Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Really? What broker are you using?
I mentioned the same a couple days ago. It is hit & miss...no constant hang-ups so far.
How would you know what they purchased? Oh that's right, you don't. Just another troll comment. Jeez...you're such a joke.
The Hub seems very sluggish for me right now going from page to page. Anything going on? Btw, seeing some "500 Internal 502 Bad" messages where some banner ads would normally reside. Just an FYI.
Unfortunately you can't. Best thing is to invest in a mirror and check behind you.
Ask that question on the following board. They should be able to help you out.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/Computer-Learning-470/
Can you actually explain the non-sense you post? Or is it just a game to you?
Really??!! Have you actually read some of the non-sense that has been stickied on some of the boards? That would drive down membership if that was a requirement...unless you are referring only to Admin stickies?
Hard to say...depends on the coverage required. It could even drop to Company level. Below is a break down of the troop levels. But I still don't think it will be at Platoon level. What do you think based on the numbers below? We are still talking large numbers of orders, even at the Company or Battalion level IMO.
SQUAD – Nine to 10 soldiers. Typically commanded by a sergeant or staff sergeant, a squad or section is the smallest element in Army structure, and its size is dependent on its function.
PLATOON – 16 to 44 soldiers. A platoon is led by a lieutenant with an NCO as second in command, and consists of two to four squads or sections.
COMPANY – 62 to 190 soldiers. Three to five platoons form a company, which is commanded by a captain with a first sergeant as the commander’s principal NCO assistant. An artillery unit of equivalent size is called a battery, and a comparable armored or air cavalry unit is called a troop.
BATTALION – 300 to 1,000 soldiers. Four to six companies make up a battalion, which is normally commanded by a lieutenant colonel with a command sergeant major as principal NCO assistant. A battalion is capable of independent operations of limited duration and scope. An armored or air cavalry unit of equivalent size is called a squadron.
BRIGADE – 3,000 to 5,000 soldiers. A brigade headquarters commands the tactical operations of two to five organic or attached combat battalions. Normally commanded by a colonel with a command sergeant major as senior NCO, brigades are employed on independent or semi-independent operations. Armored, cavalry, ranger and Special Forces units this size are categorized as regiments or groups.
I actually meant Battalion...not Brigade. Sorry for any confusion on that. But Platoon level is out of the question IMO.
Did you not see the Flappy Bird story?
I think you misunderstood why WSGI called it a (platoon level asset). I think there will be one or more at Brigade level....but it makes no sense for every platoon to haul a BIB/WASP around. I think Brigade level is more reasonable for deployment. But even so, those are still huge numbers for possible orders. Hope I was clearer on that issue. There is no way EVERY platoon will have a BIB or WASP....or whatever you feel comfortable calling it. You really should stop with the semantics arguement when someone disagrees with you. It's very un-becoming.
BTW: I was the one who suggested to YOU that BIB and WASP were different if I remember correctly.
Ya know...I thought about that comment Indy made about platoons, and every platoon getting a BIB/WASP. I believe that idea is wrong. The NIE testing is at Brigade level....so I highly doubt every platoon would receive a BIB/WASP. Plus to me...that would be unnecessary and overkill as far as the military requirements(platoon level). But still, Brigade level would still amount to a large amount of orders. JMO
Those were my thoughts as well.
I think it is very interesting that the WASP will be used as a Baseline System for the NIE 14.2. As opposed to a System Under Evaluation like it was in NIE 14.1. That seems like a very significant distinction to me.
Lighter Than Air Systems' WASP Aerostat Platform Invited Back to Participate in the U.S. Army's Network Integration Experiment
WASP Aerostat Systems to Return to Network Integration Experiment 14.2 as a Baseline System
KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FL -- (Marketwired) -- 02/13/14 -- Lighter Than Air Systems Corp. ("LTAS"), a wholly owned subsidiary of World Surveillance Group Inc. (OTCQB: WSGI), a developer of lighter-than-air aerostats and unmanned aerial systems, has announced that aerostat systems provided by LTAS to the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command ("SMDC")/Army Forces Strategic Command will participate in the U.S. Army's Network Integration Experiment ("NIE") 14.2 taking place at Fort Bliss, TX and White Sands Missile Range, NM during April and May, 2014. The two Winch Aerostat Small Platforms ("WASP") will be returning to NIE 14.2 as a Baseline System following their successful mission at NIE 14.1 as a System Under Evaluation. The Army's NIEs evaluate and integrate current and prospective systems thereby driving changing requirements, procurement, and field recommendations.
The WASP is a mobile, tactical-sized aerostat capable of carrying a variety of payloads in support of military operations helping troops in the field have a tactical edge while communicating over greater distances. The WASP leverages aerostat technology to elevate network payloads to an advantaged height to enable persistent network connectivity while reducing risk to units conducting missions.
The NIE 14.2 exercises are intended to evaluate joint force network capabilities; improve unified land operations with communications nodes based on aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles ("UAVs"); integrate networking technologies into the armored brigade combat team; develop ways to deliver, collect and process integrated, multi-source intelligence to front-line warfighters; and make field command posts more mobile and efficient. The NIE 14.2 exercises also will involve beyond line of sight communications; expeditionary signal brigade tropospheric scatter communications; network intrusion prevention; cellular communications; electromagnetic spectrum operation; condition based maintenance; and operational energy solutions.
LTAS produces various tactical aerostat systems, all of which are turn-key, self contained systems mounted to a compact trailer for use with various military or commercial vehicles. The LTAS aerostat systems are engineered to provide significant benefits, including reduced acquisition, maintenance and overall operation costs, smaller footprint necessary for infrastructure and operations, reduced operators required to manage the aerostat, decreased time for inflation/deflation, faster launch and recovery, and a simplified process. The LTAS tactical aerostat systems include fixed and remote controls, multiple winches, custom software and electronics, and self contained helium storage with rapid inflation and deflation systems for simplified user operation. The systems are designed to act as either an eye-in-the sky or a floating aerial communications tower depending on the payload to provide intelligence, surveillance and reconnaisance and communications for, among other applications, military, security, and disaster scenarios.
Not that I know of. But you could maybe email Barbra Johnson and ask if there is a different mailing list than the one you're on.
You could also check the link below periodically.
http://ir.stockpr.com/wsgi/media
They actually emailed everyone on their mailing list with the same article today. Have you signed up for that?
I agree. There have been actual PR's from the Army about the WASP. Official press releases! For someone to doubt the testing is taking place is idiotic. And apparently, those sales listed on Gov websites must also be tainted somehow in that persons mind somehow. Sure...I would love to see the shareprice higher....but posting non-sense like that is just idiotic IMO.
So you think the tests might NOT be taking place? Ya think the Army and DoD are in cahoots with that evil company WSGI? For shame! You should probably write your congressman about it. And you say you don't follow this board closely, you pretty much post daily!
You are living in a fantasy world. That will NOT happen. It's pretty foolish to even think it would. It is untenable to enforce. What don't you understand about that. So you sign up 10 days ago and already you wanna re-arrange the website. That is major balls IMO. But hey....to each his own. carry on good sir!
Since you have been an IHub member a WHOPPING 10 days, I assume you have never seen the plethora of posts by Admin that says investor sentiment is irrelevant. Be it a poster or Moderator. Maybe you should read up on that?
So after all of you're skeptical posts, what exactly is it that you think the company should be doing? What is it that needs to be done? You always critique, but NEVER offer any answers. What SHOULD the company be doing? What is the singular thing you are looking for? There has to be something specific you are looking for. What is it?
I get that too. If ya don't wanna see that, turn of Security Notifications in JAVA.
Pull the hair out of your eyes and give this a shot.
World Surveillance Group Inc.
State Road 405
Building M6-306A, Room 1400
Kennedy Space Center, FL 32815
Phone: +1 (321) 452-3545
Fax: +1 (321) 452-8965
investors@wsgi.com
Maybe the new Consortium in Ohio that was PR'd has the expertise?
Super Bold? It's like any old bold to me. Unless, it's a post you dislike then maybe you consider it Super Bold?
Quite obviously they are just his opinion. As Warped as it is, sorry, couldn't help the pun
Works fine in Chrome for me. It's an LOI for Suburban Minerals Corp.
You completely missed the point of my post. Re-read it. I do say there actually is naked shorting, but too many people(longs in penny stocks usually) use the term naked shorting as a catch all when the stock is stagnant or dropping. That was my point, that the term naked shorting is used as a crutch for any and all ill's that befall the shareprice of a penny stock.
Got a link? Ya know..to that ARGUS revenue in 2014?
Yes...some day. You can't put that into your calculations/evaluations now. It's a non-factor. The BiB, WASP, etc are what is relevant now.
Well....that is the MASSIVE flaw in your post. There is no ARGUS currently. It is still under development in Ohio.
Unfortunately Indy...Mr Miyagi passed a couple years ago. RIP Pat Morita. But in all seriousness...you are now using terms that weren't in your vocabulary a year ago. And I was serious about the Kudos to you.
What would you consider "substantial sales"?
You have learned so much in the last year Indy!, Kudos to you! A year ago you would have never used the terms R/S and "milk LJC dry". Major kudos on that. Now...if only you'd be interested in making money on your supposed investment...that would be AWESOME!! Can we work on that?
We are not arguing about it at all. You math is just way off. Sorry if that offended you.
Wow....0.001 of a million is is 1K. Am I misunderstanding your post? Please clarify.
No actually....that would be $1K....not $100K. Just sayin.