Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yes Kling-on amigo... we do believe in miracles,we do believe in miracles,we do believe in miracles
would seem a broker statement of shares or actual shares and a copy of the chap 7 would prove the loss well enough for IRS I will ask my tax guy this year.. and let you know one opinion.
THE RUSSIAN DEAL WAS DEAD FROM THE BEGINNING. THERE IS NO SUCH DRUG AS PRISTINE IT'S LIKE MFP FLUORIDE (MAXIMUM FLORIDE PROTECTION) THIS IS OVER PRICED B12 THAT YOU PUT UNDER YOUR TONGUE THAT FAILED ALL ITS EFFICACIES TRIALS.. AND DOES NOT LIVE UP TO ITS CLAIMS NOR FLY OFF THE SHELVES APPARENTLY ... SURE WHEN IT WAS ON THE PINK SHEETS IT GOT SHORTED THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS YES WALL STREET IS CORRUPT.. IF HAD BEEN A GREAT PRODUCT THAT REALLY WORKED WOULD HAVE BEEN A LAND SLIDE IN STOCK HOLDERS FAVOR APPLE,VIRGIN AIR, IBM.... PROBABLY WAS SHORTED IN THE EARLY DAYS ..PROBLEM IS THEY NEVER REALLY HAD MUCH TO BEGIN WITH IMO MY FIRST 50,000 SHARES WERE A GIFT OR TRADE OF SOME SORT THAN I GOT CAUGHT UP IN CLSC GREED HYPE AND THREW LOGIC AND GOOD SENSE OUT THE WINDOW .. MY WIFE SURE THE F*&K DID BUY ANY OF THIS AS I'M SURE A LOT OF OUR WIVES DID NOT THEY ARE GENETICALLY HARD WIRED TO DETECT MALE BULL... I APOLOGIZE FOR BEING SO STUPID PUBLICALLY..SHOULD HAVE TRUSTED HER AND MY INSTINCTS LONG AGO
WE GOT WHAT WE BOUGHT INTO .
NEWS FLASH...
I just was informed that my rich, here to for un heard distant reletive, in get, this Nigeria was tragicaly run over by a train and than burried in an umarked grave and left 30 Billizion dollars in un marked securties or some such in a safe deposit box and I'm the only living heir.. What luck! all I need is say $500 each from coblais investors and i will split up the 30 Billizion equally and maybe even pay off the YA group , the guy with the 1.5 mil,, unsecured debt CS and MT and Carlos buy CZ a dispensory so he will have a real job.. and still have $ for the Russian deal..so thier noses won't be so runny.. What luck!
wow. I did not even know I had any relitives in Nigeria where ever that is....
..... ;) wink wink nod nod.. close/kidding we have had less than a snowballs chance for a very long time... fool and his money.. guilty .. sadder budwiser
I think this means that i'm not getting my private island in the virgin islands .. i thought we were so close..;).. .. Greed and stupidity is dangerous combo.
did something happen friday in courts/
Investment?
>? what about not trading, no audited fianacials, not selling product , 2,000,000 in legal fees... denial of BK 11 a judge that obovously not happy with Clsc et al.. qualifis this as an investment?
know?
not know?
it would take the hand of God to save this sinner....
I suggest prayer at this juction as a business plan.
I think it had to do with visually impared nude midgets...
wait no.
Blind naked shorting
yea that was it.
CS is probably in a position to just step in and resolve this and throw stockholders and YA and the board in the potty and has enough skin in the game to want to make the play... if he so wished.
IMO Chaz is not the guy we need fear .. chaz has stock like the rest of us.. actually.. its giant lien holders and creditors that are the companys danger here, not the president and his band of merry men.
If were my play I'd aquire the company for the "debt" offset and re emerge with the patents , distrubution and no newdebt or stock holders..[color=red][/color]
As Tina Turner once sang +_ 'Can do this nice or do this rough,"
well im glad the hub is still alive .. even if company is not ...got a pulse... best we can see. as Cas being in bed with YA think about it? based on preformance WDF would any one want to get in bed with him.. CS maybe.. but I'm not looking under that rock.. only chance I see is appeals court with a Judge who understands who the has the white hats and who has the Black ones.
YA does not come to the fight with clean hands IMO .. despite Judge opinions.. It's a wait and c still.
oh well.
wdf c
ANY BODY WANT TO BUY A COBALIS DUNCE CAP? 14.95 THANKS BOYS.. GOOD JOB ON FUVKING EVERYONE
It would been nice had they actually just spent some of their funds to actually get reporting legal and accountable without a gun held to their heads.. their reluctance to be forthright speaks volumes IMO..why be so secretive if your expenses and books are in some sort of order, it does not take a year to audit a company with virtually no income, not free trading, and 4 employees.. Give me a break guys.
This is ridicoulous, at best.
I guess you can't just ask management nice.. a cattle prod is in order.
thats sort of what i got as well... it stops secondary markettrading as well as primary.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (also called the Exchange Act, '34 Act, or Act of '34), 48 Stat. 881 (enacted June 6, 1934), codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., is a law governing the secondary trading of securities (stocks, bonds, and debentures) in the United States of America. It was a sweeping piece of legislation. The Act and related statutes form the basis of regulation of the financial markets and their participants in the United States. The 1934 Act also established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),[1] the agency primarily responsible for enforcement of United States federal securities law.
Companies raise billions of dollars by issuing securities in what is known as the primary market. Contrasted with the Securities Act of 1933, which regulates these original issues, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulates the secondary trading of those securities between persons often unrelated to the issuer, frequently through brokers or dealers. Trillions of dollars are made and lost each year through trading in the secondary market.
Contents [hide]
1 Securities exchanges
2 Securities associations
3 Self-regulatory organizations (SRO)
4 Other trading platforms
5 Issuers
6 Antifraud provisions
7 Exemptions from reporting because of national security
8 See also
9 References
10 External links
[edit] Securities exchangesOne area subject to 34 Act regulation is the actual securities exchange -- the physical place where people purchase and sell securities (stocks, bonds, notes of debenture). Some of the more well known exchanges include the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, and regional exchanges like the Cincinnati Stock Exchange, Philadelphia Stock Exchange and Pacific Stock Exchange. At those places, agents of the exchange, or specialists, act as middlemen for the competing interests to buy and sell securities. An important function of the specialist is to inject liquidity and price continuity into the market. Given that people come to the exchange to easily acquire securities or to easily dispose of a portfolio of securities, the specialist's role is important to the exchange.
[edit] Securities associationsThe '34 Act also regulates broker-dealers without a status for trading securities. A telecommunications infrastructure has developed to provide for trading without a physical location. Previously these brokers would find stock prices through newspaper printings and conduct trades verbally by telephone. Today, a digital information network connects these brokers. This system is called NASDAQ, standing for the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.
[edit] Self-regulatory organizations (SRO)In 1938 the Exchange Act was amended by the Maloney Act, which authorized the formation and registration of national securities associations, which would supervise the conduct of their members subject to the oversight of the SEC. That amendment led to the creation of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. - the NASD, which is a Self-Regulatory Organization (or SRO). The NASD had primary responsibility for oversight of brokers and brokerage firms, and later, the NASDAQ stock market. In 1996 the SEC criticized the NASD for putting its interests as the operator of Nasdaq ahead of its responsibilities as the regulator, and the organization was split in two, one entity regulating the brokers and firms, the other regulating the NASDAQ market. In 2007 the NASD merged with the NYSE (which had already taken over the AMEX) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) was created, which is now the only SRO.
still not sure ?
Revoked?
This probably is not that great any idea what this actually means? Im afraid I do not know wht the SEC act of 1934 says ...WDF ... DOES THIS MEAN TODAY.. I DON'T THINK IT MEANS WE WON THE PONY?
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ERROR 404: File Not Found
You are receiving this error message because your browser tried to reach a page or location that does not exist on this site.
You may have followed a link that contained a typographical error, or the material may have been moved or renamed. To find the page you wanted, try any of the following:
Main Menu (on Home page)
Site Search
Site Map
We regret any inconvenience, and we thank you for your interest in the SEC website.
not sure he has a choice at this juncture.. he did sign an affidavit . for at least a 1 year commitment .. may be about up now however.
Are they out of the BK or still under the 11 shield on the "plan"
Not sure a venue change is even possible undert the 11 , if I understand your comment either way unless they get enough funding to launch some serrious good pr and consumer awarness it will be a slow road.. I have been offered 144 stock at a .10? not sure how that makes any sence where as its free trading some how out there at .05 .. OH well as i say long road... maybe they will prevail with YA suit and David will actually slay Golieth.
That would cause a stir..
I wish them, well what else can I do at this point.
Go to CVS and buy some pills I suppose.
I UNDERSTAND B12 IS GOOD FOR ANXIETY AS WELL...MAYBE CLSC SHOULD DIVIDEN A YEARS SUPPLY OF PRODUCT FOR ALL STOCKHOLDERS THAT HEVE BEEN HERE FOR OVER 5 YEARS AND BOUGHT STOCK OVER .50.. TO CALM OUR NERVES.
WELL A RESPONCE FROM MM WAS NICE THE HORIFING PART IS THAT THEY ARE JUST NOW DOING THIER FIANACIALS.. I HAVE BEEN PREACHING HOW HARD IT IS GET BACK ON LINE ONCE YOU OFF TRADING.. AS STATED IN THE PAST I KNOW A GROUP IN THE PINKS WHOSE FIAS WERE SUBMITTED IN JAN AND ARE STILL NOT TRADING THATS AFTER THE ANSWERED THE 80 OR SO QUESTIONS NEEDED BY THE AUDITORS.. ITS BEEN 6 MO. IN SEC HANDS APPROVED IN CONCEPT..
THIS IS GOING TO BE A LONG HOT SUMMER... AND SPRING AND........
WHAT WERE THEY DOING ABOUT THIS BACK WHEN COURT ORDERD THEY GET THIER HOUSE IN ORDER.
NOT THAT GREAT..STILL.
OH I FORGOT THE RUSSIAN DEAL
Yea logic has not been thier strong point... not sure what thier strong suit is save persistance..
Actually lottery tickets would have been about the same odds with red or black its only 51% house ...
Yes an infusion of capitol above HS contribution for a real blitz campaign or even to prevail on a count or 2 of the YA suit would probably turn the tide. As much as I'm sure he does not want to be the sole sugar daddy.... CLSC.... has apparently is not raising an excess of extra funds to match or raise his comfort level to the point where he's willing to 2x down and fund a serious media campaign.. this is speculation on my part not facts If I were his position I'd take the reins install my own team finish the FIAs file and start a real media blitz and see pass or fail..Maybe he's waiting for some court milestone? He's in pretty deep seems the way out for him is through not waiting for CLSC core to match or some how fill in the shortages , there is just not enough momentum or investor confidence to raise the needed shot in the arm to take this home.
THIS IS ALL IMO
SPOKE TO 2 GUYS LAST FEW DAYS BOTH IN "THE KNOW."
A
THERE ARE "SALES AND COURT AND audited FIA ARE "MOVING AHEAD" THERE WAS A "LOT OF HISTORY" many quarters and is expencive.
Q?
I ASKED IN TEXT FORM WHY WAS "NO NEWS" AND WAS REPLIED
A
"WHY HAVE NEWS IF NOT TRADING ANWAY...?" +_
AQ
I TX BACK BECAUSE "STOCK HOLDERS WOULD LIKE TO KNOW SOME GOOD NEWS ANYWAY AFTER ALL ARE WE NOT PART OWNERS?"
A...
"no reply"... . ...............as of yet.
what could be worse? no body has drowned yet...!
NOT A BAD IDEA.... IF HE HAS NOT KEEP DECENT BOOKS FOR LAST 10 YRS WOULD EXPLAIN WHY NO ACCOUNTING/ ACCOUNTABILITY.... THAT IS PROBABLY NOT ALL THAT LEGAL.. BRING SOME PRESSURE TO BARE......
I GROW WEARY AS WELL...
THEY NEED TO ANSWER UP OR ADVISE WHY NOT.
A smart friend once told me to (watch the tape) re health of a company......... need I say more.... flat line and no news speaks volumes.. sorry I bought the story in the first place ... I have a wall of shame of IPO great ideas stock certs.. always room for one more... watch the tape and the news oh yea is not any...
wdf clsc?
Price dropping is fine with me as well... not sure about effectiveness one way or anotherI took it for a time 1/2 year +_ and jury still out.. I'm back on benidril.... instant results for me... B12 is wonderfull for a lot of ills no doubt and if one has to take it everyday seems like a 19.95 or less point of sale would be better , I'd like to se under $10 personally once we/they get going cost of manufacture will probably be under .$1.00
Greed kills... it's about volume at this juncture not profits.. id rather see them sell 1 million boxs at cost+ .05 cents than 100 with 1000% mark up.. it's customers (hooked on B12)with results we need . not the one or 2 box profits.
Advertizing , free trading 3 for one deals etc.. promote promote promote sell sell sell.... profits will come with volume and reconition and repeat customers ..IMO for my .02 cents as well ..
hey with .o2 cents I could probably buy a share of stock!
OHHH SIGHHHHHH....JOKE UM IF THEY CAN'T TAKE A ..............
shhhhhhhhh........wait............I thought I heard some thing......nope ................no volume...
everyones speechless.. where's Pollyanna? the gay investor? or Doom and Gloom the non stock owner antagonist...? have we finally slipeed into investor apathy... alas....say it isnt true...
6mo? try 6 years
WELL DOCTOR LOOKING AT THE CHART THE PATIENT APPEARS TO BE FLAT LINING..ANY ONE CARE TO CALL IT? DOCTOR .....DOCTOR....NURSE?
THE TOE TAG SAYS D.N.R.
TV CAMPAIGN... I ACTUALLY OWN A TV AND HAVE YET TO SEE ONE ADD EXACTL WHERE WOULD ONE SEE SUCH AN ADD. 3 AM? CHANNEL 172?
BTW... UNOFICIAL.... appearently as the day in court progressed ClSC did actually prevail on some important points ( THEY REALLY ONLY NEED ONE GOOD CAUSE) .... this was from a actual horse's mouth that was there...I'd like to see the written proof .. but if what i was told was the case the tide has turned against YA... I await a written conformation.. the excerpts I cut and pasted were prelimanary findings... more to follow..
might as well hope for the best we all been geared up for the worst for a time.
I'm cautiously optimistic on what I heard , he who knows how to access additional findings please do your stuff..
Lido
This points to the (motion) however not that clear seems , judge, is not happy with Clsc position however seems he is leaving door ajar?
It's too convoluted for me to follow.. mostly looks like denials of CLSC pleadings .. but still not convinced.
Help?
Tentative for 5/26/11:
This is YAGI’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions. The argument essentially is that this latest
iteration of the Amended complaint is so similar to the last version as to represent a
frivolous waste of the court’s and parties’ time. Also, it does not appear to have been
opposed. Nevertheless, the court is not persuaded that sanctions are appropriate. While
the court ultimately agrees that the debtor has not managed to allege enough different Cobalis Corporation Chapter 11
here as to make something stick, at least some of the arguments are recast artfully
enough, and the points and authorities skillful enough, to persuade the court that this was
not in obvious bad faith.
Deny.
Im no attorney however i do not see any victories here?
2nd opinions wellcome..
IV. Conclusion
The motion will be granted as to all claims. The question is whether it should be without leave
to further amend. The debtor has now had four opportunities to get it right and we do not seem any
closer to anything upon which a claim might be stated. As to some of the claims the court is ready
to conclude that further leave to amend is pointless and not warranted, such as the RICO, 10(b)-5
claim and the Section 17 theories. The same can be said as to theories which are merely derivative
of these, or rely upon an argument that the damages arising from an involuntary petition is not
pre-empted such as the Unfair Business Practices theory, or Interference With Prospective
Advantage, etc. The court is less convinced as to the breach of contract theories, and so will
consider argument.insert-text-here
HOW KNOW HOW? Court news ? I hope you are correct.