Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
kind of like, you can't PR about acquiring a company (completed), and then not have actually done it?
yeah, makes more sense than penson = zecco
right right, more accurate
penson is zecco...when i moves funds from my brokerage to my bank, it shows as "penson"
and some of us know when the gig is up...how are these new shares working out for ya?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=56250370
come on man, get over it already
now look at that....i knew there was something that wasn't quite right
even if it is a line of credit, that isn't a "windfall" so of course, more b/s from EIGH and crew
i'm not totally familiar with that situation, but after a quick skim of some PRs, that isn't exactly the way things happened, and the "misprint" was about claiming the A/S was being reduced when they meant the O/S
looks like a scammy company in it's own right, but not the same
you claim they said there would be a divi, and then said that was a misprint...again...that isn't what i see after a few minutes of reading PRs
agreed...and considering the $40MM is something like 10X their Q3 bottom line (from memory, so don't shoot me if I am off a little) it raises eyebrows
but they will be answering these questions, so just a matter of time
ahh, thought u meant where it was mentioned..
yeah, what the origin of the actually windfall...your guess is as good as mine
i think many claim is doesn't exist (my personal opinion) since it was PRed in Sept. but left out of the Q3 report
also, no source for the windfall was ever given...zero, just the claim they had a windfall..from where...which "acquisition"..nothing, no info
1. suspension != halt
2. claiming you will pay a divi due to a $40 million windfall only to wait several weeks and finally PR you aren't the day before it is due is not a typo, or "misprint"
well, imo, an "agreement" between "Monk" and CDIV, no matter what it is, is highly suspicious, being that it is one of his "FLDs" that he pumped/supported so strongly several months ago.
it would be the third of the 4 that he has been shown to have some kind of vested interest in, besides being a regular retail investor
don't know about the authenticity of that one, but no, JW has used "Jerry" on legal docs before (see: the "Monk's Den" incorporation doc)
wrong, they won't suspend a stock based on complaints...period
they may look into a stock based on complaints, but not suspend it...if they suspend, they see inaccuracies of some kind
lol, i wonder how many don't get the point of your comment, but i thought that was funny too
yeah i just noticed
maybe not today, but no rush
well, neither you, i, or anyone else that doesn't work for the SEC knows what they are and are not investigating. you can say they haven't suspended CDIV, but you cannot say they are not investigating it (and you can't say they are, for that matter).
it is reasonable to assume they have/hed their eyes on CDIV due to it's affiliation with monk's den, but we won't ever know any details unless they decide to pursue some type of action.
i'll miss the morning, but hope to see this that a shot at some resistance today
you won't get that nice tax write off, but hey, maybe you can use them as a conversation starter
wow, lost another asst. mod
great, ty for the reply
not talking about share structure, the squeeze sticky...it was there for months, now you drop it the same day of the E suspension....why, it isn't relevant anymore?
hey, is this still a FLD? where is the SS chart at the top/sticky? sure looks empty up there
true, if there is one thing about the SEC, it's they are very tight-lipped
ty, looks good....
no, they don't, they don't interrupt a public companies trading because the receive complaints
SEC doesn't suspend a stock because people complain
They may look into a stock because people complain, then
if they don't like what they see they will suspend it
lets not be naive
of course...the SEC doesn't suspend stock on a whim to check things out. they have already found enough that they feel a suspension is needed.
anyone with any gray matter can understand that they can do basic investigation before suspending a stock, and that they don't like to suspend stocks (for many reasons).
i think things are a lot simpler than most would believe too:
1. 40 million windfall
2. will be used to pay a divi
3. opps no divi
4. hmm, no 40 million on the financial report (although the windfall was PRed in sept)
so, if there is no $40 million, there is fraud (PRing you will pay a divi with money you don't have)
as far as the MOnk's Den stuff, well that i have no idea...that will be the messy part due to his past as a paid promoter and the time-line of events/relationships with companies he was pushing...so no idea what will happen with that
for crying out loud, they can't even get the law suit threat correct
libel is written, slander is spoken
what happened to the cover? was yesterday showing cover on your L3?
google is your friend
because their leader and his shills tell them so
last time this made it move it pushed for the .30s, so if if continues to get volume, i would hope to see it move back to that area
should move fairly easily too, imo
could be a sleeper, that is for sure
Hmmm, some action over here
This was applicable yesterday, but not today?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47180502