Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GASP! You’re saying Mercedes Benz was doing business prior to dbmm acquiring them? I wonder how many of the other very august organizations that have worked with d/c and are displayed as happy customers have had nothing to do with dbmm since. An inconvenient truth, perhaps? Our resident legal expert will undoubtedly have the answer.
Quote: "will continue to grow and prosper as stated in filings and Updates." A familiar theme for two decades. And yet, here we are. Some kick-ass growth, all right.
Perhaps "go back years" and read old "news" releases, Q's and K's. See how much information, purportedly "prudent in these matters" turned out to be mere fantasy. See how much forward looking whimsy actually occurred. Misinformation? You be the judge. Shareholders know.
Yes, yes. That's awesome. BUT -- how much knowledge does she have pertaining to growing this 20-year stagnant business? Sooner or later, this NSS drama is going to come to an end -- one way or the other. At that point, production will be the ONLY issue. Personally, I'm not feelin' it.
Simple answer: Time will tell.
Sometimes smells like a cockeyed money laundering operation. I M O
Quote: All will fall into place as intended.
That verbiage, or blandishments similar thereto, has been Linda's credo for two decades. You're right, "shareholders are not stupid" and will, IMO, get the hell out of Dodge at the very next sign of some semblance of a profit. DBMM's "9 wins" came on the heels of year after year of losers, not to mention losses. Was the "fall into place" period intended to be twenty years in the making?
All IMO. Just sayin'.
Yes. The future IS happening. Pretty hard to say otherwise. As to what that future actually is …….. well, who’s to say …… with absolute certainty, that is.
C'mon! Timely K's & Q's? Wasn't always the case, was it? But, I digress. IF future K's, Q's and Updates don't include some semblance of progress in terms of actual revenues, what are the chances of anything of substance ever taking place? It's time for "the rubber to meet the road". Alibiing for the sake of reading one's self in print ain't gettin' it done.
Happy Easter everyone. Would've thought a truce might be called today.
Wellsir, after almost two decades in business, stringing together 9 'wins' is a milestone, indeed! What a total shame that couldn't have happened at the outset of their existence. But, I digress. Isn't it even a tiny bit ironic that the NEED for those glorious wins came on the heels of their very own digressions? Yes, yes -- I know -- that's all ancient history, right? Or is it? Just sayin'.
How so is the "CE end game" an issue? Asking for a friend.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Perhaps.........
"Shareholders know". Quite honestly, with very few exceptions, I doubt seriously that shareholders actually give a damn about much of anything but the daily PPS and what's being done to improve the situation.
Just another daily frolic through the fertile fields of DBMM. Simply cannot make this shit up!
Another phantom memory conveniently discarded as time marches on is the company’s two decades worth of red tape. Not a dime reported as net profit in all that time. Small potatoes when compared to the big, bad revocation prognostication, eh? ; )
Was not "meeting simple deadlines" what got them (Linda, et al) in hot water to begin with?
For my personal edification, could you please outline those statements that you deem “false” or “misleading”? TIA.
Whatever you say, Johny. You da man!
They should do what they always do. I.E., whatever makes them happy.
You're forgetting that company history is of no relevance here. Unless, of course, it serves present narrative.
No, no no. That tidbit should be good for at least a week's-worth of banter.
Great times! Linda at her absolute zenith.
"Supposed" covers a number of past announcements, as in "storied". Again, IMO, of course.
IMO, in their storied history, it wouldn't be the first time that supposed financing apparently did not take place.
Actually, if you've got a hankerin' to view a positive balance sheet, you'll have to go all the way back to ............... oh, wait ...........they've never had one.
So, in essence, you give up on growing the company because your stock isn't trading? How about those companies that are private, don't trade, have never traded and have no intention of trading? No, there's something else going on here (other than moass or Q) that keeps them in the game. IMO, of course.
The absolute irony to the points being made (the big 9) is that now the company is back to square one. I.E., still forecasting wonderful things, still deep in debt, still underperforming in terms of revenue, still OVERperforming in terms of bravado. IF this were a viable concern, why is it there was no signs of growth during the past several years? Shouldn't they have been practicing 'business as usual' while battling the SEC, et al? Talking time is over. It's time for the rubber to meet the road.
Oh, I don't know if that was the tallest tale. $.50 to $2.00 guaranteed seems to have been a trifle taller. Just sayin'.
Oh, it's been there before. Immediately after the 1000/1 reverse split, as I recall. lol
In conclusion, the violations alleged in the OIP are proven, but no available sanction is
appropriate
Sounds like a backhanded 'attaboy' that they would have preferred to have avoided. But, it is what it is. Linda winning! roflmao
Ambiguity has been a company trademark for years.
Linda: If you have that ace-in-the-hole, now might be a real good time for you or your 'cadre' to play same. Just sayin'.
At some point, without solid company performance:
1. The purported MOASS would or would not take place.
2. If it takes place, everyone would take their profits and the stock would retreat to who-knows-where.
3. If it doesn't take place, the stock would retreat to who-knows-where.
It is high time for King Reggie and Lady Linda to deliver, for a change. Two decades of nothing but talk has done precious little for investors. Some of the more memorable promises have included: The now-infamous Industry Disruptor, Mezzanine Financing, the company APP that was farmed out to some eastern European outfit that never delivered (as I recall) and, one of my favorites -- The 'Cadre of Investors' -- (doesn't THAT sound official?) that were standing in line awaiting their chance to save the day. Please note that the Cadre took a different form recently as the super-secret, pinkie-swear, behind the scenes money providers who were waiting to swoop in and make something of this little company that couldn't as soon as the stars aligned.
It's been pointed out on many, many occasions that the company history and lack of performance didn't mean anything in light of the highly touted CE drop and resulting MOASS. To the company's credit, the CE was dropped, and the MOASS (?), well, let's just say that it hasn't taken place as of yet. Soooo, NOW performance DOES matter! Doesn't it? If Linda has an 'ace in the hole', IMO, it's time to play it!
All IMO -- just sayin'. 1.......2.......3.......
Or avoid it altogether.
"Posters of scam"?? A link to same would be appreciated.
Actually, the "journey" began a much, much longer time ago. Wayyyy back when the pps was over $2.00 per share. Close to 20 years of busted promises and forecasts. Yes, the CE drop was a momentous occasion. No one could deny that. So now, the little company that said it could but couldn't, is, once again, standing on its own two feet making veiled promises and forecasts. Right now, the promise of the highly touted moass keeps the dream of riches alive. Should that not occur ---- then what?