Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It depends on the politicians they're schmoozing with.
All of these alleged acquisitions and still don't own anything, have no product or income.
Doesn't it strike anyone as odd that every time they come out with what should be a PR that would boost share value, it goes down.
You think that more prospective investors are digging into the KNSC and these alleged owners histories?
Are they running out of suckers to dupe?
BTW nobody has answered the challenge to show us any documentation where these people legally own RSHN.
What makes you think it's not bogus?
RSHN has no products, no income, just talk.
It doesn't take weeks or months to prepare a SEC filing that is legitimate when you have the supporting documents.
When you're making it up as you go, it does take longer.
The long winded PR posted by RSHN really said nothing.
Many scams do just that, that's why I said smoke and mirrors.
The SEC filing may or may not happen.
The question still remains, do these people legally own RUSHNET?
If anyone can answer that question, please share the documents where and when it was legally purchased.
Well we'll see what happens with the promised SEC filings they've allegedly been working on for weeks/months.
This looks more to me like the old political mantra, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, bury them in BS".
I hope I'm wrong because if this turns to be true, it would be good for the shareholders but in light of all the BS, I think I'm justifiably skeptical.
As usual the Forward looking statement protects the scammers.
They keep adding words to better protect the scammers.
ANNNNNNND, THE BIG NEWS IS!!!!!!
Prospective investors have realized what a pump and dump scam Rushnet is!
Notice that trading gets lower and lower.
That's just regurgitating old news.
Nothing new.
What's the point ?
The only follow through is more BS to add to the pile.
I challenge anyone to show proof of anything the alleged owners of RSHN have produced that adds any value for the shareholders.
The only thing we have here is a smoke and mirrors con job.
APRU was a spinoff from Rushnet several years ago.
We shareholders received worthless shares of APRU which are still worthless.
Look at the history of RSHN and the people involved, it will tell all you need to know.
RSHN was a scam from day one and as far as I can see, that hasn't changed.
It will be interesting to see if the reference to Dr. Richard Goulding allegedly claiming to be dealing with SEC filings/matters turns out to be the SEC questioning how Goulding and others came into possession of Rushnet.
Making money by pumping and dumping a worthless stock is a scam.
So far RSHN has nothing but BS pumping to dump.
I've had this stock probably longer than most of you and I've followed the many empty hypes promoting it and nothing has ever materialized from it.
If BS was gold, RSHN would like Fort Knox !
It was refused for multiple reasons.
The reasons were explained in detail.
It appears they have up to six months to respond.
It is quite interesting reading.
IMO the trademark attorneys were quite thorough in their review.
That is not an IPO as stated.
Preparing for and doing are quite different.
Maybe they're still preparing like all of the other things they've been preparing for.
It has not been done.
I stand by my comment about A RSHN scam.
This BS has been going on far too long.
Nothing beneficial to shareholders has ever come of any of the so called PRs.
If it was there, it would still be there and the person posting that claim should be able to produce it.
The fact is Rushnet does not now and never has had an IPO.
The more posts like that I see, the more it makes RSHN look like a major scam.
If they're not already, they should be on the SECs radar.
Where is this PR stating Rushnet is raising over 50 million dollars in an IPO ?
I have never seen any such thing & I doubt anyone else has.
How can they issue an IPO when they have NOTHING !
Ask yourself, what has Rushnet actually acquired, what do they own?
They have no funds and no income so what are they using to make these purported acquisitions?
Their PRs are always, In talks with, Reaching final stages of, implementing & exploring opportunities.
Has any of these things ever been completed, if so where is the money Rushnet should be making for the shareholders?
It's always the same refrain and nothing comes of it.
Today's BS PR bumped it up a little and probably people whom got suckered into holding millions of shares dumped to save what they could before the toilet flushes.
It's just to add hype and try to pump what appears to be a major scam.
Rushnet has no products therefore no income just hype to keep pumping and dumping.
Their mantra is always tomorrow,soon, maybe next week, month, etc.,etc.etc….
When I see actual product materialize and being sold to make money for the shareholders, I will get onboard.
It has been a flippers play for some time, 4-5 million or more shares on 1 or 2 ticks repeatedly is a pretty good payday.
I have an investment here that I've had for a long time as well.
I always have and will continue to call it like I see it.
What a joke, Rushnet has no product.
I guess they'll use the trucking Co. to transport the money they get from the suckers that got conned into buying and holding!
Why are people posting about POTN here? This board is for RSHN.
Didn't anyone notice in the last RSHN OTC filing it showed in share structure accumulated deficit as of Sept.30,2018, $7,729,739,834.
That is the same number as the outstanding shares.
So what does that tell us ?
I think people did notice and some are dumping before they pull an RS which some claim they won't do and wipe out many of us.
In spite of claims made here, the fact is RSHN has NO product, No income and a huge deficit.
And just what does it prove?
What QR are you referring to, I don't see any QR for RSHN since Sept..
That is old and doesn't prove anything.
People keep trying to pump this with absolutely no facts to support the hype.
The more people pump this the more like a scam it looks.
That is a Restated/filed document of an earlier filing with some changes.
When one reads it, there are 1 billion shares of common stock authorized but read further and they can add as many as they want later.
The 15 acre harvest that was supposed to be in October hasn't happened yet, I wonder if it is in the area that just got 24" of snow, that wouldn't be good for the pot crop.
I don't know why people keep talking about an IPO because there is nothing to offer.
Sounds like more pumping to me......
We've been hearing the same BS about RSHN daily for months now.
The pump and dump propaganda/hype has effectively destroyed any chance RSHN may have had.
It wouldn't surprise me if they did.
Typically that's what scam stocks with this many shares do.
It will not affect RSHN because the only thing POTN & RSHN have in common is Dr. Richard Goulding is the CMO of both.
The Propaganda/Hype mongers are trying to get RSHN riding on the coattails of POTN to make a quick buck and it appears to be backfiring.
POTN actually has products and equipment to make money and add value for their shareholders.
RSHN has nothing but Propaganda/hype which has no value for shareholders.
IMO, existing RSHN long and prospective shareholders are seeing this as a pump and dump scam because for months now the only thing produced is propaganda/hype on a daily basis.
Their experience doesn't seem to be helping Rushnet become a viable company getting value for shareholders.
So far, we haven't seen anything productive, it's been all talk and nothing produced for months.
If BS was worth anything, we would all be wealthy.
Rushnet has never amounted to anything and IMO it's continuing on the same path.
As the saying goes, "This ain't my first rodeo".
I'm stating my opinion based on my experience and what is and is not in the records.
Nobody has answered my questions from my last post.
Resumes mean nothing when you don't follow through on what you are claiming.
To date, they have proven nothing with Rushnet.
BTW, what ever happened to the harvest that was supposed to be in October ?
One thing I have noticed is the Safe harbor statement has gotten more creative with adding more adjectives that give the scammers more protection.
Go into the OTC Markets website and read the information for RSHN.
Pay particular attention to the financials.
Last reported in 2017, nothing for 2018.
All RSHN has is debt, no income.
What products does RSHN actually have to sell ?
What have they sold to make money for the shareholders ?
The answer to both is NOTHING !
IMO, All the so called news being reported is nothing but hype to Pump & Dump.
Nothing has come of anything posted here and on other sites, all talk & produces nothing for shareholders.
The scammers implore the suckers to buy and hold so they can dump their shares and leave the suckers holding the bag.
I thought earlier that RSHN may have something good for us long shareholders ( I've owned this stock for many years) but they proved me wrong.
I didn't buy any shares this time, I was wary and my gut instinct was correct.
Good DD is not only taking a hard look at the company but also the people involved.
GLTA to all the bagholders.
There is nothing in the filings on OTC or SEC for RSHN or POTN that shows the two companies are connected.
When someone produces/posts a legitimate connection/filing on OTC or SEC, I'll withdraw my comment.
It was the propaganda being posted here and on other media trying to make it appear that RSHN & POTN are interconnected that bumped this to .008.
When people realized what was going on RSHN tanked and has not recovered.
The fact that Dr. Goulding is CMO of two competing companies does not add value for RSHN shareholders when it produces nothing but talk and a conflict of interest.
What has been going on here for months has actually made RSHN look like a pump and dump scam that some claim it is.
I was hoping for better.
What is posted here as DD is opinion/speculation and means nothing.
What is filed with OTC or SEC is what counts.
Show us something in the filings where RSHN & POTN are connected.
They are related in that they may have the same product.
As far as I can see the only connection is Dr. Goulding is CMO of both.
If in fact they were part and parcel, RSHN stock would be worth much more than it is.
You are right, but the fact remains he is CMO of both competing companies with the same product, therein lies the conflict.
Whether he is CEO, Chairman of the board or not is irrelevant to this issue.
That's a good way of putting it, that's a saying I use quite often.
That could explain why RSHN isn't moving up, others see it too.
According to POTN's PR, Dr. Goulding resigned from CEO but retained the position of CMO.
Additionally, Dr. Goulding is the CEO & CMO of Rushnet (RSHN).
Unless the two companies are related, there is an inherent conflict of interest.
IMO there's no confusion, a little subterfuge maybe. One can't hold the same position in competing companies with the same product and not have a conflict of interest.
We'll see what happens.
What I'm looking is transparency & clarification.
The POTN PR indicates he is in fact the CMO full time.
The term consultant usually indicates part time.
It doesn't appear that RSHN & POTN are connected but in fact are competitors so it would follow that there appears to be a conflict of interest.
We have been hearing May, Might, Could, Maybe for weeks/months and to date nothing concrete that would increase share value.
Read the second paragraph of the Oct. 25, 2018 PR from POTN on the OTC board.
It sure looks like Dr. Richard Goulding is the CMO of POTN unless someone is lying.
Apparently nobody noticed or they're just overlooking it but it appears that Dr. Richard Goulding may have resigned as CEO of POTN but he is still the CMO of POTN as well as CEO & CMO of Rushnet (RSHN).
Does that seem a little strange since the two companies appear to be competitors?
Correct me if I'm wrong & I'll look at it again.
LOL, That's what they do for a living. RSHN has been around and I have owned it for many years and it has never done anything.
This recent activity looks promising but IMO all of the chatter here means nothing until the information is verified with filings with OTC or better yet get current with SEC filings.
That's when we'll see it take off.