Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Tada its like magic I post what I know
Please call back and ask specifically about when they see the ticker change to nvob will happen I think you may have gotten the front desk girl Michael Ajzenman is the president of Madison he or the other gentleman there should be able to verify as they did yesterday and I encourage others to call as well I know what I was told
OK according to Madison the as is 5 mil the is is 2893292 and in about 20 days the new symbol will be NVOB
Also according to the OTC it was a 1000 to 1 of all shares it does not just say os shares
They had been around 5bill before but I also recall reading that prior management/BOD were forced to retire some of their shares I will see if I can find the link I happen to be over seeing a project in the Philippines (lucky me) with mitra energy and an dealing with a headache in Arizona at the same time (wish I was in Arizona instead) but I'll attempt to find the info
No the As is not 5billion I believe it is around 4 mil or so now with an OS of 2,892,876
You will most likely see trading start tomorrow but unfortunately for people on etrade and Scottrade won't be able to trade for 10 or more days after brokers like fidelity schwab Merrill Goldman s Sandler O'Neill will be able to trade right away or with a call they do not make you wait for the delivery of the converted stocks like Scottrade etrade TD ameritade and the others that do make you wait so yes some people will be able to trade before others and there is nothing that can be done about that and
MMS will be able to place non retail orders as well as firm up or liquidation of positions so do not let the first week or so of trading get you up or down as it is only a small faction that will be trading and manipulation can be rampant during the process
You will most likely see trading start tomorrow but unfortunately for people on etrade and Scottrade won't be able to trade for 10 or more days after brokers like fidelity schwab Merrill Goldman s Sandler O'Neill will be able to trade right away or with a call they do not make you wait for the delivery of the converted stocks like Scottrade etrade TD ameritade and the others that do make you wait so yes some people will be able to trade before others and there is nothing that can be done about that and
MMS will be able to place non retail orders as well as firm up or liquidation of positions so do not let the first week or so of trading get you up or down as it is only a small faction that will be trading and manipulation can be rampant during the process
You can do an ACH deposit then call your local office and they can place the trade for you and bypass the restricted funds issue and also make the trade at the online commission price and not the phone commission price the only thing is if you cancel the order or goto modify it the funds will go back to restricted
Hello I am not in the us and don't have that issue but would like to let you folks know a very smart trader on these boards has been recommending a company named just2trade with them I understand that if you have a margin account (2500.00) to open that OTC funds are not treated differently and are available immediately no restrictions for them to clear and OTC trades are a flat 2.50 fee no additional commissions for them
If you do not have a margin account the funds are restricted on pinks with both etrade and Scottrade also deposits in either are restricted but if you call your broker they can bypass the issue and make the trade for you at the online commission price and not the phone commission price
I have to disagree with you on some points as someone who is well over 40 and was of the first gaming generations we tend to be very loyal to games we play or game types I have played StarCraft since 1998 as well as a game city of heroes for 8 years (city of heroes has been closed by ncsoft) tho StarCraft Blizzard/Activision ( Now just blizzard again) is still going and has since also released a StarCraft 2 but the original is still going strong.
I am also assuming that you are in the USA and tend to forget that their are other areas of the world that do not have the ability or access to some technology but the internet is global so pretty much anyone who can get on can play the game and hunting is alive and well in many countries.
Not for nothing but if someone is just going to copy and paste copyrighted IP from another companies website they should first receive permission to do so and second credit the source they are posting verbatim someone has been doing this for days I personally would do the research and make calls to verify information and not just use other people's words because they have something against a stock there are plenty of links and phone numbers to call to get Information and to see corporate filings if you truly believe there is an issue investigate do your own DD and not just use stolen words with no basis or proof to back things up everyone should look at a stock closely before investing it is crazy to not do so
Please excuse my fat fingered phones auto incorrect and I never asked for my post to be stickied I had called for my peace of mind
I posted what I was told you may have gotten a different person also how you phrase the questions you have to them can allow for different responses with my call I explained my concerns over confusion and walked her thru my first 2 calls that brought me to her she did tell me that information gets posted on the site as well I had also asked her average time frames for things and she saw nothing filed and when something is files they request a lot of information from the company and that that can take time and even then it is not a guaranteed acceptance and that a timeframe for the 20th with nothing in their system would not be achievable as everyone here is waiting on news we can only see what happens I have a few ins with high level Finra people but I do not like to abuse them the answers I had gotten were for my own price of mind with everything that was being posted and I felt satisfied with the responded I was given I had even posted over on that fraud board that that person kept mentioning
Well it may have been closer to 20 as I can be chatty Rebekah white in Florida at 850-245-6050 then Leah H(Greek name don't want to butcher it) at the general number 301-590-6500 and I think it was Samantha Gary at the Finra otcbb market operation department at 866-776-0800 all were very pleasant to talk with if I had felt something was fishy after that and I did not I would have called Marvin Ellis-El at his direct line where he is a Finra special investigator supervisor I don't like to abuse his line tho as he has helped me with some other companies but he is good if I have an issue
Hello I just wanted to say that I had heard Novacab was looking to go public quick to expand I know nothing of sbrh or its seemingly shady past. Novacab is a company that I would love to invest in even if I have to do it thru sbrh ATM if novacab is replacing the Bod and management as had been put out I am thinking that sbrh will just be gone after. I have been doing a lot of reading on the board here and there and people brought up valid concerns and points so I made the phonecalls and put the numbers for everyone to see and do it themselves that board felt like I was reading a scream fight I feel I got the information I needed to decide on my investment into it and where this is a did fraud board I would have thought that someone would have done the same before posting like what was going on there the 3 phonecalls took all of 12 minutes please verify for yourselves I will continue to check this board for information as well and thank you it gave me a reason to call
Please re read my post
Wow stop the insanity. This was giving me a headache. I just spoke to Rebeka White regularly specialist Florida Dept of State Division of Corporations 850-245-6050 (Very nice woman), and she explained that they just do the name change anything else gets scanned to finra for consideration. I then called Finra 301-590-6500 after a pleasant conversation and a check with her supervisor we contacted Finra Otcbb market operation department 866-776-0800 about a reverse split they had Nothing filed for a reverse split also we discussed average time frames for mergers between a us and a Canadian company she said there was no average time, but I think we may have come across why the lack of PR from novacab and that is that it requires an sec sign off and you governments sec is closed my bet is that is the hold up
Wow stop the insanity. This was giving me a headache. I just spoke to Rebeka White regularly specialist Florida Dept of State Division of Corporations 850-245-6050 (Very nice woman), and she explained that they just do the name change anything else gets scanned to finra for consideration. I then called Finra 301-590-6500 after a pleasant conversation and a check with her supervisor we contacted Finra Otcbb market operation department 866-776-0800 about a reverse split they had Nothing filed for a reverse split also we discussed average time frames for mergers between a us and a Canadian company she said there was no average time, but I think we may have come across why the lack of PR from novacab and that is that it requires an sec sign off and you governments sec is closed my bet is that is the hold up
I see a stock that has gone from 14 to 21 in 2 days
I see a stock that has gone from 14 to 21 in 2 days
Um... it has been green all day.
Very nice pr
I have enjoyed playing so much I added to my pile yesterday
It is rather normal for someone to hold multiple simultaneous positions and projects I know i do is the ceo expected to sit in a room 24/7 and watch paint dry whilst awaiting final permits?
Being a CEO and or BOD member shows an ability to be able to focus and multi task multiple simultaneous projects if one did not they would not be a good CEO I am happy that SIRG has a driven ceo and not a lazy one.
Ok so there is no actual picture of Rod on there so in my opinion it is all speculation also not all the information from there was provided in the post lots was left out like charges dropped docket destroyed no probation no disposition no jailtime and no known aliases case was discharged with no action and file destroyed so there was no proof it was even him and all of the aliases posted were from another site with no picture and had nothing to do with the first post that states Names / Aliases: N/A
can someone please explain to me how all these dots are connected?
i bet they cant
http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Florida/Miami-Dade-County-FL/John-Rodney-Martin.54851971/details/
Name: MARTIN, JOHN RODNEY
DOB: 12/02/1961
Court Case No: F-02-000385
State Case No: 13-2002-CF-000385-0001-XX
Warrant Type: N/A
Assessment Amount: $0.00
Balance Due: $0.00
Hearing Type: N/A
Court Room: REGJB - JUSTICE BUILDING, ROOM No.: 3-4
Court Address: 1351 N.W. 12 ST
Previous Case: N/A
Next Case: N/A
Judge: DE LA O, MIGUEL M
Defense Attorney: FINESILVER, MICHAEL
Bfile Section: F015
File Location: DESTROYED
Box Number: N/A
Probation Length: N/A
Probation Type: N/A
Defendant in Jail: N
Defendant Release To: MARTINEZ/CHI
Bond Status: DISCHARGED
Bond Type: SURETY
Date Filed: 1/07/2002
Date Closed: 1/25/2002
Stay Due Date: N/A
Hearing Date: N/A
Probation Start Date: N/A
Probation End Date: N/A
Bond Issue Date: 1/05/2002
Bond Amount: N/A
Names / Aliases: N/A
Charges:
Seq No. Charge Charge Type Disposition
1 COCAINE/POSSESSION FELONY NO ACTION
2 DRUG PARAPHERNA/POSN MISDEMEANOR NO ACTION
Dockets:
Seq. No. Date Book/Page Docket Assessed Paid Balance Last Assessed Last Payment
14 01/28/2002 DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED P07 00326371
13 01/25/2002 CLOSING JUDGE TRAWICK, DARYL E
12 01/25/2002 CHI AMT/ 6000 DISCHARGED 01/25/2002 POWER/P07 00326371
11 01/24/2002 INTAKE UNIT ASSIGNED: VAULT - FELONY REC CENTER
10 01/24/2002 INTAKE PROS. ASSIGNED: BETTENDORF-PL, KRISTI-MD
1 01/16/2002 ARRAIGNMENT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/25/2002 AT 08:30
8 01/15/2002 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY REQUEST FOR COPY OF CHARGES
7 01/15/2002 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND PLEA MICHAEL I. FINESILVER,ESQ.
4 01/08/2002 CHI AMT/ 6000 ISSUED 01/05/2002 POWER/P07 00326371
5 01/07/2002 BOND RECEIVED POWER/RECEIPT #P0700326371
Here is 523 pages of sleep aid you will want to start around page 150
http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-51808.pdf
The Limit Order Display Rule defined a “covered security” to include both reported securities and other securities for which market information is disseminated through Nasdaq. See former Exchange Act Rule 11Ac1-4(a)(5).
674 The Quote Rule defined a “covered security” to include both reported securities and other securities for which market information is disseminated through Nasdaq. See former Exchange Act Rule 11Aa1-1(a)(6).
675 In paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of the Quote Rule (redesignated as Rule 602), which requires a registered national securities association to disseminate quotations at all times when last sale information is available with respect to “reported securities,” the reference to “reported security” is being replaced by a reference to “NMS security.”
292
The Quote Rule and the Vendor Display Rule both used the term “subject security,” although they define the term differently. To eliminate this inconsistency, the amended Vendor Display Rule (redesignated as Rule 603) does not use the term “subject security” and Regulation NMS retains a slightly modified version of the definition of “subject security” currently found in the Quote Rule.
The Vendor Display Rule defined the term “subject security” to mean “(i) any reported security; and (ii) any other equity security as to which transaction reports, last sale data or quotation information is disseminated through NASDAQ.”676 As discussed above, the extension of the Nasdaq UTP Plan to include Nasdaq SmallCap securities rendered obsolete the distinction between a “reported security” and a security for which market information is disseminated through Nasdaq. Accordingly, the amended Vendor Display Rule (redesignated as Rule 603) uses the term “NMS stock” rather than “subject security.”
The Quote Rule defined the term “subject security” to mean:
(i) With respect to an exchange: (A) Any exchange-traded security other than a security for which the executed volume of such exchange, during the most recent calendar quarter, comprised one percent or less of the aggregate trading volume for such security as reported in the consolidated system; and (B) Any other covered security for which such exchange has in effect an election, pursuant to paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this section, to collect, process, and make available to quotation vendors bids, offers, quotation sizes, and aggregate quotation sizes communicated on such exchange; and
(ii) With respect to a member of an association: (A) Any exchange-traded security for which such member acts in the capacity of an OTC market maker unless the executed volume of such member, during the most recent calendar quarter, comprised one percent or less of the aggregate trading volume for such security as reported in the consolidated system; and (B) Any other covered security for which such member acts in the capacity of an OTC market maker and has in effect an election, pursuant to paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section, to
676 See former Exchange Act Rule 11Ac1-2(a)(4).
293
communicate to its association bids, offers and quotation sizes for the purpose of making such bids, offers and quotation sizes available to quotation vendors.677
Because the Quote Rule (redesignated as Rule 602) will continue to apply to both listed options and equities covered by an effective transaction reporting plan, Regulation NMS's definition of "subject security" revises the Quote Rule’s definition of “subject security” by replacing references to a “covered security” with references to an “NMS security.” In addition, for the reasons discussed below, Regulation NMS replaces the phrase “reported in the consolidated system” with the phrase “reported pursuant to an effective transaction reporting plan or effective national market system plan.”
I am sorry i cant reply to pms as i refuse to give them money after what they have done to people but if what you pm'd me is tru you need to call your broker and have them call down to the trading floor to find out why your order is not there and if they cannot get it fixxed because they should be showing the first 5k shares of that bid (its the law) i will gladly give you the supervisor at finra his direct line as i have been in contact with them over matters with other stocks that is an issue that needs to be fixxed or reported
Ok just a couple things the daily short report is not an accurate tool the only report that matters is the bi monthly report from the otc
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/OTCE_Short_Interest_popup.asp?Symbol=ient&StlmtDt=06/14/2013
also market makers do not even have to show an order under either 1500 or 2500 i cant remember the one that it is offhand to give an example i have an order right now on the bid at .2506 and it does not show but if an mm dumps to the bid my order will get it
so say etrade has 11 people looking to buy or sell 700 shares they do not even have to show anything but if those 11 peoples bid/asks were first in line over nites they would fire first and that is a reason that you would not see a decrease in the ask amount from nite also all or nothing orders the mm only has to show the first 5000 shares so you could have a 1,000,000 share bid or ask but if it is an all or nothing the market makers only have to show 5000 shares of it
also all or nothin and good till cancel orders are set to the lowest and last in line and that is how you can have a good till cancel order in at a bid of .3 and the mms can ignore it and sell to the good for day order at .29 the same is true for sell orders
ient will explode when the time is right and that time will be soon imo
I am always happy to get cheap shares
GO SIRG
Just to let people know a GTC order has a lower priority than regular market or limit orders the same goes for all or nothing orders I had an AON GTC order at .22 that never got filled nor did it even show on the bid side even when the bid dropped to .16 so if you want the shares removing GTC and/or AON will give your bid the proper priority otherwise the MM'S can ignore your order until it is the last one left or it is something they can benefit from
Thanks and hi to all as you may know things in my corner of the world is not the best place ATM but as I finish my retirement process I will be around more often and once the rand stabilizes I will be mainly in the UK Africa has lost its glitter
Actually the first article had errors in it and was never treated as gospel and the journalist was informed of his errors
Finra sorry I hate auto correct on this phone
Yes the mm shorts are being looked at by finds they are screwed
And no big issues found it is running smooth and I can see its ability to go cross platforms easily I still cannot believe how cheap the pps is with the share structure I have investments in ncsoft funcom and a few other large gaming companies and they are much higher ncsoft is usually in the 100.00 plus range
And no big issues found it is running smooth and I can see its ability to go cross platforms easily I still cannot believe how cheap the pps is with the share structure I have investments in ncsoft funcom and a few other large gaming companies and they are much higher ncsoft is usually in the 100.00 plus range