Gosh capnmike!
I'm still waiting for you to perform your most excellent DD so you can point out to confused shareholders exactly which claims in the XRF patent appliaction (No. 10/268,678) make the origin ELF/EM-1 technology "revolutionary"!
No one seems to know... or at least they don't want to talk about it!
A positive well thought out reply would benefit all shareholders. Maybe a call to Poteet would prove worthwhile.
At least engage me (LOL) with this question, why has CDEx patent application No. 10/268678 containing the touted "revolutionary" ELF/EM-1 technology been rejected twice by the PTO for claims shown by the examiner to be "OBVIOUS" and "ANTICIPATED"?
------------------------
revolutionary
adj.
1 of, characterized by, favoring, or causing a revolution in a government or social system
2 bringing about or constituting a great or radical change (a revolutionary design)
----------------------------
So what's so great about it? (Excuse me, that was two questions)
P.S. Ontheedge, feel free to reply with useful information.
