Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Right now I'm more concerned about short-term insider trading than I am about shorters. Remember, insiders have a leg up on the rest of us in case something goes blooey, and a few might try to peg the meter as low as they can before GESI takes off for the moon and beyond.
Having said that, I'm open to corrective response, so someone can feel free to shout me down here if I'm wrong about this.
RSVP
Hound
Perhaps someone will read this before it gets deleted the way most of mine do.
So, MILV inches up to .008, and what happens? Nickel and dimers move in to snatch pathetic profits, and the thing slips again. Looks like insiders and a few posing as traders are milking it. And for what?
With the news of products coming and at hand, MILV oughtta be rising slowly and steadily. Isn't it clear now that a few are just playing games with the rest of us? The handwriting is on the wall, folks.
I first bought this thing nearly a couple years ago when it was at .04. It had been as high as .40 before that, so I thought it had bottomed out. Needless to say, it hadn't, but bedrocked at a little below a penny.
It hovered there while gold was being shorted by the bankers I guess, but with gold now heading north again, AGCZ has recovered with it, and I see no reason to believe this thing won't rise even further, especially since AGCZ isn't a speculative stock. This baby is and has been producing all along.
I also expect this and gold to continue rising since the price of oil isn't really going up at all; the dollar that has been hyperinflated by Bennie and the Inkjets is tanking, and they know it. The price of oil and gas are only going up because the dollar is plummeting. Naturally, this won't show up on the inflation index (real as it is), since the government doesn't factor that in anymore. But as oil and gold go up and the dollar down, AGCZ should rise steadily as well.
RSVP anyone
Hound
Even being conservative and using simple math, 20 oz. daily comes to a market value of about 35,000 dollars a day. Chump change to a big shot, I suppose, but not bad for an OTC outfit. So if their numbers are accurate, this thing is still flying under the radar, and not for long we hope.
This stock is really something. For weeks now we've been fully fueled on the launch pad with all systems go. Seems to me we're only missing two minor details: ignition and lift-off. Did I miss it when mission control put the countdown on hold?
So what's the time frame as of today? Is it soon? Or is it very soon?
C_L,
Now don't get all bent out o' shape at me here, pardner, because I sincerely hope you're right . . . . for a change. Just keep throwing those darts at the board. Maybe one of 'em will finally stick.
Choppersop,
Mine were to be transferred, too. As best I can recall, SPFM did a R/S on or about Dec. 30 at 1 for 500, and no further word of any kind about LGTT was ever passed on to us. I guess like all other promises this one fell into a black hole. Just as well, perhaps, since SPFM has crashed even further since then.
Hinkydink, I just nominated you.
Hound
Whether you're hip, hype, hopeful or hapless, let's face it. In the next couple or three weeks either this company starts delivering on its promises (and I mean for real), or buy -- buy -- buy will be followed by bye --- bye --- bye.
RE: #3132
Chetra, I smell something brown, but I wouldn't say it's a penny.
That was me, Alias, and I'm still mulling as to whether or not it's worth it. And thanks for the offer, but I can afford it, even though gas costs more every day now. I don't have that much invested in this company (if that's what it is), so my gas expenditure would cost about what I'm down now.
Besides, the last three or four posts I put out there were deleted by a probable company insider posing as something else (happening to others perhaps?), so I don't know if you'll get to read this. It's actually censorship under the guise of screening.
Hound
RE: #10093
Well, Xander, I'll be happy to eat crow on this one if SATM/GESI does what you say it can do. Either way, as Todd Beamer on Flt. 93 might have put it, . . . . "Let's roll."
Hound
RE: #10092
Thanks for the info, Classic. I've only been in pinkyland for two years and have seen the same. When I read and do some DD I try to hook up with the hope and avoid the hype.
Hound
RE: #2478
Hey, Spruitenburg. You invested $1,750 and are holding for $70,000? Wow. Now that's bold. That is patience. I will humbly tip my hat and salute you if you can reel in a fish that big.
Hound
Just curious, fellows. Bought a couple other companies that changed their names and symbols, and that of itself didn't make any appreciable difference. Enthusiasm over charts and chart projections and such I can understand, but why would the switch from SATM to GESI alone be such an eye-opener to investors?
In short (oops, no pun intended), what's in a name?
Hound
Ditto here, Flat Foot. Henry Ford once said rightfully, "You cannot build a good reputation on what you are going to do."
I'm a bona fide investor, but recent numbers don't match all the hype and charts. We're looking more like a yoyo than a skyrocket.
Okay, guys, I'm finished. You can lock and load and shout me down now.
Okay, I'll take the cue. I'm gonna drive down to Cape Coral in a couple weeks to visit a friend, and on my way I'll find out what's at the NBI site. But if I end up in a gator-invested swamp at the street address, somebody has to come fetch me.
. . . . And remember to bring a long pole in case you find my hat floating on top of a quicksand pit.
You might be right, Eom, though it hasn't happened since late November. Gold keeps rising, so why not AGCZ.
Maybe the McDonald's sells some Nature's McBioceuticals products in there. Or maybe they put one or more ground up products in a Big Mac to make it a healthier meal. Just a thought.
I'm not disparaging your point, Shanon. It's just that, like alcohol, some people it affects greatly and for others it has little or zero adverse effect. No such thing as one-size-fits-all-physiologies. If you personally can put it to use without everything going blooey, God bless ya. Some tokers take a few puffs and start seeing purple catfish flying over windmills.
But back to the present, my main point is: I'm still in, because I do believe mm does have some merit, especially for the terminally ill and other extreme sufferers who obtain no true relief from the nasty crap big pharma keeps peddling.
Suebarth (and others), I assume the company's headquarters is in Cape Coral, FL, which is about a half hour's drive from where I live here.
I actually thought to take a little jaunt down there to see what's been happening (if anything), but I decided to save the gas, since it would be pretty embarrassing for me as an investor if I arrived at the address and found that the corporate complex and manufacturing plant consisted of a small office cubicle in a mostly boarded up strip mall.
In other words, I chickened out out of fear.
Hound (the gasoline conservationist)
Well, Divvy, your point is well taken. I don't argue with those who think maryjane should be legalized period. It's just not for me. I do feel strongly that (like alcohol) it is a major impairment to anyone behind the wheel, and this society is simply not mature enough to know how to legislate it to the point that it wouldn't be used in sufficient moderation. Alcohol in the living room or back yard is no problem, nor would marijuana be. But in a vehicle both are deadly, and marijuana is not as predictable as alcohol. I smell someone smoking it? I look the other way, since it's none of my business or the government's. But I repeat, I choose to give the weed some space as opposed to synthetic drug concoctions put out by big pharma.
The bottom line is that we still have enough trouble dealing with drunk drivers; drunk smokers would only compound the dilemma. Then again, to backtrack, if you lived next door to me and you wanted to toke away, I say, . . . . light 'em up if you got 'em.
Either way, as for mm, all I want is for the government to get out of the way and shuffle off to Buffalo so those who would truly be benefitted by it can do so. God made the stuff; He did not make prednisone, and I've personally seen first hand what that diabolicial drug does to the human anatomy.
Been invested in this thing for over a year now, but refrained from posting. I like the periodic optimism; that's why I'm still holding as are many others. But despite all the analysis pro or con, one factor rings louder and clearer than anything: Everybody knows that marijuana is at the heart of the stock, and when mm is legalized and the government gets off its political postering hobby horse, MWIP and others in the mm business will finally roll. Until then we're all just treading water.
While I don't use marijuana and don't advocate its sale over the counter, I do acknowledge that it has therapeutic value for those really suffering. After all, it's just a God-made herb and is a sight better for people in dire straits than the likes of prozac and prednisone. And remember also, were dealing against big pharma's lobbying money here, so it will be an uphill battle before MWIP gets its due.
RSVP
Hound
C_L, enough of the latest ticket sales. Your current support line is like all the others over the past two months. It's made of sand. Show us the product line, not the incessant hype when it appears convenient.
I like your attitude, and it's good to be positive, but reality has been making a mockery of the cheerleading. So again, show us the products, not the pom poms. RSVP anyone.
Just conjecture on my part, but with this thing stagnating in the .009's (currently at .009 itself), are insiders buying up shares at fire sale prices? Or are there more and more investors who have finally concluded that there ain't no fish in this hole and enough is enough, at which point they're cutting bait?
Or is there another reason or two? I'm listening.
Hound
So this news is going to produce something we haven't seen since the beginning of November, right?
6 and 7 digit volume.
We're also assuming that was really him on the phone.
Hound
P.S. --- I'm very sorry, heh, heh. I shouldn't be so suspicious.
What's with the communications silence from Milvie (or whatever its latest name is)? As crappy and shady as the airlines are these days, at least they show the courtesy of announcing flight delays. In other words, insiders ought to at least say something. We shareholders have been sitting here on the tarmac for quite a while now, but neither the pilot or flight crew are uttering a word. Not good.
We all try to remain optimistic, but anyone who isn't at least a little suspicious at this point is doing the ostrich thing.
May sound like an old saw, but it's the truth. Products breed and produce fulfullment. Hype and hope do neither; they're empty. No substance to them.
Substance, friends. We need substance. All else is meaningless at this point. Time for millvy to walk the walk. What say you, cohorts?
It's after 11:00 and no posts thus far, so it looks like everyone's finally tired of the hype. Now we'll see if this quiver has any arrows in it.
.005? On the heels of recent activity? Wow. Is this an insider trading stunt?
Thanks for the info, fellas. It would be nice if what we needed to know was readily available in up front fashion. Instead, those on the other side of the wall get to play hide and seek with us at every fork in the road, since every time I try to do research, all I seem to find is dangling carrots and spin. Guess these are just more signs of the times.
Can someone help me here? I'd like to do more DD and find out what percentage of the shares is owned by insiders; that would tell a major story. If insiders are loading up on the cheap, we're cooked. If things are spread around among true traders, we've got a shot at it down the road. Let's face it; insiders can pull of a P&D as kings, queens, and rooks while the rest of us move about the board as mere pawns.
Any info would be helpful to all of us. Thanks.
Hound
P.S. --- And you can bet the farm an insider will have this deleted.
A lot of interesting posts, folks. But I like to deal in facts, so here's one I'm hanging my hat on:
None of us really "knows" anything at this point; we're all just speculating with charts and gut-level hype and details, so I'm still holding with a mixture of guarded optimism/pessimism.
Yes, it would appear the thing is about to trend up, but dadgummit, I think an honest trader should acknowledge that this critter still doesn't quite pass the smell test. With the tale of the tape coming in the next two weeks, we'll soon see who's lyin' and who isn't.
Okay, I know it's moot here (and a bit archaic), but only a little over a year and a half ago this thing was going for .04 to a dime, so the end result is not so outlandish, just the way it happened like a lightning bolt.
And there have been no reverse splits at anytime since, so a near nickel a share is not of itself so astronomical.
You're right, LittleBrother, that's exactly what my post was inferring. I want to see bottles with labels rolling out onto store shelves, or even for sale through the net. Some time ago we heard mid-January as a general target date for this. Well, it's now 1/10, and to me that's mid-January, so . . . . . . . what? Any day now? Is that the next post from an insider?
Well, Pavito (et al), I have to keep going back to this product line business. The pictorial of their web site shows a slew of nicely displayed bottles. But what I want to see is labels on those bottles, which is what gives bona fide credence to Mistral's claims.
At this point, they don't have to show us the money; just show us the bottles with something in them. The public isn't going to buy glass or plastic bottles with nothing in them. And if that sounds like an oversimplification or a formality to an executive or company advocate, it shouldn't. You produce with a product line, not with words about a coming product line.
What about the target date for product rollout? Is it still mid-January as advertised? Early February? Later? The bottom line isn't really an expo booth in California or anywhere else, since an expo is little more than company public relations. Products on the shelves sometime somewhere determines profit. So, when and where?
As to my own post (#2325), I apologize, folks. I missed this one big time. Thought the thing was gonna run up a bit, even though the stochastic had advised otherwise. I should have obeyed the chart. My bad.
Looking for a good day today. I don't say that often, but I'm saying it here. No numerical predictions; just a good day.