amended complaint by Thursday , March 5, 2015 , if it can allege sufficient facts that plausibly establish the following claims against Defendants: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (4) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage.
Failure to file a second amended complaint by this date shall result in the Court dismissing these claims with prejudice, and the case will continue only on Plaintiff's following claims: (1) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (2) breach of a consent decree.
Anything you would care to share would be very helpful Hawk, as there is a bit of an official dead end after the courts judgement
Thanks
Thanks lesgetrich
I just read the court docket, pleadings,judgements, etc, and this lawsuit appears to have been dismissed with prejudice.
Could you please direct me to any court doc's you are aware of detailing mediation orders, as I have not been able to find anything official.
It would be doubtful Comcast would entertain paying so much as a penny for what appears to be a complete dismissal of PNTVs claims, or for that matter waste their time in mediation unless they are court ordered to do so.
The only lawsuit other than the Comcast suit that I could find recently is the following:
LAS VEGAS, NV--(Marketwired - Nov 9, 2015) - Players Network, Inc. (OTC PINK: PNTV), a fully reporting publicly traded company, announced today that it has filed a law suit in the district Court of Clark County, Nevada, against Vis Vires Group Inc., KBM Worldwide Inc., Asher Enterprises Inc., and Seth Kramer and Curt Kramer, individually. The case is currently contested by the defendants in both Federal and State Courts in New York and Nevada.
tia
Sobe, where exactly does this lawsuit currently stand?
On another bullboard site, a poster posted the following, which would appear to suggest the lawsuit has been dismissed in its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file its second amended complaint by Thursday , March 5, 2015 . Failure to file a second amended complaint by this date shall result in the Court DISMISSING these claims with prejudice and the case will continue only on Plaintiff's following claims: (1) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (2) breach of a consent decree.
..................................................................
On March 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint, alleging the following causes of action against Defendants: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; (4) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (5) tortious interference with prospective economic gain; (6) breach of a consent decree; and (7) fraudulent misrepresentation. (SAC ¶¶ 54-125).
...................However, Plaintiff has had an opportunity to amend these claims and has not cured the deficiencies identified by the Court. Accordingly, the Court finds that further amendment would be futile.
IV. CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED. The following claims are dismissed with prejudice: (1) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing insomuch as is premised on an implied contractual obligation that Defendants utilize dynamic ad insertion; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (4) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage: and (5) fraudulent misrepresentation.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020150813B23/PLAYERS%20NETWORK,%20INC.%20v.%20COMCAST%20CORPORATION
Kinross repeats: No Southridge deal
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Gold miner maintains it never established any partnership or joint venture in Mexico, despite Southridge's assertions to the contrary
JACQUELINE NELSON
Southridge Enterprises Inc. insists it had a deal to form a joint partnership with Kinross Gold Corp. But Kinross, Canada's third-largest gold miner, repeated Monday that no such agreement was struck for the junior gold explorer's Mexican properties.
Southridge, a penny-stock miner based in Texas, drew the attention of the main U.S. market regulator last week by saying it had a multimillion-dollar mining deal with Kinross - a claim Kinross has rejected as false.
Southridge maintains that it's not clear why Kinross would deny reaching an agreement to form a joint partnership. In an e-mailed statement, Southridge said, "it would be our best guess that they do not want the company's exploration strategy within Mexico to be publicly revealed."
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission halted trading in Southridge on Dec. 27. The regulator said it would assess the company's operations and "certain claims regarding a joint partnership and an arrangement to obtain funding and to change the listing venue for Southridge stock," the SEC said. Trading was still suspended on Dec. 31.
"We will confirm once again that we are aware of no communications which establish any partnership or joint venture between Southridge and Kinross," Steve Mitchell, a Kinross company spokesman, said in an e-mail on Monday.
That contrasts with Southridge's most recent account of the deal: "What we can say is that Southridge Enterprises does have two signed agreements from Mr. Martin Moscosa, and we have e-mails ... confirming his direct quotation," according to an unsigned statement from an e-mail address listed on the company's website.
The conflict began when Dallas-based, Mexico-focused Southridge issued a press release on Dec. 26 naming Kinross as the new partner for its Cinco Minas and Gran Cabrera properties in Jalisco, Mexico. It attributed a value of $550-million to $600-million (U.S.) to the agreement. It stated the transaction would be complete by mid-January. Company shares soared.
But one day later, Kinross denied any partnership or investment had been made. Kinross, the Toronto-headquartered company with gold projects in several countries, said it didn't anticipate any such deal would be struck in the foreseeable future.
Southridge's statements were, "to the best of Kinross' knowledge, without any basis in fact," Kinross said. Quotes credited in Southridge's initial release to Mr. Moscosa, Kinross's exploration manager, were incorrectly attributed, Kinross said. Southridge shares plummeted on Dec. 27 to about half a cent - less than the shares traded at before the original press release.
Southridge would not respond to an e-mail on Monday and calls to its headquarters went unanswered.
So where does this leave Southridge? The properties in question are two of three sites in Mexico in which it is involved through its subsidiary Southridge Minerals Inc., according to the company's website. Selling these assets to another buyer may be the best option - a move Southridge said would be less advantageous for shareholders than a partnership with Kinross.
"While we are disappointed that the relationship with Kinross is no longer a viable option, we have interest from numerous other suitors regarding our Jalisco properties, and we will continue to pursue those potential partners," Southridge said.