InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: capnmike post# 6727

Tuesday, 01/10/2006 7:44:35 PM

Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:44:35 PM

Post# of 45771
I wasn't talking about your CDEx investment.

The more that you dodge questions the more one must wonder why you're acting like ontheedge.

You must have thought that your Loch Harris investment (VAMMP, ELF/EM-1) put you in a "particulary good position" as well since you claimed to have put your life savings into it, yet you are at a complete loss to explain with any credible evidence what happen to those products or whether the products truly existed as advertised.

What happen to VAMMP?

What happen to ELF/EM-1?

What happen to the suite of transition products initially advertised by CDEx?

What happen to the PSSS that went on sale three years ago this month?

They've all been "back burnered", dismissed from development by the Army/Navy and rejected by the PTO.

These are the very same products which you wholeheartedly endorsed and posted endless links describing all the potential applications for the technology (as advertised). Many of your posts contained irrelevant applications and/or applications completely out of the scope of the advertised technology's potential use IMO.

While reputable physicists openly claimed that the advertised technology "defied the laws of physics", you continued to post nothing but potential applications without addressing the important issues from these experts.

In the past, you always posted your opinions and links regarding the technology on the premise that "it's all good". Not once can I remember a critical post where your DD could provide any meaningful support to the claims of the technology.

Are you beginning to see my point more clearly?

That technology has now gone bye-bye and you claim to be 100% satisfied with that issue. Your "particulary good position" is now based on something new which is considerably less impressive from a performance point of view. The new product, Valimed, is NOT revolutionary IMO, but relies on designing an application specific instrument and selling it into a niche market.

Will you get rich? Don't know. Will a giant see the potential and enter the market or buy CDEx out? Don't know. Has CDEx filed basic patent protection with Valimed being the only product that can do what it does? I don't think so. Has CDEx filed adequate patent protection to protect the application processes that they envision? Don't know. Can a company circumvent any granted patent protection (like Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. that already has a very similar patent)? Don't know

In the mean time, you continue to behave in the exact same manner as you did in the past. New applications: Meth labs, Tamiflu, "rid the world", "save the world", "______ amount of deaths a year due to _______" (full in the blanks- landmines or medical errors)... etc.

Big names, big names, big names!!!!!

The exact same blueprint as Loch Harris, the exact same hype.

Maybe if you presented ALL the issues in a more realistic and critical manner you'd have more credibility (at least to me) instead of just being the captain that cried "wow".





















Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.