Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If you don't pay up, you lose. If you pay...Your choice
not a chance.......good grief dude, i made my choice.....what part of what i'm saying don't you get.....i don't give a rat's ass about what happens to me regarding my status on this website, but i do give a rat's ass about standing up for principles, and doing the right thing........this really is about the free speech ground that i'm standing on, but why should i expect a broken record, "just pay" robot like you to understand?
my inclination is to believe that matt is actually gonna let me back in, and that he's actually weighing things out based on principle.......i reckon we will see!
but golly gee, thanks for your advice....again...lol!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
There are two ways to get out of here
for you?..yes.....for me?..not a chance in hell......you may have no problem with politically correct kowtowing buyouts, but i do........this is about principles, not price....if the powers to be can't figure out that i don't belong here, especially after the uncovering and the exposure of a certain poster's "hiding in the shadows" vendetta against me....after all this, if the decision is made to boot me, then just do it!.....quit friggin lollygagging and make the call one way or the other
if i'm outa here, then show me the door.....if i'm in a timeout, then let me know for how long......how hard can it be to make this decision?
hell, i finally get a response from matt today regarding my status, in which he tells me...i see no reason to let you back on.....okay, if that's the case then make the friggin call
what a beautiful reflection of (cough! hack!) real-world liberal philosophy this website is
[Suppressed Sound Link]
is this a french jail, or one that just follows french policies and procedures.....2 days of work with 5 days off....what's it take for the decision makers to actually make a decision, one way or the other?..........in america, i think it's referred to as "shit or get off the pot!"
[Suppressed Sound Link]
hmmmm....just more juvenile jivin' jargon from the jokeless jailhouse jester?.....you go jerk!
and no.....no credit card will be forthcoming, and none will be required
[Suppressed Sound Link]
to make a post on my board anyway
to be honest, the way the emails came, the wording that was used, and the fact that most of my posts are on zeev's, while the posts to your board were few and far between (17 in a few months), it really never dawned on me that it was you who initiated all this.......gee, i hope that doesn't bother you...lol!
this is the framework that caused me to make that last post to you saying, seeya......read that post again, does it sound like i'm aware that it was you?....nope
hey tornado...........even though i've only posted 17 times on this board since it became free again, matt doesn't want me to post here.........obviously the two thin-skinned residents here have gotten the free speech america they want......at least here anyway
i wanted to thank you for your level-headed cordiality that you displayed in your private messages to me back when the board reconverted......seeya!
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=7072703
gee, if you really think about, it's actually your fault....you brought this all down by your hiding in the shadows...lol!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
caught in and forced to admit one blatant lie
just an oversight that i clarified
you choose to tell two more blatant lies:
i reckon that depends on what the meaning of is, is, combined with typical lawyer slog
nope, not even close -- you didn't make any 'deal' with anybody -- you were thrown out on your butt and told never to come back
okay, i had no part.....but i certainly agreed, and considering that there is nothing you can do to stop me from posting there, it was my agreement to your request that i was referring to
and abided by it' -- nope, wrong again -- you posted twice on Tornado Alley after you'd been officially informed
i posted once to let you know that i wasn't allowed to post there anymore, little realizing it was you who put in the ban order.....if you want to count that, so be it
the other post?......the only reason i posted one last time is because you said i could
then you may reply to this post
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=7081191
and when i did, and it didn't include your demanded apology, you deleted it.....how typical.........and if you had only been upfront, by letting me know immediately that it was you who did all this, then not one post would have been made in pollution central
[Suppressed Sound Link]
He's not getting out this time unless he buys his way out.
[Suppressed Sound Link]
but this ridiculous post
gee.....should i be surprised at your lengthy lawyerly response, layered with your emotional and sypathy-laden defense of your client?......the problem?.....her actions speak louder than your words
'months ago, i made a deal not to post on tornado's alley, and abided by it
okay, i made a deal not to post soundbites months ago and abided by it, and after my first stint in jail a few weeks ago, i made a deal with you not to post at all in tornado's alley, and abided by it
supposed 'blatant plagiarism'.....she's never claimed original authorship of everything she posts -- though she could do a better job of it.....it's beyond absurd to assert that she claims as her own creations the many and often quite funny, bemusing, insightful and/or incisive jokes
again, her actions speak louder than your words, and her posts are the evidence.........the most comical of her comical posts are the ones where a joke is posted, and when nobody responds with "har har", she posts it again.......early on, it was standard procedure for her to post a joke at least two times, and sometimes three times, in order to get the necessary response to satisfy her loneliness
supposed 'spamming'.....no iHub rule whatsoever says, per se, that a person can't make (substantially) the same post on more than one board.....I strongly doubt she's ever violated the very clear terms of the quite explicit rule against spam set forth in the board info for Zeev's Politics
oh the lawyerly technicalities, dontcha lov'em
for some time, out of over 3,500 iHub boards currently, tpbbls's board Rants and Raves has consistently been in iHub's 100 'Top Boards' (as has been my board Tornado Alley)
you're actually serious with this reasoning?...lol....a board owner bombarding their own board with posts is relevant as a qualifier for total volume?.....sheesh!
perhaps if that board owner's own posts are taken out of total volume, the status would be quite different, eh?.........and is it any wonder that tornado alley has high volume?......take those same rants and raves postings, and then add the other poster's massive amount of conspiracy theory posts, and voila!.....what would you expect the volume to be?
i give you exhibits A and B.......again, her actions speak volumes above your words
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=2412
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=2412
it is not your place to decide or dictate where tpbbls, or indeed where anyone else, 'needs' or should be allowed to post
no kidding!.....that's up to her to figure out.....but i do have a say in pointing out the abusive posting pollution that is the hallmark of her heritage on ihub..........and i do have a say in rendering my opinion in an attempt to put a stop to this blatant abuse
personally attacking....simply and solely because her posts and point of view don't fit your 'agenda'
this is not about political points of view, it's about principle......besides, the vast majority of her posts don't really have any views, unless you consider nonsense a viewpoint....the reality? well, her jokes aren't funny, and her views are
i realize that she is very lonely, and has no life', could hardly be more untrue -- I know her, and i know that she's anything but 'lonely'
who gives a crap?.......in this forum, once again, her actions speak louder than your words..........and the perception from the nickel seats is that she has no life
then I'd suggest a case can be made that you should be terminated simply for that crass ADA remark you made yesterday
in this forum, there are no disabilities, everyone is equal, so don't make some overemotional sympathy play out of someone's personal situation that is irrelevant when it comes to this forum.............can she type? (that seems obvious..lol!)......then she is an equal, and has no handicap when it comes to this forum
finally -- re your 'i just attempted to stop the pollution, that's all'........you and you alone are the source of the 'pollution' at issue here
again, her actions speak louder than your words
take responsibility for and correct, your own flaws, failings, bad attitudes and bad behaviors, you continue to lash out making personal attacks on others
thanks pastor, i'll keep that in mind....lol!
this situation you now find yourself in has nothing whatsoever to do with your 'free speech' or with any aspect of your point of view on anything
the fack it don't!
jury foreman, what is the verdict?..........we find the jailed defendent "not guilty"
[Suppressed Sound Link]
i only have one post left for today, so let me say..
inre susie's post.......susie and i are hardly on the same side of the political fence, and she probably doesn't agree with much that i post, yet she sees and agrees with what the facts are regarding the plagiaristic spammage that is occurring on zeev's.....thanks susie! (i hope you suffer no recourse from your support of my position on this specific issue)
in fact, regarding the spamming poster, what does it say about a person who would willingly hijack someone else's posting humor, and then create the impression that the humor is original?......what does it say about a person who would knowingly abscond with someone else's blogging input and then repost it as her own?
ocean11......regarding.....zitboy, once again. Start a new account. Don't post anymore with this name & don't pick a name that resembles that one
i have had the same moniker on every message board........whether it was yahoo, raging bull, or ihub, my user name has always remained........no attempt to hide in the shadow, it ain't my style, and i won't re-sign under another identity
if i'm martyred for trying to make ihub a better place, then so be it...........even if i did create a new identity, my posting style wouldn't change, so it wouldn't take long to figure out who the new kid on the block is...lol!
and bottom line, just like my isp tells me when the connection goes down, and i miss out on getting an online trade done, the standard response is......"for entertainment purposes only"
so it is with my posting style, at the bottom line, it is for entertainment purposes only.....and i guarantee, i leave many non-posting observers with a good laugh on a daily basis.......it's too bad that more than a few posters have no sense of humor, regarding my hard-hitting, cutting-edge nastiness........if you knew me, you would know that nothing bothers me, and that i never take things personally......i'm a very "content in my skin" human being.....my problems on ihub are a result of people who DO take it personally, and use their "being offended" status, as their method of recourse, which leads them to the courageous act of becoming professional tattle-tales......hey "different strokes for different folks", but it certainly ain't my style
on any board, at any time, i have never put anyone on ignore, and have never reported any poster to any authority, EVER
as far as the "off with your head" crowd is concerned, what else would you expect them to say?.......it's standard procedure, right out of the liberal playbook
[Suppressed Sound Link]
You're annoying and constantly in violation in TOU.
like i said, let me know what i need to know
is it just my hard-hitting "nasty" style?
or is it the soundbites?
give me the sounbite perameters....G rating?....PG-13?.....R?
should my language reflect what is heard everyday in certain groups....should i pretend my audience are kindergartners, jr high-schoolers, or college students?
this whole circumstance has arrived because of my attempt, through posting, to somehow get the attention, and to get ihub's most prolific spamming plagiarist to stop polluting other boards with her multiple duplicate and triplicate postings
she has her own board, so there is no need for her spammage, and yet nobody says a word.......months ago, i made a deal not to post on tornado's alley, and abided by it.......so how about someone sending her a message to do the same regarding zeev's board?
just take a look at how many posts she bombards zeev's with.....then take a look at how many of them are exact duplicates of posts on her board, and then reduplicates of those same posts in tornado alley..........a month ago, she never posted on zeev's.....now she is the top poster on zeev's, and almost every post is this type of triplicate spam
i just attempted to stop the pollution, that's all
p.s......i realize that she is very lonely, and has no life, but that's no excuse to allow her spammage
[Suppressed Sound Link]
matt.......jail?....again?......what now?......another timeout?
just let me know what i need to know, okay?
thanks!..(scrathing my head)
maybe we should cut him some slack because looks like he just got out of the ihub jailhouse
it was my hard-hitting, cutting-edge posting flair that grated a certain few posters.....you know, the posters who have "free speech" tattooed on their foreheads like they own it, and since they own it, they get to make their own personal judgements on who, and who not, are violators of THEIR interpretation of what's acceptable in the public forum
just so happens that i brought up why nobody had confronted a certain plagiaristic spamming poster, who now pollutes this board with her duplicate and triplicate postings, while creating the impression that her balatant plagiarism are her own words......let's remember, she has her own board where nobody goes....then she re-spams her plagiarism to tornado's alley, and since nobody gives a rat's ass in either of those two places, she has decided to triplicate her plagiaristic postings over here, without a word from the powers to be
and so tornado, a harvard lawyer (based upon his actions regarding this situation, he must specialize in ADA cases) instead of giving advice to his client regarding her spammage, (a direct violation of ihub policy) he sends me to jail and tells me that i'm no longer invited to post on his board
his inconsistent free speech guidelines are not black and white, but are filtered through his determination of how offended a public forum participant is......he's a wimp!
and now, we get to be the recipients of this caddish spammage, and there are a few here who already have figured out her M.O.........she got her start as the most prolific plagiaristic spammer on ihub by posting other people's jokes as her own, and if she didn't get a response, she would post it again, just like we see her doing it here..........and here i give you exhibit A
Posted by: Still Broke
In reply to: teapeebubbles who wrote msg# 118235 Date:7/30/2005 12:34:11 AM
Post #of 118291
What do you do, post this same story once a day, over and over?
[Suppressed Sound Link]
ander....it don't matter to them.....so someone manipulates the tape, big deal......as long as they see it, it must be real, especially if it comes from one of their reliable web sites..lol!......gee, it's on the internet, so it must be true
i saw it live.....gwb gave a thumb's up.......but don't tell them that......you might ruin their day....lol
[Suppressed Sound Link]
good grief!
i can see that you have no problem being ihub's most prolific plagiaristic spammer.......ain't anyone gonna be an environmental patriot and somehow find a way to stop this plagiaristic pollution from ihub's loneliest poster?
do you ever have an original thought?.....do you always plagiarize other's words and make them look like yours?....what a spamming cad you are!.....get a life!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
the adminsitration spun the intel
they spun nothing....they prepared for everything
and freed a people too......thank God, and it's about time!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
Iraqis Stand Against Terrorism.... an article in..an Iraqi newspaper....Iraqis stood for three minutes of silence....thousand of cars stopped....carrying Iraqi flags and displaying victory signs in defiance of the terrorists......“We will not sway from our path and we will not kneel to those who commit these crimes....We are confident that all nations of this world stand beside us, because to day terrorism does not only affect us Iraqis but the whole world. We Iraqis have the honor of being in the front line in the fight against terrorism."
an historic stand for freedom completely ignored by the world's press........and the leader of that free world, the usa, and those responsible for recognizing freedom and keeping us informed about it's progress, are so drunkenly inebriated with that power to persuade, and so hellbent on having us see life through their narrow-minded viewpoint, that only in retrospect will they realize that they missed out on history as it happened right under their noses
tragically and disgustingly pathetic!
hey tornado...........even though i've only posted 17 times on this board since it became free again, matt doesn't want me to post here.........obviously the two thin-skinned residents here have gotten the free speech america they want......at least here anyway
i wanted to thank you for your level-headed cordiality that you displayed in your private messages to me back when the board reconverted......seeya!
Rove is guilty on many levels
yep, of being a republican, and of being gwb's #1 confidante and fan.....period!
Your posts show...blah...blah....blah
well ain't that the doody calling the diaper stinky
it's obvious that your posts show that you're only expertise is as a plagiaristic polluter who hasn't had an original thought since this website began......what's even worse is that you have your own clap trap where you're the only one flapping your trap.....and now the conspiracy theory board is dead in the water, largely as a result of the thin-skinned whining tactics that dominate in that alley (wonder when f6 is gonna take his name off of that joke)......so what's your solution?..........to duplicate and triplicate your putrid plagiarism here......again, spare us the stench
[Suppressed Sound Link]
and thanks to whoever put me through the rigmarole that defines the jailhouse politically correct policy........the only good thing about trying to wade through the "make new policy by seat of your pants" bureacratic boondoggle, is that i got a pretty good feel for what it would be like in the senate
[Suppressed Sound Link]
Karl Rove and the Bush administration's involvement in the disclosure of a CIA agent's undercover identity.
ihub's #1 posting polluter, the factless fool, doth speaketh again
1)......no name was disclosed
2)......she was not undercover
3)......she's been that way since '97
4)......no laws were broken....period!
and quoting john kerry?.........priceless
what seems to be happening, especially in light of the press corps relentless non-factual questioning, is that the msm must be getting all of their strategy from the whacked-out left blogs......keep it up, it's a great strategy...lol!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
No.1
irrelevant......it doesn't matter what reason i'm here for, and frankly, it's nunya....nunya damn bidness
No.2 You are a "noncontributing guest"
says who?....you?.....because i don't pay?.....then why have any free access?.........fact, i have contributed more on that board than all of you overemotional whiners combined, especially if you compare my individual posts to yours.....originality would not be the first description regarding your "cut and paste" expertise......you and others just can't stand my manner of posting, and so the TOS police look for any technical violation they can to quash my creative free speech
then i come here and listen to a poster who gives me advice on how to get out of here........just pay! (gee, our founders would be proud!).......this extremely poised poster then gets into a childish dialogue ending with a puffed up he-man threat......i'm certain that firefighters across this country are shaking in their straps and boots at the site of this menacing ass-kicker
#No.3
see above
and by the way mariner, thank you for your fine example of narrow-minded, self-righteous, hypocritical arrogance that so defines your ilk, while you decide who should and who should not have a seat in the public forum
Maybe you should try posting some fresh material on your own? Just a thought... Lose the {i} - {/i}
you're kidding, right?.......i post {i} - {/i} as a way to reference what my fresh and original material is rebutting, which avoids having to click backwards to see what the poster said?
now compare my posting with some specific posters, one of which is an endless conspiracy theory poster, and the other who has plagiarism down to a fine art.......one hasn't posted an original thought since gwb was elected, and because they couldn't win the argument, they whined their way to making their board a pay-fer board (it was reverted back recently).......since no one posts there anymore, the two have decided to venture anywhere they can to pollute as many boards as possible
the other is a professional plagiarizer, who has her own clap trap where she's the only one clapping......by the way, whenever i post someone else's material, i always reference either the post or the link, but this particular plagiaristic poster seems to delight in creating the impression that her posts are her own.......it's bad enough doing things in duplicate, but she must be a professional bureaucrat, because she does everything in triplicate
it's actually my freshness, and my creative use of soundbites, that those two can't stand, and voila! TOU
again, i understood the fine line i was treading as a result of the first post that was deleted, so if smell me you flatulent twit is what the powers to be are making judgements on, well then move over alexander solzhenitsyn, you got company
[Suppressed Sound Link]
Learn how to post directly to Matt
did it
Confess your sins
i have nothing to confess for......in this forum, you're guilty until matt finds the time to figure out which thin-skinned whack job sent me to this hell hole
Promise not to do it again
duh!....right up and until it happens again, right?.......Phil (Bullrider), you an inmate or part of the blue crew?, anyway, you know how in hockey, you can get a penalty for taking a fall?.......is there any system in place here, that penalizes the TOU "boy cried wolf" over-abusers?
[Suppressed Sound Link]
This isn't a "public airway".
it certainly is!......i get an isp, i log in, and for no cost, i can post my message......in fact, it's even more "public" than my cable tv example, because i can actually participate........the public sets the standards, and whatever the airwave or access might be, those making the decisions try and figure out what those standards are
regarding my incarceration........the original in each others face post you referred to was deleted, and perhaps i should have used the "m" word, like they do with our children in the 6th and 7th grade.....point is, i was sent an email about it, so i knew to be on my best behavior, when out of the sky blue, wham! i'm in jail
remember, we're talking about a politics board, where everyone is dishing it out.......now, knowing i've been warned, and in response to some wonderful hypocracy, i provided what i thought was a very fitting and funny analogy, and then threw a punny pie in his face, when i said;
well that's the shat calling the diaper stinky.....smell me you flatulent twit
short, sweet, and entertaining, eh?.........now, how many of the channels available on your cable box, including the networks, would have a problem with "airing" that statement?
the real problem is some people are just better than others at dishing it up, and others are just not very good at taking it, and voila! TOU
[Suppressed Sound Link]
This probably didn't help your cause either
try tuning into tnt, tbs, and fx to hear a similar linguistic repertoire on the public airwaves, but hey, thanks for the heads up
the speech police's poster boy
[Suppressed Sound Link]
sent matt an email to get out of here.....no response
again this is what got me here
well that's the shat calling the diaper stinky.....smell me you flatulent twit
after looking over other areas of the site, i can tell that the head of the speech police has many whiny worms doing his first amendment for him.........almost a duplicate reflection of how our court systems work these days
good grief!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
when does the parole board meet?.......need to get out of here....i have a wife and kids to raise
from the post that got me here, which word caused my relegation to the jailhouse?
well that's the shat calling the diaper stinky.....smell me you flatulent twit
master, whatever it was, i won't do it again
[Suppressed Sound Link]
easymoney.....This is a very important document that you've linked
yes, incredible!.....and did you see the other important supporting document in that report?........i believe it was titled. "and monkeys might fly out of my butt"
[Suppressed Sound Link]
You just aren't capable of being civil are you zit?
the truth is a two-edged sword, slicing and dicing it's way through your perceived civility of perpetual ignorance........don't you find ignorance disgusting?.....perhaps even uncivilized?.....especially when there's no excuse not to be informed?
never mind!
Wilson was not the issue.
wilson, that liar, creepy liar, was exactly the issue when rove gave cooper a heads up, that cooper was about to get himself ratherized by wilson's lies
again, keep beating that dead bunny!
[Suppressed Sound Link]
She was very much under cover.......Last I heard ignorance was not a defense to a crime
the idiotic density rises again..........to commit a crime, rove would have had to reveal her name.......he didn't do that, get it?
and since YOU won't be able to use ignorance, your specialty, as a defense, you'll have to use the brick wall defense, since it's obvious you have run into it head first on many occasions
with the likes of (cough! hack!) informed supporters like you, election trends will continue to go in the direction of common sense
[Suppressed Sound Link]
How do you know she has been given a waiver by her source?
must be another miller
Ms. Miller has been jailed for refusing to cooperate with a grand jury subpoena directing her to testify about "a specified executive branch official" whose identity is known to the special prosecutor in the case, according to court papers. But Ms. Miller refuses to rely on the waiver the source signed or the sort of assurances that have satisfied other reporters.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050711/ZNYT02/507110602
Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said Miller is doing a "brave and honorable" thing. "The simple fact is that Judy made a promise to a source that she would protect his anonymity. That source has not granted her any kind of a waiver from that promise, at least one that she finds persuasive or believes was freely given, and she feels bound by that pledge. And more than that, she feels that, if she breaks that pledge, she will compromise her ability to do her job in the future."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/12/AR2005071201402.html
it is the source's privilege to be protected, not the reporter's........if this source did sign a general waiver, then why is she persisting, and why is the nytimes editor so adamant that she stay in jail........is there something more to this?.....i'm rather sure there is
one thing's for sure.......it's obvious that her source is not karl rove
Yes I know you would rather compromise the integrity of the press.
oh the density!........miller has been given a waiver by her source...get it?.....so why is she in jail?.......is her boss at the nytimes fearful of exposing her source?.....is HE keeping her in jail?......who is her source?
perhaps the nytimes is now knee-deep in some collusive illegal dung, and knows it might be in a rather precarious situation
what if it's joe wilson who gave it up?...would his wife have him charged?......oh would that be rich!
Who the hell is the coward who Judith Miller is in jail for?
try calling the ny times and getting hold of the editor in chief
what you call biased hatred is actually intelligence.
okey dokey opie!
there are some people in this country that just don't believe every piece of information this adminstration
didn't need input from the administration, i simply read cooper's email.......i reckon you haven't read the email, you simply checked the usual whacko blogs for the daily talking points, eh?
[Suppressed Sound Link]
why doesn't McClellan say that at the press briefings?
as we were used to hearing endlessly for 8 years from janet reno......"can't comment on an ongoing investigation"
what was good enough dozens of times for bill, should at least be good enough for the one time it happens in gwb's administration, eh?
of course not, especially in the frantically hypocratic world of liberal thinking
Is that the best you can do????
the truth is a very simple thing when you don't have biased hatred getting in the way......try it, it's refreshing in its simplicity
What is your take on Rove outing Plame?
did rove tell cooper her name?......did rove even know her name?......how could he out her if these answers are NO, as confirmed by the emails
fact is, rove was trying to tell cooper to make sure his facts were correct before he gets himself ratherized around wilson's lies