Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Might want to consider referring to the Presentation as the Emerging Cicada Company. Seventeen years of hibernation before finally "emerging".
If memory serves, very similar jargon was uttered over 15 years ago -- by the very same person -- via conference call. How is today's utterances to be more believable? Are you still "jazzed"?
Well then, the prerogative answer swings both ways, now doesn't it? Insofar as your company being trashed 24-7 is concerned, that wouldn't be the case had they not deserved it. Once (if ever) they produce something solid, all the baddies will silently slink away. BTW, you "seriously doubt" my participation in the form of sharing in this great, once-in-a-lifetime, opportunity ---- DILLIGAF?
I try to keep to one-liners so's y'all understand, but seriously doubt that's the case.
Another pertinent question might be; Why do YOU care so much what anyone else thinks, says or does? If you're so very pleased with your company, your company's leaders and the direction in which it's headed, why not just sit back and enjoy the ride? Why not place all the nefarious naysayers on ignore and go about your day?
Just sayin'.
I would proffer that it's equally obvious that yourself, et al, really don't give a damn should the company " fail, go bankrupt, and disappear" so long as it manages to take one last deep breath and rise to a nickle where everyone can finally get the hell out of this madness with a few bucks in their pocket. At that point, a brand-new batch of bagholders can take over this robust forum. All IMO, of course. Please don't attack me!
1. Sorry, I don’t use ‘OUT’, but could be convinced to begin.
2. What, specifically, ‘aggression’ have I used against shareholders unless, of course, in defense of my right to post here like everyone else?
You are really losing your shit, Poo. Should Due Diligence not trespass further than 6 years. Are you actually invoking "statute of limitations" privilege to those here interested in knowing the (shudder) FACTS?
What it IS, is an example of company hype that never bore fruit. Why should it not be used as an example of past efforts which, unfortunately, failed? Why should it not be part of a healthy diet of the vaunted Due Diligence? What's to say that their latest nuggets or information are any different? That particular episode created quite a stir, as I recall.
Anyone in doubt as to your identity (or direct connection to the company) need only peruse your initial sentence, which included; a deal which was pulled back because the Conditions of Closing were not met. How did you know that? Thanks for finally answering my query as to your involvement with the company.
Insofar as backtracking 12 years is concerned, your sycophants relish in utilizing the same tactic. What's good for the goose --- as they say. History is just that and cannot be changed --- even when flying in the face of your oft-used "conflation" dialogue.
Can't wait for the next results update.
The West Coast connection is "deja vous, all over again". To wit:
Posted by: davidam
In reply to: None
Date: 06/16/2012 05:25:46 PM
Post #: 75,364 of 343,736
BRAND NEW COMPANY BEING BORN BRAND NEW TEAM JUST ARRIVED
Steven Baughman - The Pussycat Dolls, Usher, 50 Cent, Destiny’s Child, Pink and Snoop Dogg are just a handful of the top-selling artists that Grammy Award-winner Steven “Steve B” Baughman has worked with. A California native, Steve B. graduated from California State University, Chico in 1995 with a BA in Music, Recording Arts. He then made his way to the heart of the music industry, Los Angeles. Starting his career at the prestigious Larrabee Studios, Steve B., worked with a wide variety of artists, producers, writers and music executives over a five-year period. This opportunity, straight out of college, allowed him to learn the music business from the bottom up. Armed with this knowledge and experience, Steve B. went off on his own in 2000 as an independent recording engineer.
Working for Death Row Records, Interscope Records, Sony Records, Capitol Records and many others, he was able to form relationships with some of the biggest moguls in the music business, including but not limited to, Dr. Dre, Eminem, Michael Jackson, Jimmy Iovine, and 50 Cent. Since then, Steve B. has worked on innumerable platinum records like Eminem’s 2002 “Eminem Show”, which was nominated for multiple Grammy’s and won in the category of Best Rap Album. In 2004, Baughman opened his own personal recording studio, servicing multi-platinum artists and up-and-coming talent. As a writer/producer/mixer/engineer, he has been able to provide these clients with a complete start to finish album experience. Due to this success, in 2007, Baughman was hired by multi-billionaire Dr. Henry Nicholas to help form a new record label. As a staff A&R/producer/mixer, he was responsible for handling existing talent and bringing new talent into the system. Steve B continues his musical entrepreneurial drive and now has a new production/management imprint that includes country artist, Megan Moreaux. In addition he continues to mix and produce the biggest names in the music business.
BrandE
EXECUTIVE TEAM
Jeffrey Wattenberg - Chairman
A private investor and Wall Street veteran, Wattenberg has experience in financing sports and entertainment properties. Wattenberg previously founded two telecommunication companies in Santiago Chile and the Netherlands. Jeff has served on the Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) Board. He is responsible for raising over $20 million in equity capital and tour sponsorships. He was also the architect of a reverse merger for the AVP into a public shell.
Cord Pereira - Managing Director & Producer
Pereira oversees entertainment platforms and licensing. He is a veteran of the live sports and entertainment industries. He was president of Diamond Sports Management & Development, which developed and managed sports franchises, arenas and event and other media properties and original programming. Pereira is versed in structuring public/private partnerships, urban renewal programs and fundraising. He was formerly president of SISCOM, a sports and broadcast video asset management and analytics company whose clients included the NHL, NBA, IMG and dozens of professional sports organizations. These systems have been cataloging high value content for the last decade, and will prove to serve as the foundation for social media monetization, the next major phase for the Internet.
Mick Mankowski - Brand & Celebrity Licensing
Mankowski is highly experienced in brand and celebrity licensing, mergers and acquisitions. He's completed over $2 billion in licensing transactions and created brand programs for Carlos Santana, Kelly Ripa and Reba McIntire.
Todd Dewell - Chief Technology Officer
Dewell brings combines enterprise-level experience with the latest in social media technology and integration experience. He's responsible for overseeing all technology development, project management and integration across our platforms and projects.
Clay Pereira - Web Developer
Pereira is president of Cord Hosting & Click Technologies which offers comprehensive website/eco-system hosting, custom design/development, API Integration and client support services. Click Technologies owns www.downtowncolo.com a state-of-the art hosting center, and a proprietary auction system (SaaS) that is distributed/licensed by BrandEntertain and leveraged into platforms.
PROFESSIONAL TEAM
Jonathan Blinderman - Legal Counsel
Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen and Shapiro, LLP
Recognized for his expertise in entertainment law, IP licensing, finance and mergers & acquisitions, Jonathan Blinderman is Of Counsel at the Firm, working with the Corporate Entertainment and Media Transactions Department. His work is focused primarily on matters pertaining to the development, production and distribution of entertainment projects, the licensing of intellectual property, and financial and M&A transactions for media companies.
ADVISORY BOARD
Bill Pereira
Pereira has been a NEWSWEEK correspondent, co-founder of Air California, co-owner of the largest advertising agency in Orange County (California), a breeder of Arabian Horses and an owner of three minor league baseball teams and two hockey teams. He is the author of "The Majestic World of Arabian Horses" (Abrams, 1987). He is a Stanford graduate and completed the Program for Management Development at Harvard Business School. Pereira is the co- recipient of the first Most Valuable Person in the World Award by FunnyMondays. (He shares the award with the Dalai Lama.)
Carl Verheyen
Called “One of the Top 10 Guitar Players in the World” by Guitar Magazine and “One of the Top 100 Guitarists of All Time” by Classic Rock Magazine, Carl Verheyen has created a wildly successful, multi-faceted career in his 40-plus years of playing the instrument. He is a critically-acclaimed musician, vocalist. songwriter, arranger, producer, and educator with ten CDs and two live DVDs released worldwide. A member of the smash hit British rock group Supertramp since 1985, Carl has played to millions of enthusiastic fans in sold out arenas worldwide.
Simple. By employing your method of researching past posts on this board, you're only posting here on a daily basis. It's been that way for several weeks now. As the unofficial dbmm post historian, there's no way you could contain yourself from exercising your right to lie and defame posters on a more regular basis. When (and if) admin releases said constraints, I'm certain we'll be regaled with more of your nonsense at that time. Can't wait! Should be a hoot!
You just don't 'get it', jj! Your opinion of what is or isn't factual just doesn't matter. It's no more concerning than a yellow hole in the snow. Now, I'm going to give you the last word cuz I know how important it is to you. Make it good. Adios.
Well, jj, sometimes ya just gotta take people's words as factual.
If'n ya can't do that, I, for one, would have to plumb brand new depths to find a way to care less.
Why don't YOU confer with your fearless leaders and come up with some silly excuse as to why this purportedly robust operation is still languishing in triple-aught territory, where they've resided for over a decade?
Being a Linda sycophant is getting tougher all the time.
Oh well...........
Personally, I really don't think anyone here really gives a damn what you make of that. Hate to see you waste your one post per day on a cheeky, half-assed attack on a shareholder who's been invested in this "company" for quite a while. The company should be quite capable of defending themselves without your invaluable assistance.
Now THAT is funny!
😆😀😃😁😆😅🤣😂
Facts of the matter are:
Yes, there was a period of time when we (they) did “like” dbmm, predicated upon good-time Charlie forecasts and promises of a ‘disruptor’ in the works that never happened; not unlike today’s robust prognostications.
Hmmm, where have we seen the word ‘disruptor’ before?
However, r/s’s totaling 100,000/1 really had a dampening effect on all the enchantment with dbmm,
and Linda’s totally forward-looking but never realized chats and bulletins were a further detriment.
Hell, I can even vaguely recall talk of a west-coast manager with connections to the music industry who was going to give the company a valuable boost due to his being the godfather to Fitty Cent’s child.
“Them” could be YOU quicker than you realize.
Maybe hold off on all that smarm, l’il johny and consider the possibilities.
Well of course. However, it seems as if the OLDER facts are conveniently discarded or 'taken with a grain of salt'. But, don't look now, but "FACTS like OIP dismissed, CE removed, Pink Current, etc." are getting a little long in the tooth themselves. Just history repeating itself.
Shouldn’t the twelve years ago period be considered part of the due diligence that, reportedly, “shareholders know”? Shouldn’t shareholders be aware and consider the possibility that past performance might, just might, be indicative of future capabilities?
Just guessing, but methinks he probably considered the source and chose to ignore it.
Oh lady! Go back and read your own posts. They say a lot about YOU! smh.
One cannot help but notice your apparent inability to refrain from celebrating the holiday week-end without your typical pugnacious donation to the cause. Well, Happy Easter anyway, Poo. Many more.
Aw geez! Now THAT is funny. "Calm and serene". (except when their little bum-bums are burned by what they perceive as an attack on their delicate sensibilities)
Anyone here see the video of that bridge in Baltimore being taken down after being rammed by a ship? They're still looking for survivors. THAT is important shit, people! 99% of what is bantered about here every day is NOT.
I believe your synopsis has merit, particularly the possibility that the company would likely fold on its own..
Mathematicians will say the same thing.
Taking into account the recent robust 'run-up' of "10000%", one might conveniently forget that DBMM, in it's former life-form, was at a price of $2.00 per share. I, personally, had a fistful of those 2 buck shares. Then came the reckoning over the years. From 2 bucks to 0.0002 with two r/s's totaling 100,000/1 in between. What might be the percentage of the drop? I don't even know how to figure it out. Point is, the "10000%" run UP is chump change compared to the amount of DROP it took to get there. This NOT "revisionist history".
2can$ ....... That was about as awesome a post as ever I've read. It took a good person to say what you said. Well done, my friend, and best of luck with your investment.
L.O.L. As flattering as it may be that you're of the opinion that I, or anyone else for that matter, has an "intrest"(sic) in you, you may rest assured that said intrest is strictly for amusement purposes. Insofar as your purported 39m shares is concerned, one would think you would be as proud to display proof of ownership as you were to ballyhoo said position. Ironically, it was one of your buddies who referred to me as "an F'n liar" when I refused to produce proof that I sold my millions for a tidy profit. Yeah, as you said, "are we close like long lost family members" when I asked you to prove your position. Thought it would be interesting to turn the tables, so to speak. Everyone's an F'in liar here except your and your ilk, would that be accurate? And why might that be? I'd be interested to know. It's not like you know me or anything about me. You got 39m of this "company"? Well, good for you. Not calling you a liar. Just thought you'd like to know what it's like to have everything you say doubted and ridiculed. N'est-ce pas?
I repeat, if your lot in life is to play Superhyperman on this board, spelling and grammar would go a long way to elevate your self-appointed stature. Just sayin'.
Tell you what, toucan. If you and a few others here would remove the words "liar" and "lie" from your vocabularies, you'd be functional illiterates. Speaking of 'lies', you say you've got 39m shares? Screenshot, please?
I tend to try to stay neutral but when someone like yourself passes judgement predicated upon idle stock board chatter, it's genuinely simple to ferret out the 'dipshit'.
Turning into "One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest" here lately.
Don't let those 2 bashers breath(sic)? You being a trifle extreme there, toucan?
Trouble is, on THIS board, and many others, I would opine, there is no distinction between the two terms; i.e., Bears/Bashers.
Well, so much for that idea.
Hopefully, at some point, everyone here —- especially YOU, Poo, are going to have to stop all the bullshit and let the company sink or swim on its own. Talk is cheap and is getting cheaper.
Oh, please do explain in what way, shape or form dbmm identifies as a "sophisticated business model".
My post was directed to someone other than you. But, thanks so much for the interest.
Not today, huh? (Growing up, that is) Well, maybe tomorrow.