Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The same way a tenant in any building gets satellite TV. The satellite TV guy comes over, puts up a dish, strings a wire to the tenant's space. Done. Requires no genius whatsoever. And you certainly have no genius available at MDGC!
What Val does not have is an FCC license to transmit. So, the props were for a pinky land picture show. Hope the components didn't decay too much over the last decade sitting in that junk pile.
LDMS does not use the same spectrum -- 28 - 31 Ghz -- as the recently released TV white spaces 54 - 608 Mhz. This was discussed last fall. Val's old junk surplus from 1999 never heard of the White Spaces of 2009 -10. LOL
----
http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/bandplans/lmds.pdf
----
Some definitions from the FCC ruling which may help in investigating available TV White Space channels:
(c) Fixed device. A TVBD that transmits and/or receives radiocommunication signals at a
specified fixed location. A fixed TVBD may select channels for operation itself from a list of
available channels provided by a TV bands database, initiate and operate a network by sending
enabling signals to one or more fixed TVBDs and/or personal/portable TVBDs. Fixed devices
may provide to a Mode I personal/portable device a list of available channels on which the Mode
I device may operate under the rules, including available channels above 512 MHz (above TV
channel 20) on which the fixed TVBD also may operate and a supplemental list of available
channels above 512 MHz (above TV channel 20) that are adjacent to occupied TV channels on
which the Mode I device, but not the fixed device, may operate.
(i) Personal/portable device. A TVBD that transmits and/or receives radiocommunication
signals at unspecified locations that may change. Personal/portable devices may only transmit
on available channels in the frequency bands 512-608 MHz (TV channels 21-36) and 614-698
MHz (TV channels 38-51).
(m) Television band device (TVBD). Intentional radiators that operate on an unlicensed basis on
available channels in the broadcast television frequency bands at 54-60 MHz (TV channel 2), 76-
88 MHz (TV channels 5 and 6), 174-216 MHz (TV channels 7-13), 470-608 MHz (TV channels
14-36) and 614-698 MHz (TV channels 38-51).
(a) Power limits for TVBDs.
(1) For fixed TVBDs, the maximum power delivered to the transmitting antenna shall not exceed one
watt; this maximum applies regardless of the number of TV channels on which the device operates. The
power delivered to the transmitting antenna is the maximum conducted output power reduced by the
signal loss experienced in the cable used to connect the transmitter to the transmit antenna. If transmitting
antennas of directional gain greater than 6 dBi are used, the maximum conducted output power shall be
reduced by the amount in dB that the directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi.
(2) For personal/portable TVBDs, the maximum EIRP shall not exceed 100 milliwatts (20 dBm) with the
following exceptions; Mode II personal/portable TVBDs that do not meet the adjacent channel separation
requirements in § 15.712(a) and Mode I personal/portable TVBDs that operate on available channels
(provided by a Mode II TVBD) that do not meet the adjacent channel separation requirements of §
15.712(a) are limited to a maximum EIRP of 40 milliwatts (16 dBm). These maximum power levels
apply regardless of the number of TV channels on which the device operates.
And yet Cogent stated there is no relationship other than that Mesh is a customer of an internet service provider. What part of 'no' could possibly cause any misunderstanding?
Without an FCC transmission license there is no project, well, other than the normal for Val misdirection and slight of hand. Val has simply started using a camera and props, since photoshop wasn't doing the trick any longer! LOL
There would have to exist a patent application on file with the Patent Office. No such application exists. It's all more of good ol' Val's string-along stammering.
A company run by a vacuum cleaner salesman is simply a customer of the vendors listed. An internet service provider like Cogent does not vet its customers any further than AT&T would before selling Val communications service. Val's web site says Cogent is a supplier of service. That is all.
Somehow the idea of putting a dish on a roof was presented as something novel. It was -- a decade or two ago!
Needing a license to operate is an even older concept but is still imperative.
Globe Track Wireless is a partner? Seems Val runs constantly and consistantly with the wrong crowd:
The last company being GlobeTrack Wireless, Inc (GTWGPS) The phone numbers for GlobeTrack Wireless, Inc have been disconnected and they are no longer at the Mopac address; it appears the above "funding" ($1.2 Million) spoken of by Michael Coker in his bankruptcy hearing still hasn't come in. You can listen to it in the "Other information" section. The IRS has a writ on the property from the office on Mopac in Austin,Tx. Said another way, the property is now under control of the IRS
A few short stories depicting each of the schemes described above will follow. The judgments found to date, total over $2.2 Million; Restitution (mail fraud and securities fraud) over $3.4 Million; IRS Liens over $500,000; Cases Pending in the amount of $473,000. Other people are owed money ($214,000) but have not filed a law suit.
http://www.stopmadsencoker.com/
.
Have Val PR it. Otherwise the farce label sticks like glue. Speculate as you like but smart money gets out of the way at the first whiff of rot. There have been multiple such whiffs of pink stink over the past two years at MDGC.
Well, I won't bother you on this one. The explanation is rational. But where in all the pictured installations is the cord to connect to the vehicles?
http://www.carcharging.com/dania-beach-electric-parking-garage.html
How does anyone know if the antenna is connected to the electronics? I mean, this IS a pinky, after all! LOL As you can see by the PPS, the intended picture show was a glaring flop. And showing NINE minutes of an unnarrated video slide show of Boise on youtube is supposed to impress anyone? Makes the company look more foolish than ever.
Licenses are specific to location. The MG project is in Boise, ID. No license there. Can't turn on a thing he mounted on the roof, if that old crap still works, it is just a picture show! HA!
Or, the pinky CEO might well keep any unlikely profits in MG, use the news (or just use any dubious MG 'news' regardless of profits) to pump MDGC, and sell the stinking pink out. Why else would Val keep MG separate, why not merge them now? Oh, maybe he picked up a trick from his cronies at Aerius! Dump the assets in a private company and leave MDGC swinging in the breeze! The old tried and true, ONE TWO!! HA!!
I see. You couldn't come up with proof of a broadcast license either. No one can because the whole thing is a farce. HA! You proved that a broadband license differs from a LMDS license. Neither type does Val/MDGC/MG own for the Boise 'Project'. The Public Record speaks volumes by its silence HA HA!
There is no such thing as a confidential license. The FCC's records are Public Record. Nice try.
Mesh Global owns no broadband wireless license for Boise. That is why I say the so-called Boise Project is all photography, no substance. Before Wytec went belly up they had started PRing that they were going to into the Chinese market. That was the death knell tolling right there, there were no plans to accomplish anything, except turn what remained of a failed company into what is now known as a China scam stock. Obviously there was no serious effort by the fact they bid on only one license in 1999. One of hundreds available. Just as today, with the current management, it is all show with no substance.
That 1999 license LDBTA426A* which became BTA426** for broadband wireless formerly owned by defunct Wytec is currently owned by Clearwire.
B426 03/28/2016 NSAC, LLC Clearwire BR Broadband Radio Service BTA426 Springfield, IL Clearwire Corporation 1250 Eye Street, NW, Suite 901 Washington DC 20005 Nadja Sodos-Wallace 2023304011 2023304008 nadja.sodoswallace@clearwire.com
What kind of license has Mesh Global? That's why one wonders if that old junk they tossed up is actually able to transmit. HA!
* http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/charts/23press5.pdf
** http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=BTA426+clearwire
.
That info is from 1999. As I said, decade old news, decade old junk, hauled out of a crate for show and tell a string along pinkstink CEO tale! LOL Too funny.
The names were Hwang and his offshore investment group and Wm. Yuan
Speaking of Wm Yuan:
William Yuan was once the CEO of MDGC and MDGC can be traced to the same office as TTCM-China, Inc. back in 2005. (This company always has to share an office with some other company, LOL) This was also a RTO company...that same trace leads to persons such as Rick Papaleo Norman Birmingham, Won-gil Choe, Andy Hwang, Mel Rich and other 'characters'!
I'd say this qualifies as an original China scam stock, with that pedigree.
I recall the first time I heard about this stock, looked deep and discovered that a vacuum cleaner salesman was hiding behind an over-blown story about 'changing the world' blah blah blah. MDGC is a decade long scam that was pieced together by a Chinese group that got themselves a ticker symbol, then they handed off the scheme to opportunists in the wireless space. It is really an early China scam stock. Only the names have changed recently as the Chinese names disappeared with their dough. First in, first out. Very inscrutable!
It has been established that Mesh Global and Mediag3 share the same tiny office in Boise. Val signing a contract with Mesh Global is exactly the same as Val signing a contract with himself.
Funny but is was not Mediag3 but Mesh Global that bought services from these companies. Now Val may be running the show there, but that show, and it is a show, is unrelated to shares in MDGC. Mesh Global is not a subsidiary of Mediag3. Not that Mesh Global is anything at all for that matter! LOL
Where are the buyers? I do not find the total disinterest strange at all!
You'd expect Val to put up self-serving articles written by self-serving publications. The fact is backhaul will be fiber wherever high capacity is needed. Right now there are numerous tower installations that require little bandwidth. Companies do not spend anything extra in areas of a territory where the demand is low. The status quo is the way they go in such areas of country. Where greater capacity is needed fiber is provided. An exception seems to be Verizon, the best carrier in the US because they spend their dollars for the long haul, on fiber, as you can see here:
Verizon has committed to deploying fiber to 90% of the cell sites in its territory by the end of 2013, closely following VZW’s LTE roll out schedule. But Llamas said that the fiber-to-the-cell deployment won’t solely benefit Verizon Wireless. As Verizon’s wholesaler, Partner Solutions, sells to all of the operators in its territory, and is in discussions with multiple customers about fiber and Ethernet backhauls services, he said. While deploying to VZW’s cell towers, those sites typically have four or five other operators, many of which are experiencing capacity spikes from increased 3G usage. Some of the operators are planning to take advantage of any fiber services available soon, Llamas said, while others waiting.
“Each of them have their own timeframes,” Llamas said. “Some carriers, who are ready for 4G, are getting ahead of the curve, but there are other carriers who aren’t ready yet.”
http://connectedplanetonline.com/mobile-apps/news/fiber-fed-wireless-backhaul-1109/
.
What? A real company? CCOI? No fun here! LOL
A crate of decade old parts dragged out into the sunlight makes for a great picture show. But the fact Val the vacuum cleaner salesman CEO managed to get a hold of this junk speaks volumes as to how worthless it had become after a decade in moth balls, gathering cobwebs and dust. Go MDGC... suuurrrre! Too funny.
In 2009, the management there transfered the intellectual property to a private company. It's a shell for the unwary. Makes you wonder why exactly Mesh Global exists, doesn't it? LOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61140543
Jobu: Pinksheet CEOs count on it. You betcha.
He did inherit that crate of 10 year old Wytec junk. All ready to set up someday when the thought stuck him to fashion 'proof' for a pump and dump. LOL Pennystockchaser didn't turn the trick, since they were canned by the Feds, so he actually has had to put up the decade old props. And see if anyone kicks the tires on what amounts to an electronic version of a scrapyard Yugo.
I am totally speechless. This is what Val wastes his time doing? Taping a nine minute unnarrated video of the environs of Boise, Idaho? Wait until I pass this one around for laughs!!
http://www.youtube.com/user/MeshGlobal
Mesh Global documentation lists John Lehne as the CFO, not the CEO. He Googles with no known accomplishments. Could be a carpet installer for all anyone knows! At least Val Googles as a pimple cream salesman at Sisel!
But the patent does expire shortly. What is more important? Val is a 58 year old vacuum cleaner retailer, not a tech guru. If he were he'd have made something of himself by 30 or younger. Jobu pointed out that Val has nothing published with the IEEE nor has he proof of any other tech accomplishment at all -- besides vacuum repair. These are important details about management worth repeating. Old failures like Val are desperate men. That's all you have here. The desperation of an old vacuum cleaner salesman.
Looks like a phone model most tossed for recycling three or four years ago. Besides, anyone looking at their 15 year old patent, coming up on 16 now that it is 2011, will just wait and do the same thing royalty free very shortly. I see the pps there is really jumping! LOL
Oh, and as was pointed out, AERS the stock with that ticker no longer owns the intellectual property. It's exactly what would happen with MDGC -- if there was anything to that Areius partner!! LOL
Don't worry. They have enough funding to create a few. Then 'problems' will develop, no FCC ID number, then it'll die away.
See, the market doesn't believe in this foolishness any more. Wolf was cried way too many times.
Here's a little DD on the IR firm, Equititrend. They are the only kind of IR firm that would bother with Val.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/business-consultants/equiti-trend-advisor/equiti-trend-advisors-llc-equ-89357.htm
Doomsday came and went for this company the day it was dumped in Val's lap.
That is why pinkstink CEOs avail themselves of the protection of 'forward looking statements'. All Val really said in his PR was he hooked up MDGC to Mesh Global via an internet connection. Since they both share the same closet-sized office, it was no sweat! LOL Really -- this stock is just too funny.
Blair emailed me back and said they are not affiliated with MDGC or Meshglobal so im just a bit confused.
Blair Kutrow of Lightsquared e-mailed you to confirm they never heard of MDGC or Mesh Global or Val Westergass? I guess I'll have to live and learn!!!