Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So says the math but FORW's PPS does not seem to be closing that GAP. Its doing very nicely anyway to the upside but see it only working on closing that GAP the closer we get to NOVEMBER when they can be exercised
WOW LOL That would have a nice affect on my box of U.S. junk silver dollars , quarters , and dimes that I segregated out of circulation over the past 60 years for the heck of it. Started doing that just to pass them down to my kids. Plus what helped make it a lot bigger is my own DAD when he past on left me with an even bigger box load.
.42 Nice starting point for the regular hours of trading I guess.
Now just waiting and watching for what the rest of the day brings
TSNP finally broke .50 so that should and is boding well for FORW
YUP - the SHORTS are making a KILLING today because of investors BUYING shorted shares at unsustainable PPS prices. SHORT SQUEESE IS OVER buying NOW only hurts you not the SHORTS
With today's release am very surprised TSNP did not shoot past .50 , like in the first half hour , and then more in the rest of the trading session.
Now we sit back and watch to see what kind of impact that release has on TSNP's PPS , assuming one already has enough shares
If memory serves , there is a lot more trading activity in the PM today compared to yesterday at this time. Saw only 16,600 yesterday at this time , Today over 577k. I normally disregard form t trades but maybe its a sign something is up this time.
GME way overpriced even at $40/share. Any decent DD will verify that so it has a ways down to go yet. A crazy SHORT SQUEEZE caused it to go SKY HIGH but that will not hold it up.
In time see all the metal prices of what PEBBLES has will go up. So METALS SQUEEZE may be more the proper term
NAK starting out FEB with both a large % move up and 224M share volume so far today. Would say interest and belief the PEBBLES MINE PROJECT is ALIVE and still coming is a given. PATIENCE pays
This stock seems t peak out early in a session then churns the rest of the day. A close above .40 today would be nice but would not count on it. Higher prices will come this month IMO but will have to hold and WAIT for it.
You are most welcome
Sign The Petition: Retail Investors Demand Market Transparency! Make the Hedge Funds report their Shorts!
Off-Topic
Sign the petition here: https://www.change.org/sec-amend-13-f
Retail Investors demand more visibility into institutional trading and borrowing. Anyone investing over 1 billion dollars (i.e. hedge funds and other investment institutions) is required to disclose their holdings to promote transparency in our markets - it's called Form 13-F. But did you know that they only need to disclose it 4 times a year? And did you know its published with a 1 month delay? And did you know that they don't need to disclose all of their positions?
We the people are asking for a re-evaluation of transparency requirements for Institutional Investors. We have access to technology and data that gives us new sophistication - and are beginning to understand there is a tremendous disparity in access between retail and institutional investors, and are concerned that this access is being used against us, in ways that we genuinely worry could be in flagrant violation of Securities Laws. We believe that with better access to institutional trading data, retail investors can better participate in the market when making buying and selling decisions.
According to Form 13F (https://www.sec.gov/files/form13f.pdf), Institutional Investors only need to disclose their positions 4 times a year. Why?
Filing of Form 13F. A Manager must file a Form 13F report with the Commission within 45 days after the end of each calendar year and each of the first three calendar quarters of each calendar year. As required by Section 13(f)(5) of the Exchange Act, a Manager which is a bank, the deposits of which are insured in accordance with the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, must file with the appropriate regulatory agency for the bank a copy of every Form 13F report filed with the Commission pursuant to this subsection by or with respect to such bank. Filers who file Form 13F electronically can satisfy their obligation to file with other regulatory agencies by sending (a) a paper copy of the EDGAR filing (provided the Manager removes or blanks out the confidential access codes); (b) the filing in electronic format, if the regulatory agency with which the filing is being made has made provisions to receive filings in electronic format;
In your FAQ (https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/13ffaq.htm), it is clear Institutional Investors are not required to disclose short positions. Why?
Question 41 Q: What about short positions? A: You should not include short positions on Form 13F. You also should not subtract your short position(s) in a security from your long position(s) in that same security; report only the long position.
Contact the SEC and let them know retail investors demand increased transparency (https://www.sec.gov/contact-information/sec-directory)
For those of you who think NAK is being ILLEGALLY SHORTED by by hedge funds and other read below:
Sign The Petition: Retail Investors Demand Market Transparency! Make the Hedge Funds report their Shorts!
Off-Topic
Sign the petition here: https://www.change.org/sec-amend-13-f
Retail Investors demand more visibility into institutional trading and borrowing. Anyone investing over 1 billion dollars (i.e. hedge funds and other investment institutions) is required to disclose their holdings to promote transparency in our markets - it's called Form 13-F. But did you know that they only need to disclose it 4 times a year? And did you know its published with a 1 month delay? And did you know that they don't need to disclose all of their positions?
We the people are asking for a re-evaluation of transparency requirements for Institutional Investors. We have access to technology and data that gives us new sophistication - and are beginning to understand there is a tremendous disparity in access between retail and institutional investors, and are concerned that this access is being used against us, in ways that we genuinely worry could be in flagrant violation of Securities Laws. We believe that with better access to institutional trading data, retail investors can better participate in the market when making buying and selling decisions.
According to Form 13F (https://www.sec.gov/files/form13f.pdf), Institutional Investors only need to disclose their positions 4 times a year. Why?
Filing of Form 13F. A Manager must file a Form 13F report with the Commission within 45 days after the end of each calendar year and each of the first three calendar quarters of each calendar year. As required by Section 13(f)(5) of the Exchange Act, a Manager which is a bank, the deposits of which are insured in accordance with the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, must file with the appropriate regulatory agency for the bank a copy of every Form 13F report filed with the Commission pursuant to this subsection by or with respect to such bank. Filers who file Form 13F electronically can satisfy their obligation to file with other regulatory agencies by sending (a) a paper copy of the EDGAR filing (provided the Manager removes or blanks out the confidential access codes); (b) the filing in electronic format, if the regulatory agency with which the filing is being made has made provisions to receive filings in electronic format;
In your FAQ (https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/13ffaq.htm), it is clear Institutional Investors are not required to disclose short positions. Why?
Question 41 Q: What about short positions? A: You should not include short positions on Form 13F. You also should not subtract your short position(s) in a security from your long position(s) in that same security; report only the long position.
Contact the SEC and let them know retail investors demand increased transparency (https://www.sec.gov/contact-information/sec-directory)
CLOSE back below 200 today and LOWER next week. Is my view
Why the company has not taken advantage and ISSUED something like 10M shares on their vastly OVERPRICED stock is a mystery to me. Would have given them funds to not only buy those shares back later at a much lower reasonable price but money to BO a better managed competitor
LOL - "NO" but not adverse to buying GME PUTS
Trading volume still high ,so interest is still here. May not hit yesterday's volume but still good anyway.
AGREED but traders currently think they are playing some kind of MOMO stock movement , think they can outsmart other traders , or think they are helping to burn the big short sellers. Clear thinking not is use
IMO buyers are walking into a BEAR TRAP at these PPS levels.
SHORT SQUEEZE ??? Currently , after watching the movement of GME's PPS , it would not surprise me to get verification that the "SHORTS" are the ones facilitating the rise in price of GME not just by covering short positions which I am sure they have for the most part done already with a plan to short at a higher PPS. In looking at the financials of GME , one would have a hard time justifying a $40 share price much less where it is now. Plus I see GME becoming another BLOCKBUSTER type stock that in time gets put out of business by its competitors. SO SHORTS LOVE GME PPS TO GO UP as they will take advantage at some point and make a KILLING. Bear in mind SHORTS have far more $$$ resources than retail investors
That situation is of course "ILLEGAL" but to answer your question - "NO ONE" and that is sad.
Nice to see a basically RED DAY close a touch GREEN
You were saying ? LOL
Going DOWN
Robinhood may be doing its clients a favor also they do not really control the PPS of GME in that there are more than enough ways to buy GME without the use of Robinhood. I am not a user of Robinhood and could buy if I wanted to but deem it better to buy PUTS instead currently and came to that conclusion before today.
In that GME is OBVIOUSLY way over priced even now I AGREE. A hugh SHORT SQUEEZE may have caused it to sky rocket up but those squeezed shorts are now IMO coming back at it with vengeance and would say set up a BEAR TRAP PM. GME PPS should come back to earth PPS wise now below 100
Currently (TODAY , THIS MORNING) am looking at either a DEAD CAT BOUNCE or a REBOUND in TSNP. Not sure which yet as it is still dropping after up spikes.
Just a hunch on my part BUT I believe the BIDEN Presidency will be BAD for AMERICAN OIL PRODUCTION and therefore bad for our economy. Am expecting our price at the pump to go up while our U.S. oil production and U.S. oil stocks earnings to go DOWN . So not too hopeful here.
Have reason to believe TSNP will move and trade over .50 sometime in February but this week (tomorrow) see it testing .40 , maybe even .35
No stock only goes just up. TSNP recently did have a pullback from .33 to under .10 but it came back up strong didn't it ? So a little more RED can happen. See February as a good month for TSNP so see opportunity here this week to accumulate .
Holding up well today considering the pullback in TSNP.
Late in the day spike putting the PPS back up to HOD .48 ??? Nice I guess. Making over .50 tomorrow more likely
OOOPPPs - Stand corrected but still that is soon anyway which I believe will be AFTER TSNP launches in 40 countries.
TRUE but COMMON SENSE tells you SHARPE cannot exercise those warrants all in one day. Which is why I see that MATH 101 not being reflected in the current market PPS. Also with coming events for TSNP SHARPE would not start exercising them now anyway.
For those that don't already know yet , FORW will have a CC on FEB 12th
So one should value shares at .375 right now per that tweet ?
We are a little short of that PPS currently but at least the PPS of FORW is somewhat in sink with the up move of TSNP at the moment.
Trading at .48 now
YUP thats the backup plan
Your not the only one coming up with that kind of reasoning. That kind of thinking though gives BOTH a solid reason to BUY FORW based on a view of undervaluation "AND" also gives a solid reason to SELL as the PPS of FORW is not preforming as expected therefore something is wrong. So its staying kind of flat for now. HOWS THAT FOR A VIEW ???
LOL - It does not matter as TIMES SQUARE is basically VOID of people now anyway
Established a new 52 week high this morning of .39 , remains to be seen if it can break through that before the close. Would be maybe a good sign for Monday's action. Currently churning in the .36 area.