Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
gee that's really helped this stock over the last years...ROFLMAO.......
LOL and 'it should be at $12' isn't ridiculous........
c'mon entertain me - tell me it really should be there
it's been dropping like a stone since 11am
Yup. This stock has ALWAYS disappointed. Just a question of when the morning gap is closed
The pump didn't even last 5 minutes today.
I wonder if it will take another 2 years before it reaches $3 again?
pump n dump. Did the same thing ~2 years ago, which was the last time it made it back to $3. Same thing as then - all predictions of the big run-up. Of course nothing happened back then and it quickly dropped back to $1.
Watch as history repeats itself again.
well OF COURSE it's a scam. The trick is to not be the last one to the party. You really think anybody seriously thinks this is a real company worth investing in???
2 weeks according to the lawyer letter that was posted. Sure one can play the game for several days, but it's a shame the usual pumpers on the the ATRN board are back in full with the ususal nonsense that this stock is going to rocket to 0.35 and above with diltuion just several business days away.
with huge dilution coming???
Well technically the bottom would be zero, as is the case for companies in the bankruptcy process.
Wasn't that news available Monday morning, and the stock didn't start jumping until late afternoon the following Friday.
If it was ngoing to jump beacuse of the news than why the delay?
Nice to see any type of run for those that held on, but given the amount of talent that left the company and the crooks in management left, I can't see this stock running based on business prospects.
Maybe it's all speculation based on the hearing, but that was Monday and this stock didn't jump until late yesterday -who knows.....
If you believe that it's the fault of the 'naked shorts' then let me sell you:
The Brooklyn Bridge
Swampland in Nebraska
Advertising space on the flag on the Moon
The book explaining Who Really shot JFK
You'd have to be a fool to think their people, the 'real' ones, bought at the top. All the rest that thought they were getting a pickwere cannon fodder.
Not if they're delivered under Rule 144.
In that case you're holding them for 6 months.
<If You Own 30,000...This Means You Will Have 60,000 Come Monday
Yeah but when the certificates for those new shares are delivered, they'll prob be stamped with Rule 144 - meaning they can't be sold for 6 months.
Yup - rule 144 will prevent shares from being sold for 6 months - and the stock will be worthless long before then.
Will you be able to sell those extra shares before 6 months?
Not that I personally think any lawsuit for amount to anything - But I'd figure any lawyer who'd take the case would want to turn it into a class action suit. In that case anyone who has a loss would get automatically included in it. Unless DPS is paying the lawyer himself, he wouldn't get to tell the lawyer whom to include.
yes, regardless of the situation short term trades can always be profitable. Good luck.
I said a poster of Dr P's site claimed to have a PACER account and posted the following from the docs he read there (and others also posted the same info). You'd have to got here and ask him that question. That info you're asking was not specified in the post I referenced.
the following came from a poster on Dr P's board on the issue of shares after the new company takes effect:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This may be my first or second post but I've been on this site for a while. In ATRN at .11 and holding. I made a PACER account this morning and am taking a look at the documents, but I'm at work so I'm getting through it very slowly. I found this in the Terms Sheet which mentions Common Stock in the company. Maybe some of you guys can translate it out of lawyer talk. I also had to retype it all out since it's just a photocopy so copy/paste was a no go.
Class 3. Common Stock in the Company...
Each Class Interest shall be impaired
In full and final satisfaction of all Class 3 Interests, each holder of a Class 3 Interest in full and final satisfaction of such allowed interest shall or retain its previously held shares of common stock of the Company which shall remain outstanding under the Reorganized Debtor which shall equal a pro rate share of 0 to 10% of newly issued common stock of the Reorganized Debtor.
I feel sorry for anyone who mistook the legion of posts porpurting scenarios that were never based on anything but the desire to see one's bank account grow - none of them were ever 'facts'. As evidenced by the post I originally responded to. Hopefully some learned a lesson from all this. And I never once said 'I told you so'
I think it's time you realize the train just ran everyone over.
No Facebook connection
No Google connection
No Media Whiz connection
No Microsoft connection
They weren't bought out over a year ago
The dark period didn't mean they were being bought out in 10 days
They don't have killer management
The debt wasn't all paid off
etc
etc
etc
Pretty much every piece of 'DD' twisting reality to imagine some pie in the sky fate for ATRN was fantasy fueled by being the sole reason of being long the stock.
But what is he fails in his attempts to turn the company around?
Nah, I got the point. It honestly just wasn't that funny. I expect better of you, you know....
Well I can't see paying good money for some of the wild conspiracy & crazy pie in the sky stuff posted here either.
Possible, but not hiring him could have an even worse impact on the company depending on the state they're in - they may not have had a real choice. Coming out of the dark takes money too.
What does that have to do with the original question of coming out of the dark?
Uh, because they hired him as a last ditch effort to turn things around - and coming out of the dark would be an extra expense that wouldn't have an impact on turning things around?
Why would they come out of the dark?
They went info the stated purpose of saving money. The fact that they have to hire a CRO is a pretty good indication that money is still a major problem.
You could ask ATRN to put out a PR on it ... lol ...
I'd say don't get yourself wound up anticipating a PR release for that.
Old financials are meaningless. if you think what they did in the past is indicitive to what they are doing now - info they refuse to release - then that's a mistake on your part.
<and
we are still operating with $30M+++ Revenues, I will
continue to concetrate on that.
Old financials are meaningless.
ATRN never said they are in a buyout. They said a poss one was terminated ; they never said there's any current buyout negotiations going on. and you're pumping a buyout is in process. This is really quite simple. But that's ok - this board has pumped buyouts in progress and attacking anything to suggest otherwise since they went 1st went dark (Buyout in 10 days; google; facebook ; media whiz connections; heck there once was a stickied post that announced ATRN was bought out a year ago)
There was no buyout announced on Friday.
Your opinion is that a PR that didn't state they were bought out actually means that they were bought out ... just sayin ....
LOL yea you're right there........
Well there used to be a stickied post that ATRN was bought out a year ago.
Then they were bought out when they 1st went dark
Then they were bought out 10 days after going dark
Then Facebook or Google was buying them out.
Throughout all that the market never was able to figure it out given the lack of buying volume that has brough the PPS to where it is. They obviously haven't figured out this revelation either.