Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I took some initial notes last several days and did not write down my sources. Taken from their website and YF and IHub prs.
PROFITS = *50% of EBITA (IN THEIR BUSINESS MODEL IS TYPICAL)
They have over 60K customers Calif.
They would like to get 200K by end of 2018, and a subscription cost $8-12/month.
The above is NOT hard facts and I am not Accting proficient.
For now (WED AM) e seem to be basing @.12-.14 stock price range. Can not really see how any retail shorts would be able to make much/pay on this stock.
If I remember right, company plans to offer at least one free online lottery ticket buy/try out. It might help if company targets mailing coupon in sample test zip codes to nearest heavy retail outlet stores that sell lottery tickets?
Why not think big and give free online buy coupons to all Tesla Owners registered by DMV? Shark Tank That! Why . . . even put Kirk on Fake Shark Tank pool in a comedy Ad! Stand on the freeway on ramp access stop-light corner with 'you can buy @ home or mobile lottery tickets NOW!' or whatever signage :)
Great . . . wouldn't it be rad if Washington DC was our next online lottery siting approved?
I just recently bot 'misbehaving' book by Nobel Prize Winner Richard H. Thaler PHD Behave Economics.
If your going on a trip, you can just throw everything at random into your backpack, etc. or develop a logical way to pack your pack. The essence of Information Theory is Order must come from an equation of logic that is repeatable. One cannot just toss a bunch of parts into a pile and get a car by randomly shaking it.
Our stock price is going down for a reason (which we retail are not 'in' on) . . . but that price can only go to .0001 and its all over.
That is not the intent nor purpose proposed by the informational news
we have and expect to soon enough receive.
LTTGF stock promoters have created this legal mobile lottery tech for a purpose, and I do think that purpose is in Calif. producing revenues firstly (then on to next 20 some odd states that will be receptive to
earning a novel new source of lottery players $$s venue). LTTGF is prototyping their tech and getting steady new customer base increase.
Its going to take some time to build this out.
How lucky to be in on at the start?
This new model of lottery playing at home or mobile, is going to register
with enough new and current lottery players; to produce a nice chuck of continuing tax revenues, user fees, and ad data re=sale $$s to boost the stock price. The Kirk TV and media interviews and face book, etc. will
'light-up' former and current Star Trek, etc. Series followers.
Us Valley Boys and Girls are 'Going-Down-Town'!
Do not forget . . . this mobile player lottery tech venue can be adapted to pay-to-play VG formats. Oh Yeah!
Lets find out what coming up herein.
I just bot in today and will buy some again if it goes down further.
This is going to get a price boost (I suspect), when Dec 11 N.Y. Sup-Court takes up the case for online betting in that state.
Administration in DC may twit about that as true states rights example, and their choice to attempt to create more state and federal taxes revenue via online gambling?
Wait until news hungry TV shows have Captain Kirk on for an interview!
Think security of NOT going personally to local retail Quik-stops to get your ticket and you find out automatically with a 'heads-up' on your cell and computer for you personally as to whether you won or not.
Just think of this LTTGF stock as a constant chance to win at the lotto every day . . . you already bot your recurring ticket!
This is buy-and-hold small coin gamble/investment on online retailing.
We are a stock very few know about . . . watch the volume go up steadily
as once the PR Soup gets cooking . . . lots not want to NOT take a chance on their favorite pastime . . . lotto.
This is model of mass psychology instinctual investing . . . pull up a chair . . . get a drink and popcorn . . . and watch the show?
Looking the stock over . . . is not Mr. Frost's age quite advanced to be actively running such a company?
The Claros I in-office patient sample testing system seems well set-up for2018 approval.
What about other mobile testing methods competitors like devices, that attach to cell phones and tablets that are developing and use apps and cloud to process patient test results and are send to the doctor?
Really . . . is Mr. Frost the major funder of this company finances (along with his money partners)? Is he really that rich?
OPK website stated the company also is conducting numerous investments in
other medical tech companies . . . I should hope some of them would be fruitful for OPK.
Who do you think is 'beating down' this stock price . . . is it just
necessary adjustments in funds EOY tax-selling positioning?
With 6K employees . . . is not that a lot of pay-rolling and marketing costs to incur?
Anyone have any thoughts herein?
Maybe, maybe not as no reference was made to diet history of patients nor their weight and exercise ability (just that they had some degree of blockage or occlusion of a main artery and that may have been the factor the caused 'chest pains'). There was also no mention of any other meds that patient was taking currently (like anxiety or other psych medicated conditions). Low threshold inflammation allergy can manifest itself in the
equation also, and not having been addressed as source contributing to
'chest pains'. There was no reference to stress factors in the patients life and environment.
Best to seek alternatives to surgery beforehand and if the patient is finely at a stage wherein 'chest pains' manifest, operative measures are usually quickest way to alleviate a stat medical threat to patient and their condition? Be this so, CVRS is still 'in-the-game' of improving
operative outcomes.
As the article alluded to, the vast surgery operations numbers worldwide are not going to be halted, without further supporting research studies. One might suspect however; that meds panels given to patient will be more closely watched and adjusted thus. One cannot fault the surgeon doctor, unless they have not adequately made observation of surrounding tissues and blood flow states. And, this may just be impossible in an emergent medical situation. Stents may be all there is left, before mechanical pumps and electronic valves and boosters to heart beat are needed? And, genetics plays a role also. Thus, operative procedures can try and beat 'your genes' monkey wrench thrown in to the medical equation.
It is not pleasant to watch our stock price daily fall a stead bit, and why this is so is basically unknown. As a reference I sold out my small
stock position and am now watching for entry when it bottom signals a new support bases.
Sounds terribly off estimate . . . and smacks of having advanced info before event . . . careful. What happened to IMO?
Everyone wants this stock to succeed, or whatever . . . but use some sense of cautious in your statements?
Careful . . . you may be called a troll, etc.
Its like going to a casino . . . they get all wigged up if you start asking about which machines are more popular?
Just found the stock today . . . B. Braun distribution deal news and settling the sourcing of special materials metals, should be coming in Nov 9 earnings call . . . though is it not held after-hours? Not a real good thing.
Volume down from AV today and stock price seeking temporary support level?
What is word on development progress on ISRG Devinci adaption of DXTR staple and Stapler Cart.?
DXTR going to need new funding soon, to kep gong?
Or, is everyone counting on new contracts etc.?
Anyone care to answer on my ?s
I want to take a chance on this company, but do not now if should wait to see what next few days brings.
You are most correct, as human is major loop operator of TITXF device.
However; AI will soon enough move in to take over, as human population grows beyond ability of doctor types to handle. TITXF is a little side gamble/chance to ride in the surgery stock tech cycle . . . for now. Sell high and Buy low, and hold some for the LT.
Doctor cannot even out-think AI in its ability to scan more data and come up with better medical options. AI does not have to go to college.
It can 24/7 scan patient healing and activity process.
OK . . . I listen to everyone . . . like the board and the stock, but I just think outside the box . . . have much to learn and not afraid to say I can make mistakes.
Why would I stab-bo a stock that I do not short but own?
Better question . . . why 'the docs w/o identity' bot in if exercisable warrants are still out there, they don't control?
Honestly, I think you are right.
I may surely have confused it with TRXC.
So, everything is smooth sailing technically, if so that's great!
We just have a money prob after 1st quarter of 2018?
Thanks for pointing out my error.
Like the reality therapy of cold accounting guess-animation.
Wow . . . we are in trouble now?
Your basic argument asks telling . . . where is the Money!
And . . . it seems to imply more stock price drop coming-our-way?
Its time to PR the steps to Heaven . . . on to the Moon Alice!!
Kind of shoots the 'Buy-Out!' in-the-foot logic . . . why buy a yet to prove itself stage company and product? And, I would just doubt anyone is going to drop $Billions on TITXF at this moment . . . maybe say $450mil and that is quite a stretch. <---only one I could suspect would be someone completely out of this area of medical robotics and wants in bad . . . to so cover their --- as the times . . . they are a-changing. Why not just buy-up X million shares . . . get a seat of the BOD . . .
and offer tech assistance to boot? Oh my . . . the gov watch-dogs just got 'dumped'.
Why maybe F or GE might do it . . . or HP :)
Sorry, rarely take notes or remember names.
It was some guy(?) that did a hit piece on TITXF and implied that the basic robotic platform was hardly changed from when it was purchased from Italian Company (in 2011?) I just wondered if TITXF is steadily modifying and improving the platform (should suspect they would be).
Is TITXF going forward with a now set-in-stone manufacturing process, or are they just at prototyping adaption phase?
I do not watch the videos nor get to any actual shows or conferences.
Like the vast majority herein, I am just a speculator on this tiny also-ran
OTC above-the-border listed stock gamble. I do not buy $60 or whatever stocks . . . just taking a chance on a dawning new tech area in med-land.
As an aside . . . I love it when the gov states its going to 'economize' medical care (translation: for who? Their old-hat donors . . . sure!).
There has been some bad talk around about TITXF system has not been improved since 2015. Would you care to state if you have (or soon will) have had the opportunity to see first hand is that is untrue?
I enjoyed your thoughts, and look forward to your professional insights on the board.
The question is did you take the .40 odd cent profit, by selling some shares to be then able to trade your remaining shares held for free? I would have. This stock is game for short-term trading, me thinks (at least right now).
I am not rich enough to be day-trader, but will short-term trade.
You obviously have been around for years with TITXF?
That's great . . . I will follow your postings for insights.
This is just a budget robotics medical stock I have invested in a small bit, as an 'also ran' long-shot. I suspect that is not your investment position here . . . but you think TITXF is very soon destine for major stock price move-up? And, what year do you see this happening in? 2017 tax-selling season approaches.
You are expecting a major PR around the corner, to prevent stock price falling further. I surmise.
Lets hope you are right.
There does not appear to be strong stock price support pattern established yet. Or, do you foresee .30-.25 as that support barrier that will hold (currently)? I would estimate our new found 'doctor friends group' hardly wants their protective barrier at .25 to be breached. Lets see what the real shorts think of protecting the doctors ploy.
Regardless, I say other small retailers besides me, might buy-in if stock price breaks below .25.
I like what you said. its makes me wonder exactly where our real need for funding this company will come from.
I am still holding on for now (only small retail investor), but this company has a lot of 'show me please how you expect to succeed' stuff
to do. For example, we will need hundreds of operations data to show to FDA before we can expand into other operative surgical procedural clearance status. <---that will take months and months, and lots of new cash.
But like others have said . . . we are at pivot position in robotic surgery
status of new systems offering to compete against the established mega-company. Lets see what 2018 brings and maybe we do get established pole position in lower-cost robotic surgery market.
We go to .25 or less, someone got 'free money' . . . from whom?
It sure was not retail investors benefiting. Nothing like becoming a 'partner' with free shorted money?
It was not retail investors shorting or selling herein.
TITXF will need many more millions to get its product going sales wise and they do not have that money now.
No way to gross this over for us little guys.
There is going to be no quick magic road forward, unless we obtain a real partner that wants to improve TITXF tech actively.
TITXF will need more time and bucks or loonies, to get itself recognized
in the surgical robotic field? That to me means the stock price 'bounces' about quite a bit, before it starts rising steadily.
It will be 2018 or 2019 until we get there.
We will (by then) be extremely lucky, if we can compete against competitors coming into robotic surgery field.
Do not forget . . . we are the 'budget' level robotic offering and may just get pushed to the side, unless we can fulfill the 'budget' robotics surgery slot against all comers.
Hold and be prepared to buy a little more, if its price drops dramatically.
Not sure what you reference when you speak of VERB . . . it is an EU area stock?
Most are not yet aware of TITXF and its potential for smaller hospitals and rural, etc. use situations. The advent of 5G and its effect on robotics was interesting comment.
IF doctors are buying into TITXF, that is good as they have understood the potential herein.
Were TITXF to build a miniature video cam internal surgery site single port medical robot that say worked with a tablet, I should hope the military would be all over it? It might even be possible to use solar cells to power an operating laser, to seal wounds etc.
Perhaps the bigger robotic surgery companies, would not 'get' into this type of medical device, as it would reduce the use of their hospital sited medical robots.
Psych behavioral factors (like PR 'herding' effect) rule the turf on stock investing, go figure. Must be some form of cosmic madness disease?
TITXF does not have much in way of fundamental grounded invested right now. Its' future hope-um-driven folks.
I can't afford the bigger (and costly) surgical robotic companies at their 52 week highs . . . and I would suspect there are going to be many other small retail investors that will take a 'flyer' on TITXF and TRXC. MBOT I watch, but it just seems stuck in developmental stage
for some more time, and has not talked about remote mobile uses of its tech.
TITXF looks positioning for 2018 and beyond USA use.
Canada could sure help if its medical schools were to order some?
Canada should be the test case, as vast rural medical needs and they are presently expensive to serve.
Lets get some young geek doctors behind this.
One big problem with these new electronics is they are more expensive for car buyers and more prone to technical 'issues'.
Ma-Lends may have parents $$S to fall back on . . . younger not so much.
Parking fees and road crowding volume increasing . . . leads to ride sharing Uber-ites?
Fuel cells (unless able to produce on-demand H instead of pressurized in-vehicle H containers) and lack of refueling stations . . . will limit H Cells as passenger size car uses?
TSLA may move newest models over to China for production, and no one is yet sure how USA buyers will be on accepting Chinese Auto products.
Note GM had been focusing on bringing Chinese-made Buicks to USA market.
No word yet on how consumer market went for that.
China has more population to create engineers and scientists and business whizzes/unit volume . . . but will they find freedom to innovate like TSLA has in USA? Maybe we will see Chinese factories moving into USA and getting the tax-breaks here. Guess who gets to cough up the missing taxes that should have been? Not the rich.
Tax them robots!
I took an initial position Friday, this should follow the robotic surgery 'tide' up.
Also ran company (TITXF) that can fit in to worldwide coming surgery revolution. You have to wonder why USA always wants to step on Canada
Companies . . . they are our closest bordering allies and very smart folk
(and nice too).
TITXF should look also to India as potential partner and user in their health care market.
See no reason this stock cannot rise to .60-$1+ price area . . . specially
if another tech like VR/AR headset stuff is added to our surgery platform.
Think remote assist robotic surgery platform for small rural hospitals and say military field hospital-type situations.
GE is basically not even addressing this area of health care . . . and they wonder why their stock price is falling? All we need is overseas bank to back us for more R&D and platform purchases.
India, for example, is going to be our new counter China partnership, and they are very competent technically.
Regardless of how DC throws monkey wrenches into budgeting, health care is going robotic for efficiency and safety of patient. TITXF lowers the price barrier.
Ok . . . this is most secretive stock I have owned.
PHDs unable to discussion uses of their tech . . . funding for what (after 2018)? Potential orders always couple of years away.
Apple seeking patent for display projection that needs no user glasses. MVIS has many patents covering its tech; however does it have funds to fight patent challenge court battles?
MVIS makes no mention of numerous other applications for this laser projector tech, and yet other companies working to apply lay-over projection to surgery uses and remote repair instructions.
MVIS . . . silence.
Is this a reverse spilt machine . . . issue more stock . . . attend conferences . . . and repeat? Stock volume and price indicative of other stocks I have held, that eventually passed away. Super tech that did not
reach out and touch anyone. Where is the R&D expansion and pre-sales and ad budgeting?
Joke: maybe MVIS should contact administration and demo a projection Border Wall. <---it will be way more cheaper to concept visualize.
The puzzle piece is who would get the solar cell wall contract for Administration Border Wall? That may not happen if proposals are enacted for an upgraded 'electronic wall' and more border guards instead of actual physical wall?
Suspect we are being played with by larger stock market players, for now.
Just watch and see how far down they are willing to bring this stock.
SPWR should do well as its steadily getting set-up for domestic USA production of new solar cell design.
All we have to do is focus on USA weather damage areas with proposals for installing solar cell farms and neighborhood solar projects.
Replacing power line grid systems, means just waiting for more weather storms and flooding repeat power lines installs?
Last night on PBS TV, coal executive stated solar power costs .26/watt verses wonderful coal smog power that is way cheaper, according to him.
He did not mention health costs to public and water pollution,
etc. costs.
Evidence of one-sided angle of attack against solar power, especially if citizen user actually owns and controls own power system.
National and regional logical planning, is opposed by certain interests that want only their side to have control.
If stock price gets taken down below $6, I would personally buy.
PPS will be rewarded over time. This is a stead growth industry, that will keep lowering its costs as tech improves.
Excellent comeback.
I shall watch and see how it goes.
Best of luck with F.
Nothing wrong with trailer parks, IF dedicated to specific customer ranges and enforced rules. When I went to college, I lived in trailers.
F is a little ahead of HP . . . but having hard time stabilizing its self in the future of transportation.
I am thinking F probably will need major financing to survive.
I will watch and se how that might effect stock price.
Ok . . . you then assume world population will not keep increasing in the next two decades . . . where are the new vehicle customers to come from?
IF the trend is to EVs with the average person trips to be 500 miles or less and with battery tech that charges in less than 10 minutes, or exchanges packs by robotics . . . that presently does not look like increasing pickup and SUV sales?
EVs will cost less if petro fuel prices increase, and they have less parts. Thus, service costs and parts costs have to go up to maintain F
revenues. Solar cells at home, at work, and on or in the vehicle body seem like what is coming down the road. How will F adapt to that?
As the population ages, I suspect less personal vehicles will be owned.
Self-driving taxis may be choice of many for local trips. If software is not F owned, they will have to pay to use it from other sources like MSFT and Goggle. The electronic guts of self-driving cars is something F may not be able to corner and thus another lost source of profiting for F. F also not talking about battery production either.
F future revenue sources appear to be reduced, due to above type of things.
USA just increased defense spending by $100 billion . . . where is the infrastructure spending increase to come from? Local and State tax increases? A lot of folks are going to have to chose between health care costs and food and heating needs, etc. That does not sound like an economic driver for new vehicle purchases. People are smarting up and budgeting for taxi use, rather than pay for auto insurance and petro costs and parking fees.
Looking around . . . its now being talked up that new jobs may come from tele-operating remote sited robots and activities. 3-D VR/AR entertainment will gradually bite into vehicle sales too.
F up for that?
Why do you suppose projector did not go over in USA?
Was it due to such a huge in-place inventory of in use projectors already bot in USA? I thought maybe mobile VGs and students would go for the
ease of projecting capability to carry around. Imagine projecting art forms on to buildings and at parties.
Apparently Asia likes the idea of mobile projection capability.
I originally thought of PICO and all . . . as to be a huge draw for younger folk, that could share with family and friends their works, etc.
I guess I over-estimated the desire to expand ones self into the surrounding environment, via live projection. I saw this company as a way to expand self-creativity into social creativity . . . perhaps that is not
a trend that present western culture embraces in the immediate.
Western culture is more than willing to experience ads in its entertainment space . . . and finds its art in a commercial transaction?
However; if Asia can be the kick-start this company needs . . . and then 'the trend starter' effect will transfer over . . . to the west.
What is hard to understand about F future customer base is will USA MC incomes continue to rise sufficiently to allow them to continue to buy pickups and SUVs? Also; without a major infrastructure upgrade across the board, for transportation oriented society . . . roadway travel and parking and efficiency is destined to de-evolve in to further states of chaos.
Everyone is hoping (assuming) gas prices can remain low into the future.
With 2-3 more billion worldwide populations increase projected over next two decades, that's a lot of income inequality to overcome.
Under such a scenario of events and challenges, what will eventually come about; world leaders budgeting to be focusing on housing, mass transportation, health, and food needs of such a larger population . . . or more pickups and SUVs? Resources, energy, space and time usage might just eventually become survival mode logic.
Folks chose entertainment helmets and suits over physical vacations, where is F future concentrating on vehicles?
How will F fair against say MSFT and Goggle?
Perhaps the new ex-furniture guru will bring forth 'entertainment couches'.
Approaching holiday season and school spending over, and no evidence of
our product anywhere. WE did however do a stock offer registration.
Sounds like company has nothing to offer?
TSLA shows the way to the future . . . GM, F, TOY have the sales (for now) . . . can they keep selling ICE products against the environmental
mandates governments and citizens desire? Can petro products (including
NG) keep being dumped into the finite bio-planetary system?
Profits are political controlled now.
And, dependent on actual needs of the citizenry and the environmental travel and living space within our cities.
TSLA can survive without vehicles sales dominance, but can the other three companies?
Within 10 years probable weather cycles and old-school politicos percentage in society will determine who decides wealth distribution and energy usage? Coming societal and eco-trends generations will hardly be
huge ICE vehicles in urban spaces fans.
Outcome is all dependent on limits to growth and efficiency of urban life.
TSLA does IPO for Space X and folds it into TSLA by purchasing some of it for say retirement plans or whatever . . . things can dramatically change, as to TSLA stock price? You saw how he bot out Solar City and pulled it into TSLA. TLSA has lots of backup techs to play with?
Why not do a uber-type mass rental concept, wherein drive-less cars are rented daily for trips around a city using a TSLA credit card account?
or, your own personal credit card use choice.
Solid-state FCs could be managed as integrated small computerized components, alike how Tesla designed his Li-Batt EV power supply.
TSLA is much more a liberal wet dream company, it is creating the future of transportation and ownership and social evolution.
Why would anyone want to text while driving a vehicle?
Ever heard of speaking via ear bud microphone directly to your mobile conversation partner? Tech oriented young people will soon learn to hack
and disable the anti-texting software and device in vehicles, if they so desire.
Ever hear of a parent telling their children . . . 'you are on your own
if you are stupid enough to violate the public laws that I have told you about' . . . 'The courts and law will then decide your fate'.
F and all auto manufacturers have a problem . . . water logged vehicles + sewage and industrial waste and diseased waters have entered the vehicle up for resale. Who would want such a car?
Strip down costs and coating costs to seal auto body for legal and safe reselling, and then installing brand new interiors and engine flush is way beyond used car market profit potential. Lawsuits potential will also be another prohibiting factor in re-sales. Does F, etc. think they can offer insurance for those vehicles?
Next problem car manufacturers face is IF they sell these eco-wrecks into
third-world countries after having strip-and-renew costs done in 3RD world setting . . . they automatically challenge their regional dealerships and factories away from new car sales.
Best to just junk the waters damaged cars, and recycle into metals sales.
Is night-time dumping as in chemical wastes and private
ocean garbage contractors to transpire? Bad PR if anyone finds out.
Maybe F made major mistake by not going into recreational motorhomes and housing trailer parks angle? Luxury interior mobile vehicles can be quite enticing to money-ied couples and individuals?
F is now facing dinosaur status as car company.
Why do think they hired a furniture entrepreneur to lead their recovery?
If coming winter is ice-storms and drifting snowing buildup . . . auto sales and manufacturing pace may fall.
Ford financial arm is going to have to do some magic to get youth to buy cars. Many do not even have driver licenses, let along a job prospect.
Just imagine F offering free drivers training, with a vehicle contract?
The more robots and AI . . . the higher the steaks for having to tax automation and F getting behind the GAI (Guaranteed Annual Universal Basic Income)? New citizen dreams as the way to create new customers is running into obsolete educational goal planning wherein no connection to dawning automatic society and economy coming.
F best start selling flood insurance to all future vehicle customers?
To my thinking, company should be having much more PR.
Little evidence that anything substantial is underway.
Time will see who is closer to right about F?
I just presented some thoughts that others may not have considered.
Millions of driver-less cars communicating with each other, going down the highway with standard wheeled drivers? You do realize thousands daily on highways juiced up, on cell phones with older cars that need shocks, brakes, and tires (but no money to repair them in-house).
F looking like will needs tens of billions of dollars in new funding, to get its self-together. Why do you suspect F stock price cannot take off?
Lets hope you are right and everything I said is wrong.
As last ditch effort . . . F can always find Asian partners for USA new factories, in union-less states and heavily robotized.
Birth-to-Death lifetime credit cards coming to someone near you?
Just another form of GAI. Everyone is happy then and the can rolls merrily down the road.
AI is going to be the lead into driver-less cars.
Too early to predict who can hold on to the lead therein (NVDA so far, but MSFT, IBM AND INTC pushing up hard).
F is going for steering-wheel, gas pedal and brake-less autonomous vehicles . . . sounds like it will be better to lease them to consumers and get into the service and insurance business ends? Doubtful F can muster cash needed to consolidate and stand innovation flops, as industrial giants like APPL and Android toss monies at drive less-vehicles. Time is also working against F, as competitors strive to push ahead.
Hard for long-time F fans to see what's coming in next 10 years.
Ever wonder why F has to partner to compete now?
That is obvious clue to where things are going towards . . . 20-30 huge international corporations share and rule world governments as trade blocs.
Deficits are just electronic cash off-books accounting now . . . never can be paid off, as no one can afford to draw the funding to do that from current budget needs. Many today will never have a job and must be supported by taxing robots and given a universal basic income with side-benefits. As the top 10% get richer and richer, who will buy the production to keep it all going? Note F is offering vehicles at huge discounts just to get anyone to sign the purchase contract.
And, who is rushing into buy vehicles that cost thousand more each year, and can't find a place to park them downtown or at work?
Huge transportation bottlenecks loom as infrastructure outdated to modern needs.
I do not have the answers and doubt F has either.
Watch for update by mmmgt.
This company has done rather nothing but present at conferences and do beneficial ownership transfers, as country-of-origin of MBOT has provided no info on anything about the company possibilities, yet seemingly unable to get their tech going.
No apparent sales staff, no active partners, no revenues, and very small
R&D expenses . . . mostly transfers to who? Sounds like conference presentations are fun-gatherings, great write-offs.
What can one PR but more of the same?
Clock is ticking on the ME wonder-kin.
Day-trading range tells it all?
New alliance with provider of home and trip solar charging for EVs, looks
good for this company. TSLA solar city and its battery company and solar cells are their competitors. Plus SPWR which is in to building solar electricity also. Someone stated on another MB that VSLR uses Chinese solar cells ( do not know if this is exclusively true). President Trump acts to tax most imported solar cells, is this to effect negatively VSLR business . . . or would they just also then offer USA and Canada SCs?
Note that no one is offering solar cells homes to Puerto Rica under USA Aid Package. Looks like business area potential to me, if one can side-step PR utility control of the monies provided. <---for decades PR utility
funding has moved 'else-where' than infrastructure energy 'logic' design and improvement?
China figures out to loan some $$$s to VSLR and mandate its use in PR, would that not side-step the recent PR BK plight, and get Chinese products to PR W/O going into USA anti-dumping of foreign solar cells into USA?
China carries the new debt, PR gets home solar systems, and VSLR gets jobs and revenues to pay China back. Move the PR utility right out of the equation, as they obviously cannot seem to manage a power grid rebuild. they just want same-old-same-old power pole lines grid system, they can continue to control regardless.
USA Hedge Funds are intellectually impaired by their focus on previous Debt Bonds of PR they bot, and expect USA tax-payers to cover their lack of creative money management possibilities? Where is Facebook and Gates, etc. in figuring out how to help USA citizens in need? Fix your own home firstly?
VSLR seems to be focusing on states that have lots of seasonal sunlight year-around. Its stock price may stabilize or continue down some more.
VSLR neds to go both communities and households solarizing, and further perhaps sek partnerships with EV car companies new offering (like F and GM).
Thanks for your reply.
Wise advice, I bot a small amount below $3.00.
Note that today, the B?A spread is .05 . . . any thoughts what that means
for us?
Do we just redo the dosage schedule and amount and re CT . . . what are thoughts from board?
Will adult CT part be continued, as of now?
Law-suits from investors coming?
Check latest news today, as SPWR is jointly creating solar power grid in Chile, to power its underground railway network for its Capital, via
solar power farm (and will use robots to reduce solar cell cleaning costs).
Can and should SPWR create portable solar cell packages for Puerto Rican
homes and families, now w/o grid power in remote areas?
Will USA front the bill for PR solar farms, that can be made of wind storm and water resistance deign? Which is better: continuously re-stringing
above-ground power pole electrical grid system, or just bringing in more solar cells to replace those lost or damaged by weather system forces?
If PR homes and businesses are to be rebuild: why not provide them with solar cell power system, that can rotate into reinforced building and roof, if dangerous weather systems approach?
Should SPWR, approach federal and private USA insurance industry with new tech ideas, that save lives and property claims?
Was it not somewhat weird that foreign-owned and USA based solar companies were the ones that brought the anti-dumping lawsuit case, to USA Federal decision making panel?
Are we in USA facing foreign sovereign government funded economic competition in our market place, as form of economic warfare against our workers and their families?
If we allow overseas USA companies profits to be returned to USA without taxation, will those returned un-taxed dollars just go into stock buy-backs, etc. without any net new USA-sited jobs and plants and infrastructure creation domestically?
These are active issues that will effect SPWR destiny and stock price.
Anyone care to comment on above?