Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wel i sur wiz puzild und taint ovin frum thur, bit are thunkng ibot goni to cawlig thir wen i grajitit sun so wi kin lurnt bout awl of im.
quester614: Back when we were young, teachers didn't engaged [sic] in that occupation for MONEY. It was about creating a truly educated population to better our country.
blackhawks: Man your posts demonstrate a failure in YOUR education. CRT didn't exist when you went to school, so what happened with you?
quester614: Maybe you should go back for reading comprehension class. What don't you understand about when I was young meaning 1950-60'S. Compared to NOW WE GET CRT or no education. Most would understand NOW as present TIME IDIOT
Failed repartee as the one who did not comprehend the clear point made of not being able to blame CRT for your comprehension failure and wondering what your excuse was. Funny how that AI thing is hard to control; don't just copy/paste what it tells you to without grammar checking or inserting some nuance or even thought, perhaps. IDIOT+
Somebody asked, so I was referring to an acronym of SFBs for Shit For Brains, was leaving something to the imagination, and couldn't PM back, thus this explanation...
TA is attracting more annoying SFBs these days it seems...
Shut your filthy, wicked pie-hole...the repulsive swill that oozes from your every post corrupts the space it occupies.
Your mother taught you well not to be confused with the facts; they just get in the way of legitimate discourse. We'll be saying goodbye to you soon; that's inevitable, one way or another, sort of like that alphabet soup username bothole.
You asked for what I provided, and this article with embedded links should cover most of your new points of contention and will easily dissemble the misinformation you reference. Have a good night; do some more reading to catch up on some legitimate and not so easily disprovable alternative facts, would you? Finally, you seem not to be able to grasp the concept of equivalence; no man is infallible or perfect, but the desirable attributes of one clearly outweigh the lack of them in the other, and the reverse is equally true as to the negative aspects where one clearly shines in that regard. I'm sure you'll figure it out eventually...NAH!
https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/editorials/joe-biden-black-voters-election-kamala-harris-20240602.html
Perhaps in a very oblique way, and when fully analyzed, race is very much connected if not integral to the issues voters, in particular black and Hispanic, really care about the most. It's not a vacuum the solutions will be identified in; at least most relevant factors are necessarily considered, leave major ones out and keep treading water or sinking.
Simply, the question was asked and answered with examples provided, so if the subject shoe fits as to bigotry/racism/disparagement? I didn't make up the query to get on the stump. I say nonsense on the man doesn't matter; the messaging is more like the cult of a shameful and shameless disordered narcissistic personality being fashioned as somehow messianic? Quite comprehensive with your clumping analysis, cover it most? No doubt MANY legitimate concerns to honestly address, but can't imagine much progress at all, more likely a rather significant further regression or even implosion if 46 doesn't remain 46.
Tell us how you really feel, Donald; I'm guessing you'll attack the source, but many are legit and remembered by many...bigoted or racist, both...equal opportunity offender!
https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history
and on the preferences matters...
https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2024/05/20/an-early-look-at-black-voters-views-on-biden-trump-and-election-2024/
and
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/05/trump-racism-black-republicans-vote
and
https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/most-black-americans-continue-support-joe-biden
Take your pick, and finally, facts seem to have a liberal bias these days don't they?
"So tell us, are you a little sad orange guy scored on all 34 counts? In his own net?"
It was nonsense as to why you'd chunk that at me out of the blue, so what do you expect, roses? Smarmy or smartass, you got it, enjoy the game.
I'm too dense to comprehend what you are trying, and failing to say, but then nonsense is not my forte. One would think that nearly 20 years and 51,000 posts would yield more accomplished posting. I just couldn't resist saying something nearly as stupid as you did.
Well, he isn't batting 1,000 today, that's for sure...trying to prove people wrong and stepping in a big stinky pile of misunderstanding!
lol, ok, get your point, but both are factually correct, of course, Nancy did not like the unnecessary foul, for sure...
Well, glad we got that settled, but I sure don't see the Trumpy thing AT ALL, no way! When someone is live on TV, they usually tend to trend a little on social media, no?
*************************************************
Your post:
“In order to conserve Company resources, the CEO agreed to accrue a majority of his salary.”
Once again, Mojo isn’t wrong. You even managed to prove yourself wrong with the above statement. Try doing a little math with all those numbers you gave and you will see that not all of his salary for last quarter was accrued. Also, he receives quite a bit of other compensation outside of salary which has never been accrued. I’ll let you figure out what that is.
*************************************************
I made no such statement, you extracted that from the filing. You do whatever math you want to answer whatever questions you may have, but I raised no such query.
I simply addressed Mojo's "kim hasnt deferred any salary for years...the increase in "accrued salary." is simply the interest on the millions owed to him.."
Mojo can defend his erroneous assertion as needed, but to use your words..."You even managed to prove yourself wrong with the above statement." You said above "you will see that not all of his salary for last quarter was accrued". Why are you proving Mojo wrong in this regard, lol? With friends like you, he doesn't need enemies.
Nor do I flavor it with the context you describe, rather it being something already obviously self evident by prior conduct of the felonious Trump in this and former trials where he directly attacked and stoked animosity to jurors, judges, witnesses and others. It is not her fault nor intent to whip anyone up, but her responsibility to fairly describe the facts as she sees them and potential repercussions thereto.
No it is not; these facts can be independently verified by sources you trust, then you can decide what you believe. Things aren't always quite so absolute as you seem to infer. Sorry about your council person.
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/can-trump-vote-november-convicted-felony-new-york-rcna154286
Excerpt below:
Florida defers to other state laws when it comes to disenfranchising voters who are tried and convicted elsewhere. That means Florida voters like Trump lose their voting rights only if the states where they were convicted would disenfranchise them for the crimes, too. And if the states of their convictions would restore their voting rights, so would Florida, said Blair Bowie, an attorney at the Campaign Legal Center who advocates for the end of felony disenfranchisement.
New York prohibits those serving time behind bars for felony convictions from voting, and voting rights are restored as soon as a person leaves prison. Those convicted of felonies who do not go to prison never lose their voting rights.
In the New York case, “the only way he wouldn’t be able to vote is if he is in prison on Election Day,” Bowie said.
AZ, so...you and Deacon miss the context completely, it was more about the huge potential negative implications if their identities get out, and what perhaps MagaNuts might want to do to them or their families, not to mention the personal weight of doing that jurist responsibility given the historic nature of the whole process. Apply some nuanced thought after you view and listen to what she said and how she said it...I believe she was just reporting the facts as she saw them and applying some perspective to consider, but you decide...
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1106455413790753
Pardon my minor correction, lol...RNC?
That is simply not a certainty at all, unless his is actually incarcerated on election day, then you may be right.
You usually are better than this...look at the Summary Compensation Table and Employment Agreements and Related Party Transactions for the facts to refresh your memory and correct your statements!
05/29/2024 Form POS AM Post-effective Amendment to a Registration Statement
What arachnodude was referencing:
On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Kim Thompson, its President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and sole director, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015. The agreement was for a term of five years at an annual salary of $210,000 in 2011, with a 6% annual increase thereafter. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the annual salary was $281,027, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2016, the agreement was renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an annual salary of $297,889 for the year ended December 31, 2016, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2017, the agreement renewed with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $315,764for the year ended December 31, 2017, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2018, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $334,708 for the year ended December 31, 2018, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2019, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $354,791 for the year ended December 31, 2019. On January 1, 2020, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $376,078 for the year ended December 31, 2020. On January 1, 2021, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $447,915 for the year ended December 31, 2023. In order to conserve Company resources, the CEO agreed to accrue a majority of his salary. As of December 31, 2023, the accrued salary balance is $3,511,776. See, “Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence - Accrued Salaries and Officer Loans - Mr. Thompson, CEO/President.”
Annual Compensation:
Between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2023, Kim Thompson, our CEO accrued $3,511,776 of unpaid salary, which represents a portion of the annual compensation owed to him pursuant to the terms of his employment agreements during such time period. As of December 31, 2022, there was $3,077,393 in accrued interest on Mr. Thompson’s accrued salary; such interest accrues at the rate of 3% per annum. As a result of these accruals, as of December 31, 2023, we owed Mr. Thompson $6,192,012 in salary and interest related payments.
EOD
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/18/blind-amphibian-named-after-trumps-climate-change-stance
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4247132/Yellow-skinned-Cowfish-resembles-Donald-Trump-spotted.html
https://x.com/GranadaReports/status/823842175507197954/photo/1
https://imgur.com/gallery/new-hobby-putting-donald-trumps-mouth-on-puffer-fish-RQgZ4
Nothing new to see here, so guessing maybe that's your ambiguous point? Are you saying that it's new or old phrasing? Pick one! I'm sure you'll pick the correct one now, but it doesn't matter since it's old news.
So...just propagate lies under guise of satirical license it seems. Not that I'm defending Maher, just showing what the interview actually consisted of. All good; now I know.
"The God Pod is a satirical comedy podcast hosted by God and Jesus. The Divine Duo review the news of the week and try to make sense of the world they created."
I'm confused what interview was being referenced as the book is not "Smug Bastard", but "What This Comedian Said Will Shock You", and many, even most of the attributed comments were not made at all, so here's a link to the actual interview...for what it's worth, or not.
Amen to that...this is so worth a listen, and re-listen...
Say, bot123...as you posit, yawn, lame, etc. I'll go with Jordan any day vs. your multitudes of what videos? He's legit funny and sharp: are you in one of these, Einstein? Lots more where these came from. BTW, you write that funny language convincingly, but you can't spell worth a damn! Next time, maybe choose your own screen name, not a rando one your computer chooses for its mindless owner.
Well, she did write this, so pretty dang close!
"[T]he Court finds the Special Counsel's pro forma 'conferral' to be wholly lacking in substance and professional courtesy. It should go without saying that meaningful conferral is not a perfunctory exercise. Sufficient time needs to be afforded to permit reasonable evaluation of the requested relief by opposing counsel and to allow for adequate follow-up discussion as necessary about the specific factual and legal basis underlying the motion," Cannon wrote.
"Any future, non-emergency motion brought in this case — whether on the topic of release conditions or anything else — shall not be filed absent meaningful, timely, and professional conferral," she warned. "Failure to comply with these requirements may result in sanctions."
per... https://www.rawstory.com/aileen-cannon-denies-jack-smith/
Undoubtedly a sociopathic disability you express repeatedly with your disgusting commentary...
Maybe ask a question with more specificity if you really want an answer. Here's a start...https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/living_wage.asp or "According to research from MIT, the living wage in the United States was $25.02 per hour ($104,077.70 per year) before taxes per year in 2022 for a family of four (two working adults with two children)."
It demonstrably wasn't, isn't and never will be a wise choice according to her own words...and it's decision, of course. Her choice infers she must think Biden is even worse, naturally, but she is simply starting the necessary major kneeling needed to regain or retain any semblance of a political future in the Grossly Offensive Putarty.
And if we had a President then who gave a shit about anyone or anything beyond his political gain, the maps would all have been A Whiter Shade of Pale
Keep proving my point by pumping out more crap as apropos for you who wouldn't know nuance if it bit you in your dirty, sick perverted mind which is obviously breaking down into a fetid clump of worthless mush!
POS you are making light of it, sick men you and the originator!
My thoughts, too; quite perverted attempt as gallows humor in quite poor taste coined on unreliability of GHM. Some here lack filters.
Nice and true and FU Rowe!
That happens a lot or most or every time they use Newsfile rather than GlobeNewswire, take your pick. Dollar wise and pound foolish!
So I submitted this on https://www.kraiglabs.com/contact/ page. Maybe that will help?
When you use Newsfile rather than GlobeNewswire, your press releases are not reaching various brokers so Newsfile is not doing a very good job of getting the information out to as wide an audience as possible. Were you aware of this and can you include GlobeNewswire as a distribution channel? Thank you kindly.
Never mind...you got me, too...
I'm guessing silence after last week's dust-up, but I hope not!