Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That language was for Risk Factors, not a…..
project description.
Unless……..
Waiting at the dock bro!
So, if the tech is proven does that mean…….,
we should heed this warning?
While non-ferrous targets have been identified by the SeaSearcher, none of these targets have been exhumed yet. There is also a strong possibility that there are no artifacts of significant value located at the Juno Beach shipwreck site.
They probably heard Kyle say that SFRX……
had set the standard so high it would be difficult for anyone else to catch up, so they’re playing games trying to accumulate shares.
I’m sitting on the dock waiting on SFRX to bring home the bling.
GL
Per Kyle, SFRX has set the standard so……
high, it’s going to be difficult for anyone to catch up.
17 years…..$28MM accumulated deficit…….8.5B OS…….ZERO TREASURE!
What a standard!!!
But I won’t give hope. I’ll stay here on the dock waiting for them to home the bling.
Well Q3 2023 won’t be hard to beat…….
Sales were what, $37 a day?
Regardless, I don’t think the co-packing number is going to be a blockbuster.
What matters is clarity around Lena. It’s good that they have a plan to expand to 8 breweries, but when are they going to close on the first?
He said the investor meeting was promising.
Git ‘er done Tony!
GL Shadow
Yes I do, the government got it, and they later went out of business.
Yet folks were still touting the stock many years later.
I’m not saying they weren’t victims, but there are two sides to every story. It was there word against the DR.
But to tout the company after it was defunct is beyond bizarre.
Same thing happened with SFRX’s attorney and…
Bruce Klein at TEXX.
TEXX owned a tequila brand and “sponsored” an Indy Lights race car driver who had his own car and crew.
They also struck a similar deal with AMF Racing (speedboat) who entered several races touting their brand.
They never got paid, but Huffman and Klein pumped the racing teams and Klein dumped a chit ton of stock. Huffman deposited some shares too.
It’s a common scam in the OTC. Find legit and make it look like chit.
Also, take chit and make it appear legit.
I know what happened, but later they……
went out of business. That was 11 years ago.
But in recent years folks were touting that defunct entity.
Anyone can check it out. You gave the ticker.
It’s like touting a shipwreck site found in 1978 that has never had anything significant recovered from it, while suggesting it’s under worm poop “in the vicinity” of the ballast pile.
Didn't Deep Blue Marine have issues in......
the DR?
They went out of business in 2013 and told everyone they were. Stop filing in their jurisdiction too.
Folks were still touting it in recent years.
Good for you, but that's not always.....
what happens to silver.
Great idea. Go out of town and have……
what looks like a Zoom call to pimp the stock.
From my understanding they were in bad shape.......
and no dates appeared.
SFRX has never posted pics of the coins either.
Silver degrades so it's not unusual.
IDK. You have his contact info. I was......
interested in Juno. You can ask about the dirt.
But there you have pictures of a hull blown clean. I don't think SFRX ever got that deep.
Where's the treasure?
OCS moved on for some reason. Ask Don why.
I never said I was only interested in coins......but
if I were it would be Early American coins because they are far more valuable in the right condition than Spanish coins, generally.
I don't believe there is anything of significant value there, and I just posted pictures of the hull. It's obvious OCS had more powerful blowers than SFRX did. That thing was cleaned off about as good as it can be. There's nothing there, so I set my threshold accordingly.
What I was saying was someone like the captain may have had a box or sack of coins for the voyage. Maybe they had a couple of passengers carrying their wealth with them. A cargo ship may have had that, but it's definitely not a treasure ship.
They found silverware, but you think they missed massive amounts of treasure?
I said if they could prove the tech worked and could justify waiting on the permit, I was cool with that.
It doesn't need to be $5MM. A large cluster of silver coins may not even be worth $50K, but it could prove the tech works, right?
Here's some pictures, as well as......
part of Don's comments. Now I am keeping some things to myself, such as coordinates off the pier.
First email response, in part;
Kyle Kennedy is a worthless lying sack of human excrement and you can quote me on that! He's been running a pump and dump operation on that site since he took over in the mid 2000's! I wouldn't trust that POS as far as I can throw him, he stole me site and he still owes me money! I'm the reason he had a Class Action lawsuit filed against him by his investors in 2006, because he didn't pay any of his help his bills that he ran up at various marina's and shop's in the Jupiter area.
$15b is laughable! I'm working with a guy who has the permit for the Flor de Mar in Indonesia and that is considered on (sic) of the richest shipwrecks in the world at $2.4 billion.
Some discussion on Juno.
The article went on to describe how Capt. Dye had discovered the after a Hurricane had destroyed the first international communication cable laid from Jupiter FL to Cabal Beach Bahamas (we found that too). Capt Dye was a salvage diver and also the Captain responsible for laying and maintaining the cable, so after the Hurricane in 1903 damaged the cabal he was walking it down on the bottom when he discovered the wreck in 80fsw straight off what is now the Juno Beach Pier.
The story went on to say the Capt Dye lost his ship the Ruby Dye in a subsequent hurricane and was the sole survivor of that wreck. We found that wreck too!
I have other pictures from Don, and the Juno file at the state has other info.
Feel free to reach out to him. He says he owns 10% of Juno.
Don Patterson
Old Charter
(407)-432-6565
dpexp@protonmail.com
Fair question, but I won't even set......
a "value" on success. I'll keep the bar low.
Now remember, Tim has said the tech likely wouldn't detect a single coin, so let's say a few clusters buried under the sand that they documented and could prove the tech saw before they exhumed it. I would call that success.
Longs have said they wouldn't have been waiting for a permit.....unless, right?
So, let's see what the tech saw and prove it works.
How's that for lowering the bar?
Prove waiting for the permit was worth it.
I'm here to eat to crow bro! I know many want to see that.
Also, we have been told it only takes a weekend, but one long is saying they have only scanned about 20% of Juno.
Two years and 20%?
GL
Is SFRX secretly involved in this DoD…..
project?
Sure looks similar to the tech. Started in 2020.
Hmmm
Maybe to throw off the Chinese they are asking SFRX to keep quiet. Plus, that may be why they did not file for a patent.
Yeah, that must it.
In 2021, Northrop Grumman was awarded a Phase 2 contract to continue the Manta Ray program that began in 2020. As part of Phase 2, the two prime contractors, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation and Martin Defense Group, would each develop unique full-scale demonstration vehicles.
https://theaviationist.com/2024/04/08/northrop-grumman-unveils-prototype-of-manta-ray-uncrewed-underwater-vehicle/
The Juno story has changed over the years......
At first Judd had them looking in the wrong place in order to steal the treasure from them. Judd hired other salvors, he simply owned the rights. It proved to be a dud, so they claimed he was hiding something from them. The AWOL affiliate even claimed the treasure was 5 miles from the ballast pile, but of course provided no provided no proof.
Now there's the teredo crust claim "in the vicinity" of the ballast pile.
So, the cannons and the treasure fell out of the ship "in the vicinity" of the ballast pile and the worms came along and took a massive dump on them.
Makes sense in a fairy tale.
Of course, some longs say the cannons were salvaged but have no documentation to back that claim.
SFRX spent resources in a multi-year legal battle going after the Juno wreck with no proof of treasure, and years before the tech was ever mentioned. The claim they wouldn't be wasting time going after a permit doesn't hold water, especially since they just renewed Melbourne.
The tech was supposed to be more efficient…..
than anything in the market, so why have they scanned so little of Juno?
Who told you that?
They waited over 2 years on the permit and made YouTube videos, but didn’t scan Juno and other sites like they said they would?
They said Melbourne was a dry hole but just renewed the permit.
How does this make any sense?
“We are now using the SeaSearcher, as weather permits, to scan several other shipwreck sites of interest. We have part of a shipwreck in Melbourne Beach Area 1 that we call the HTQ site. Additionally, we have pieces of what appears to be a shipwreck trail that is potentially from a historic sunken fleet, though a more thorough inspection of diagnostic artifacts must be completed to fully determine its origin. We have located several shipwreck sites that are beyond the nautical three-mile mark which all need to be scanned by the SeaSearcher. We are excited to scan the Juno Beach Admiralty Arrest site, where previously-conducted survey data was withheld from us by two different entities for the past 14 years. We have found the Juno Beach site has a large and thick teredo crust in the vicinity of the ballast pile that previous salvors assumed was the seabed. Obviously, the crew is anxious to use the SeaSearcher to scan the crust andsee what lies beneath it.”
Mr. Kennedy concluded, “There are also treasure salvors, both domestic and abroad, who would like to lease the SeaSearcher for use on their shipwreck sites. With all of these sites in our immediate and near future, we have plenty to keep us busy.
https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/seafarer-announces-second-generation-seasearcher/
You said wait and let’s see what they…….
find, right?
You said you don’t own shares, nor do I own shares.
Ok cool.
I say I don’t need to wait. I am quite familiar with what a treasure site should look like, especially one that potentially had what would be the largest find in history.
And I have discussed the site with the previous salvor……Old Charter Salvage, who was there in 2003-2004.
The site is a dud bro!
SFRX can invent, build, imagine, or dream of the coolest gadgets known to man. It doesn’t change Juno’s status whatsoever.
Have a great day!
SFRX said this about the Juno project……
Do you consider it to be negative?
Old Charter Salvage partnered with Judd prior……
to SFRX coming on the scene.
After conversing with Don as well as doing my research, which among other things includes SFRX’s reports to the FBAR, here’s what I see on the horizon for Juno in my opinion.
BTW, I am not saying a savvy trader can’t make money. Some already have.
Do you need Don’s contact info?
I recall what you said about Roger Smith……
Let me try again. A safe harbor isn’t……
needed in a project description.
I realize it was CYA, but it was about the project….ie a project description. Look at the filing bro!
Their conclusion is there is a STRONG POSSIBILITY they won’t find anything significant at Juno.
An enthusiast already knows that. As do the other salvage companies that came and went at Juno.
Have you reached out to Old Charter Salvage? If you have you know Don Patterson will tell you “Kyle Kennedy is a lying sack of human excrement” and he told me I could quote him on that, which I just did.
SFRX is the laughingstock of the salvage industry. At least according to some.
Others think the $28MM in losses over about 17 years with nothing significant found is impressive.
Next?
Weren’t questions about the death mask considered……
white noise?
Some really fell for that hoax, didn’t they?
A safe harbor isn’t needed for a project description…….
That was CYA……ie we told you nothing was there.
And any enthusiast would know several salvors have completed their work at Juno. There’s nothing there. They might find some pocket change, but that’s about it. There is no historical documents showing a treasure galleon wrecked at Juno. The company puts a date of 1554 based on Roger Smith’s work, but he dismissed it being a treasure galleon.
A treasure galleon would have been part of a fleet. In 1554 there were three ships that sank off Padre Island, but those have been located.
Also, Raider has already explained, there’s no cannons, but you go ahead and wait for them to complete the project, just like you’re waiting on the brewery acquisition to close that was announced in June 2022.
And why would an enthusiast want to spend…….
time on a message board about a company who says the Juno wreck might be the most valuable in history?
No way that makes sense, huh?
Folks sold during the Torres Rally, just like…..
they are during the current Worm Poop Rally.
Look at the float and then the 7 year chart makes lots of sense.
Folks also sold after the Q1 2020 hype turned out to be bullshit.
You have access to the filing. What did the……
company say?
Do you think Melbourne shows more promise after what, 25 years?
It sure got Josh excited about 5 years ago.
I think some are misinterpreting what SFRX said……
It might be why the pps dropped today.
While non-ferrous targets have been identified by the SeaSearcher, none of these targets have been exhumed yet. There is also a strong possibility that there are no artifacts of significant value located at the Juno Beach shipwreck site.
They didn’t say they didn’t expect to find anything, but I get what you mean.
Be careful, folks admit the pps is quite vulnerable if things are misinterpreted.
Good to know SFRX’s pps is so vulnerable, and…..
longs misinterpreted the 10K too.
Everyone had the same information.
Perhaps longs should stay on their A game instead of pointing fingers and deflecting.
SFRX could use the same headline number as Max, and it might not be so easily misinterpreted by longs, as it was here.
Funny, some longs claim to be happy about the dip. They said they loaded up. Others feigned disgust at misinformation based on the misinterpretation.
BTW, can you provide data that shows why shares were sold? Or are you attempting to deflect from the dump-a-thon?
Again, good to know the Worm Poop Rally is so vulnerable. I’m sure the dump-a-thon had nothing to do with this from the 10K, and look forward to you showing your data explaining the sell off. It should be amusing.
While non-ferrous targets have been identified by the SeaSearcher, none of these targets have been exhumed yet. There is also a strong possibility that there are no artifacts of significant value located at the Juno Beach shipwreck site.
I remember Kyle saying it could fly……
over a mine field and detect bombs.
Who knew sonar is also radar?
I also recall someone posting the construction industry had a need because of old buried cables.
Yeah, if they only had someone to call before you dig. You know, like 811.
How ‘bout they prove the tech works first before moving it to other industries in dreamland?
Or is that too much to ask?
I decided on my own to do that starting…….
yesterday.
It was then that I became aware so many look to me for investment decisions. At least that’s what is being suggested by you and others.
Within minutes of seeing the new filing around 9:30pm on 4/2, I stated the post that you referenced and others like it was wrong, and that Max had not sold. I continued to state I erred well over a dozen times in multiple posts.
Mods can’t act on a post after 48 hours. What mods can do is alert Ihub to someone spamming the board saying the same thing over and over and over and they can decide how to handle it.
I’ve admitted my error so much, I may be spamming at this point.
Have a great day Shadow.
That’s not what I said, not even close……
The disclosures linked were available at least a week before the 4/2 filing.
Folks that CORRECTLY interpreted the filings, and I am sure every long read them, could have posted long before me on the matter and said…….LOOK, MAX HASN’T SOLD ANY SHARES.
But they didn't, did they?
Why is that?
Do they not read the filings?
Did you not read them?
Come on Shadow, fess up.
Of course I opened the links. I erred…..
in the headline number.
You and others couldn’t open the link?
I was looking at the headline number, as was everyone else.
I’m not excusing myself, but you’re excusing everyone else, including yourself.
I know, it was me. I linked both…..
filings to come to my conclusion, but only I was wrong for the misinterpretation, right?
It’s not like anyone could have open the links and said……hey bro, hold up.
That would have required the reader to think, wouldn’t it?
Amusing.
Then the new filing came out, and the lights came on!!!
You were suggesting that it was intentional, right?……
Say now, prove later.
I was asking about something you and I are familiar with.
Should I have not corrected like the CEO of that company?
Thanks for clarifying.
No one figured it out until Max filed on……
4/2.
In reality, he overstated his holdings. That’s why no one figured it out until the headline number was reposted, including me.
A misinterpretation was made. I was happy to make a correction. I may have to again in the future. Maybe my Shadow will be on his game and help point the error out.
BTW, did that beverage company CEO ever correct the sales figures that were off by $1.8MM?
It’s rhetorical.