Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes this may come back but no they are not working anything. Forget what the company "is working on" and just hope for a big pump when that moo group decides to open this one up again.
Very well put MikeSo - yes, trends are established off of facts; however misinformation can be included which alters the analysis and provides false results.
I agree the subject is MMTE and all things related - we are discussing PR release information which is related to MMTE. There is no need to teach anyone about trend analysis - it is a rather straight forward concept. Accurate information is needed to establish a trend analysis of PRs and if it is not provided it is considered misinformation.
Actually a trend analysis of PR release dates is required to have factual data otherwise it is flawed and meaningless. With that being said the only trend in PR release dates for the 26th would be between May and October. Beyond this time frame the trend analysis fails to meet the 26th requirement even with oddities thrown out.
Based on facts there have been more PRs released by William on the 18th.
Based on facts the only consistent release of PRs on (or about) the 26th was between May and October 2011.
I hate to hear that Phrozt - I have been through the same thing and I know how hard it is. I hope you find something soon.
Maybe MMTE and Liebs will pull it off and treat you right.
The contradicting statements in this message are extremely confusing. So which is it - did Liebs write them all as he personally stated in the past OR did he approve some that he wrote earlier OR did he write them, handed them off and then approved them? What is the difference in "approved/wrote them" and "wrote them personally"?
Its too bad that my analysis is based on fact - it is hard to argue with official dates, times, etc. It is when opinion is mixed in with fact that causes problems! Stick with verifiable facts and you cannot mislead anyone.
I certainly agree - in terms of the "silly minor business stuff" I think there are a lot of people wanting to see something official. As always there is a lot of guessing and opinions.
I am interested to see what comes of MMTE through mid-year. IMO if things don't happen by mid-year it never will.
Let's hope that a leap year is when things peak and we all make money.
I over analyzed for no other purpose than to show the facts rather than opinions and misconceptions. There have been several claims regarding days, dates, times, etc and I felt the need to fully clarify so no-one is misled. Now in terms of the ones Liebs "personally did" - well, he did them all so again I'm not sure where this is coming from.
Considering that Liebs has stated several times he writes the PRs - and numerous other people have heard the same thing where is the justification regarding PRs that Liebs "personally did"? I'm not sure I understand where you are coming from with that statement.
Based on the facts it seems that way - it certainly would be nice as long as it is a helpful PR and not just more of the same.
Yes, let us analyze a little - these are the facts:
Provided by drews in post 93155
Mondays - 6 prs.
Tuesdays - 8 prs.
Wednesdays - 10 prs
Thursdays - 8 prs
Fridays - 10 prs
Now let's analyze the claim regarding shorter cycles (summarized from post 93155:
2010 PRs - 20 - PRs in every month except January, March, June with 3 PRs in February, 5 in July, 5 in August, 2 in December.
2011 PRs - 21 - PRs in every month except January, April, December with 2 in March, 4 in May, 3 in June, 3 in July, 3 in August, 2 in October, 2 in November.
Based on the facts it appears the shorter cycles in 2010 vs 2011 is false. The cycles between 2010 and 2011 are fairly similar.
Let's look at the specific date of the month:
Day of Month - # of PRs
1 - 1
3 - 2
5 - 1
6 - 1
8 - 1
9 - 2
10 - 1
11 - 1
13 - 3
14 - 2
15 - 1
16 - 2
17 - 1
18 - 5
22 - 2
23 - 3
25 - 1
26 - 4
27 - 1
28 - 3
30 - 3
31 - 1
2010/2011 (and 23 Jan 2012) PRs
1-7 - 5
8-14 - 10
15-21 - 9
22-28 - 14
29-31 - 4
2011 PRs ONLY
1-7 - 2
8-14 - 4
15-21 - 2
22-28 - 11
29-31 - 3
Based on facts it appears there was a preference in 2011 for release of PRs between the 22 and 28 but more specifically between the 26 and 31. Now based on a broader history it appears the preferred release time is anytime between the 8th to the 28th.
Last but not least let's look at the time of the day:
0700-0800 - 3
0801-0900 - 5
0901-1000 - 10
1001-1100 - 3
1101-1200 - 5
1201-1300 - 0
1301-1400 - 1
1401-1500 - 4
1501-1600 - 1
1601-1700 - 9
1701-1800 - 0
1801-1900 - 1
Based on facts the preferred PR release time is at market open or close.
Jan 23, 2012 1058
Nov 18, 2011 1807
Nov 14, 2011 1500
Oct 28, 2011 0915
Oct 27, 2011 0920
Sep 28, 2011 0915
Aug 26, 2011 1130
Aug 22, 2011 1135
Aug 05, 2011 1305
Jul 26, 2011 1614
Jul 26, 2011 1200
Jul 13, 2011 0930
Jun 30, 2011 0900
Jun 28, 2011 1133
Jun 03, 2011 0845
May 31, 2011 0915
May 26, 2011 0940
May 18, 2011 1145
May 10, 2011 1435
Mar 30, 2011 0951
Mar 11, 2011 0800
Feb 23, 2011 1030
Dec 09, 2010 0930
Dec 08, 2010 0845
Nov 18, 2010 1524
Oct 13, 2010 1439
Sep 01, 2010 1645
Aug 23, 2010 1620
Aug 17, 2010 1625
Aug 16, 2010 0745
Aug 13, 2010 1615
Aug 03, 2010 1650
Jul 30, 2010 1630
Jul 16, 2010 0745
Jul 15, 2010 1007
Jul 14, 2010 1615
Feb 18, 2010 1000
Feb 22, 2010 0830
Feb 25, 2010 0930
Apr 06, 2010 1430
May 18, 2010 0830
Jul 09, 2010 1630
Until recently the infrastructure to support electric cars was not in place. Now there are more and more areas installing charging stations. In larger cities the stations have existed for some time but it has not been widely available elsewhere and therefore has not been efficient.
I think the US will significantly reduce its dependence on oil in the next 10-20 years but there will always be a need. I know the military is looking at several alternatives and I know they are also using electric vehicles around the installations.
Another reason electric vehicles never gained the momentum in the past was the cost of gas was so cheap. People could not justify paying more for an electric car and realistically why would they? Times have changed and they have changed extremely fast.
Now is the time for the electric car and various other alternatives.
Anything is certainly possible; however, I don't think we will see 5s again in the immediate future. We should be in MMTEs time frame of a slow but steady increase.
I'm ready regardless of what or when it happens but in the interim...money is there for the taking.
So does that mean let the advertising campaign begin?
Just an FYI - I have shares purchased between 3 and 45. More recently I have purchased 3/4/5/6/7/8/9 and most have been held.
It is a pink and ultimately it is about making money and not letting the pink get your money. I know a tremendous amount - a lot of negative, a few good items but it doesn't really matter - the simple fact is we are all here to make money. Experience has proven and large number of those in the know will tell you not to hold any pink and to do exactly what it is intended for.
There is nothing wrong with making money on the way up. Yes, I do believe it will go up...at the same time I do not expect this to jump/gap up and not retrace. So in other words "chasing" it should not happen if one has patience.
Why wouldn't you sell at 7? It's all about making money so let's think about this for a little playing money:
1) Buy at 3 or 4
2) Sell at 8 or 9
3) Double to triple the money for some play money or to buy more shares.
4) Buy more at 6 or 7 see what happens
So....this is all while waiting on this big news. If MMTE is as big as some believe there will be plenty of opportunity to buy in...what is the difference if someone buys at 7 or 15 assuming MMTE is really going to new highs?
I'm assuming you meant a gap up from where we are now correct? You do realize a 30% gap up from 7 is 9 correct? That is not saying much.
I wouldn't consider much of the information submitted has been conservative nor would I consider it correct in many cases.
Thank you drews for providing the facts so all can see! Very difficult to argue with factual information that is 100% proven and available to everyone.
The problem with certain posts is they have been unfounded. There are references to a pattern of release dates between certain dates and that is not based on any factual information. There have been patterns established about particular days of the week but even then it is not certain. A pattern of dates of the month is far from factual information.
http://www.foreigninvestment.cl/images/stories/pdfs/newsletter/investmentreview.pdf
This has been talked about and may have already been posted but above is the actual newsletter from Chile.
I agree - this will be a great play! Look at the nice gains over the past week!
6 digit? Aren't you leaving off a few zeros?
I'm very happy with Fidelity right now in terms of pink trading.
No last year it was purely speculation and was hyped BIIIIGGGG time! It was not a pump and dump last year but it was pure speculation and anticipation...like other scenarios can't wait for something to happen, can't wait can't wait and then once it finally does a lot of people lose interest.
Very similar to what happened here - it was anticipated for so long and people started looking at each item with a microscope. There were and are several flaws.
Best I can say is enjoy the ride while it happens!
How can it be a pump and dump? Where is this coming from? There were a very few sites that mentioned MMTE but unless I missed it none of the pump sites mentioned it.
Yes it is and I made it a point to buy more this morning. Picked up a few yesterday as well.
It is nice to see this run again! About the same timing as last year!
The one thing to truly keep in mind is this is a play just like any other pink - play it while it's hot. It looks like it is really warming up! All the talk about long term potential - well maybe there is but for right now play it while its HOT.
See all the new names, see all the volume and watch the PPS rise!
I have bought on Etrade in the past few weeks. I also have a standing order at 3 with Etrade that hasn't been filled or partially filled over the past week. Funny - Fidelity filled almost immediately.
So where is all the support for EMXC and Roxie now? I thought this was legit and 'going to the moon' lol
Number 180 on the day trading list - sounds about right for now.
http://daytradingstockblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/top-penny-stocks-1912-january-12-2012.html
There are a lot of aspects that one can go back to prior PRs and question what has or has not been done. If you look at it positively one will see PRs pave a road to the future, if you look at it with an open mind you will see a lot of unanswered questions, and if you look at it in a doubtful way you will see a rocky road to no bid or worse.
This could be similar to WLs definition of "IMMINENT"! Liebs has set his own definitions of time related terms - to most imminent means very fast...to Liebs it simply means within 12 months. So for Liebs to say "moving quickly" it very likely means within 3-5 years.
From time to time I go back to old postings and am curious how you feel about this now?
So how did this "new company in the make" turn out? I believe I called this correctly - it was a good short term play and certainly not a long term investment.
I am just curious what happened to the coal property in Kentucky and their grand scheme of a plan to sell at higher than average prices - when I spoke the truth of what all is involved I was criticized and basically told I didn't know anything.
Well - looks like I was correct!