Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It surely is a tough crowd & job you've undertaken; we appreciate your efforts, sir!
In, re: the whole women's issues discussion being so casually devalued: Not to anyone in particular, but, seriously, gentlemen, by now has it not been well and surely objectively proven that exhibiting significant hubris by discussing and opining ridiculous arguments and flippant, often disrespectful commentary to address what should be left to scientists, doctors and women is futile and insulting? Since I don't have anything of consequence to interject, I haven't, and suggest consideration that many here do the same, as this exhibition shows the subject is beyond collective capability and capacity to treat with due respect. Finally, just put the hap crap on ignore and enjoy the sweet silence; let him speak into the wind and his empty drivel go unanswered. So, let the assault begin or at least someone start a new thread not so easily mangled!
I choose to ignore your incessant ignorant babbling to yourself.
Why the nonsensical statistical recitation? "None..." Stating the unknowable as fact is not becoming...suits you!
That is simply your statement/opinion of your reality and misspelling of Jehovah. You do not speak for others or know what may actually be. "--so why not"...sure.
Make up your mind, I answered you so you rephrased the question...still nonsensical.
UT Austin would be one...Today, Greg Abbott’s [Department of Public Safety] has more courage to arrest peaceful student protesters than when an active shooter entered an elementary school in Uvalde. Texas state troopers responded at the request of university officials and Gov. Greg Abbott, according to a Texas Department of Public safety spokesperson.
"Well where are they"
Here you go...https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profile.aspx?user=18545 pick any or all of them...
At least you are adept at proving yourself to be a world class idiot with your nonsensical posts.
You most certainly are wrong are by posting an unsubstantiated and false opinion only. EOD
You must like being wrong again!
Nah, we see where you're coming from, fantasy land to promulgate those bs lines. Earth One goes with: "If Congress enacted President Biden’s tax plan, tens of millions of workers and families would have their taxes cut, nobody making less than $400,000 would pay a penny more in taxes, and the wealthy and big corporations would finally pay their fair share—which would fully pay for the President’s tax cuts and investment agenda."
Arguments on Presidential immunity:
Shameful
Ultra
Politically
Radical
Extremism
Made
Evident
Cult
Of
Ultra
Rightist
Tribalists
So you unimaginatively puked up 5 nonsensical sentences worthy of only...NOPE!
IMO, might be worth a look if you have access to view PBS...about 1/2 through the series, hope you can access the earlier ones, too!
A Brief History of the Future
A Brief History of the Future is a unique six-part documentary series about our futures and how we can reimagine them. Hosted by renowned futurist Ari Wallach, the show invites viewers on a journey around the world that is filled with discovery, hope, and possibility about where we find ourselves today and what could come next.
Also, Tell Me More with Kelly Corrigan
Kelly speaks with Dr. Francis Collins, former director of the National Institutes of Health, who oversaw the prominent Human Genome Project. Dr. Collins shares how genetics are most often misunderstood, his concern about the impacts of social media on adolescents, and what scientists know makes a lasting difference when it comes to our well-being.
I am really enjoying the exposure to these subjects covered and hope you will too!
I just wanted to present these as a change of pace from a lot of what goes on here.
Well that was quite an election to watch out for in 996 years, and glad to know you have very reliable sources and data that are quite believable as horseshit! Maybe you could try getting AI to write something at all credible for you? You are truly and "bigly" DAF!
And to wash it down... How about this? I think I know the answer...
I agree, but since you've been on both sides of sentiment, I think it's more like the head swinging dick, lol...
I voted BLT all the way, but I admit to never turning down my daughter's Smashburgers when we visit...it was fun!
If you are implying some revelatory new understanding of wherever KBLB is now vs. then, just say so and lay it on us. I read it then and now and nothing pops into my brain that excites the neurons. That will happen when commercial production and deliveries result in significant recurring revenues from well known customers. Until then, YAWN...
That's just good clean fun...nice for a change of pace! Puntastic find!
Fly Boeing!
No, you are full of shit...get over that you ignorant imbecile...
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Why are you disregarding excess death statistical analysis as applied to Covid? A starter for you... https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2024/new-analysis-reveals-many-excess-deaths-attributed-to-natural-causes-are-actually-uncounted-covid-19-deaths/ ...What you'll find is the 1.2 million US deaths is likely quite an under-count. Not that hard to find if you make even a little effort. So there's that.
I like Joe too....More as a grandfather now, lol.....So if I want to just fall in line, I might do as you say I left the entire article....
Please finish your thought if you have a understandable point to make.
Many of our discussions are a little deeper than just rhetoric and pats on the back......Ive been talking with some of these people for years......Agree with them on many issues.....Know they are wrong about many to now.....
Yes, otherwise, they are not discussions. as I said, oh arbiter of truth. Sounds conceited and overly self-assured to me, only you can know as Trump can. Familiarity breeds contempt.
So unless you want to make the discussion a bit deeper, Ill add more to the over 1100 posts in my mail box that aren't read by the first 8 words alone....
You certainly know how to muddy the waters with your lack of clarity.
Not that I don't think you shouldn't express yourself, others will read it.....But I think too many have fallen in line on both sides and that's one of the biggest problems we face.........
My goodness, I need those clicks so I can sleep tonight. Yes, heaven forbid we have conviction in our opinions and beliefs.
Snide condescension is generally unbecoming.
For one, why not use some of the info in the Carville NPR post you just made.
“He’s a tenacious guy that’s had a real life. He’s a state school guy. He doesn’t have an iota of elitism. He doesn’t even know what ‘woke’ is. He’s been demonstrably the best president that Black America’s ever had, Clinton and Obama included,” he said. “You look at incomes, employment, poverty rates, access to health care. It’s not where whites are, but it’s closer than it’s ever been.”
You said..."And nothing dems have done will lead them to think things wont continue, just keep the status quo and slot of people are now sick of the status quo or there wouldn't be a trump in America of all places...... "
Dems don't want things to continue as before, where have you been? Attempts at mitigating income inequality are being made via jobs creation and re-distribution, taxation, etc. And just who is standing in the way? Performance minded Rs in Congress, okay? Maybe the few Independents will bail us out?
You seem to be on your ongoing bent of being an equal opportunity offender by phrasing things as you do...proving Shinola...you and Dems dirty words in your mind; not sure where you fall at all. Oh, just the truth enabler?
Chester is right about many things he says in the article, especially the take on Biden and who he is and what he is about. Give or take the headline colloquialism is just his Cajun cracklin' coming out of his character, nothing nefarious or ill intended there.
It seems that overt pretzel twisting, deflection, re-direction and ad-nauseam repetition does not engender or reciprocate positive and beneficial discourse. If that is what you think you are attempting to engage in, you seem to reliably lead with a poke in the eye on the way in, during and after. Rail about many on the left, then many on the right, draw ill conceived equivalences and infer that leaves you as the preferred arbiter emcee of the central and just truth and wisdom. Say it ain't so, but that is more than the central perception I get, not to mention being often unable to easily discern where any article linked content and your tweaked analysis and commentary begin and end, leading to often misconstrued intent and content.
You know this channel has the right to control participatory content, as do most on the site. Redirect your antagonistic intent to No One Is Banned or something similar where you can pursue your endeavors as the chief grass burr under the horse blanket to your heart's desire. I don't think this is the place to walk around with the shit chip on your shoulder constantly. Participate, don't overpopulate. You do need help in this regard; see last couple of hours. Take a break or enjoy the incoming, lol. You seem to be enjoying the stimulation, though.
Just my take, you obviously do you.
Geez - clearly presented factual examples of fraud! I don't care about nor can I fix your lack of understanding of the factual presentation, nor will I deconstruct your convoluted cut and paste rationale as to who is making the valuation assertions and when. The article clearly presents the facts and you do not. EOD for me, you do you.
What a surprise, thanks for letting me in on the secret! Obviously (to most) multiple sets of books maintained by Trump served to increase and decrease valuations to suit the purpose intended. Presentation of a vacuous set of supporting income approach valuations that are nearly impossible to refute without sufficient access enables property valuations established during the rendition process to be quite favorable to the owner. But you know this already and had nothing to add other than the inanity under translucent cover as information. Do better; better yet, do nothing. Or, perhaps, peruse this... https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-never-before-seen-trump-tax-documents-show-major-inconsistencies ...to bring you up to speed a little bit.
Thanks for the guidance, and horse shit on the poor me crap bemoaning the sky falling on me cause I just went way overboard after I got too greedy all the time. Perhaps the time is right to get after everybody else doing it beyond reason, which is the point here. Way beyond reasonable, he got greedy and got caught, just like others get caught. Shot off his mouth too often, getting it stuffed now, glad for his well deserved misery. Not a stretch at all.
Done, but the article does not address and completely misses my property tax point, so I deem it irrelevant to the point of my post, which all of these big legal minds are simply overlooking for what excuse or reason, I have no clue.
Far from no victim, how about everyone else in every taxing jurisdiction in which they achieved fraudulent valuation reductions for each and every year multiplied by the applicable tax rate. The society which they raped by paying less than what should have been their due is the victim as the public services cost burden was offloaded to everyone else. So far, he has gotten off cheaply. I care less about the loss of profits for financial institutions based on their interest rate getting a haircut, but to call it victimless is idiotic, as is your inane and flawed closing premise. WTF is everyone missing here!
Credit for spin, doctor...obviously no big deal, but it was your statement, and clearly inaccurate...my only point...more credit for stubborn...and you as well.
"Speak with the one beginning with a multiple in their post. 🤫"
Why would or should I need to since I quoted you directly from your post, that's plain to see...
"Profits start X2 of their particular price point."
I must be confused at your intent since profits start at any price point above their particular entry price point, not when it doubles. If you mean free money shares, where, if one sold 1/2 total shares when twice their purchase price point has been achieved, sure...
And a further followup to yours:
Methinks it generally very worthwhile to follow Mr. Steven Rattner on "X" for a wealth of regular and ongoing statistical updates and importantly, fact checking of all things lied about and bass-ackward "alternative facts" twisting by Republicans. If you are not familiar with him, check out his posts over the past few weeks, for example, and see if you might enjoy and appreciate the comprehensive wealth of graphically presented facts and accompanying analyses he presents. Very impressive, imo.
https://twitter.com/SteveRattner
Yes, especially like the National Space Council and the White House Coronavirus Task Force, both stellar accomplishments by Mr. Pence? He surely must be on the short list for the award for exactly what?
Adding a few of Mr. Rattner's charts as fact check confirmation...
Today on @Morning_Joe, I fact-checked three of Trump's favorite fictions — on crime, energy, and the national debt. Watch here:https://t.co/q30TZQLOBF pic.twitter.com/ciUdCJ7Gas
— Steven Rattner (@SteveRattner) March 14, 2024
My reality is you're spending way too much energy on water way downstream already. All can believe or not the disputed facts and methods during the process, but this could not be ignored. I'm hearing mostly crickets and few heads exploding in response, so just take the medicine and move on already. You're off the reservation on your bias perception and hung up on getting counsel from mentors/advisors actually being a thing. Now, I'll remove myself from your head on this thread. You can have it back. Regards...
Split decision due to it being given daylight needed; coverup of their actions led to their self inflicted wounds that is now and will affect the case in the future. Don't blame me, defense had every right and responsibility to bring the issue to light, and given the elevated status of the case, needed some sort of resolution. Caps or no, hope the 'tini was soothing!