It is not a commercially available product - it seems to be a home chemistry project.

That assumes that someone would want to buy it.

I still think Otiko mixes it up one batch at a time in his bath tub...

Did you catch that he posted CONGRATS to ... HIMSELF?

They sell firetrucks now?

Are you a turtle?

They sell firetrucks now?

Ae you a turtle?

Maybe we will see some fireworks in GVDI next week. I'd certainly like that!

Some good volume out of the blue today for GDVI. Anyone got any intel? TIA

Some good volume out of the blue today for GVDI. Anyone know what might be driving this? TIA

I think it is headed down because you have your screen upside down...

Thanks for trying.

If they were working on a reverse merger for Vyome into HIND, I can see why that took priority over doing something with LICH. Maybe now LICH will move to their front burner.

woo-hoo - $187 worth of volume. A banner day.

If these are senior people in prominent management or technical roles it is pretty standard for them to be granted options as part of their compensation package. They vest over 4 years, so it is not an outright giveaway.

Additionally, since these are NEW employees, by definition they have not manipulated the stock down to get a lower option strike price.

I am fine with this very normal comp package.

OPTT had a very nice contract win to sell their unmanned nautical vehicles (think: drones that navigate through water) to an element of the US Government. It was a fixed price, non-competitive bid - which means Uncle Sam really wanted it and no one else makes 'em.

The meme crowd has got into OPTT so the volume the last week has been insane - 600M shares today and still counting in the AH. Nonetheless, I think the contract win they recently pr'd is just the tip of the iceberg. If they are selling these things on "a firm-fixed-price purchase order on a noncompetitive basis" then one would think the margins would be pretty good.

Curiously, I was able to buy common around .45 today and write February 5 calls for 15 cents and February 7.50 calls for a dime.

Probably just EOQ window dressing.

Can you try that again in English?

Today I received a letter from DOJ indicating that I am considered a victim in the federal case against HIPH and those that manipulated it. It won't replace the money I lost but I am glad to see the Feds going after these weasels.

Ort maybe it was a market holiday?

VDRM does suck but your rant is totally misplaced. Happy Juneteenth!

That is my fear as well.

Is that cash figure really believable?

The vote was for BoD only. The CEO is not elected, or voted out of office, by shareholders and never will be.

Your rant would be more persuasive if it was based on facts.

Agreed

Greenleaf is out as a director, he still is CEO.

Hopefully the remaining BoD members got the message that investors, including enough institutional investors to carry the vote, believe that PG has failed and the compensation is excessive.

Maybe it was finally already dead?

It means the ticker is truly dead - forever.

I got a fill at .0025 today.

Your remaining order (7931 shares at .015) is too small to be "marketed" on Level 2. It does not matter how big your original order was. If the residual order at any point is less than the share count threshold for stocks at the price your order is at then there is no requirement to post it to Level 2 and you can easily get "bypassed". I have had this happen many times. It is not sinister manipulation.

EDIT - for orders below the threshold, the market maker can post them on level 2 if they choose, but they are not required to show them.

When I call Schwab to place a trade (broker assisted) I pay 6.95, just like if I were able to do it online myself for an otc or pink stock.

I agree it is a pain, but as far as my experience goes, trading otcbbs through a broker WHEN THE ONLINE PLATFORM SAY YOU MUST CALL appears to be a revenue-neutral either/or for Schwab.

How can AESO shareholders scam anyone if they only control 5% and, as we all agree, are just along for the ride?

Here are three things I can think of relating to why RCRT would want AESO.

1. Isolating the AI-related assets into a different company/ticker allows that company/ticker to be a "pure play" on AI as applied to HR
2. Isolating the AI-related assets into a different company/ticker isolates the non-AI business and ticker from any potential liability arising out of the AI side.
3. As you note, there is value in having one of the entities be substantially debt-free.

Here are three things I can think of relating to why RCRT would want AESO.

1. Isolating the AI-related assets into a different company/ticker allows that company/ticker to be a "pure play" on AI as applied to HR
2. Isolating the AI-related assets into a different company/ticker isolates the non-AI business and ticker from any potential liability arising out of the AI side.
3. As you note, there is value in having one of the entities be substantially debt-free.

We're all hoping it hits 20 cents some day, but very few of us actually believe it will ever get there.

I would love to be surprised.

deep dark depression, excessive misery...

You are clogging up the board!

I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt since you might have something useful to say on other stocks at some point.

However, since neither of you seems to be man enough to walk away and just let the other guy have the last word, IGNORE for both of you.

**GO** dormant? I thought we were already there...

I agree - they sure are BOTH really tiresome.

Probably a long time from now if ever given the r/s.

Doesn't matter

I agree that reducing the bloated share count is a good move. However, the share structure has no bearing or revenues or net income.