Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Truth is, the company's words looked great to just about everyone, myself included. Wouldn't it be a gas if those words had been totally accurate?
Repeat: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted. Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."
Repeat: From 10/27/22: "On 10/26/2022, FINRA processed a Form 211 relating to the initiation of priced quotations of DBMM, which means that the submitting broker-dealer has demonstrated to FINRA compliance with FINRA Rule 6432 and therefore has met the requirements under that rule to initiate a quotation for DBMM within four days of 10/26/2022.
Repeat: the removal of the Caveat Emptor follows a careful process. No amount of misinformation will change that.
Misinformation, Linda?
The MARKET can't do crabs until the Fed removes the shackles.
Quote: "Just opinions with no evidence."
Agreed! That's what this entire thread is -- day after day after day. Pro and con, back and forth. The final say is in nobody's hands but the Fed.
"Prove me wrong"!
...1 ...2 ...3
Well, here's a gut-wrenching scenario for consideration; What if, prior to a final ruling by the SEC, the Kramer crew files for bankruptcy and cannot cover?
And yet, when "logic and inference" is utilized in defense of arguments opposite the popular 'moass' prediction, said points are dismissed immediately. Until such time as final rulings actually take place, all posted logic and inference -- pro and con -- are little more than hyperbole. All IMO, of course.
We KNOW that Kramers naked shorted our beloved do-nothing "company"? Musta missed it. Link, please.
Totally accurate. I doubt there are many here who would disagree. At one time, it seemed to have promise, but the 'emperor's clothes' dissolved rather quickly. 1....2....3....
Quote: "a decade is a long time waiting." Sure is. One of these days, you'll see for yourself. Lol.
Ah, but when The Disruptor finally arrives (as guaranteed over a decade ago), no MOASS will be necessary.
Not to worry -- Linda still has that "disruptor" in her back pocket that she hasn't used yet.
I'm not sure that "longest in history" without making a single cent would really be accurate, n'est pas? Close, though. Very close.
"Longest in history"? Link, please.
So very pithy!
Until such time as the truth manifests itself, how exactly is an opinion true or false?
Oh wow! LOL! That was a real knee slapper!
"Stay tuned". It'll show. Always does.
IMO, if everyone here were to agree on your very first, and very accurate sentence; i.e.,
Quote:
CE coming down soon!
Fact? Opinion? Whimsy? Wishful thinking?
Oh pu-leeeze! You're inferring that the Rico act is going to be invoked here? Better hope not. That would only add years to a final consummation. IMO, of course. Please note that IMO isn't used very much here these days.
Would be interested in viewing those documents, please.
As is probably 90% of the daily conversations here. Hearsay and conjecture.
Inference being?
Also to be seen, or at least proffered is the ever-popular 'CE removal a mere formality'.
The post he was referring to was in answer to Post 253053 indicating that it had gone to a penny on the CN market TODAY. The last time this hit a cent was as a result of a highly successful pump that fell flat once again. Kind've a dbmm trademark.
Huzzah! Totally sensible idea! Am predicting it will not happen, tho.
Well, THIS shareholder IS worried about it and am not necessarily one of the "one's" (sic) betting on the dreaded revocation.
Just a thought, but if all the subliminal barbs and one-upmanship were to cease and everyone just took a breather and waited for this thing to pan out on its own, life might, just might, be a trifle less tense. As if there wasn't enough crap going on in the world already!
Yes. It was short, to the point, non-accusatory and professional. I doubt seriously if Linda had anything to do with it. All Reggie, more than likely.
Wellsir, if you were to remove the word "revocation" from your vocabulary, I'm afraid you wouldn't have a helluva lot to say. Say what?
Re: the post to which you refer; is not "ce COMING DOWN" not more than opinion? Possibly 'irrelevant opinion'? IMO, if all opinions here are 'irrevelant', this board would cease to exist.
Just sayin'.
Now why in the hell would anyone bet their retirement on this Class A lotto play? Kinda reckless, n'est-ce pas? The ingredients were certainly there for a potential windfall but 'management' kept snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Stay tuned. Just sayin'.
Actually, that's small potatoes when considering the "sucker punches" dealt out by 'management' over the years. Linda, are you still "jazzed"? Inquiring minds want to know.
Quote: (not mine) "100 % GUARANTEE $DBMM CE removal". I rest my case!
Shareholders "had to endure"? There IS an 'ignore' option for those who choose to elect to do so.
You state that dbmm "wants off the OTC". Well, who can blame them? Perhaps the next Q will deliver definitive, positive indication that they're headed in that direction ----- for the first time in over a decade.
Shareholders will "stay tuned", all right. Without CE removal, we have precious little choice.
The "100% revocation guarantee" chestnut is still in play, as is all the other guarantees of the CE being dropped being a foregone conclusion. No use in harping on either opinion. When the smoke finally clears, only then can the victor be announced.