Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The usual argle-bargle. Never ceases to entertain.
Okay, Linda. Here ya go! All encumbrances removed and it's time for clear sailing. Time for the rubber to meet the road. Time to break out that "disruptor" that had you so 'jazzed' so many years ago. Whoowee! TEN wins! Does it get any better that that?! Yeah, it could get considerably better than that but that would mean performing as a company for the very first time in two decades. C'mon, Linda -- the little Harvard grad who could, but hasn't thus far. Time to show us what you got.
Just sayin'.
Great post! Nothing like a walk down memory lane. No argle-bargle.
Quote: "The 9 wins few if any companies would have the tenacity to pull off and succeed and attract long term investors who are here to stay, “in it to win it.”"
In it to win precisely what? These LTI's have, reportedly, been around for years with nothing discernible to show for their generosity. Nine wins in 20 years -- golly!
Yes, yes. Much ado over nothing. The question is: Exactly how long has it been since MB did business with DC? Have King Reggie and Lady Linda had any business with them since acquiring DC? If not, why not?
One who is so genuinely stuck in the past should appreciate those of us inquisitive enough to question the future.
Is that $.50 to $2.00 a guarantee?
Prolly not, IMO.
Well, now that you mention it; Isn't the Q2 10K somewhat overdue? Asking for a friend.
The statute of limitations prolly expired.
LOL!!! I wonder when the ‘statute of limitations’ might run out on the “100% guarantee” fallacy.
GASP! You’re saying Mercedes Benz was doing business prior to dbmm acquiring them? I wonder how many of the other very august organizations that have worked with d/c and are displayed as happy customers have had nothing to do with dbmm since. An inconvenient truth, perhaps? Our resident legal expert will undoubtedly have the answer.
Quote: "will continue to grow and prosper as stated in filings and Updates." A familiar theme for two decades. And yet, here we are. Some kick-ass growth, all right.
Perhaps "go back years" and read old "news" releases, Q's and K's. See how much information, purportedly "prudent in these matters" turned out to be mere fantasy. See how much forward looking whimsy actually occurred. Misinformation? You be the judge. Shareholders know.
Yes, yes. That's awesome. BUT -- how much knowledge does she have pertaining to growing this 20-year stagnant business? Sooner or later, this NSS drama is going to come to an end -- one way or the other. At that point, production will be the ONLY issue. Personally, I'm not feelin' it.
Simple answer: Time will tell.
Sometimes smells like a cockeyed money laundering operation. I M O
Quote: All will fall into place as intended.
That verbiage, or blandishments similar thereto, has been Linda's credo for two decades. You're right, "shareholders are not stupid" and will, IMO, get the hell out of Dodge at the very next sign of some semblance of a profit. DBMM's "9 wins" came on the heels of year after year of losers, not to mention losses. Was the "fall into place" period intended to be twenty years in the making?
All IMO. Just sayin'.
Yes. The future IS happening. Pretty hard to say otherwise. As to what that future actually is …….. well, who’s to say …… with absolute certainty, that is.
C'mon! Timely K's & Q's? Wasn't always the case, was it? But, I digress. IF future K's, Q's and Updates don't include some semblance of progress in terms of actual revenues, what are the chances of anything of substance ever taking place? It's time for "the rubber to meet the road". Alibiing for the sake of reading one's self in print ain't gettin' it done.
Happy Easter everyone. Would've thought a truce might be called today.
Wellsir, after almost two decades in business, stringing together 9 'wins' is a milestone, indeed! What a total shame that couldn't have happened at the outset of their existence. But, I digress. Isn't it even a tiny bit ironic that the NEED for those glorious wins came on the heels of their very own digressions? Yes, yes -- I know -- that's all ancient history, right? Or is it? Just sayin'.
How so is the "CE end game" an issue? Asking for a friend.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Perhaps.........
"Shareholders know". Quite honestly, with very few exceptions, I doubt seriously that shareholders actually give a damn about much of anything but the daily PPS and what's being done to improve the situation.
Just another daily frolic through the fertile fields of DBMM. Simply cannot make this shit up!
Another phantom memory conveniently discarded as time marches on is the company’s two decades worth of red tape. Not a dime reported as net profit in all that time. Small potatoes when compared to the big, bad revocation prognostication, eh? ; )
Was not "meeting simple deadlines" what got them (Linda, et al) in hot water to begin with?
For my personal edification, could you please outline those statements that you deem “false” or “misleading”? TIA.
Whatever you say, Johny. You da man!
They should do what they always do. I.E., whatever makes them happy.
You're forgetting that company history is of no relevance here. Unless, of course, it serves present narrative.
No, no no. That tidbit should be good for at least a week's-worth of banter.
Great times! Linda at her absolute zenith.
"Supposed" covers a number of past announcements, as in "storied". Again, IMO, of course.
IMO, in their storied history, it wouldn't be the first time that supposed financing apparently did not take place.