Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think you will be proven correct. It's over or close to it. I just Googled the 3 firms Triangle has retained. They specialize in consulting and restructuring. You probably already knew that.
I see. You are saying that a small conference in Dana Point had a larger impact on the share price than the FOMC results that were watched by millions globally. I get it now. Thanks for educating me.
The FOMC meeting comments were released at 2pm followed by Janet Yellen doing a press conference at 3pm. Now go look at the chart for CDE for today. Does it make sense now? Anyway, I am holding CDE and am happy about it.
I don't think the Roth Conference had anything to do with the increase in share price. PM's and the miners all went up after the FED meeting release.
It looks like oil is at about $38 and the sp is at 1.06. Some say the increase in the price of oil is due to short covering. If what you say happens and the price drops sub $20. I think a lot of companies will go out of business. It's good to see that TPLM is hanging in there.
I think this one rebounded because it had been beaten down so far. Last year at this time it was trading at $5. It had lost over 90% of its value. The stock has tremendous potential if it can endure the low price environment.
No need to shout. If oil goes lower, I will add as you suggest. Right now I'm happy with the shares I own "risk free" and will be okay no matter what happens. The share price being over $2 was very short lived. Could it have been caused by a few traders placing market orders instead of limit orders?
For those of you with a lower cost basis, a good way to play this is to wait until the share price doubles and then sell enough to get your principal out. It's not the most exciting course of action. And, those of you trading on pure technicals won't be interested. However, for investors like myself it reduces the fear/greed influence on decision making. You'll have a bit more peace of mind to stomach the fluctuations. I say this because this stock has a strong 5x to 10x return over time.
It's great to see the share price at .41 pre-split!
I wish I had seen this video before. FWIW, At various points in the video he is exhibiting non-verbal signs that indicate he is lying. Check out 5:57 when talking about the plant and trials.
NNVC Video:
[url]http://www.equities.com/media-gallery/170-nanoviricides-inc?category_id=65/url][tag]insert-text-here[/tag]
How to tell if someone is lying:
[url]
"As a former prosecuter, I am surprised that the SEC and/or FBI have not begun an investigation.
The evidence appears to be more than sufficient."
If any complaints are filed with the SEC, it will be by someone with a large enough loss to make it worth their trouble. I'd say the VC's made money, and the insiders are making money. I'm not sure what stake institutional investors have. That is, if there are any. That leaves Joe SixPack and the longs on this board. They may not be up to it. I'm not sure what the laws are regarding "forward looking statements". If NNVC doesn't turn this thing around legitimately, I think they will just say that they failed as someone else suggested. There's nothing illegal about failing. I do feel for the people who invested more money than they should have. Penny stocks tend to attract people who are the least likely to survive a loss. That's why I call comanies like NNVC a "lottery ticket stocks". If you are shorting or a trader, do so at your own risk. If you are long, invest the amount you would have spent on lottery tickets or going out to the movies or another form of entertainment. Please don't bet your future on it.
"Yes! They can just claim that they failed in their attempt, chapter out and it's not illegal to fail, even if you got paid millions during the attempt. That is exactly what I expect."
I'm a former shareholder as of June 2014. Before I get called a basher, I'd like to set the record straight. I never shorted the stock. However, I did make a decent profit on my exit. My initial intention was to see if this might be a good time to get back in. Unfortunately, I think the above quote is the most likely outcome. If 80-90% of the startups in this space fail, you have to be honest with yourself and ask the question: Does this company behave like the top 10-20%? IMO, I don't think they do. I don't know if what they are up to is illegal or not. There are plenty of you here to debate that. When/if they successfully complete Tox, I will be back. Best of luck to all.
WOW! What happened?
It's been a while since I've paid attention to NNVC. I got out shortly after the reverse split and I'm glad I did! At one point I really thought this company was promising but still considered it a lottery ticket stock. Is this the final dance?
FWIW, Dr. Seymour stated years ago that there would be no peer reviewed papers. The FDA is the only entity's approval he cares about.
Additionally, all too often peer review yields a consensus which is influenced by the reviewers' need to be accepted by their colleagues. Putting one's stamp of approval on a such a potentially disruptive technology no matter how good is risky.
"Of course no one on this board is going to give me the peer reviewed papers I requested, because they don't exist.
If you understand that peer review is irrelevant, why did you triumphantly link to an NNVC press release as an example of a peer reviewed paper? And why did Forzanano do the same thing?"
re: jg35 I watched as much of "Thrive" as I could without throwing up.
NNVC faces some real risks, but leave the paranoia behind.
Everyone should watch 2016 Obama's America and Thrive regardless of political ideology. NNVC has something big. I hope we'll see the realiziation of this great technology.
It is truly amazing how the anonymity of the internet allows one to say things that anyone with even the most basic information knows is false. I for one don't understand what people were expecting from the Pre-IND meeting. The company received guidance on how to progress. That's it. And they are doing so. And incidentally, the multi-national approach to testing was mentioned years ago by NNVC.
The uneducated or mis-educated herd lost the most money in the tech bubble. Anyone educated in market cycles saw that the top was in months, if not years earlier. The same with real estate in 2005-2006 and today. Guess what? The internet is still here and there is still a real estate market.
JP
"I'm sure plenty of people said that those newfangled horseless carriages would never make any money for anyone, either."
This reminds me of the two guys I overheard talking in 1996. One says to the other, " That internet thing is just a fad." Reply: " Yeah, just a fad. "
JP
Here is another recommendation without much info.
penny stock recommendations
It means just the opposite. Because the FDA is receptive it increases NNVC's legitimacy.
Allan Comments on Press Release
[url][/url][tag]http://allallan.blogspot.com/
Seeker, you make some valid points. However, I think the frugality so far has been wise. The acquisition of the new building is a step in the right direction. I can't imagine they are planning to utilize a building of that size to employ only four people. I would add that I would be interested to know if Dr. Seymour's role will change as the company grows. Many startups have a succession plan in which expert managers are hired to get the company from one stage of growth to the next. Like many, I do think we are on the cusp of new growth phase.
"Here we go with the hyping of another artificial "deadline" about which it is said if it is not met all hell will break lose.
Give it a rest folks. Progress is being made. That's the key for investors. "
Exactly!! If you are all worked up over this press release, you likely have too much of a position in this stock. No stock is worth loosing sleep over. Anything can happen. I recommend adjusting your position so that you are comfortable.
I don't think we will see "under promise, over deliver" until there is a marketable product and a board of directors.
And even with that said, I am very satisfied with the recent progress of NNVC.
"Why does everything NNVC does have to be so different from (and take so much longer than) what every other drug company does? At a certain point it borders on the ridiculous."
With the success rate of this industry in mind, you should be happy that they are not going about their business like other development stage biotech companies.
I agree. I don't think many truly understand the magnitude of the effect this disruptive technology will have on the status quo of the pharmaceutical industry. I'm sure the shorts and "paid naysayers" ie: reverse desk, poop and scoop, etc. have increased their silent personal "long" positions. Otherwise, the sp would have been back to .80 long ago. I do think we could see .80 again if management doesn't advance the cause in a substantial manor.
At some future point marketing will drop "cides" from the name altogether. "Cides" accurately describes the technology but has negative connotations, ie. pesticide, suicide, infantcide , and genocide. The end product will have a friendlier name tied to the benefits of an NNVC drug, not to the process or mechanism as it is now.
JP
I'm at CROI 2011 listening to a presentation on the last 15 years of HAART therapy. I am more optimistic than ever that NNVC will revolutionize antiretroviral therapy!!!
It was probably an investor who understands the value of what NNVC is working on or an inexperienced investor who put in a market order. A .07 premium is insignificant when compared to the potential of this company.
JP- NNVC Long
wild4nano,
Am I wrong in thinking that a PR announcing a pre-IND meeting is going to be the event that moves this stock higher?
JP- Long NNVC
Great presentation! I urge folks to follow the link to the presentation and then link to their Facebook pages. It would be nice for this video to go "viral". Pun intended.
JP
RE: Updated Short Sale Info for NNVC:
What does this tell us about the price direction of NNVC?
We could see $1.00 again. The price decrease would not likely be attributed to the company itself but reaction to the sovereign debt contagion and the likeliness of possible austerity's effect on the market.
You are correct
I think that the PR mentioned that the surviving mice were cured with no signs of illness or side-effect. If that's true, the results are amazing!
Correction--Just re-read the PR. That wasn't in there. I must have read it in another post.
Gap closed 2.23 2.24
My ears did perk up. Although I tried, I didn't get to hear any of the conversation. Nanoviricides isn't household word yet!!
"I'm beginning to get the feeling - a gut feeling - that there is no longer any mystery pharma
with any interest in NNVC."
Because of this PR, NNVC's blip on the radar screen just got bigger. I know that many of you have been investors and others, traders since day one. For most, this is just the beginning. I'm at the HPLC conference in Boston this week and I just overheard NNVC mentioned by an attendee. I've never heard NNVC mentioned outside of this website. The future is promising.
JP
I'm extremely happy to be back on board with NNVC! This market has some downside left. My research shows the DOW going down to 9000. I hold a large cash position and am short the market with EPV, DOG and EUO and RSW. NNVC is my ONLY long position!! I'd like to thank DRFEELGOOD and all of the other contributors here to make this board one of the most informative on the web.
JP
Thanks, I know what the words mean. If possible, I was looking for a simple explanation of what it is and how it works. And, why it's better.
What is a Nanovircide? I'm a shareholder and lurker here and am wondering how to explain this technology to friends. Any help will be appreciated.
JP