Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you care about a stock that never runs?
Because that's what you've got here.
Do you care about fraudulent news?
Because that's the only kind this scam has released.
Do you care about a stock that only runs briefly on hype, not on fundamentals or anything the lame-ass owner has done?
Because that's what MEDS is.
Do you care about a stock that lost 75% of it's perceived value today?
Because that's what bagholders own here.
Do you care about an owner who tells his shareholders to F OFF?
Because that's what shareholders must endure here.
In the next 4-5 years the CEO could be serving a prison sentence.
Possibly much sooner.
LOL wow what an ignorant statement! So clueless!
How many people have you EVER heard of getting trapped in gas vehicles because of a dead battery?
I've heard of several in Teslas specifically.
Daniel, Xu, Suren, Scam.. .Verified
Maybe for the same reason that buying a junked Yugo doesn't transform it into a Lamborghini.
Buying a shell means nothing if you do nothing with it.
Suren doesn't appear to be the magician many make him out to be.
MEDS has tanked in the past year - now worth less than half of its June high, and is falling once again.
OH NO! Where da fours?!
Someone knows something - $275 flushed down the toilet today.
Mother & Daughter trapped in rented Tesla with dead battery
Hertz put a first-time EV driver in a Tesla that was half dead, then tried to hold her financially accountable for getting stranded on the side of the road.
When Becky Liebau and her daughter arrived to the Hertz counter, they were told the only car left on the rental lot was a Tesla. Liebau had never driven an EV; she had booked a reservation for a gas-powered car, but rental companies are notorious for taking reservations though not holding onto them. According to Liebau, this was around closing time and she had no other choice but to take the Tesla, which appears to have been a Model 3 based on the CBS report:
Disaster ensued for the mother and daughter, who had booked the trip to scope out prospective colleges for the 16-year old scholar.
Hertz had given the pair an EV that was reportedly under 50 percent state of charge. The Tesla showed approximately 90 miles of range left, which may have been enough to get Liebau and her daughter to a charger. Hertz, however, did not provide them with an adapter to use charging stations that don’t conform to Tesla’s charging standard. Hertz later suggested these adapters are often targeted by thieves. It’s hard to see why that matters, or why Hertz would mention this — other than to suggest it was acting in its own best interest.
The Tesla’s tires were also low on air and would have benefitted from a top up. What Hertz basically did was hand Liebau the keys to a less than half-charged EV with low tire pressure and a missing adapter for use at nearby chargers. The Tesla went dead as Liebau searched for a charging station, trapping the two inside the cabin. Liebau and her daughter had no idea how to get out of the dead EV, and their phones were running out of battery, too. Again, that’s user error, but no one at Hertz explained the proper procedures to Liebau.
No roadside assistance came from Hertz. The two were eventually towed by a driver they had tracked down on their own, who taught them to override the electric door locks. They were taken to a hotel nearby, and had to pay one of the maintenance workers there for a ride across the state.
Presumably, back to their home. A hefty bill was waiting for them, as Hertz tried to pin the blame on Liebau. She refused to pay the invoices, and the company put her on a do-not-rent list. Hertz only happened to reverse course after CBS investigators reached out to the company. CBS says that Hertz has now refunded all charges and has reimbursed Liebau for the expenses she incurred.
Really? Up $4.21 is most bullish?
That says nothing good about the losers.
Obviously they care nothing about shareholders or transparency.
It's clear they aren't interested in explaining anything to anybody.
If insiders haven't moved to replace the CEO by now, they probably won't.
Moon landings are no longer rare occurrences, though manned Moon landings still are.
US government slams Muskrat in court filing wants him deposed over “chaotic environment” at X
Again, I'm not a scientist.
AFAICT neither are you.
Scientists still can't explain how fragile sea life thrives at depths and pressures that can crush the best submersibles.
You said it yourself in your last msg: "My theory is the Hutchison Effect." T-H-E-O-R-Y.
You've had that theory for years, when you prove it get back to us.
No one, including NHTSA, Tesla, mechanics and everyone else who've looked at the defects have concluding they were caused by anything other than design or manufacturing errors, least of all supernatural or extremely rare phenomena which may or may not exist.
Bad castings can cause brittle parts prone to failure. Yes - even within 3 days.
Several other suspension components break in Tesla vehicles, including in the Model 3 and Model Y. A Swiss Model S owner saw the lower control arm break at 200 kph (124 mph) on a German Autobahn. The Model 3 and Model Y had suspension recalls, and the Chinese government forced Tesla to replace some components in China with the Model S and Model X.
Tesla has not issued a recall for the problem, but it has issued multiple technical service bulletins. The TSBs call out suspension issues with Model S and X Teslas. A TSB issued for 2016 Model S and X cars in February 2017 warned: “Some Model S and X vehicles may have been manufactured with front suspension fore links that may not meet Tesla strength specifications. In the event of a link failure, the driver can still maintain control but the tire may contact the wheel arch liner.”
Internal investigations have shown that Model S and X suspension failures were caused by fore links that are fractured at the ball joint. They show visible flaws and/or improper forgings. Instead of issuing a recall, Tesla issues TSBs. Lots of them.
This dude reported suspension problems on his two-month-old Model Y.
💩 HAPPENS.
In that video you posted as evidence, the narrator didn't come to any conclusion. At 29:41 he says "if the Hutchinson is some kind of an electrostatic effect..."
IF - in other words, he has no idea what it is or if it's even real. So thanks for shooting holes in your own theory.
At least you're in good company - neither of you can prove a damn thing.
Several SpaceX rockets exploded during launch, let me guess your theory on that - ummmmm something to do with Hutchinson?
Is Bernie Madoff your idol?
You seem to hold scammers in high regard.
Suren lied, Suren's accomplice Xu lied, they teamed up to steal your money by lying, Suren told you to F OFF, yet all you can do is worship at his feet and beg for more Kool-Aid.
I'm not a scientist, but I'm sure there's a scientific explanation other than the curse of Hutchinson.
Like thousands of gallons of jet fuel igniting and melting the steel.
Don't know how the pages from that book of fiction got attached without scalding - maybe the hundreds of pages above it protected it, while they were burned.
Snopes\ was unable to corroborate whether a firefighter discovered that after 9/11.
Whompy wheel is clearly a manufacturing defect - nothing more. Even geniuses make stupid mistakes.
One need look no further than Twitter/X for proof of that.
Or the CEO's latest li'l bastard's name - Techno Mechanicus.
They're not gonna RS a low-floater.
They don't belong on Nasdaq and never should have uplisted.
If they finagled a way to get over $1, it would only be temporary and they'd fall right back off the exchange again.
Their efforts are better spent concentrating on what went wrong than trying to play with the big boys.
Nasdaq is for successful companies, not successless conpanies.
They only did it to trick big investors into dumping money into a company lacking the revenue for such a valuation and exposure.
Insiders and/or the SEC should begin an investigation into shareholder fraud, imo.
Hutchison Effect caused the Morocco earthquake.
Hutchison Effect caused the Libyan flooding.
Hutchison Effect caused Hurricane Irene.
Hutchison Effect caused a brick wall to collapse onto a Tesla yesterday.
Hutchinson should be on a box of Wheaties, 'cause he's got mad strength.
Tesla stock surge based on ‘mumbo-jumbo,’ says Gordon Johnson
The week got off to an excellent start for Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) investors. The stock saw out Monday’s session, 10% into the green, with the rally driven by a glowing report from Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas.
The analyst not only upgraded Tesla’s rating but also slapped a new Street-high price target ($400) for the shares. The reason for Jonas’ bullish take is down to the opportunity represented by Tesla’s Dojo supercomputer, its in-house-built and custom-made AI data center developed specifically to train the full-self-driving (FSD) system that sits in all Tesla vehicles. With various tailwinds at its back, Jonas reckons Dojo can add up to $500 billion to Tesla’s enterprise value.
Investors evidently thought that sounded great and piled in to load up. However, one prominent long-standing Tesla bear has taken umbrage with Jonas’ take. In fact, GLJ Research’s Gordon Johnson says the Morgan Stanley analyst conceding it is “difficult to explicitly validate the many claims Tesla has made about Dojo’s cost and performance,” seems like “TYPICAL Adam Jonas mumbo jumbo” and amounts to an admission that he’s “basically admitting his entire upgrade is speculation.”
“Why the market pays attention to this guy is BEYOND ME,” Johnson goes on to add. “But, keep in mind that MS is the banker for Musk, which may explain why he put out such a speculative note.”
There are other specific issues that rankle with Johnson, who claims Jonas is upgrading the stock on “among the WORSE parts of the ‘TSLA is not an auto company’ story/thesis.”
For example, Johnson points to Consumer Reports testing that recently ranked TSLA 7-of-12 in advanced driver assistance technology, a drop from 2020’s number 2 spot, while Guidehouse recently put Tesla in the bottom position in advanced driver assistance technology. Moreover, the “many faults/real-world-mistakes with TSLA’s FSD tech” have also been regularly documented.
For Johnson’s conclusion, he takes aim at what he sees as frivolous behavior in what should be a serious profession. “What TSLA’s FSD vaporware does for the company is allow non-serious analysts/fund managers/etc. to have a perpetual ‘future promised land’ to point folks to as to why they should continue owning TSLA’s stock as the real business crumbles before our eyes,” he says. “There will (no doubt) be more stuff like this as TSLA’s fundamentals worsen (i.e., TSLA tech days, AI days, blah, blah, blah).”
It will come as no surprise to learn, then, that Johnson rates TSLA shares as Sell.
Johnson’s bear thesis gets support from 4 other analysts on the Street and with an additional 12 Buys and Holds, each, the stock claims a Hold consensus rating. The $272.50 average target suggests the shares are currently trading for their fair value.
Tesla's engineers hated the Fuglytruck
This comes from Walter Isaacson’s biography of Elon Musk, via Insider. Isaacson spoke with Franz von Holzhausen, Tesla design lead, who said the engineering team’s response to the angular, steel body was less than positive. From Insider:
Tesla stock boost based on analyst whose 2015 call hasn't delivered
Hyundai is developing a Giga Press to boost EV production and cut costs
Hyundai is taking a page from Tesla as it plans to model a new EV production method after its Giga Casting. The new process,”hypercasting,” can significantly cut costs while boosting output.
The process involves injecting molten aluminum alloy into casting molds that harden into the vehicle’s frame. Since introducing the method in 2020 at Tesla’s Fremont Factory, the EV maker has introduced it at its plants in China and Germany.
The massive machines produce parts much bigger than what the auto industry was used to. Automakers can save much-needed time and resources without the need to bond multiple parts (it can also help reduce the vehicle’s weight). Tesla is said to have reduced costs by about 30% using Giga Casting.
Traditional methods include drilling thousands of holes in around 70 steel plates and welding them together individually. You can see how it saves time and money.
Korea’s largest automaker has decided to develop its own casting, processing, and assembly plant, with production planned for 2026.
The company already filed for the “hypercasting” trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on August 21, 2023.
Hyundai isn’t the only one looking to take a page from Tesla to boost EV production. Several automakers, including Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo, are looking to introduce similar processes. China’s Geely has already introduced the method to build ZEEKR models.
The South Korean automaker is also looking to counter Tesla’s proliferating Supercharger network in its domestic market with its own ultra-fast chargers.
Hyundai has had success so far in transitioning into the electric era with EV models, including the IONIQ 5, IONIQ 6, and Kona Electric. However, to keep up with EV leaders like Tesla and BYD, Hyundai sees an opportunity to transform its production network.
The plan by Mercedes and BMW to crash Tesla
Mercedes-Benz and BMW are making significant strides in their efforts to compete with Tesla in the premium electric vehicle market, as they revealed their latest electric concept cars at the IAA auto show in Munich.
Mercedes showcased the Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class, while BMW introduced the BMW Vision Neue Klasse. Both of these vehicles are built upon entirely new platforms developed by the German automakers, which will serve as the foundation for their electric vehicle (EV) lineups in the coming years. This marks their most ambitious push into the world of battery-powered automobiles.
While these vehicles are currently in the concept stage, the final production models may differ in appearance. Here’s a closer look at what Mercedes and BMW have to offer:
Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class
The Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class is constructed on the Mercedes-Benz Modular Architecture (MMA), a brand-new platform designed specifically for electric cars by the German automaker.
The Concept CLA Class lineup will include four new models, consisting of a four-door coupé, an estate, and two sports utility vehicles (SUVs).
Mercedes claims that the vehicle will have an impressive range of 750 kilometers (466 miles) on a single charge. Additionally, they assert that a 15-minute charge can provide enough power to cover a distance of 400 kilometers.
Mercedes is placing a strong emphasis on the interior and user experience. The company is developing its proprietary operating system, MB.OS, to power various features within the vehicle, including a large dashboard screen and an advanced voice assistant. Furthermore, it will allow integration with third-party apps, such as music and video streaming services.
BMW Vision Neue Klasse
BMW’s response to Tesla comes in the form of the BMW Vision Neue Klasse, which is also based on a new architecture intended for BMW’s future electric vehicles.
The first electric vehicles built on the Neue Klasse architecture are set to enter production in 2025.
Featuring a glass roof and incorporating classic design elements that BMW enthusiasts are familiar with, the BMW Vision Neue Klasse maintains the brand’s signature aesthetic.
One standout feature is the “Panoramic Vision,” a heads-up display projected onto the windshield at the driver’s eyeline. This feature will debut in the Neue Klasse, allowing both passengers and drivers to interact with the display.
Did he really? Have you seen MEDS' chart?
Lost over 75% of its value in the past year, almost back to being down 50%.
Trading was halted last month.
In June they received a Nasdaq Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing
In February they received a Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing (form 8-K)
Seems they also received a Notice Of Delisting Or Failure To Satisfy A Continued Listing Rule Or Standard; Transfer Of Listing in July 2022.
Looks like Suren's doin' a real bang-up job there.
As in, investors are getting real banged-up there.😁
Elizabeth Holmes proved herself worthy with Theranos... ...for a while.
Now she's serving a 135 month prison sentence.
Bernie Madof proved himself worthy for decades... ...before he was charged with the largest Ponzi scheme in history and died in prison.
If you were smart you'd have invested in MEDS.
Stop whining because you bet on the wrong horse - it's not gonna cross the finish line.
The shocking toll of Tesla’s Autopilot: 17 fatalities, 736 crashes
Tesla’s driver-assistance system, known as Autopilot, has been involved in far more crashes than previously reported
Each Tesla crash cleanup could cost over $1 million
If that don't make your insurance rates skyrocket, nothing will.
Price surge based on one analyst's upgrade.
What next - a surge based on a single tweet?
Wait - that's happened.
Seems Tesla investors are easily manipulated, i.e. fooled.
People gettin' rich here flippin' 4s for a cool 25% profit.
Look at that volume - already $12,500 spent.
Oh wait, that's $12.50.
So...who exactly is makin' 💰️here?
OLD, MOLDY NEWS!!!
Dip-shit it was in Suren's hands then too.
I don't recall Xu being the owner at any point.
I'd tell you to buy a clue, but I know you can't afford it.