Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sand,
There's no doubt in my mind that readers can see thru capnmike's dance. He's acting so ridiculous that at first I thought it was a joke!
We all know that his post was not meant for me at all, it was all designed to fool you, Sanddollar, into thinking his tedious reply was an actual answer to my simple question.! LOL
His history of hype and suggestive posts has added up to zero. I remember Brian Jenkin remarking in an interview that he wished we had "an x-ray machine that can see into a terrorist's soul". Capnmike spammed that quote on the boards for weeks latently suggesting that it was linked to Jenkin's recent visit to the Tucson lab.
More recently, I enjoyed his Vegas story about the guy pulling out his credit card and waving it in the air to buy a Valimed unit!
It's very difficult for me to believe that any hospital has a requisition system that works that efficiently for capital expenditures. LOL Maybe that person was just kidding and fooled capnmike.
Maybe it was Henry Blair in disguise.
Crow,
"Perhaps a central purchasing point for a chain may use one to verify a new source, but I doubt it.""
Hosiptal pharmacies and drug stores are making it more and more convenient for people to call in their orders by phone. If the prescription requires a doctor's approval for refill it's a requirement to call in at least 24 hours in advance at my hospital.
When I called in my last prescription in advance I noticed the packaging was different from when I just walk in to the pharmacy and wait for my order to be filled.
Last time I asked the pharmacist and she told me that all call in orders come from central fill locations. Central fill locations fill thousands of prescriptions daily and are designed as a cost effective way to take the burden off local pharmacies.
A year ago I came across Spectral Analytical Devices at a trade show and learned of their patented spectral fingerprint identification technology that is remarkably similar to Valimed. McKesson has exclusive distribution rights to the validation system and have employed it in several central fill locations nation wide.
So you are correct, the central fill locations were the first targeted market for prescription validation by spectral fingerprinting.
I believe that Spectral Analytical Devices' patent has the market tighted up for that application. I had a chat with their VP of Technology (a cofouder of the company) and he said that they were aware of CDEX's niche market applications and were looking into the scope of their patent claims.
On the positive said I asked him what did he think about the niche market (hospitals) for the Valimed unit and his reply was "there are a lot of hospitals".
What's your problem Capnmike?
You're dancing around my simple question!
Are you unable to answer my question with anything positive? Is that it? So you dance like Ontheedge/Kidinsight?
And capnmike, try to stay focused on the topic. I'm talking about what I believe to be part of the Loch Harris scam and the subsequent cover-up.
What I'm talking about involves the XRF claims. What I'm asking has nothing to do with the Valimed unit based on UVF. Apples and oranges.
Specifically, I'm talking about patent application No. 10/268,678 which seeks patent protection for the "revolutionary" ELF/EM-1.
Can you please point out which claim(s) in the patent application make(s) the invention "revolutionary"
Please point out the claims capnmike or ask someone to point them out for shareholders that invested their honest money into the alleged Loch scam. If you have knowledge of damaging evidence I hope that you don't withhold it.
And it does not matter what "people think" EXCEPT FOR THE U.S. PATENT OFFICE, the U.S. ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE and the DOE.
They didn't think too much about it.
I don't think I can make my question more clear.
"I'd certainly like to see CDEX developing more, but it their device found its way into virtually every drug store and hospital they could do extremely well."
There are a few posters that certainly want you to believe that scenario.
CDEx appears to be operating just like Loch Harris where the company limits information to the point where speculation such as that is alive and well since it cannot be confirmed nor denied. You can also thank a few highly invested individuals posting information which suggests and/or supports such speculation.
Elf was going to save innocent chidren and rid the world of land mines. "They'll sell like hotcakes" (-p4316)
VAMMP was going to dramtically reduce wafer fabrication waste. "Think Taiwan" (-p4316).
Now Vaimed is going to save countless lives by verifying flu vacines, help detect meth labs, sniff out fake drugs and bad booze and save the children from medical errors.
Does the theme sound familiar?
And the same people that have been 100% wrong every time they posted this type of hype in the past are still at it today... well most of them.
Yawn....
Hey lotoworld,
"... so what does that say about your unimportant and biased opinion???????"
So why are you asking me my opinion?
Valimed is not a scam.
ELF/EM-1 was a scam as a result of false amd misleading advertisement IMO and the opinion of many, many others.
Are their people working for CDEx that are withholding incriminating information about Loch Harris? I believe so.
Do I want to do business with those type of people? No.
Will CDEX/Valimed make people a good return on their investment? I don't know, but I think most people will agree that a good return will be much harder to achieve for the honset Loch shareholders that have seen this long ordeal through to this point.
New money will have a much better opprtunity to make a buck and that is what is needed to make the CDEx insiders rich (or more rich if they already got rich from the Loch Harris scam).
Any other questions like why do I post?
Feel free.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that I know who your previous alias on RB.
Gosh capnmike!
I'm still waiting for you to perform your most excellent DD so you can point out to confused shareholders exactly which claims in the XRF patent appliaction (No. 10/268,678) make the origin ELF/EM-1 technology "revolutionary"!
No one seems to know... or at least they don't want to talk about it!
A positive well thought out reply would benefit all shareholders. Maybe a call to Poteet would prove worthwhile.
At least engage me (LOL) with this question, why has CDEx patent application No. 10/268678 containing the touted "revolutionary" ELF/EM-1 technology been rejected twice by the PTO for claims shown by the examiner to be "OBVIOUS" and "ANTICIPATED"?
------------------------
revolutionary
adj.
1 of, characterized by, favoring, or causing a revolution in a government or social system
2 bringing about or constituting a great or radical change (a revolutionary design)
----------------------------
So what's so great about it? (Excuse me, that was two questions)
P.S. Ontheedge, feel free to reply with useful information.
Quite an emotionally post for someone who's just now considering buying back in!
You seem to have been following Loch/CDEx events very closely.
Excellent DD, reward yourself.
Exactly Crow,
Valimed is used in conjuction with or to "complement" current QC protocols. I believe this point was made by both you and I and was fervently agrued against by our resident apologist, INET6 (that doesn't mean I don't like you INET! LOL).
And another thing, the integration time keeps getting longer and longer, now it's 30-60 seconds for a bulk, one ml sample with detection stand-off at under an inch.
Now that's hardly detecting trace explosives at 2 meters in real time (or even 5 seconds at 34 inches [-wpoteet])!
WOW!!
"The volume and the SP reflects whatever confidence that the public has in CDEX. The "public" includes those here that continue to EXPRESS confidence in the future, but are not buying the stock.
Even more significantly, to me, is that the people that should have the most knowledge are selling, even at the now lower prices. This only drives the SP lower."
It's just not making sense if the company really has the potential claimed by the resident hypsters.
I think that you're dead on Crow.
Maybe Valimed's usefulness lies in too narrow a niche market.
Maybe it has critical limitations to where it will never be marketable for broader applications other than it's currently focused niche and the professional market knows it.
Maybe it's usefulness for counterfeit drug use is 95% hype and 5% reality.
Maybe potential investors wonder why posters are feverishly advertising how wonderful BAXA is like they did with all the other big name bio in the past (which has proved to be all fluff).
Maybe investors are confused why the "revolutionary" XRF technology advertised by both Loch Harris and CDEx has been rejected by the PTO twice for making claims which are "obvious" and "anticipated".
Maybe investors wonder what ever happen to the VAMMP which both Loch Harris and CDEx advertsied. It simply vanished with no explanation whatsoever to shareholders (suspiciously after Sandia National Laboratory with granted a patent for virtually the exact same technology). One of many things that is curiously absent from capnmike's DD! Although capnmike is once again 100% satisfied after posting a link showing that Poteet worked on some lenses for a company contracting with Sandia!
Yes Crow I think you are spot on! The lack of movement of this company refects the confidence level for long term investment.
I believe that some of the heavily invested posters that continue to publish highly speculative information underestimate the intelligence level of todays investor.
"MP sold only 500 shares this week."
I'm wondering if that was a typo?
lmorovan, are the "puffers" snifex units??
Excellent bio on Poteet:
Although I am a little curious why CDEx didn't give more detail about his employement as Senior Research Scientist between the years 3/87-3/92. My sources show that at some point (1991) during that period Poteet was working at:
Infrared Laboratories, Inc.
1808 E. 17th Street
Tucson, Arizona
(520) 622-7074
http://www.irlabs.com/irlabs%20pages/irlabs_frameset.html
Nice people. Among their product line is thermo-electric cooling devices for instrumention:
"The cryogenic cooling systems are designed to cool detectors, optics, experimental materials and complete instruments to cryogenic temperatures and to sustain them at these temperatures for extended periods."
It makes me wonder if CDEx is using Poteeet's past employer for their active cooling platform in the Valimed units? After all, they are a local Tucson source- makes sense.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Biographical History of Dr. Wade M. Poteet
Dr. Wade M. Poteet
Statement of Qualifications
EDUCATION
Ph. D. - Experimental Solid State Physics - VPI, 1970. (Thesis topic: Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance in Superconductors)
M.S. - Physics - Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1968. (Thesis topic: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Superconductors)
B.S. - Physics - Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1966.
2 years, Nuclear Engineering North Carolina State College and State University
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
• American Institute of Physics
• Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
• Optical Society of America
AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
RESEARCH PHYSICIST with emphasis on advanced instrumentation in optics, electro-optics and detector technology from x-ray wavelengths to the far infrared
NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETIES
• Sigma Xi
• Phi Kappa Phi
• Sigma Pi Sigma
• Phi Eta Sigma
• NSF Traineeship
• Mu Beta Psi
PUBLICATIONS/QUALIFICATIONS
45 referenced papers in the open literature. Over 250 technical reports generated for private and government agencies. Three decades of active participation in the design and fabrication of airborne, balloon, and spaceborne infrared/visible/UV instrumentation. Direct involvement in mechanical, optical, and array sensor systems for astronomy, defense, SDIO, and commercial programs worldwide. Recipient of NASA certificates of recognition as well as public service group achievement award (1986) for "Superior professional scientific skill and personal dedication performed in conceiving, advocating, developing and testing a Spacelab 2 mission scientific investigation".
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
CDEX INC. 4565 S. Palo Verde Road, Suite 213, Tucson, AZ 85714
2001-Present --------------- Principal Scientist for private start up Company that is now public and selling technology driven products in commercial markets. Specific focus is research and development of remote species detection technologies, basic research, and new product development.
CP Systems, Inc. 4001 N. Runway Drive, Suite 132, Tucson, AZ 85705
1999-2001---------------President/Principal Scientist
Directed contract research in remote sensing in the x-ray and ultraviolet regions, including landmine, anti-terrorist. and drug detection programs. Provided research and development for nanometrology technologies under contract with Loch Harris, Inc.
System Specialists, Inc. 4001 N. Runway Drive, Suite 151, Tucson, Arizona 85705
1971 - 1999 ---------------- Vice President/Principal Scientist
Directed all research and development, including NASA airborne projects and advanced instruments for commercial and government programs. These programs include SDIO (Brilliant Eyes, "IRX"), Air Force Focal Plane Array programs, and commercial infrared cameras. Designed and constructed color Schlieren proof - of - principle experiment for use in microgravity fluid flow research. The system was successfully flown aboard the NASA KC-135 low gravity simulation aircraft and is now in Phase 2 instrument development. Designed, developed, and constructed ultralow-noise preamplifiers with cooled electronics for a family of infrared detectors and focal plane arrays, including bolometers operating at 0.3K, photovoltaic Indium Antimonide, HgCdTe (PV and PC), and extrinsic silicon photodetectors. Provide a continuing design service to commercial firms for re-imaging optics in the visible and infrared, including cryogenic design and analysis and complete system evaluation.Infrared Laboratories, Inc., Tucson, Arizona
3/87-3/92 -----Consultant/Senior Research Scientist
Principal Scientist for research projects involving infrared instruments and cryogenics. Designed, and developed commercial superconducting (cryogenic) stepper motors and actuators. These actuators are used to position and control optics and filters in the NASA SIRTF program. Group leader for fabrication of infrared array cameras that are sold worldwide. Managed the detector and focal plane array testing and evaluation efforts.
LTA, Inc., Tucson, Arizona
3/86-3/87-----------------Research Scientist/President
Principal Scientist for research effort developing multi-array infrared sensor system for SDI program ("IRX"). Provided design services to commercial firms for re-imaging optics in the visible and infrared, including cryogenic design and analysis and complete system evaluation.
E/ERG, Inc. Tucson Arizona
3/84 —3/86(1/2 Time) ----- Senior Research Scientist
Performed research and development for initial evaluation program for SDI "IRX" program involving infrared array sensors. Served as consultant for design and optical system analysis by commercial firms and government agencies, including Rockwell International, Infrared Laboratories, EERG, Inc, Marshall Space Flight Center, and University laboratories in Japan.
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
8/71 — 3/86 (1/2 Time) -------Sr. Research Scientist
Served as staff scientist in support of astronomical research programs. Team leader for fabrication of the Spacelab - 2 Infrared Telescope focal plane array system that flew aboard Space Shuttle flight - July 1985. This successful experiment resulted in a high - sensitivity sky survey at intermediate and long infrared wavelengths using state-of-the-art extrinsic silicon detectors. Participated in early design and detector studies for the Infrared Astronomy Satellite. Developed cryogenic amplifiers, reset switches, and multiplexer for ultra-high sensitivity infrared detectors used in Spaceborne telescopes. Designed, built, and flew balloon-borne IR telescopes for infrared sky survey programs.
Rice University, Houston, Texas 8/70 — 8/71 (1/2 Time) -------Postdoctoral Fellow Project team member for the "Flying Infrared Telescope", a 20-cm telescope flown in the NASA Lear Jet for astronomy missions. Program lead for the cooled Flying IR Telescope to map the isotropic thermal background from high altitude.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank, W. Va.
1963 - 1966 -------------------Co-Op Program in radio astronomy/ Observatory data reduction and main computer systems analyst for 21 — scientist group studying radio sources with the 85-foot and 300-foot radio telescopes. Developed spectral hygrometers for IR telescope site selection and evaluation.
LOL! Did Moonie (the inventor of MoonieMath) post this gem?:
"A $40,000 machine sold means a one-time addition of $40,0000. But lease the same machine over 5 years at $2,000 a month, and you get a five year contract for a continued relationship. And, it means you get $60,000 for that $40,000 machine over the same time frame."
On another note: Defendants (in the DA) Boone and Baker accused RS of accepting finder's fees and representing PP investors with large equities in Loch Harris. A RB poster (Closertocash I believe) once stated that RS was a PP Broker for Daboyz. Milchip has made collaborating statements on several occasions claiming that RS once attempted to take control of CDEx at inception.
We all witnessed that he tried and failed to obtain Loch Harris proxy votes through solicitation on RB at the beginning of the Loch/CDex transition period consistent with Milchip's accusation.
Milchip claims that once RS failed to take control of the new CDEx, RS became a PP Broker (and one of the first PP investors) and a message board spokesperson for "Saint" and "Savior", MP.
Lmorovan submits collaborating evidence that Onetheedge mistakingly (bad move) answered MP's personal email.
Ontheedge denies answering MP's email and 100% loses credibility with readers when he is caught fabricating a fake email to back up his lie. When caught red-handed by lmorovan, Ontheedge claims it was all a joke. True CDEx Longs take a no comment position and remind silent hoping the damage done by Onetheedge will fade away with time.
ATXMAN makes accusations (via a series of questions) concerning RS's involvement with Loch/CDEx which are perfectly consistent with the above accusations.
Onetheedge claims to have an indepth knowledge of all past Loch Harris/CDEx events 100% consistent with the above accusations.
Onetheedge denies all accusations against him on all occasions and tells each and every accuser that they're liars!
Ontheedge openly acknowledges his true identity and moniker used on RB (on several occasions).
Kidinsight tells a fable to defend against a newspaper story which establishes Poteet/Cauthen's past (1995) association with the company OSEM and Henry Blair. Diddy calls the newspaper and speaks with the authoring reporter and legal department and confirms the story told by Kidinsight was 100% fabricated. In defense, Kidinsight claims the truth to his story is locked up in the secret files of the SEC investigation. The newspaper reconfirms that the story Kidinsight told NEVER happen.
Kidinsight loses credibility with readers. True CDEx Longs once again take a no comment position and remind silent hoping the damage done by Kidinsight will fade away with time.
Readers begin to seriously wonder whether all the collaborating accusations and aggravating circumstances made in the above paragraphs are a conspiracy against this person or are in fact the truth and it is indeed, Onetheedge, that has a serious pathological disorder and his posts should be dismissed as self-serving nonsense.
This poster believes that the integration time to seriously wonder this question should be as long as the fraudulently touted integration time of the infamous ELF- virtually real time.
Thank you. eom
lmorovan, can you please delete post 6754. I accidentally posted it before my edit and I don't seem to be able to remove it. Thanks
"You will not find any true validation of the Tech from "KNOWN" sources back in the Loch days. CDEX on the other hand, continues to line up one after another. Further more, Baxa Corp has signed up to line up many."
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Apples and Oranges.
Validating a UVF instrument (fluorimeter) that detects bulk chemicals in 30 seconds at under an inch and under pristine laboratory conditions is a far, far cry from the original claims of Loch Harris/Boone, Baker, p4316/CDEx.
OF COURSE the CDEx product can NOW be validated! LMAO again.
Shall we compare the performance claims between the two technologies once again you silly rabbit? Carrots and apples!!!!!!!!
CDEx is not now claiming to defy the laws of physics while under the "3-letter agency" microscope- good boys. They are taking the obvious course to minimize the threat of civil law suits. CDEx had to continue the Loch Harris illusion long enough to give shareholders something tangible IMO. That tangible product was a new instrument with highly downgraded performance claims operating on the well known principles of UV Fluorescence.
Can shareholders be bamboozled into thinking the technology with the revolutionary performance lives on? Definitely, without question IMO!
Is it a revolutionary technology? Absolutely 100% NO in my opinion! I challenge anyone to provide evidence to convince a person "skilled in the art" that it is revolutionary. Cite the claims in any of the patent apps which clearly distinguishes the basic operating principles of the spectrometer as being novel or revolutionary. I specifically challenge Capnmike and ontheedge. (Note: As I pointed out earlier, capnmike has a history of NOT performing this type of DD. He assumes it's revolutionary as advertised and posts all the wonderful applications. If it IS indeed revolutionary I challenge Capnmike to use his impressive DD skills and close communication with the CDEx technical staff to demonstrate it to shareholders! I can think of only one reason why that would not be a good thing to do.)
Is cooling of the sensor to improve sensitivity revolutionary? No, it's old hat. It's been used for decades in high-end optical sensing instruments such as observatory instruments, missile guidance systems and the like. In other words, very expensive equipment where the cost versus benefit curve is not an issue.
Is Valimed using this principle where other commercially available instruments may not have the need? I think so. Does it cost more to actively cool the sensor(s)? Of course it does. Can anyone do it? Yes.
What do I think? (I known INET is dying to know! LOL) I think that CDEx has designed and developed an analytical instrument for a specific niche market in the health care arena that apparently fills a need in the industry. How much of a need we will all have to wait and see. I've said years ago that CDEX appeared to be putting together an impressive and qualified staff to help them leverage their new products into the targeted niche markets. Do impressive bios guarantee success? No, we've all been there.
I guess we'll all just have to wait and see if any of the honest shareholders that have been waiting so very long will be included in that small group of insiders that are obviously doing very well with this enterprise. Just like Loch Harris if I may add (and I just did. TM- Coquille).
In my opinion, the insiders are looking after the average shareholders best interest like a rancher looks out after his herd! LOL
As a final note I would like to inform readers that I will be dramatically curtailing my posting on this board (unless onetheedge posts something real, real stupid!- LOL).
INET, if you miss me you can always send me a private email at my Lycos address. LOL
diddy
P.S. I anticipate with 100% confidence that niether Capnmike nor Ontheedge will or can come to the plate and meet my challenge. Of course, CDEX's success or failure doesn't hinge on them doing so.
We've all witnessed on these boards that sometimes the best stategy is to let sleeping dogs lie.
P.S.S. Ontheedge, STOP, don't say anything stupid buddy-boy.
Hooo...hum (TM- blkhoc). eom
Rottenapple, And edgy is still asking that same question after he's been told time and time again that we don't care how many shares he's sold.
He's a "tenacious little monkey" (TM- Cosmo Krammer) isn't he? LOL!!!
I wasn't talking about your CDEx investment.
The more that you dodge questions the more one must wonder why you're acting like ontheedge.
You must have thought that your Loch Harris investment (VAMMP, ELF/EM-1) put you in a "particulary good position" as well since you claimed to have put your life savings into it, yet you are at a complete loss to explain with any credible evidence what happen to those products or whether the products truly existed as advertised.
What happen to VAMMP?
What happen to ELF/EM-1?
What happen to the suite of transition products initially advertised by CDEx?
What happen to the PSSS that went on sale three years ago this month?
They've all been "back burnered", dismissed from development by the Army/Navy and rejected by the PTO.
These are the very same products which you wholeheartedly endorsed and posted endless links describing all the potential applications for the technology (as advertised). Many of your posts contained irrelevant applications and/or applications completely out of the scope of the advertised technology's potential use IMO.
While reputable physicists openly claimed that the advertised technology "defied the laws of physics", you continued to post nothing but potential applications without addressing the important issues from these experts.
In the past, you always posted your opinions and links regarding the technology on the premise that "it's all good". Not once can I remember a critical post where your DD could provide any meaningful support to the claims of the technology.
Are you beginning to see my point more clearly?
That technology has now gone bye-bye and you claim to be 100% satisfied with that issue. Your "particulary good position" is now based on something new which is considerably less impressive from a performance point of view. The new product, Valimed, is NOT revolutionary IMO, but relies on designing an application specific instrument and selling it into a niche market.
Will you get rich? Don't know. Will a giant see the potential and enter the market or buy CDEx out? Don't know. Has CDEx filed basic patent protection with Valimed being the only product that can do what it does? I don't think so. Has CDEx filed adequate patent protection to protect the application processes that they envision? Don't know. Can a company circumvent any granted patent protection (like Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. that already has a very similar patent)? Don't know
In the mean time, you continue to behave in the exact same manner as you did in the past. New applications: Meth labs, Tamiflu, "rid the world", "save the world", "______ amount of deaths a year due to _______" (full in the blanks- landmines or medical errors)... etc.
Big names, big names, big names!!!!!
The exact same blueprint as Loch Harris, the exact same hype.
Maybe if you presented ALL the issues in a more realistic and critical manner you'd have more credibility (at least to me) instead of just being the captain that cried "wow".
Capnmike, I believe that you are in a particularly good position to provide some answers here "Buster"!
"This is a tangled web of seemingly independent assessments that are not and claims of scientific advances that defy the laws of physics," says Regina Dugan, an independent consultant in Alexandria, Va., who until May was a program manager for the Defense Department's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. In that job she oversaw development of advanced land-mine-detection technology."
Where is VAMMP/ELF today ("think Taiwan"- p4316)?
Why did Malcolm Philips continue to promote this technology after taking over Loch Harris then slowly-but-surely put the technology on the back burner?
Why has the REVOLUTIONARY technology been dismissed from development by the Army and Navy in independent contracts, labeled as "secrecy not recommended" by the Army, Navy, Air Force and DOE, and rejected twice (as "obvious" and "anticipated") by the PTO?
Why has the technology's performance currently been reduced to the use of UVF operating at under an inch and requiring 30 seconds? A performance level which can be currently achieved by several spectral instruments IMO?
Some posters have published to the investment community that they are 100% satisfied that they have all the answers to these questions. I wonder why they post these statements, yet do not share a sliver of credible information to back up such claims?
Why after posting such opinions do they publicly state that they have elected to discontinue their "chatting" posts, but will continue posting the same type speculative posts that they did for VAMMP, ELF/EM-1?
Where did those type posts get Loch Harris shareholders?
INET6, what do they say about those that fail to learn from the past?
"Robert did that because at that time he was sharing the Ragingbull account with Kerry Thomason, a broker in Lubbock."
I wonder if that's why the ontheedge moniker got booted off RB.
Is having two users a TOS violation?
Darn it Sand, I should have read ahead. I guess we both heard the same story huh? LOL
Edgy will be back and categorically give each and every one of our posts a sound thrashing with his wit, intellect and in-depth knowledge of all things Loch/CDEx.
At least in his mind.
"Arloco, you should be honored, as am I, that they did not see fit to make us members of that board!!"
Crow, there's a funny story behind Arloco's apparent request to become a member of the TCL. Even funnier the response on the board.
It doesn't look like capnmike has much motivation to explain why he's 100% satisfied with the fact that his original investment in VAMMP and ELF/EM-1 has disappeared. Nor why the original revolutionary technology has been dismissed by the Army and Navy not once, but twice along with two rejections by the PTO.
Not to worry, CDEX now has Valimed- bulk detection of chemicals in 30 seconds at under an inch using UVF.
Another product that is going to save the world and rid our neighborhoods of all those meth labs. LOL
Hype away with all the possible applications capnmike. Your pattern of irrelevant links and speculative posts have not changed since the ELF days.... nor have your "wows".
"Have you ever considered that after three years of begging for monies to keep CDEX going that he may have had to advance monies to keep things going. As a private concern he would be carrying notes for those transactions."
INET, wouldn't a loan to the corporation be in the SEC filings? After all, if he did loan the company money he would certainly want it documented so he wouldn't have to pay taxes when the principal was repayed?
Why document only the pay back, that doesn't make sense INET.
lmorovan, the insiders will make a ton of change whether the PPS ever allows the common shareholder to profit or not.
It's a win-win for them.
Look at Mari sweet thirty center deal.
No telling what some of the perps have received under the table.
Sand, Never read that post! Thanks. Yep, ole edgy was quite the player. No wonder he knows so much about the scam.
What a bold face liar that guy is!!!!!!!!!
"I've enjoyed learning from my 100%-full committment in seeing the issues you mentioned have their related questions resolved to my 100%-full satisfaction (including Sandia National Lab questions, and the answers which included the fact that Dr. Wade Poteet has collaborated with Sandia researchers)."
That statement makes it perfectly clear to me that you either don't understand what the true issues are or you are deliberately attempting to side step them.
You're post about Poteet and Sandia have no relevance to the important issues such as what happen to VAMMP and the ELF/EM-1, and how is it that Sandia appears to have developed (and patent the commercially viable stuff) the exact same technologies at the time Poteet, Cauthen and Blair were allegedly doing work for Sandia.
You claimed to have invested your life savings into Loch Harris for those technologies (I can hardly believe it was for the Tuli burgers and solar pumps) yet your obsure little link showing SSI did some work indirectly for Sandia has you 100%fully satisfied?
Of course, I understand you don't want to see your life savings go down the drain.
How much of the truth are you withholding to protect your interests?
One more rhetorical question, can you explain what makes the ELF/EM-1 technology revolutionary by pointing out the novelty in the patent application claims?
Don't you honestly feel like you were scammed by the ELF/VAMMP PR advertisements?
(OK, that was two more rhetorical questions)
Sand, maybe MP was still fooled by Boone and Baker at the time the absurd forecasts for the near term future of CDEx were fabricated.
In any case, I'll bet (sorry Scared) those figures were a great tool in hawking PP shares.
I'm I right ontheedge?
PCF, how much money have you made or lost?
Capnmike,
You once published that there was a time when you were 100% sure that you had colon cancer. You went on to state that you had been wrong.
You published about great things to come after the SPIE convention and your belief that Blair could be a Nobel Prize candidate. Nothing great happen after SPIE and Blair turned out to be an alleged trickster. You were wrong again.
Your announcement made the pubic aware of the Loch Harris/TaiPower event and you were "wowed" at the possibilities after such a success. The technology was later dismissed by the Army and Navy, and has currently been rejected twice by the PTO with any hope of acceptance hinging on a trivia statement of "at least one meter". This does not distinguish the technolgy as revolutionary by any stretch of the imagination IMO.
You recently posted your most wow-filled post ever after attending the AAHP event. Now, recognizing your own gullibility, your past prediction failures and your ownership prejudice, can you give shareholders a conservative estimated of your percent confidence in the success of the Valimed unit? Something that they can be comfortable with knowing that you have made the correct considerations (Something Scared was trying to ask you).
Percent-wise like you did with your self-diagnosis.
Will the smaller hospitals buy them or only the larger, better budgeted teaching hospitals?
Percent-wise what is your confidence that the smaller ones will?
Remember, be conservative.
"How was Mari able to purchase PP shares at 30 cents and then turn right around and sell them. (That tidy profit made my profit look like chump change!) Where are the supposed restrictions on the PP shares?! And she wasn't the only one who filled her bank account."
But how many shares have I sold?
"This is a discussion board! Not a personal web site for capnmike to mislead people, which is exactly what he's doing."
Maybe CDEx will build that 2 million eV XRF analyzer for radioactive waste drum characterization like Capnmike's past posts have suggested. LOL!!
But I don't think so, after all, he too was fooled by Blair just like Boone and Baker. In fact, I believe that he posted Blair could be a possible Nobel Prize candidate.
And all the while both Poteet and Cauthen were busy in the lab not knowing that Blair was being called the inventor.
And Robert Stewart did not receive finder's fees from Loch Harris.
That's one unbelieveably funny story.
"Plaintiffs Robert Stewart and Mari L Stassi are inappropriate representatives of the general shareholder's in Loch Harris interest due to numerous past business dealings of Mr. Stewart with both Loch Harris and CDEx in which Mr. Stewart received finders fees for and represented creditors and holders of large equity interests seaking corporate control."
"Did you get his from the truthful posting of lmorovan? lol"
Don't play stupid. You claim to be a Loch/CDEx know-it-all, yet you don't know that that is an official court document from the Loch Harris DA in which Robert Stewart was a plaintiff.
"I have never raised one dollar for Loch Harris or sold one share on their stock, and I repeat, you are a LIAR for saying so."
Three possibilities: 1) The attorneys for Boone and Baker submitted false information to the court. 2) There is more than one person using the ontheedge01 alias (just like you did on RB) and when you say "I" it is not RS posting, but someone else. 3) You are lying (once again).
Thanks for the info lmorovan.
Posted by: d4diddy
I'm specifically referring to patent application 10/268678. That is the application for the revolutionary ELF/EM-1 technology based on x-ray fluorescence.
This patent was filed to protect a revolutionary technology which Loch advertised would save countless human lives by ridding the world of land mines.
Don't you remember all the posts by capnmike and others giving links to all the land mine victims and casualty statistics?
Now we have the same theme with Valimed and the same type of posting.
Don't you remember?
Sure you remember, you sold PP shares for Boone and Baker based on all the hype.
You must of laughed all the way to the bank
Posted by: ontheedge01
d4diddy:
"Sure you remember, you sold PP shares for Boone and Baker based on all the hype."
What an absolute liar you really are.
Care to back up your lie?
"Plaintiffs Robert Stewart and Mari L Stassi are inappropriate representatives of the general shareholder's in Loch Harris interest due to numerous past business dealings of Mr. Stewart with both Loch Harris and CDEx in which Mr. Stewart received finders fees for and represented creditors and holders of large equity interests seaking corporate control."
What does a salesman sell to receive finders fees from Loch Harris?
What is the only product that Loch Harris ever sold?
Who at Loch Harris paid you those finder fees?
Have you sold PP shares for CDEX? Is that why you answered MP's personal email, business as usual?
Ontheedge,
"You really like the Sandia wine stuff. I hope you can figure it out."
LOL!! I don't think anyone will figure out that irrelevant post other than that's what he often does when he what's to distract attention away from another issue.
At best, he seems to be trying to illustrate that SSI had been indirectly involved in a particular Sandia project. Old news, there's much more interesting stuff than that.
However, I'm still curious over capnmike's fixation with this "tough question" of mine he apparently thinks he knows! I wonder why he thinks it's so important and why he hasn't posted the question for all to read?
His post clearly tells me that he has absolutlely no idea what MY tough question is.
In any case, I would suggest that he post the tough question FIRST before answering it, then maybe readers will be able to make more sense out of his post.
lmorovan, could you please post a link?
lmorovan, let me know if you find that document. Thanks.
Interesting...
"Had you not typed Sandia so many times, I may have missed the opportunity to ask YOUR tough questions directly, eye-to-eye with SSI folk (now CDEX team members).
Something like.... "I can only discuss and comment on work that is PRIOR to CDEX."
Capnmike, when you write: "something like" followed by a statement, what exactly does this mean? Was that statement the reply to a question you asked a CDEx team member?
Actually, maybe I should back up a bit.
What exactly was this question that you considered to be tough?
Did you really ask the question "eye-to-eye"?
"Thank you again d4diddy - I feel even better about my investment knowing this portion of the past works of Dr. Poteet and co. I really did think you must have discovered this, but now I think not, so here 'tis. WOW!"
Hey, don't worry about! I'm happy to have helped. Now get outta here and stop spreading those gosh awful rumors, well at least don't publish them.