Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"I didn't post it"
And I wasn't responding to you.
George, your post implied that you had gotten information that the filings were going to be uploaded. Why would you not want that information to get attention? That is why you posted it isn't it?
If you feel a post might lead to future embarrassment then perhaps you should think twice about posting it in the first place.
If you ask me nicely to remove the sticky post I will do so.
"I looked at their website and wonder why the kit includes "sacks", if the product is flushable."
They aren't for the pads. The site clearly states what the sacks are for.
You mean you don't believe that they are about to produce the samples that they already said they produced? lol
Well there are the updates of course...
At first weren't the updates supposedly made up in order to fool the shorts, now they're being hyped as progress.
Either they're true or not- can't be both.
They don't need to worry about keeping PYCT from moving upward, The company just laid out 2 billion more shares recently.
"these shorters are really not wanting to cover their position at all, and I don't blame them, this is going to cost them a ton of money"
You're not making any sense.
It's not going to cost a short money to cover at .0001 when they've purchased at a higher price.
If there were massive shorts, this is exactly where they'd want to cover in order to make money.
It doesn't appear as they're moving too fast though. lol They claimed emergence on the market in early 2010 and now they're admitting that they're just now ready to produce the product samples? At least they're trying to give the impression of transparency.
At least those 2 billion shares went to good use... perhaps the secret Chinese people had budget issues.
Tough to put a date on it given that they haven't released filings but the update was in May so we'll go with that until they file.
No requirements really- just a history of following the IHub posting rules as well as posting maturely. An ability to back up one's claims helps as well, no matter what the view.
The number of past deleted posts will be a definite factor as well.
Looking for an Asst. Moderator. Anyone interested PM me.
Those who have been barred from PMing me due to incessant immature posting or profane private messages need not apply.
"oh are you a web master? I have done a couple websites I know how they work. get your facts straight"
It doesn't take a webmaster to know that what I'm saying is indeed factual.
If your claim is that a website cannot be updated without the visible site being a mess then you are wrong and any webmaster will tell you just that- actually anyone who's ever built a site can tell you that.
But even nimrods can update sites so perhaps that's indeed what is going on. Hopefully they can spend a few of those 2 billion shares and get someone better to work on the site in the future.
And seriously... take a break and have a good weekend.
No doubt. Have a good holiday- remember what's really important.
"the fact that the "Supply Chain" is established?"
Wow- that's a fact? Sounds like it's just another unfounded claim made by the company. Once they provide proof you can call it a fact.
Until then you can wonder where the product is that was supposed to emerge in early 2010- it's now mid-2010.
Work on that this weekend. LOL It's a holiday... good god- take a break and enjoy it.
"get your facts straight"
The facts are that there is no need for any part of the site to be a mess. Whatever is going to be changed can be done then uploaded when ready.
"I still say there is MUCH MORE going on than the pads and liner biz."
Well of course- there's the online payment system. LOL
That's going to be huge, remember? Didn't you mark all those posts?
"its clearly being worked on."
No, it's clearly being managed by inept personnel. Not exactly something to be excited about.
Websites are being "worked on" every minute of every day and don't end up looking like that. There's no reason for the site to look that way.
Or maybe they're trying to upload the new TV ad. LOL
Admin will just change the board to reflect the new name and symbol.
Everything else will remain the same- including the post history.
The FAQ has stated they've added another 2 billion shares.
The company is doing the misleading. If they aren't keeping him informed then all he can do is give out the most recent info that he has, be it right or wrong.
So either you have Tom ignorantly misleading people which the company is responsible for or you have both Tom and the company misleading people. Either way not a great scenario for those who have more invested than can afford to lose.
As long as they aren't making it up as they go along...
All can only be revealed with filings which you said weren't coming. That is after you said they'd be out days ago.
What's your story today?
You were close on the share count Lakers- they're admitting to have diluted another couple billion shares.
Yet they're funded by private means. lol
There's no spin on the fact that "early 2010" is now passed.
" It would really not be worth the effort to set up dozens or hundreds"
Which is precisely why we don't see this mysterious group posting here...
"as no one here can name a company that has defeated them."
Very true- and there's no reason to believe that this one will be the first. There were others before this one which were going to cause shorty to burn and all the other nonsense, yet as you point out- no one's done it. There's a reason.
If the stock moves up I'd be perfectly happy with it doing so on it's own merits. Apparently too many people there are none-thus the need for the other garbage.
GLTY
The company disagrees with you.
Of course you're welcome to call them liars now as well.
Why not? The added features are nice although I often don't keep the paid deal.
Seems to keep some honest.
I already said why. Non-paying members can easily hide behind multiple aliases. Some even get put in jail for it...
"HAHAHAHAHA well 2,000+ other shareholders will disagree with that statement."
Well you claim to know hundreds so have them of them purchase IHub memberships (we wouldn't want any multiple usernames now would we?) and have them posts their input here.
If they're at your beck and call then that shouldn't be an issue.
"I think the only difference with 'Naked' shorting is the broker agrees to not charge you borrowing fees, but I would think maybe increase the Margin a few percentages (not sure on that tho)"
When you can verify that concept then be sure and post back.
"IN FACT there is a deficit of 50 to 120 BILLION "
If it were a fact then you wouldn't have to continually change the number. *yawn*
"Are you denying that BLOOMBERG is wrong in their report?
Are you denying that this illegal act of selling "Phantom" shares has never ever happened to PYCT?"
Nope, I never have, naked shorting is a possibility in any stock.
I simply don't believe that there's a shred of proof (nor have you posted any) that there's a massive naked short to the tune of 100 billion shares that are going to have to be covered.
And posting dozens of posts per day here is not going to change that.
"AND THAT IS A FACT "
Then provide due diligence that specifically states so or get back on the topic of the company.
Have a good night.
Go right ahead. You can also try and explain how it's been supposedly proven that PYCT has a 100 billion share naked short without posting generic videos and articles that don't mention even the company.
There are plenty of boards to discuss hedge funds... this is the PYCT board.
And hedge funds don't put up cash to enter trades? Interesting.
Sorry but the discussion has moved on to "groups" that have supposedly naked shorted, not just market makers.
Spend less spamming videos and catch up.
"You're in a group that has $410,000.00 to invest in MLON"...
"To avoid that, and probably because of greed, you continue to sell Naked shares at .0001, just because you can. "
In your scenario we have a group of people shorting, yet also those who have the power to naked short... So how do you figure the group who shorted in the first place (your average every short) also naked shorts as well? The theory involves 2 different entities- simple shorts and naked short market participants.
Perhaps you can explain but I don't see why you're confusing the two and speaking as if they're one and the same if indeed you are.
"Everyone knows I believe the shorts from the Winter of '04-05'
never covered"
Why would that be? During this period they would have shorted at .001 and much higher and had years to cover at .0001 and take a huge profit on those trades.
Why would anyone believe that they left the money on the table for 5 years waiting for the stock to rise before covering? While a reverse split would be nice for them, anyone short on the stock would already be massively banking. These people would know how to make money and leaving in an account full of PYCT stock isn't the way.
Or is this the same situation that has made all the other "massively shorted" pinks run to 40,000%?
If it's shorted at .0001 and rises to .0002 then they're already at a pretty hefty loss- positions will be closed pretty darn quickly in this case. Why would anyone think that anyone who knows the market well enough to open a short position (not something just anyone can do) is going to allow themselves to get caught while the price has set at the bottom for years? And why would they tie their capital up for years?
Which ever "massive short position w/ a forced cover" story is used it doesn't add up.