Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
At 5% commission, these $11.1MM in closings should yield $550,000 to HCPC. If they use 35% of that for share buyback they can take 1,925,000,000 shares out of circulation at .0001. Let's see what happens.
Just my opinion.
Here is an excerpt from yesterday's PR mentioning the 50-60 barrels:
"We have been working aggressively to increase our net production to an anticipated 50-60 barrels a day by the fourth quarter. I will also be in Kansas next week to witness our second well come online as well as work to close on an additional lease."
To me it sounds like their goal for total production in the 4th Q is 50-60 a day.
Just my opinion.
Do you feel that it is moot in that by forcing the parties to submit a new docket control number in the next ten days the pending Motion for Summary Judgment is stricken from the docket? I would like to embrace that assumption, but do not know enough about the fine art of litigation to do so.
Isn't a big part of today's sell-off a matter of people doing the math in regards to the 50-60 barrels a day at $100 per barrel for 365 days and figuring out that they still have no idea what the stock should really be worth since there is no O/S disclosure to finish the PE formula?
I was ready to hit sell on the PR yesterday too when I figured gross was $1.8MM. Doesn't seem like much money, but hopefully the O/S isn't 1B, and the production will continue to grow. Gonna hold my shares and let the dust settle until share structure is revealed. May even double-down again if it drifts any lower. It's only money.
Just my opinion.
Since it appears that Plaintiffs' Motion for Continuance of Pending Motions for Summary Judgment was denied by this most recent order, wouldn't that mean that the hearing for Summary Judgment will still takes place on Monday, and that Plaintiffs' winning that hearing is critical and supercedes the issue of re-opening discovery at this time?
Just my opinion, do your own due diligence.
Doubled down today. Hopefully new IR coming on board next week will help make this a multi-bagger. Otherwise, oh well...it's only money...too cold to go to the casino today anyways...
Thank you, that makes sense.
Mirror trades question. I added to my position with a buy for 108,000 at .0032 at 10:32:00 this morning. L2 shows simultaneous trade at .0028. I've heard mention of mirror trades before, but what do they actually mean? I buy from an MM at one price and he buys from someone else at lower price simultaneously?...Huh? Where do the shares come from? What is the logic here? Is this an attempt to move price in one direction? Thanks in advance.
Don't think this case is contingency based. Why would JPM be reimbursing MOSH for legal fees in settlement agreement if said fees weren't hourly rather than contingent.
Just my opinion.
Thank you for the post. DVAR claims it will be cash flow positive 3rd quarter of '08. Also states that 2/1/08 is expected release date of new software. DVAR info looks encouraging going forward, but definitely not as positive as most here hoped at present. Gonna hold and see how it plays out.
Just my opinion.
SEC filing today shows Michael Lee purchased another 1/2 million shares of ALRX at .162 on January 15, 2008.
That seems like a lot of activity on his part in recent months. Anyone think something is imminent any day now?
Lantis and LNGT finalize joint venture:
http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/080115/134294.html
The Plaintiffs' counsel.
I did a small buy at the end for a 150K at .0012.
Etrade shows the following in my order execution:
Transaction Status Order Description Date & Time Quantity Price
Executed Commission
/Fee
Order Placed - RVGD Buy 150,000 RVGD Limit Day 01/11/2008 3:55:30 PM ET 150,000 -- 12.99
Executed - RVGD Buy 150,000 RVGD Limit Day 01/11/2008 3:56:44 PM ET 150,000 0.0012 12.99
Reversal - RVGD Buy 150,000 RVGD Limit Day 01/11/2008 3:57:05 PM ET 150,000 -- 0
Executed - RVGD Buy 150,000 RVGD Limit Day 01/11/2008 3:57:15 PM ET 150,000 0.0011 12.99
To me it looks like my .0012 fill was intentionally reversed by MM and then refilled at .0011. Is this manipulation?
The 504 filing appears to be for a private placement only. It clearly states that "non-accredited" investors are excluded and that minimum investment is $10,000. Don't see how this particular filing could possibly be related to any claims of dilution we might be seeing in the public market.
Just my opinion.
If I may interject for a second, it does appear that the April 16, 2007, press release from COHG is in fact verbatim to the November 4, 2007, Eric David newsletter concerning ONMC. Specifically, the mention of the "four days negotiating" and "closing the contract this week."
Would someone be so kind as to clarify why these PR's which are spaced seven months apart are identical. I am aware of the disclosed incident regarding alledged misdealings on the part of COHG towards Aquagold, but it still doesn't explain why Eric David's newsletter is promoting ONMC by quoting COHG's old release, nor does it lend itself to instilling confidence in whether the entire thing is simply a charade and a contract is "closing this week".
I am long, but now wary and confused as to whether everything from the start of the COHG PR's through now isn't simply some form of double or triple-blind ruse.
Disclaimer:
All of the above is my opinion and not intended as a buy or sell recommendation in any stock.
My dentist friend believes that a $20,000 price point for this device would be appealing enough for at least a 5% penetration in existing practices, specifically those that are modern and technology oriented (which would be in line with what Lantis is projecting). The ability to have the image available real-time by the side of the chair could help the dentist sell more expensive treatment plans since it should be easier to show the patient exactly why the dentist is recommending a certain course of action.
In "scratch start" practices, where all the equipment needs to be purchased to outfit a new office, the OCT should have significantly higher penetration since it would not be too much more expensive choosing a new OCT device at $20K over a new X-ray machine at about $12K+ when you are already spending about $200K or more for a typical four chair buildout.
To me the questions regarding the feasibility of Lantis as a good investment involve learning:
1. whether the company can hit that price point once the units come to market;
2. whether the units can be produced and distributed at a cost that still leaves a reasonable profit margin, especially after royalty or licensing payments are made back to the original patent holder of the OCT technology;
3. whether the possibility exists for another technology or a "knock-off" to cut into the market at a lower price point for similar performance.
P.S. - I am also long LNGT from about the time the JV with Lantis was announced, but am much less confident about that investment and feel it's an even more speculative play.
Disclaimer:
Everything expressed herein is my own personal opinion and is not intended as a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.
Link to a summary post at Agoracom that has some interesting tidbits about Lantis Laser not found in iBox. Thought this might spark some fresh discussions. I'm long since November after having been directed to this stock by a dentist friend who in turn heard from his dentist friend...etc.
http://www.agoracom.com/ir/lantislaser/messages/678583#message
Honda chose Greensburg, Indiana for new assembly plant back in June of '06, about 2 1/2 hours from Decatur. Planned for fall '08 opening. Not sure if this has been mentioned, but may have some material relevance to RVGD future.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/29/business/honda.php
The following link mentions the "strong gas flows" at the Midway well on page 2:
http://www.pex.com.au/pexnews/previous_issues/pexnews0305.pdf
"Woodside directs more focus on non-core areas:
Woodside reports strong gas flows from the OCS-G 4559-5 well (Midway prospect), which resulted in a choke-constrained flow rates of 10MMcfd during a 17 hour test in the Gulf of Mexico’s Brazos Area block A 39. The shallow water well was drilled to an impressive TD of 6247m and is 50-50 owned by Woodside and Pioneer, with Pioneer operating. The well was spudded Sep 5 2003 and later completed for testing."