Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Meltdown in Washington: President Obama Reported Sedated Following Emotional Breakdown
http://nationalreport.net/meltdown-washington-president-obama-reported-sedated-following-emotional-breakdown/
Obama has had a nervous breakdown and he does not know it
http://www.thenixonallianceunderground.com/obama-has-had-a-nervous-breakdown-and-he-does-not-know-it/
Who do people think the US is arming in Syria? A nation of dependent idiots.
Nation of sheeple systematically brainwashed and made dependent by the psychopath evil in power. Can only hope the truckers, intent on shutting down DC, will have more backbone. If every one of those parents had risen up and said, "These are our children, and you will NOT bully us around," the result would have been different for that poor man. And if that "security officer" began to manhandle a parent, the PEOPLE should have NOT allowed it. SHAMEFUL. The gov't, all the way down to these obviously overfed turds at the local school level work FOR the people. They are NOT in charge of the people. But the sheeple are willing to exchange their very freedom for an EBT card, it seems.
Understood, but I hope you do also understand that this event accomplished many things the NWO have been trying to kickoff unsuccessfully for many years -- DHS, dozens of unconstitutional Executive Orders, NDAA, and on and on. So, I hope you can see there is, at least on paper, a very good reason for the event and a very high correlation to their eventual goals, especially within the USA.
You see, that's where you are simply wrong. You are an optimist. I'll give you that. And you are correct that the event inspired some of the best to come out of true Americans who rose to the occasion to help their fellow man. Crises usually do, and if that is all you want to see, then a good crisis never goes to waste on the masses.
But, what you are most fooled on is the reality and the cause of the situation. You can choose to focus on the REACTION by patriots, which is a noble, and probably a mentally healthier thing to do. Taking the colored pill that opens your eyes to the REALITY is, I'll admit, a very bitter pill to swallow. And you, and the rest of the sheeple, may indeed be correct with the proverbial questions, "Even if you are correct that the banksters control the gov'ts and are psychopaths, what can we the people possibly do? Why waste our time and disrupt our lives, when for 90% of us, we can simply live our lives to their conclusions, and this higher level stuff will never touch us anyway?"
That has been true for most, except those drafted, or fooled into volunteering for many of these psychopaths' wars. Or those who actually made it to the halls of these monsters, and decided it was not moral, so they left or spoke out. Their families have been forever changed, but if they only focus on the REACTION and not the REALITY, then, by your standards, perhaps they even came out stronger and more positive people believing the lies.
Some do happen to believe, after actually digging deep into the facts that seem to trouble you, and most people, to the point of ignoring them, that society is getting close to a time when their lies will catch up and implode. The greed, power, and sociopath behavior will result in a debt crisis, war, civil strife, a totalitarian regime, and the disillusionment of millions. Many will understand what is happening. Most will not have a clue, because they have happily buried their heads in the sand for too long.
It's a simple choice. As I said, perhaps your way is better, as you get to wander aimlessly around "believing the dream." Millions can cling to advertising manipulation like "hope and change" and meaningless words uttered from the most evil among us -- "God bless America."
Taking the other colored pill takes a different kind of person, and there are not many left. You rejoice in that fact, and others weep. It's all perspective, is it not?
Some would rather think their father died a hero in service for his country and celebrate his life, where others would rather know the truth and die trying to right the evil that manipulated and took it. The first path is certainly the easy one. May you continue to be blissfully ignorant and happy . . . until you are not. Some very astute minds believe that day is fast approaching.
I understand, but it's sad that so many millions will, at some point, be crying "Et tu, Brute?" to their own gov't. The disillusionment will be staggering.
You are speaking to a group that refuses to even consider information that would invalidate the patriotism ingrained in them from little up. They fear their head would explode. It would be tantamount to showing a muslim irrefutable evidence that Mohammed was a gay sociopath who kept hundreds of elementary boy children locked up, and he sexually abused them for his jollies for most of his life. They just could not allow their minds to go there. I'm not saying this is the case, but simply pointing out why so many Americans just cannot even consider what the evidence points toward.
One last thought, if you are willing to take a few minutes:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/
You can click all the links on the left side of the page, but I'll just give you one small part of one link:
So, lets go to the 9/11 Commission report.
"At 9:29, the autopilot on American 77 was disengaged; the aircraft was at 7,000 feet and approximately 38 miles west of the Pentagon.59 ....
At 9:34, Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport advised the Secret Service of an unknown aircraft heading in the direction of the White House. American 77 was then 5 miles west-southwest of the Pentagon and began a 330-degree turn. At the end of the turn, it was descending through 2,200 feet, pointed toward the Pentagon and downtown Washington. The hijacker pilot then advanced the throttles to maximum power and dove toward the Pentagon.60...
At 9:37:46, American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, traveling at approximately 530 miles per hour.61 All on board, as well as many civilian and military personnel in the building, were killed."
Ok, now we're getting somewhere. The footnote "59, 60, 61" refers to The Flight Path Study of American 77 provided by the NTSB, which no one can find. One person claims to have called the NTSB and the NTSB says they havent done any reports/analysis for any of the aircraft of Sept 11. NTSB phone in DC (202)-314-6000. I tried, but i hit brick walls. Update: 8/11/06 NTSB Flight Path Study released.
So, lets go on what we have. The last known altitude reported for AA77 was 7000 feet. And travelled 33 miles in 5 minutes. Thats 6.6 miles per minute or 396 knots (Update: FDR data shows 325 knots average airspeed. 9/11 Commission Report is inaccurate). Then the aircraft began a 330 degree spiraling dive, leveling at 2200 feet to accelerate to the Pentagon while continuing descent. He started the maneuver at 7000 feet, 396 knots, dove almost 5000 feet within a 330 degree turn and covered 5 miles in about 3 minutes. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the final impact speed was 530 mph. Update: FDR is now available and the 9/11 report is inaccurate in terms of impact speed.
So lets take an avg speed throughout the dive of 430 knots (7 miles/min). We know a standard rate turn is 2 mins for 360 degrees. So lets say he completed the turn in just under 2 minutes. Since we dont know bank angles or speed. That means he was descending at better than 2500 fpm dropping almost 5000 feet only gaining 30 knots. No problem for guys like you and me, but for Hani? We'll get to him later...
Once this maneuver was completed, without going into a graveyard spiral, he started to pull out of the descent at 2200 feet and accelerated only 30 knots more at full power to 460 knots in a descent from 2200 feet to the pentagon in about a minute (Whats Vmo at sea level for a 757? Flap speed? Since it looks like he may have found the flap handle only accelerating 60 knots from 7000 feet, the from 2200 feet at full power). AA77 crossed the highways, knocking down light poles, entered ground effect, didnt touch the lawn and got a 44 foot high target (Tail height of 757) into a 77 foot target completely, without overshooting or bouncing off the lawn, or spreading any wreckage at 460 knots. With a 33 foot margin for error. Wow, impressive. Takes a real steady hand to pull that off. I know it would take me a few tries to get it so precise, especially entering ground effect at those speeds. Any slight movement will put you off 50 feet very quickly. Im sure we all would agree.
So, who pulled off this stunt?
Hani Hanjour. Reported to have 600TT and a Commercial Certificate (see quotes right margin). Hani tried to get checked out in a 172 a few weeks prior at Freeway Airport in MD. Two seperate CFI's took Hani up to check him out. Baxter and Conner found that Hani had trouble controlling and landing a 172 at 65 knots. Bernard, the Chief CFI, refused to rent him the 172. I have instructed many years. I have soloed students in 172's when i had 300 hours as a CFI. How anyone could not control a 172 at 600TT and a Commercial is beyond me. Flight Schools keep going till you "get it" if you are a bit rusty, and then rent you the plane. They are in business to make money after all. .right? The Chief CFI basically refused any further lessons and basically told him to get lost. All this can be confirmed through google searches.
Later, a week after Sept 11. Bernard, the Chief CFI, made a statement saying, "although Hani was rejected to rent a 172, i have no doubt he could have hit the pentagon." What?? Bernard, who didnt even fly with Hani, doesnt know the maneuver involved, where the plane hit, the speeds, etc etc.. says he has no doubts that he could hit the pentagon? Sure, my grandma could hit the pentagon. How about looking into the maneuver before making that statement? He made that statement while the pentagon was still smoking for petes sake. A bit of monday morning quarterbacking if you ask me. A common theme among inexperienced pilots. This also can be verified via google searches.
So, to sum up. Hani Hanjour, took a 757, with zero time in type, did the maneuver described above, a 400 knot 330 degree sprialing dive at 2500 fpm, only gaining 30 knots, then 30 knots more descending from 2200 feet at full power, with a very steady hand as to not overshoot or hit the lawn, inside ground effect, at 460 knots impact speed, but was refused to rent a 172 cause he couldnt land it at 65 knots? C'mon... sounds like a bad B movie... Please see right margin for more testimony regarding Hani and his training.
My conclusion is, the manever looks possible, for guys like me and you. But for Hani? unlikely. He either got REALLY lucky, or someone/something else was flying that plane. Sure wish we had clear video of a 757 hitting the pentagon to silence all these "Conspiracy theorists". They want us to believe the pentagon is only covered by a parking gate camera? C'mon...
For anyone wanting to do further research on the subject. Almost all the circumstances surrounding 9/11 have similar scenarios. Hell, they didnt even match up the parts found at each site to their airframes via maintainence logs. There is an article out there that states all the parts were returned to United two weeks after Sept 11. Why... so they could refurbish them to put in their parts dept? This is evidence from a crime scene. You dont give it back to the airline. They claim insurance and its over with.
.
.
.
.
Then, since you are not a "conspiracy loon," I'm sure you believe the official story for the war in Afghanistan, rather than this (an estimated $500 BILLION drug trade reestablished and levels raised higher than ever and firmly under whose control????)
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/afghanistan/drug_trafficking/index.html
.
.
.
.
Or this, in case you are a really "hip" kind of non-conspiracy loon:
Obviously, not worth the time to drag all the theories out again, but, as I said, when you take the list of the 10 or so highly-improbable things that would have had to occur for that event to have gone down like the "official" version, the odds are beyond those of the lottery. IMO, anyone thinking so either has a below average IQ, is so patriotic that they simply cannot fathom the alternatives (I know many of these people), or knows in their heart the truth about the corruption at the highest levels, but simply accepts that as a way of life. That event did not spawn the kickoff toward the destruction of the Constitution (that began long ago) and an eventual dictatorship, but it certainly accomplished the first 3-4 first downs in rapid succession to reignite the drive and give it the push for its eventual, successful touchdown against the American people and all of humanity. To think differently is most naive.
If I am reading this correctly (see link below), it is claiming a few missiles have already been fired and shot down, along with a potential plane, yet the MSM is not reporting this. The one thing I do agree with, is this part of one of the responses as to what will be the most likely initial result if missiles are fired at Syria, because they are smart enough to do what will cause the most harm, with the least amount of international wrath:
"I tend to think they may shoot down incoming missiles and aircraft, and will not fire on US vessels - they may instead opt to attack oil related targets in Saudi, Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq and so on in retaliation.
These kind of targets will do more serious damage to the US economically, but the US public reaction to oil refineries being destroyed in Saudi will be of a completely different magnitude than hearing that a US carrier has been sunk."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread968551/pg1
Regardless, does anyone believe that Syria, as Barry said in his speech, basically could do nothing to protect itself or retaliate? I suppose the sheeple who believe that a guy with 3 months instruction in a single-engine plane could fly a jumbo jet with precision that most professional pilots claim they could never accomplish will believe anything that comes from DC and the MSM.
If I am reading this correctly (see link below), it is claiming a few missiles have already been fired and shot down, along with a potential plane, yet the MSM is not reporting this. The one thing I do agree with, is this part of one of the responses as to what will be the most likely initial result if missiles are fired at Syria, because they are smart enough to do what will cause the most harm, with the least amount of international wrath:
"I tend to think they may shoot down incoming missiles and aircraft, and will not fire on US vessels - they may instead opt to attack oil related targets in Saudi, Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq and so on in retaliation.
These kind of targets will do more serious damage to the US economically, but the US public reaction to oil refineries being destroyed in Saudi will be of a completely different magnitude than hearing that a US carrier has been sunk."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread968551/pg1
Regardless, does anyone believe that Syria, as Barry said in his speech, basically could do nothing to protect itself or retaliate? I suppose the sheeple who believe that a guy with 3 months instruction in a single-engine plane could fly a jumbo jet with precision that most professional pilots claim they could never accomplish will believe anything that comes from DC and the MSM.
If I am reading this correctly (see link below), it is claiming a few missiles have already been fired and shot down, along with a potential plane, yet the MSM is not reporting this. The one thing I do agree with, is this part of one of the responses as to what will be the most likely initial result if missiles are fired at Syria, because they are smart enough to do what will cause the most harm, with the least amount of international wrath:
"I tend to think they may shoot down incoming missiles and aircraft, and will not fire on US vessels - they may instead opt to attack oil related targets in Saudi, Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq and so on in retaliation.
These kind of targets will do more serious damage to the US economically, but the US public reaction to oil refineries being destroyed in Saudi will be of a completely different magnitude than hearing that a US carrier has been sunk."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread968551/pg1
Regardless, does anyone believe that Syria, as Barry said in his speech, basically could do nothing to protect itself or retaliate? I suppose the sheeple who believe that a guy with 3 months instruction in a single-engine plane could fly a jumbo jet with precision that most professional pilots claim they could never accomplish will believe anything that comes from DC and the MSM.
Oh, come now. Syria is at peace due to the brilliant chess game played by our Mensa commander, there is no poverty, health care is on its way to being totally cured by OBC, unemployment is only for those few who no one really cares about, corporations are booming, and all those pesky debt problems are easily correctable by Ben's special monopoly printing press. Stop worrying! What in the world could possibly go wrong now? Happy days, my friend. Dow 40,000! Sell your worthless gold, and buy a few more cars!
The progressives now in eternity. That whole, "what is sin for me may not be for you" crap has been around a long time. It's the easy way to eliminate any moral absolutes of right and wrong.
They all can say whatever they want, and whatever makes them feel comfortable, but God minced no words when He said the ONLY way to Heaven was through Jesus and asking forgiveness of sins and accepting His sacrifice. So simple, yet so difficult for those with pride in their heart to believe. Sad.