Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good luck with Hurricane Matthew
This looks like a Spielberg film in the living- and this is not the time to suggest where past SHM's have taken place or where future SHM's might take place
All best wishes
The Nobel Prize for Physics... and QS ?
I am no scientist or physicist but my first understanding of
the field of study featured in this Prize is all about a new
importance of electrons and magnetic fields in the constituency of
matter
The three scientists have collaborated in focusing on the 'surface
of matter' and this surface is found and defined through electrical factors.
I wonder if Professor Tao's work is adjacent to this.
True That.....about the lease
My only recall is minimal but I have repeatedly bumped
into the phrase - re all the ongoing integration/ works with
KM - that these would be conducted "under the lease" and continue
indefinitely.
This struck me as an encouraging indication of long term
commitments ...but maybe I missed the main point written
elsewhere..
If that is right, maybe we will get that kind of minimal news - ie that the ongoing lease will be publicised as ongoing..so, nothing
material enough to celebrate or to raise the share price ??
with respect Jaymark
and like me, you are more than weary of this
whole thing, by the sound of it,
but you & we have no idea of what is going on
at any time
whether
before or after or during the actual contact
between QSEP and all these Chinese/ Russian and
inter-planetary big shots
these updates are exasperating only because they represent
the absence of an actual Material Event
that does not make them b/s..it makes them into
an expression of QS confidence and progress and
they are the context in which sales will eventually
happen
just suppose the first contract has a monetary value which
should take the s.p up to $3....and then the second takes it to
..$5 let's say...
Dont you think that these long months of Updates will look very different then ? Both to us and to the market and the value of our shares ??
There are some very very irritating things about the CEO's quasi military and sadistic view of self-promotion..but let's hope his priorities will impress our first lords and masters
One irritant : Redchip Videos ...why did they stop there , with this one tiny pocket of communication ? What was so special about that broadcast that means it can't be replicated or varied elsewhere ? Publicity is publicity and no-one was offended by the 2 videos, no NDA was violated..
weird
Is that a fact Homebrew ? The SEC takes
no notice of what is written in a filed document ?
I find that a pretty unlikely form of administration.
But, now that the SEC has checked out QS Energy
and we can read the results for ourselves, we know
that there are no issues : quite the opposite.
As with the rubbish about Reynolds numbers - if there
are genuine concerns (as opposed to trying to scare shareholders) then the concerned people should contact Professor Tao/ Temple
and also post their communications here - along with any
acknowledgment of receipt...etc
But there are no genuine concerns, so they don't contact
the right people and have nothing substantive to post
here
NOW is the time for all Longs to ask
this (because it is some time since this issue was raised
and it's my turn to do so !)
The SPLIT of the stock - forward split or backward I don't know
but the SPLIT is my current concern
I have researched the issue briefly and, yes, it seems that our stock is the ideal candidate
a long period of research and development, a breakthrough technology and a successful commercialisation within a huge market etc
and most of all - a real dependence on the grass roots of the investors (as has been acknowledged by QS ) - investors who have had to endure the years of being squashed under a stone while NDA's prevailed and the industry adjusted in its own very secretive and discreet way
all the signs indicate a rapidly rising share price which
will also be living in the future prosperity of the company
and in an under-capitalised condition
would it not be a truly appropriate gesture and thank you if
our stock was split - let's say at $10 - on a 2 to 1 basis ?
The QS Management must have pondered this ? After so many
complaints and frustrations about the pace & the communication ?
If we don't qualify for this bonus, then I don't know who
does or would..
yet more translations - Arabic, Chinese, Russian
personally I dreaded this kind of news
global and all good of course
It does seem that the first client/ contract
is going to have huge consequences for the whole
industry..
it won't exactly be 'take or leave it'
who will be able to ignore what their competitors
are saving ?
maybe give IR a call ? worth a try ?
might glean something
Yes indeed - but more likely as the site of a Longs'
Get together (Antipodean Section )
than the next SHM or a contract !?
Another day , another episode of Waiting for AO
I like the sound of the Kangaroo Island !
Your way of saying, 'anywhere ' ?
One benefit of this apparent endlessness Before the Event is that
After the Event the market and world will have become absolutely aware of the full potential
so, let's hope, the share price will not be responding only to the value of a particular contract...
people used to talk regularly of the shares in a reverse split..but that is one subject not nowadays repeatedly endlessly..
Conjecture : aren't we a little late for our next
Instalment of the Global Potential..Russia ?
As a Long who was fully installed in a desert before QS got there
and thus being constantly prone to those shimmering illusions (chimaera?)
Would I be projecting in saying that this apparent delay in the publication of the Russian potential MIGHT be due to a focus on
a more material event ??
there's got to be some kind of publication soon...it's too
damned quiet ...what kind of ambush will it be ??
well, FML2013 the SEC function in our story
is very clear for all to see : whatever caused
the SEC to publish its position re QS, I am
very pleased to see such authoritative support
for a new technology being adopted with all due
care and caution : anything hasty or premature
by our first clients would be very foolish
given its probable popularity within an entire
industry
Big Thanks to whoever prompted this information
being brought out of the obscurity which is its
favoured place !!
Smile : i think i was wrong about the Newfields
issue
i think their's is on hold
yes,trade magazines show that Newfields
have been working with an AOT and JHS..
I remember now...the waxy oils in Uinta Basin..
it's all building nicely, more and more long term stuff beginning
to come back to the surface..where we can all see them
unless like a famous naval commander you deliberately look
down the telescope through a blind eye
thanks for re-posting that SEC document Smile
that should join the Snoop regular postal service
it is typical of the kind of 'publicity' that we are
having to work with - i.e about as quiet and understated
in formal terms as it is possible to be
but all the more meaningful in its profound and long term
effects
obviously just like the oil industry likes it, as we must
all accept and while putting up with the consequences of
its minimalism
Some sources indicate that Newfield Oil
might be the redacted client...but I can't recall
if theirs would be additional units....I remember them
being included in a project a while back and then silence..
but if they have one AOT, good to see a case of real time and progress in it..
Thank you Smile for that article from World Pipelines
In that REDACTED paragraph, any guesses as to who/ which
potential client it is ..not KM or TC is the only clue I saw on
a quick read through ??
the fingers of one head ?
brilliant
the same head which tells you about the process
of a new and disruptive technology being adopted
across a huge global industry
a unique process
one client has huge significance at the end of a
documented, traditional process
one client equals enough, everything
out
Actually, the precise wording about that LOI
was that the translation was hand in hand with being
'under review by their leadership'
so in my mind I had rushed the Letter to a phase of
readiness prematurely
these are potentially huge orders with matching logistics
and consequences
no-one is rushing into anything - nor would they move so much faster even if the technology had been around a long time
Yes, you would,but it's not like that is it ?
this is about the adoption of a new technology by an industry
not about children reading signs in a leisure park
please, not just regional updates...
something in translation is needed
wow. brilliant...
never thought of those
good analogy Moorea9 : easy money
it's a Win Win situation for those who know a
good share when they see one
Labor Day means a rest for the weary posters ?
And also for those who are working on that
translation ..
which seems to be something of an epic
unless it also means re-working on What
was being agreed..
good word that, 'nigh'..it rhymes
with Pie
sorry about that !
Exactly Pie -whatever slim pickings are available
one minute it's 'it doesn't work', the next it's
'why haven't they sold an entire system of integrated
batch-controlling, remote controlled AOT's ' -
as if
these systems are a common, off the shelf commodity
with a User Manual...
which it will soon have !
Yes moorea 9 - exactly or "exactly"
welcome back !!
Please, no, not a bogus debate about turbulence
that subject has been covered here again and again
having first been worked upon by scientists, physicists
and engineers
not single AOT's but entire systems
are the new challenge and proof
Strange isn't it that entire networks and integrated systems
might take a little longer to sell than one AOT ?
then there is the remote-control of the system ...and all the
management and logistical support of it all ..
how long is that all supposed to take ?
hard to know since it's never been done before
and since the technology has so many variations and talents
that it all takes that much more research and planning..
Thank you Zerosum : 2 quotes in red
that tell the world very concisely and clearly about the history of AOT progress
every investor knows what it is reasonable to expect
at this point
and this expectation can now extend way into a future
when all the posters on this board will be benefiting
thanks always to Zerosnoop of course
yes, only time...
only
what is that most corny tune..probably sung by
a French man...Sacha Distel..Charles Aznavour..??
If I only had t**e , only **m*
what did I miss Pie?
and how does the word investor
get to be "investor" ?
by being congenitically tricky ?
Smile - and how does this confident bet
and its purchase price
fit with a Letter of Intent (in English and Arabic)
hitting the wires ??!!
I bet a packet of best chewing gum that we get
that news tomorrow or Wednesday ...
Smile : could be a week, could be a few....
days ? weeks ?
it has already been in translation for at least
2 weeks, since the first mention of it..
Exactly moorea9 .....and what a thrill to say
goodbye to one NDA ??
How much time to translate this LOI ??
I am excited and intrigued by this issue : why tell us about
the translation ...unless we are going to be affected by WHAT is being translated ?? unless we are going to see the English version
...along with the rest of the world ??
Wishful thinking on my part,,? Projection ??
It is just great to get FIRST NEWS of another voice, language
and ..client ..not the CEO's voice..but an alien voice talking about QS and AOT ...is not this the precise thing we have been waiting for ? is it so important what exactly is involved..how many AOT's .?
and maybe this also means that this client is not watching KM
and waiting - they want to move ahead, their oil situation is not the same...who knows ...as long as QS have successfully demonstrated that the whole project can be managed together
surely..the wording cannot take so long...even if a lawyer or two has to be involved
Cpopp : you have spelt out my dread/ worst case
My answer has to be that a lot of this work and testing has
already been done and the correlation between laboratory and
field work has clarified where further testing - commercially significant testing - is not needed
My hope is that it was only the condensate that needed
further work
I guess the novelty could always entail more tests as you suggest but surely
there have to be parameters and phases so that the first operations can both be trials and then for real..rather than formally designated as trials
which might delay the commercial start..
Let's hope that a Letter of Intent can cover all the phases
within a context that allows for novelty and adjustments and
then take-off !
Anyone understand Arabic ??
With that Letter of Intent awaiting translation
into Arabic - does this not sound like a very
significant detail ?
(apart from - thank God - that there can be no nonsense
about it from those who struggle to understand English !!)
does not a translation invite a signature ??
aren't we supposed to think that we are going
to read this document ??
does this sound like a material event ??
how long can a translation take ?
exciting ; real collaboration; no shyness about
publicity
words to use : splitting hairs and toilet
ie it is proven that KM want to integrate a working and
proven AOT into a remote controlled, multi-batch system
(otherwise KM and SEC would be after QS for misrepresentation)
just as it is hair splitting to argue otherwise, does it
need to be proven that Don Dickson did not just flush $70,000
down the toilet ??