Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Quote: “$$$$$$Today is the Day$$$$$$$” LOL. Again tooooo funny. Keep up the satire. You could post it every day and I would laugh.
_____________________________________________
'Again too funny'. How right you are. This SFRX clown show is continuously hilarious. The biggest joke in the treasure hunting business.
Quote: Agree with the Fact that Christmas 2022 should be Great for ALL SFRX Shareholders, IMO.
Hope you enjoy your present ($$$$)
Get ready for the:
BOOM !!!!!!!!!
________________________
In view of the fact that SFRX has nothing going for it other than cheerleader hype, your prediction must be based upon hot air speculation. The company is a dismal failure. Never found a shipwreck in 15 + years. No treasure no artifacts. The Timmy Toy is also an example of hot air and no performance. Yes indeed Christmas 22 should be just great if one believes in crystal ball predictions.
Quote:I guess it’s now being insinuated by the affiliate that it will take more than a year to bust through the worm poop and recover the $15B at Juno.
_______________________________________________________
This is all absolutely outlandish bull crap. When it comes to SFRX and its cheerleading section excuses equal survival. For anyone in the know it's actually funny.
Quote: We can all make our own decisions on SFRX but I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
____________________________________
You must have been burning the midnight oil putting that list together. I can just pick up the putrid oder of desperation. Maybe even a hint of frustration.
With all said, the reality - the bottom line is that SFRX is a total loser. Performance and results say it all.
But then, they also think teredo crusts don't exist and even mock the idea of them so maybe they are not the best source of info.
https://www.thelastwreck.com/salvage-history
____________________________________________-
A very interesting article. That said I state the fact that I have been a team member and dove and excavated Spanish Colonial period shipwrecks in the Florida Keys, Bahamas, Central Caribbean and extensively off the coasts of the Dominican Republic. In excavations reaching as deep as 12 feet into the sub-bottom I have observed portions of still remaining timbers that showed evidence of white in color calcarious like secretions coating some of the timbers, but NEVER was there solidified teredo worm crap blanketing the remnants of the shipwreck.
Another absurd flimsy excuse for SFRX total failures that go on and on endlessly.
$$$$$Today is the Day $$$$$$$$
_________________
But I thought you said that was yesterday or was it the day before? Somewhat confusing.
SFRX’s data shows Melbourne debris is flotsam……and
_________________________________________
As you know I've been saying that for years based upon research and sound logic.
There are those that choose to continue living in denial.
The same applies to Juno as well. It's a dud.
Looking Very Promising for a Great Christmas present this year from SFRX !!!!
JMO
$$$$$$$$$$$
________________
Just what might that be? A mantle stocking filed with coal for every stockholder?
Quote: Yep! We were glad to hear sfrx weathered the storm well! We feel for everyone that lost their homes and loved ones. Jmo
____________________________________
AMEN
Progress continues!
___________________
What might that be?
Quote: Yes Sir
Good News would be Great !!!!
Holding since 16
I'm ready ....
Especially with our Country being destroyed currently from the Top Down.
" Go Brandon "
GLTA SHAREHOLDERS HERE ....
___________________________
We may be at odds on SFRX but otherwise I'm with you all the way.
Quote: God knows most of us can use it with the world around us going to hell in a handbasket
____________________
You got that right.
Quote: Based on the singular type of artifact located thus far in the area, it is our belief that this is likely not a primary shipwreck site, but rather one of several debris areas. We believe, based on current knowledge, that a reasonably large piece of decking or section of hull (but likely not the main structure) deposited in this area at some point in time. This piece of ship’s structure would have contained mainly spikes and other types of fasteners which, as the structure degraded and/or broke apart, deposited the artifacts over the area in various layers of strata. Given the artifacts are just below the shell rubble strata layer, they are indicative of floating scatter that settled in that area.
____________________________
You know that I've been saying this for years (flotsam) well before Baer reached this conclusion. I knew this based upon the research produced by the late Jack Haskins, wherein it clearly stated the 'Concepcion' wrecked on a sand bank (shoal) well off of Canaveral. I had actually posted that data here before.
The intellectual brilliance of persons like the Timmy Toy inventor fall short on practical common sense. Repeatedly, total disregard is given to why a magnetometer survey never produced evidence of one single iron cannon of the 34 the Concepcion was armed with. Only one iron cannon was ever found, and that by Heartland, not SFRX. That sole cannon undoubtedly came into its present location as part of large breakaway decking. For me its astounding how clear the picture is but these people just don't get it, or should I say don't want to. What a clown show.
Quote: Sometimes we just can't fix stu##.
_____________________________
Yes but does the Timmy Toy inventor know that?
Quote: Does the old technology have the ability to look under a teredo crust and indicate what precious metals might be there?
I am not an expert, but from what I have been able to read, the answer is, No.
______________________________________
You know this gets more hilarious all the time. Now who made this one up. TEREDO CRUST? I have dove and worked on allot of Spanish colonial period shipwrecks. Many in the Florida Keys as well as many in the Bahamas and the Caribbean and never heard of such nonsense. Perhaps you can cite me where anything like this is addressed by any of the Institute of Nautical Archaeology archaeologists.
So now the Timmy Toy is finally alleged to do something right. Detect and analyze TEREDO CRUST.
Quote: The “word salad” from over 3 years ago shows he doesn’t understand how to interpret the data and findings.
__________________________
I listened to what he had to say. The man doesn't know what he's talking about. Mentioning that the Toy can work in ******** conditions and even X number of hours, etc., etc. Obviously he has little or no sea experience because a 'tethered' platform or vehicle is only as good as the support given by the surface vessel. If the sea conditions are rough, that's not much and particularly for accuracy. In the case of SFRX their surface support are small 'sport boats' that would be pitching and rolling and in all likelihood dragging anchor or if not anchored then unable to hold a course. As I stated, the man doesn't know what he's talking about. Those statements were made three years ago? So what has been achieved since then? Nothing.
Quote: That’s exactly what Rocket Man did in his……
first paid promo.
I recall he used the word “antiquated” to describe currently available technology, but only referenced a mag.
_____________________
If he was referring to the magnetometer as 'antiquated', that speaks volumes as to his naiveness (stupidity). He obviously knows nothing about treasure hunting or the applied remote sensing technology successfully used in shipwreck exploration and discovery.
Perhaps it's best he stays in the toy invention business.
Quote: True, but they love to blabber about outdated……
technology while ignoring what is available.
____________________________
Of course the point is what is referred to as 'out dated technology' is precisely what has and continues to find the shipwrecks. In the meantime there's the continuation of the bla, bla, bla about how this is now a high tech. company along with all the continuous gonna be's, just you wait and see baloney. It's all really pathetic.
Quote: Spanish galleons = bad bidness model.
____________________________________
What does that matter anyway? These clowns have never found one and likely never will.
Quote: Time to buy a vehicle with a starter and ac! The old crank in the front is out dated! Myself, I'm looking forward to what they find, in the future! Jmo
_____________________________________
Your analogies are humorous. Please list the Timmy Toy successes. In turn I'm more than happy to list all the Spanish treasure shipwrecks (and other notables) found with the magnetometer, side-scan sonar and sub-bottom profiling. The Toy is a laughable joke. Oh, but it's such a pretty looking toy even without 'a starter and ac'.
Jyo, really doesn't effect what others think. Jmo
___________________________________
Really. Isn't that just wonderful.
Time will tell. J
_________________
Oh indeed time will tell. Matter of fact it already has. Another season gone. The company is a consistent looser and the Timmy toy's a flop.
Quote: I'd listen to him. He is one of the resident experts who pointed out that a background in geo-location technology and digital signal processing has nothing to do with underwater remote sensing technology. Remember, If it is not found using a magnetometer, it's not found, dammit!
______________________
One little difference. He has never found anything. Timmy Toy is just that - a toy.
Marine magnetometers have found every Spanish treasure wreck ever found.
The Timmy Toy has found nothing. No verifiable evidence it even works.
Quote: Which I think will be happening sooner rather than later. I don't think the successful inventor and multi-millionaire Tim Reynolds has been wasting his time these last few years. I think he knows exactly what he is doing.
______________________________
And who did he invent for - the Mattel Toy Company? You do realize this is a continuous all talk and no show program.
Knows what he's doing but no 'on a shipwreck' simulation tests. Very fundamental but he lacks the common sense to do that. Wonder why?
One word:
Technology
_______________
Two words: Bull shit
Another article on Seafarer popped up.
______________________________
A hundred articles. So what?
Indeed a pretty toy. And beyond that? Where's the verifiable evidence that it works. Where's the verifiable evidence that it has found anything. There isn't any evidence. If there is and I missed it, give me a link. I'm waiting.
Just a pretty toy.
Quote: I wonder how Fisher told all his investors, year after year, “Thanks for the investment, we found nothing, sorry pony up next year?”
___________________________________________
Regardless of his manner of raising capital, Fisher was finding treasure. He was the real deal. I wouldn't agree with his methods meaning it shouldn't have taken that long but all along the way he produced treasure until he finally hit the main pile. What a poor comparison on your part. In near two decades these clowns have found nothing.
You make the claim that SFRX is in the technology business (you might have been joking). My question to you is are you familiar with Sea Technology Magazine? This is about real maritime scientists, real engineers, not claim to do all toy manufacturers.
You just might want to take a look.
https://sea-technology.com
https://sea-technology.com/exploration-of-wrecks-in-mediterranean-for-unesco
It just puzzles me to no end as to why brilliant Timmy isn't collaborating with one of these real technology companies rather than with a penny stock huckster?
I'll bet these people do real in-ocean simulation tests in their development processes.
Quote: You can only spin it as a negative because you are "all in" on failure. Shouldn't have to wait much longer to find out.
________________________________
What like maybe another fifteen years?
Quote: In any event, my belief is that we will hear something soon and to honor our experts, the affiliates can all get on the same page about what bar to go to in Melbourne to celebrate.
______________________
The SFRX circus have more than proven they can't find their ass with two hands.
They'll have to wheel you out of the old folks home in a wheel chair before that ever happens.
Quote: Okay great. I look forward to the CONFIRMATION news…….
that there’s treasure on Juno.
They dove on Juno and said they found worm poop and posted a picture of a conglomerate. They never mentioned treasure.
But you didn’t clarify how they were going to locate wrecks in the future and when legal title is obtained.
______________________________________________
Look. It's more than obvious there are some smart people posting here but totally naive about the marine treasure hunting business. TOTALLY NAIVE.
Quote: Exactly, why would you if you have the correct technology.?....”
Geez.... that is the whole.point of SeaSearcher!!!
_________________________
First of all there is no valid evidence the toy does any of the things its supposed to do. NONE.
Secondly, apparently you don't seem to understand that in governmental archaeological communities the word TREASURE is highly frowned upon.
Like I said, they'd be better off to go play in the Disneyland moat.
Quote: I didn’t know they posted the Juno dive video. I don’t recall any comments about it. Not surprised.
______________________________________
How terribly dull. What was that supposed to be all about? Don't know if anyone noticed but the anchor has no ring.
These guys might have better luck looking for shipwrecks in the Disneyland moat.
Quote: SFRX is the only entity I know that has……
done exactly what you’re describing, (spending years) but has “allegedly” built a Toy that can identify non ferrous metals, but we have seen ZERO proof to back that claim.
Short order? It’s been years since we were told the Toy worked. I don’t see anything short order about it.
Instead of spending years hoping to come across treasure that you hope is located near iron hits from the mag survey, you will now be able to scan the area of the wreck and know in short order if there is treasure or other metals present at the wreck.
SFRX has never located a wreck, so who’s gonna tell them where to look?
You no longer have to ID the ship and track down a manifest. Years of effort, time and money (possibly wasted), will now be saved.
Locate a wreck, scan it for treasure, get your answer. Act accordingly.
Quote: Real salvors know research and exploration/salvage are two different areas of responsibility within the organization. One occurs year round, while the other is planned and limited by weather and other factors.
They work simultaneously.
Research, which is much less expensive than a vessel and a crew and is never ending.
Real salvors don’t want to locate A WRECK, there’s plenty of those, they want to locate and salvage THE WRECK.
If this is what the company told the “in the loop shareholders,” then they got fed a truckload of worm poop.
______________________________________________
Truly the greatest example of incompetence and on going failure in the history of this business. Historically I know none to compare to in modern day.
Quote: Locate a wreck, scan it for treasure, get your answer. Act accordingly.
_______________________________________________
This brilliant "Technology Company" hasn't even had the common sense to do actual simulation tests on an actual colonial shipwreck. Pre-burying various ferrous and mainly non-ferrous targets. I wonder why? I have a pretty good assumption as to why. The toy doesn't work and the CEO and Timmy can't have the exposure. Of course, it's still under development.
Are you not aware that state and foreign government archaeologists frown upon your described approach of let's just scan (evening it worked) the wreck for treasure and then move on. It doesn't work that way.
I believe some people here have missed their call. Great talent shown for writing children's books.
Quote: SFRX is absolutely a technology company.
_________________________________
Really. If that be the case they're making a piss poor showing.
I've posted here numerous times about stimulation tests in like environment in which this Timmy Toy is suppose to perform and find all these (fraudulently stated) billions in gold and silver. But this "technology company" has never done that have they?
Fact is I had been involved in setting up that kind of test in the Florida Keys on the 1733 Capitana, years past, so I do know what I'm talking about. For SFRX to actually do those kind tests would result in exposure to what a joke the whole thing really is.
Like I also said a number of times. This so called technology company continues to be the turd in the candy bar wrapper.
Quote: If an investor or shareholder cannot stomach that number, one would need to do a bit more DD on the needs of a technology company.
$7K a day is an absolute steal!!
____________________________
A what? A technology company? The jokes thrown out here are unending.
Thought it was suppose to be a treasure hunting company? Oh, so now it's a technology company. A spiffy looking toy that to date has produced nothing.
For a CEO to sit back and collect a 350k salary a year for absolute non-productive failure surely got to have the brazen balls to do so.
Oh, so that's the new twist. It's a technology company. Anything to try and justify the turd in the fancy candy bar rapper.
Quote: $7K a day is quite the budget for being on a wreck that they can’t ID.
__________________________________________________
No solid evidence that they are on a wreck at all.
Quote: Of course I am forgetting your undocumented expertise and unproven success in developing and building new technology. No doubt you would have come up with groundbreaking technology in a matter months if not weeks or days, but we all can't be you, can we? Most are now waiting for SFRX to provide evidence SeaSearcher works, as opposed to making judgements in the absence of evidence. Then again, you seem to know better, because, you know, armchair technologist.
____________________________________
But this isn't about me. It's about SFRX (and it's creative inventive personnel) who repetitiously fail. On going all talk and no show. Cover up excuses are endless, coming as no surprise.
Quote: As usual, all the ad nauseam 'gotcha" posts willfully ignore the addition of Tim Reynolds to the company.
_______________________
And so what? Explain what successful achievements he has had (with SFRX) ????
Produced a toy for which to date there is no verifiable evidence that it even works. No shipwrecks. No treasure. That's really the bottom line whether you like it or not.
Continuation of turds wrapped in a fancy candy bar wrapper.