Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Don't be so bitter Bunny. You may still have a chance to reinvest in NNVC at a lower price, but no so sure about that. I am confident NNVC is not a scam. PT's "opinion" about NNVC has been a scam.
loanranger, thanks for that info.
I have quite a large chunk of those shares and am still buying. If there is a breakout above 7 and stays there for 1 month I will add 33% more.
Your short interest info is correct but reflects data as per 30 of May 2014. The data for 15 of June are overdue (they publish twice a month) .
Bought another 10K of NNVC yesterday and today. Totally 80K in my portfolio. Still 20K+++ to invest in. A serious short squeeze, and institutional buying just on the horizon.
Bought 10K of NNVC today. Totally 70K in my account. Still 30K++++ to invest in. Shorts will create a nice and strong support for NNVC when they start covering. I think some of them have already started.
Ha, Ha,ha.ha. The DOJ trial - good (bull)one. Ha,ha,ha.
No worries. I am an investor, not a day trader.My AAPL was bought 12 yrs ago @ around 14 and slowly selling. NNVC is just beginning and I am still young.
You are totally wrong. PT is actually bullying, such a strong and not truthful language he presented without revealing his name or his company name paints him as a very black character, afraid of consequences of his wrong doing.
Still not filled my 10K buy order @ 3.05. Whats going on ?
So why this PT refuses to identify himself if everything he wrote bad about NNVC was truth and only truth? He went against a small company, is he scared of something ? You see big whistle blowers like Snowden and recently NSA Technical Director, Bill Binney have more to loose (their lives) and we know who they are. Pump Terminator spreads false information and its why he is anonymous liar.
Oh really?
... Eugene Seymour....appears to have received law suits and multiple FDA warning
Fully agree !
Thank you robi-1-kenobi. Very informative
and not trolling.
Ha,ha, ha. Lawsuit based on anonymous article, oh no, his/her name is Pump Terminator. Really ? Identify yourself Pump terminator first of all. You see, Snowden, Assange, Aaron Swartz, and many others revealed their identity to expose wrong-doing to reveal the truth, even endangering their life (otherwise who would believe them or put attention). So who are the masked individuals attacking creators of the new, very promising NNVC technology on the verge of success? This lawsuit will never materialize because is based on ghost's allegations. The law firms making noise will end up with nobody putting attention to follow the suit based on unknown dirt.
It would be splendid if it plummets back to $1 (it won't happen). I own 14286 post split shares plus 10000 shares added currently at 2.81 (totally 24286). If see flash crash in NNVC I will at least double my position.
Anyhow after selling my Apple shares I'll increase my NNVC position to 100K regardless of the unit price.
Rawnoc, thanks for not removing my last post, as you did with most of my previous ones.
Tell us, what's your expertise, experience and medical or scientific background to say "BULLSHIT" in response to many of the posts of those who are knowledgeable about medical field and provide us with logical argument and deductive reasoning ?
Not agreed at all with your laughable opinion.
What crash? What are you talking about?
Echo, the interest of the big pharma, which you mentioned about did not prove yet to be genuine.
NNVC has tiny finances and could be dragged into unnecessary legal fight to defend themselves, which would significantly delay their progress.
Various gov agencies are heavily lobbied and I am sure they would support big pharma, not NNVC, in their efforts to suppress NNVC's revolutionary discoveries. (it looks so far NNVC doesn't want to share its success as they opt for independent financing only and hold majority of the stock).
FDA also granted orphan status for BUrzynski's antineoplastones just to make impression they act on public interest but in fact they silently supported ELAN and put every legal obstacle possible to fight Burzynski in court.
Well, I thought it would be “educational” for Dr Seymour and Diwan to get advantage of Dr Burzynski experience with approach to FED and watch fantastic documentaries:
insert-text-here
insert-text-here
NNVC owners should stay vigilant all the time.
Institutional ownership of NNVC increased yesterday by 2% to 3.23%
insert-text-here
Agree. But what if big pharma stands behind the attack on NNVC for obvious reasons (elimination of their profitable and toxic vaccines)???
Have you heard about large players (ELAN), FDA, National Cancer Institute fighting over decade to diminish and hide success of Dr. Burzynski antineoplastones to fight most difficult cases of brain cancer? They even tried to steal his patents and one of his crew doctors defected to ELAN, revealing Burzynski's intellectual property and making his road through hell to treat very sick patients.
The history might be repeating. I smell a trouble if there is a more powerful evil behind NNVC attack, not just a short seller looking for a quick profit.
I am worried that big pharma might have started a serious attack on NNVC ( I wish I was wrong). Its a very smart way NNVC made 3 layers of protection to their intellectual property. They should hold tightly on to it so nobody can steal it. Its also a clever move they are busy with their technology studies in Europe, China, Australia and Japan and involve famous scientists like Dr. Harris.
I hope Dr Seymour and other insiders know Dr Burzynski's story, to be a good lesson how to protect rights to their discoveries and how to protect themselves from the evil bureaucrats and jealous competitors.
I advise anyone to check out films below, which are very educational and a must watch to know and prevent.
insert-text-here
insert-text-here
Big Kahuna, you wrote that R/S was across the board (covered all type of NNVC stocks). Could you please enlighten me with the following:
The company wrote in today"s announcement: "the par value per share of capital stock will remain unchanged".
Can you explain what is the meaning of this statement and what is its significance?
Thank you.
Thank you for your analysis. Its very difficult not to agree with it.
The company wrote in todays announcement: "the par value per share of capital stock will remain unchanged".
Can anyone explain what does that mean? How many shares are represented by the par value per share of capital stock" and what is the par value number (is it 0.01 $)?
Thanks.
Do you have any proof there was a confidentiality agreement? Why to keep results confidential if they are successful. NNVC needs a good press coverage as their public relations are non existent or fatal. Maybe the results were simply awful and they cover it up.
There was a lot of "bubbling" in 2008 and 2009 about NNVC success (Herpes treatment to be ready in 2010 and Japanese verification for EKC-Cide (external eye viral disease).
Has anyone heard about Japanese EKC-Cide progress? I hope Australian studies for Flu-Cide won't end same way as Japanese one.
I was really hoping for HERPES treatment ( saw NNVC news in 2009)as millions would love to have this treatment ready - more people are affected with herpes than a flu.
So far very pathetic performance, herpes treatment seemed to be very close that time in 2009 but now we have a flu treatment "hopla" instead which probably will end the same way as the previous two attempts. The share price shows investors don't believe in flu treatment success story.
Well, lets do not loose our hopes until we are alive. Most probably FDA won't make it easy for nnvc to succeed.These guys have deep pockets and nnvc is just powerless without a strong and influential partner.
Fully agree with you, I posted a comment some time ago suggesting FDA would be a main obstacle for NNVC success.
Thank you for this report.
The NNVC risks lay not in its new technology. Most probably NNVC holds a perfect discovery to kill viruses effectively. But where is the danger? I think FDA is the biggest enemy of such innovative solutions. I suspect they will try to kill a small innovative company requesting them to perform never ending and expensive new and unnecessary studies which would require more and more financing. Everyone knows FDA is in big pharma pockets allowing them to poison us at a high cost for treating illneses which are never cured. Well, there is a report saying that FDA can not fulfill its mission (link to this article :
insert-text-here)
The report found that "the development of medical products based on 'new science' cannot be adequately regulated by the FDA," and that the agency does not have the capacity to carry out risk assessment and analysis. Additionally, the agency's science agenda "lacks coherent structure and vision, as well as effective coordination and prioritization."
I have strong suspicion that it will be a road through hell for NNVC dealing with FDA . Its good they try some research to be done abroad but they should simultaneously start approval process in other countries if their technology is as promising and effective as they state. Anyhow, dealings with FDA would require a huge cash reserves which means stock dilution. I do not see Allan Harris prediction of stock value at $ 100 in 2014. He did not take FDA influence in his account... Hope I am wrong.
Can you publish a pdf file of your and dr Seymour original letters? Thanks.
Are you talking about Dr. Burzynski who discovered some successful treatment for cancer and has been fighting in the courts since then against Federal Death Agency (FDA) and few crooks who stole his idea? If you are talking about somebody else would you pls post a link. Thanks.
Sure big pharma would be very concerned about NNVC inventions and they might corrupt FDA to significantly delay whole approval process. Going abroad is a good idea but do you think big pharma has no corrupting power abroad? Surely they do.
I am holding 100K shares of NNVC but I see only simple guys like me are holding it, there is no institutional buying so it worries me. If NNVC technology is so good maybe they already know FDA will make all tricks possible to protect big guys.
Dr Feelgood, thank you very much for answering my question and all info re EKC.
Can anyone tell me what happened with NNVC drug candidate for Epidemic Kerato-Conjunctivitis (EKC). I remember about 2 years ago Japanese were heavily interested in that study, what happened with that Japenese ineterest in this drug ? I cant find anywhere follow up on this subject.