Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Make it .06 slap slap slap
Lets Close This B over .05
Hard to get mainstream media given the non reporting status of UOIP. If a journalist or blogger took the opposite approach and wrote something related to the cable companies and their vendors who have tried to defend them we might get more looks. Even then chances of CNBC or Bloomberg coverage is small. Places like LAW 360. National Law Review, Seeking Alpha are gonna have to work until someone produces a well drafted article that maps out everything start to finish. #wordofmouth #tellafriend
$ $ UOIP $ $
Got mine locked to sell @ $5.00 Limit GTC. As expected a couple flippers and profit takers along the way but I love the fact so many board members wanna see this to the end result.
$ UOIP $
Anyone who asks about trial...the scheduling order is set. However you think these cable companies want to take it to trial given their WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT? NO WAY!!! Thats Treble Damages Son! Let the settlement discussions commence!
UOIP
https://www.streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/VirnetX+%28VHC%29+Wins+%24502.6+Million+in+Federal+Case+vs+Apple+%28AAPL%29/14043419.html
^^This is an example of what we are looking for folks^^
In this case the patents were INVALIDATED by PTAB
In our case, our patents have been VALIDATED despite numerous attempts by Cisco and Arris. This should show how valuable the patents are!!!
That case was against one company. We are taking on 13 of the biggest cable companies with MONSTER REVENUE > BILLIONS
There is still tons of upside! We are talking more than a Billion Dollar Amount. Divide by the outstanding shares and you'll see!!
UOIP
This is the Appeal by Chanbond Against the one favorable Cisco Decision. This will be icing on the cake.
https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2016-01744%2F29
$$ UOIP $$
Yes!!
#UOIP
$$ UOIP $$
$$UOIP$$
You ask this question everyday. Ride the wave or swim to shore yo
Ive got a list of authors /editors from every article on chanbond. Might start sending some emails out. Looking REAL GOOD!!!
LETS GOO!!
Great Day
Thanks for all the responses.
Looking forward to Arris IPR denial and subsequent articles and law blog coverage.
Thanks for responding, so just to clarify.. The Appeal on Cisco Final Written Decision is still in effect correct?
I have searched high and low for time frames around appeals to CAFC.
It seems that the appeal itself has to be made within 63 days from the date of the final written decision.
For Chanbond vs Cisco this was February 23 2018
Chanbond appeal as April 25 2018 ( See Link)
https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2016-01744%2F29
Nowhere on the USPTO.gov page can I find anything around how long it takes to dismiss or rexamine
Zomby I could have swore mentioned something during the motion to stay that he visited. Like the Judge and said something about it specifically. Ill dig more
I am curious about the appeal on the Final Written Decision with Cisco? The appeal was back in April. Zomby, Did you mention something about this back when you were in the court?
Nothing New in Pacer or Unified Patents Portal
OH INDEED! I saw that happen > over 1 million at .024
Major Ask wall > 1.2 Million at .024 and another line of defense right behind it .025
no kidding
Many of the posts today I think are sticky worthy
You willing to bet the farm on that? Bold Statement that SC offtake is needed. Many don't agree
ORAL ORDER: The parties have advised that a dispute has arisen requiring judicial attention. The Court will hold a discovery conference on 7/31/2018, at 3:30 PM in Chambers before Judge Richard G. Andrews to take up this issue. In preparation for this hearing the parties shall follow the Discovery Matters and Disputes procedure as set forth in the Scheduling Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/9/2018. (nms)
Why is eveyone reacting. There isnt any mysterious news leak. Proudfoamer is referring to the July 31st event.
Top dollar for that disco.
-I agree on Lind
-The PR today is kind of just saying "ya we were chosen over x amount of other projects"
-I look forward to IBC/NIOBF news first
-I'm Hoping for August or September financing
Thanks Jim Sims!! Great Presentation and This HIghlight is good news
Sir, you definitely did not see that...well maybe you did but it wasnt legitimate. You have to understand your computer and internet browser store information that you search.
Gap Down will get Scooped Up
Decent summary. There are other little tidbits on the background and ill dig some up. Everyone is preparing for a settlement in the end. Trial just yields more $
Must be MM shorts covering? I wish i knew more logistically how MM operate etc. I just notice that daily we only se 10k 20k bid sizes coming in and i would presume retail. Then occasionally you see these multiple 90k bids?
pretty good bid sizes again ..better slap the ask and get in before the weekend
48k @.499
45k @ .489
35k @.46
its just happened...top ask was at .23 for 38k size someone slaps ask for 25k shares next thing 185k wall goes up at .023 and 105k @ .0234
Ask is thin...but if say someone comes along and wants to load up 100-200k shares. This is where we see the MM shuffle correct
volume will move it QUICK
Pretty good sized bids coming in
65k @ .4823
Oh Indeed. That stay denial was huge and in some respect foreshadowing the result of the IPR. Anyways like I said before, I only care about Arris for the publicity aspect. The next few months could be pretty slow but thats just my opinion. Behind the scenes though I imagine settlement discussions will be taking place and the December dates are when that should come to light If I understand correctly? So there could be surprises along the way, but only time will tell. Glad to be a part of a dedicated group who seems to be in it for the long haul. $$UOIP$$
Thanks for trying to clarify for everyone..I've been seeing confusion around this matter. And yes they are two separate things. I would say they are connected in a way. What people need to understand when it comes to patent infringement cases..
(Chanbond vs 13 Cable Companies) is the actual court case. But what happens on the side is these other third parties that have indirect or direct interest (RPX, CISCO, ARRIS) attempt to invalidate the patents with IPR (Inter Parties Reviews) through the PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board). This can strengthen the case for the defendants in the actual court case.
So RPX lost, Cisco lost 7 of 8, and Arris has these last 5 pending that WILL be tossed for legitimate reasons (time barred, privy, etc)
Having validated patents from PTAB (governing body of patents) is VALUABLE.
VHC vs APPLE had invalidated patents by PTAB and still were awarded judgement of $500 million. That's nothing compared to 13 major cable companies
This continues to move along. Day to Day nobody should be worried. I think the last week of July is gonna be big. I expect a ARRIS IPR denial from PTAB and in the actual court case ( discovery conference) there will be a dispute settled and based on history and the great reporting from Zomby, I think Chanbonds top notch lawyers will be prepared to say the least.