Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Fiberman,
I’m surprised by the level of interest you exhibit in a company you have no financial stake in. No one here has solicited investments inMCET from you, so why invest so much time and energy in scrutinizing and criticizing individuals who have no direct impact on you?
Ramazing,
I agree with you. I appreciate the work Stokd put in on his litigation chart but it looks so complicated and packed,
I think it is easier to navigate if he concentrates in upcoming procedures, hearing, etc. perhaps a separate chart
for the past procedures. Just my opinion. Thank you for your effort Stokd, we all appreciate your work.
Your are right most sophisticated investors stay away from pink stokcs but some sophisticated investors have all kinds of information retail buyers have no access to. This is where big bucks are made.
Retail can't buy it. Only the sophisticated investors can buy PINK Sheets. They are buying BIG! Volume precedes price. A sophisticated investor is a type of investor with significant net worth and experience, permitting advanced investment opportunities.
Up 200%...then up 3000% .... then up 400% today..... going up slowly then ........!!
200% uptick followed by over 3000% .....Fiberman gone since January......
Fiberman, Don't get it started. We all know what is motivating you to bash mcet. You are transparent.
Fiberman,
You have been bashing MCET for over 10 years now, why tell us where to invest our money? Sounds like someone is paid? Do you work for Corning?
It is existing very strong.
You are right, Intel does not care about other lawsuits HDVY is up against but I believe it was part of the settlement agreement between Intel and HDVY not to disclose the amount pending Vennwest lawsuit. Usually I believe there is only 1 settlement.
My take is Intel should not have any obligation to disclose the amount yet since the final settlement has not being reached pending Venning litigation. If the information from Yahoo board is true, then it will be big big plus for the shareholders. Any other opinions deeply appreciated.
There are big moves going on in the Congress and Senators to reform the SEC, Finra etc.. to eliminate cover ups of short selling. This will bring new light to many stocks that are delisted to expert market.
Agreed 110%,,,changes are coming to the expert market....
Thank you Nelson2 for the info.
Approximately when does the 4th quarter earning will be reported?
Any idea when the new CEO will be announced?
Thanks in advance,
looks like some changes are coming just by looking at the board activities
An appeal bond (also known as a supersedeas bond) is required when appealing a court's decision in a civil case involving monetary damages. The purpose of the bond is to ensure that the defendant will pay the damages to the plaintiff if the appeal is denied.
In California, statute requires Appeal Bonds be 150% of the judgement amount. Defendants bonds require full collateral in the amount of the bond.
Look into the arrangement MCET/Dr.Faris has with Corning. This is the key!
for starter check this link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1v6FddXqs9pGRzsQ9LAoPGN7JsJle819G
I care about MCET. I am working with Corning to resolve this grave mishandling of patents owned by MCET. This is really really big!!!
My 2 cents: It is big techs' arrogance and the business practices of big techs to infringe new technologies to strengthen their moat of competitive pricing.
Great move for 3 days in a row! I have a question regarding patent. I appreciate very much if you can fill me in. Thanks, G
While the litigation has been going on since 2006, what is happening with the expiration of the patents? Are the patents going to expire in 3 years? Is Voip going to request for an extentiosion of the patent period?
Thank you for your great response. I am feeling more and more confident in buying some vplm. I was wondering whether you bought this stock based on the patent's technology angle or the legal angle or the deep pcoket defendants?
Best, G
Hi BOAR,
Thank you very much for your informative response. I am catching up fast. I hope you don't mind few more questions:
1. What is the significance of the Mandamus denial of Amazon?
2. Please correct me if I am wrong. Did Google, FB & V. requested the case to be
transferred to NDCA earlier to get a more favorable patent judge?
3. Why are GF&V cases stayed in NDCA? Did the judge of NDCA decided to stay the case until the outcome of Amazon?
4. Why are GFV on the hook for "606" RBR patent?
Thanks in advance,
Regardless of the lame judge Koh and the appeals court of CA, because of the recent Mandamus denial of Amazon in WACO, VP will get another shot at enforcing the remaining
"606" RBR patent claims. And, the Google, FB and Verizon stayed cases in NDCA that were transferred from WACO are on the hook for that too.
Hi Butter on a roll,
I am new here. Can you upadate me the KOH debacle? Thanks,
DB, Thanks for the answer.
ButtersOnARoll, Why would any of the defendent want to keep the stock price down other than making it difficult to raise capital?
InvestorinAZ
Re: None
Wednesday, October 26, 2022 8:09:05 PM
Post#
111299
of 111755
Hi Gang,
I just learned about this organization that is working to restore Patent Owners' rights thru Congress and to protect them from further assault, and I thought you'd want to get involved as well.
This directly relates to what VP has experienced over the years, especially in the PTAB and because of the Alice rule. See if any of this article sounds familiar.
https://usinventor.org/the-loss-of-inventor-rights-a-concise-description/
URGENT
Check out the latest attempt by Big Tech to avoid infringement consequences.
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2022/10/12/pride-patent-ownership-act-big-tech-boondoggling/
If you'd like to make a difference, take a look below to see if your Senator is on the "approachable" list and contact them ASAP according to the instructions below which I received from the US Inventors organization. (You can also get these instructions on their website above, although I don't think it includes the list of Senators below.)
INSTRUCTIONS
If your state is listed below, please contact the indicated Senator(s) by calling the U.S. Capitol switchboard at (202-224-3121) and ask to be transferred to their office. Please say:
“Hello. My name is ______and I am a constituent.
Your office recently met with US Inventor.
The conversation was favorable, and your office indicated an interest in talking to Senator Braun and Senator Lee regarding a possible companion bill to HR 5874 - Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act.
I am calling to urge you reach out to those offices – and to cosponsor a companion bill.
Please feel free to contact Randy Landreneau or Paul Morinville of US Inventor if you wish to discuss further.
Thank you.”
You can also email their staff the same message.
The email address for your Senator’s staff is listed below as well.
State Senator Staff Email address
AK Sullivan david_pigue@sullivan.senate.gov
AL Tuberville bradley_hayes@tuberville.senate.gov
AR Boozman Salvador_Ortega@boozman.senate.gov
AZ Kelly mayra_salinas@kelly.senate.gov
AZ Sinema seth_gillespie@sinema.senate.gov
CO Bennet vivek_chilukuri@bennet.senate.gov
CO Hickenlooper Nora_Simon@hickenlooper.senate.gov
CT Murphy jacob_ecke@murphy.senate.gov
FL Rubio Sarah_Persichetti@rubio.senate.gov
FL Scott mannar_hanna@aging.senate.gov
GA Ossoff stan_adams@ossoff.senate.gov
IA Ernst kristina_sesek@ernst.senate.gov
ID Crapo andrew_gleaton@crapo.senate.gov
ID Risch connor_lynch@risch.senate.gov
IL Duckworth matthew_weisman@duckworth.senate.gov
IN Braun katie_bailey@braun.senate.gov
IN Young jessica_helmers@young.senate.gov
KS Marshall bill_birsic@marshall.senate.gov
KS Moran garrison_holmberg@moran.senate.gov
KY McConnell michael_fragoso@mcconnell.senate.gov
KY Paul eric_haley@paul.senate.gov
LA Cassidy jacob_parker@cassidy.senate.gov
MA Warren evan_turnage@warren.senate.gov
MD Van Hollen Rahel_Boghossian@vanhollen.senate.gov
MN Klobuchar marc_lanoue@judiciary-dem.senate.gov
MO Blunt andrew_bubes@blunt.senate.gov
MS Hyde-Smith cady_cooper@hydesmith.senate.gov
MS Wicker Tucker_Akin@wicker.senate.gov
MT Daines connor_mcallister@daines.senate.gov
ND Hoeven caitlan_flis@hoeven.senate.gov
NE Fischer erica_andeweg@fischer.senate.gov
NE Sasse anthony_marcum@sasse.senate.gov
NM Heinrich max_katz@heinrich.senate.gov
NV Rosen alexandrine_debianchi@rosen.senate.gov
NY Gillibrand anthony_sidharta@gillibrand.senate.gov
OH Portman megan_harrington@portman.senate.gov
OK Inhofe jake_johnson@inhofe.senate.gov
OR Wyden olivia_brochu@wyden.senate.gov
PA Casey Adam_Fountaine@casey.senate.gov
PA Toomey joe_caplis@toomey.senate.gov
SC Scott ej_valentine@rickscott.senate.gov
SD Thune jason_vanbeek@thune.senate.gov
TN Blackburn ben_blackmon@blackburn.senate.gov
TN Hagerty jason_hoffman@hagerty.senate.gov
UT Lee elizabeth_oberan@judiciary-rep.senate.gov
UT Romney samantha_onofry@romney.senate.gov
VA Warner kate_landers@warner.senate.gov
VT Sanders sion_bell@budget.senate.gov
WA Cantwell stacy_baird@cantwell.senate.gov
WI Johnson julia_mikota@ronjohnson.senate.gov
WV Capito matthew_plaster@capito.senate.gov
WY Lummis holt_edwards@lummis.senate.gov
I appreciate reposting SeekingAlpha article.
What happens when a district court and the PTAB disagree over the validity of a patent?
https://www.markmanadvisors.com/blog/2019/5/1/what-happens-when-a-district-court-and-the-ptab-disagree-over-the-validity-of-a-patent
Very interesting read:
What happens when a district court and the PTAB disagree over the validity of a patent?
https://www.markmanadvisors.com/blog/2019/5/1/what-happens-when-a-district-court-and-the-ptab-disagree-over-the-validity-of-a-patent
Must read:
https://cryptonews.com/news/south-korean-kok-play-token-masterminds-reportedly-face-prosecution-probe-investors-must-escape-now.htm
South Korean prosecutors are reportedly set to investigate the company behind an Ethereum (ETH)-based altcoin named Kok Play over allegations of fraud.
The coin is, per its white paper, the brainchild of the Kok Foundation, and has been listed on a number of large international crypto exchanges. Its value grew by a whopping 2,205% in 2021, but the coin has since fallen from over USD 6.50 to under USD 0.30 at the time of writing (9:42 UTC on Friday morning), per CoinMarketCap data.
The foundation states that the coin helps power content creators, and has touted the launch of a K Stadium platform that could one day rival the likes of Netflix. It has also spoken of floating K Stadium on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
But investors have made allegations about the way tokens are “mined” and “staked” on its platform. According to the South Korean media outlet MTN, investors are invited to send tokens such as ETH to a Kok Play account on a smartphone-based “wallet” platform – and can enjoy “guaranteed” monthly staking rewards of between 3% and 12%.
The project also operates a “tiered membership” system whereby users who refer additional members can allegedly receive higher rewards.
On the foundation’s Twitter account, all appears to be rosy, with the coin apparently powering the production of a web-based cartoon series (webtoon) and a drama series.
But, MBN reported, a group of South Korean individuals claiming to be investors have filed a complaint with the police, claiming they have struggled to make withdrawals from the platform.
The case had initially been dismissed by the police, which included allegations against four executives, including the foundation’s Chief Technical Officer, but has now been referred to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office.
The investors’ legal team, the law firm Right Law, objected, claiming that police had failed to investigate the case thoroughly enough. Such objections are rarely accepted “unconditionally,” a Right Law attorney was quoted as stating – unless prosecutors believed police officers have made major errors in their investigations.
Another law firm, Daegun, which specializes in fintech-related cases, wrote in a blog post that it was preparing a class action lawsuit against the company, and urged users of Kok Play to withdraw any funds they have on the platform. The legal firm also asked any investors who were struggling to obtain their funds from the platform to come forward and join the suit.
“Controversy” surrounding the coin began in May last year, MBN reported, when a group of 97 investors in Japan attempted to sue the foundation – claiming that they could not access their funds. That case is still ongoing.
Then, in May this year, a group of expat South Koreans also vented their grievances. The Korean-language Canadian media outlet Korea Times Daily reported that Korean-Canadian users were experiencing what the legal firm termed “problems.”
The lawyers wrote that “due to the nature of” the Kok token’s “Ponzi”-like structure, the possible “damages” to investors could “be enormous.”
They added that Kok platform users are warned that if they withdraw their funds, they will not be allowed to return – a fact that makes many “hesitate” about making withdrawals.
Investors must also pay “cancellation fees” in certain cases, and investors must pay heavy penalties if they attempt to withdraw funds within a month of making their investments.
Investor numbers “surged” since the foundation launched in 2019 and the foundation subsequently held investor “briefing sessions across” South Korea, “mainly targeting middle-aged people,” MBN explained. The foundation has also marketed its products to international investors, with materials published in English and Chinese. The firm last year announced that it had added the futurist Thomas Frey, of the DaVinci Institute, as a technical director.
Daegun warned that the “window of opportunity” for investors to withdraw their coins was potentially narrowing. Users on Reddit’s r/MLM subreddit have also previously debated the coin’s credibility.
In a separate article, Korea Times Daily quoted Kim Kyung-nam, a lawyer at the Seoul-based ForYou legal firm as opining that Kok Play’s claims that it would overthrow “existing media conglomerates and make huge profits” were “baseless.”
The lawyer claimed that Kok Play had thus far created just 10 TV programs that could also be “viewed for free on YouTube.”
Kim added that it was “only a matter of time” before investors “exit and a run on the coin occurs.”
The lawyer concluded:
“What is certain is that those who have entered the Kok Play [ecosystem] must escape now.”
Hi, I am new here. How is Medium associated with MTRT?
Is Medium the owner of mtrt? Or does MTRT own Medium? Thanks in advance,
It appears Dr. Faris (possible spelling error) sold the patent to mcet then after some twist and turns he went to work for Corning (GLW). It appears Corning is using mcet's patent ever since Dr. Farris (sic) started to work for Corning. The big question is, has mcet received any loyalties from Corning? Does it appear the current management is in bed with Corning?
I think Fahmi made a very clear distinction of SVM when they discussed about the necessity vs. non necessity of "weight".
I listened to it. It was a good hearing in HDVY's favor. Intel side was only able to argue in a very broad brush trying to basically categorize SVM as just another regressional statistical analysis. HDVY's attorney was able to distinguish the two in a very simple and understandable language. Judge Laney was leaning very strongly towards HDVY's argument asking many questions to clarify things with Intel's attorney, Gordon.
I could be wrong but this was my take of the hearing.
I am finally out! Took so many days just to get my sell orders filled. Now I don't have to worry about getting my paper profits wiped out. I will just wait for major corrections with my ammo then pull the trigger to load up on it at a much lower price.
I won't touch it after I get rid of my position until it drops to 1 - 2 level.
There is nothing wrong in taking profit during war. The illiquidity of this stock is wiping out my profit!
Lowered my sell orders to low 7's. Not filling!!!!!!!!!!!!