Capnmike, I believe that you are in a particularly good position to provide some answers here "Buster"!
"This is a tangled web of seemingly independent assessments that are not and claims of scientific advances that defy the laws of physics," says Regina Dugan, an independent consultant in Alexandria, Va., who until May was a program manager for the Defense Department's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. In that job she oversaw development of advanced land-mine-detection technology."
Where is VAMMP/ELF today ("think Taiwan"- p4316)?
Why did Malcolm Philips continue to promote this technology after taking over Loch Harris then slowly-but-surely put the technology on the back burner?
Why has the REVOLUTIONARY technology been dismissed from development by the Army and Navy in independent contracts, labeled as "secrecy not recommended" by the Army, Navy, Air Force and DOE, and rejected twice (as "obvious" and "anticipated") by the PTO?
Why has the technology's performance currently been reduced to the use of UVF operating at under an inch and requiring 30 seconds? A performance level which can be currently achieved by several spectral instruments IMO?
Some posters have published to the investment community that they are 100% satisfied that they have all the answers to these questions. I wonder why they post these statements, yet do not share a sliver of credible information to back up such claims?
Why after posting such opinions do they publicly state that they have elected to discontinue their "chatting" posts, but will continue posting the same type speculative posts that they did for VAMMP, ELF/EM-1?
Where did those type posts get Loch Harris shareholders?
INET6, what do they say about those that fail to learn from the past?
AI
