Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
well...since no one else has said it yet...(but I know they were thinking it).........Good Call
No problem...it's all my opinion...Your right...at first...customers will probably not go to the general cleaning isle for auto clean-up....but in time...with the help from advertisements...i think people who already bought 1000+ from the general cleaning isle might test it out on their car instead of going back to the store to purchase more products....so the next time they think about auto clean up...they know where to find 1000+...
That is deceptive....acting like we have multiple products just by adding different labels? That totally takes away from our name as well....1000+ is and should be branded like we can do everything...everywhere...as 1 product....how can u claim a product can do 1000 things but have 3 or 4 product lines with the same name?
The name change already took a bite out of the identity of the company due to the word "Winning" being removed from the lead product...(that name was obviously chosen because of the company's name)...so I doubt Winning Brands will want to lose more of their identity by following shady business practices by selling the same product under different labels...or by adding ingredients to a particular label to make customers believe it really is a different when its not...
1000+ should be in the general purpose cleaning section of stores like walmart and of grocery chains....but in hardware (Lowes,HD) and stores like SAM'S...we should have it in the same isles with a non stop video playing as many uses as we can fit...highlighting paint removal, laundry, auto clean-up, etc...
Having product in the same isle ensures customers know where to find us...most customers would not go on a product hunt...they would just assume the particular store does'nt have the product, and in turn, pick up something else...
It is every traders right to "trade" whatever stock they want....any time they want...no one is forcing a trade...the Market Makers let the trades go through...So even if the stock is in a downtrend...a trader should and could make money if they know how to...That is the point of dabbling in the stock market...TO MAKE MONEY....If anyone has further questions on why we are in this severe downtrend...please pull up any post from Doogdilinger on the WNBD board and he'll probably be discussing the needed liquidity here....
Or a large holder is just tired of waiting....and cutting his/her losses b4 we say hello to the .001's again...
Don't Worry Dirty...It's not like Eric is gonna just jump straight into a new name...It will be a transition...and maybe a long one....but I agree that a new name is a great idea moving forward...It opens up so many new doors for advertising...
Well...the way I see it is...You cannot have it both ways...as you stated...it is a GREAT all purpose cleaner......but you negate that by labeling it as a "Stain Remover"...Yes...It can remove the Toughest Stains...but thats the purpose of marketing it as such...It's easier to sell the public on "A Generic Cleaner that can tackle the toughest stains"...than a "A Stain remover that is a Generic Cleaner"...IMO
1000+, World's Most Versatile Cleaning Solution", Can be marketed is so many ways...and for a very long time...1000+'s name already tells the public..."This product does a lot of things..." So IMO, they would not be surprised to see it located in many places...Auto Stores...Household Cleaning departments, Car Washes, Paint Stores, Pet Stores...and what helps is that it is Eco-friendly....It can be branded EVERYWHERE...
I meant U.S....But in Canada....I wouldn't doubt it...They are running ads in markets they are unknown in/trying to gain faster traction in....Give it a year and I doubt you will ever see another one, or very very few...
BTW....1000+, "World's Most Versatile Cleaning Solution".....Doesn't that sound like a perfect fitting? I can actually feel it when I say it out loud...
With the "Stain Remover" term attached...you'll have to convince many that it is not just a stain remover...With it not attached...you don't have to convince anyone of anything...it says it all in the 1000+...leaves the mind open to think of 1000 ways to clean something...stains/drips/drops/disaster/carwash/laundry....and the list goes on...
absolutely scup....4 or 5 commercials like that would be great...Just like BK did...or the old Spice ads with that ex-football player....Or even the Progressive Insurance with "Flo"...They are all successful campaigns....We just need a professional script writer/director to ensure it goes well....Unlike the DRTV mess...If that was all Hawthorne could come up with...I would never want to use them again...The ad looked more like Eric was doing it all on his own....with few suggestions/guidance from the hired "Professionals"...Which in that case...I think Eric did a great Job by himself....
IMO...drop the "Stain Remover"...you don't need it...it does more harm added than it does help...it limits you to a "Stain Remover" in the average consumers eye...WD-40, Clorox, Goof-Off, and Kaboom are all examples of product names that didn't need name designators/product descriptions to get customers to know what the product did...they were avertised in the right way...that's what we need. I got an idea of a ad campaign...run a campaign asking the consumers..."Can you find something 1000+ can't do"...then the response would be some off the wall thing like..."it can't clean the stain off Charlie Sheens bad boy image(or anyone who is looked bad upon by the media at the time of the ad's creation)"...and then we'd follow up by saying..."yea, maybe we can't do that....but we can do....(state 5 or 6 cleaning techniques/usages)........each ad/commercial could have different scenarios leading to 5 or 6 new things....
-This shows that we are truly versatile
-Shows we truly have limitless usages
-Gives us some needed exposure commercially by using a famous person's name
-adds humor which customers will remember and talk about...
This makes me think about the "stay up late with BK(Burger King) campaign...it used humor and a catchy phrase...something we could use as well...
Well...there you have it...1000+..."World's Most Versatile Cleaning Solution"....that covers everything...and can be advertised and branded everywhere...commercial and industrial...
Scup...I honestly think we don't want to hear "THAT" Update...Let's just let it rollover please....You guys already saw what happened when we pushed Eric for a Walmart Update while we were in the cent range...
Who still believes an NA is coming soon?
neither can I...you using Google Chrome?
about to get more...
Do not touch this one...
Thanks Bama...Hoping for another great day today..
Great buy's today...just great...keep it up... I nearly tripled my position down in this range...finally I have funds available when the PPS is horrible...usually I have to sit and watch....Not no more....LEGOO!
Trading is getting interesting right now...someone just bought 400,000 @.0027....seems the Buy in of 111,111 was a signal for others to buy...
as i was typing..someone just bought 350,000 at .0027....wow
He's trying to pump......and your complaining....lol
We had an excellent day...Let's see the .003's...Hoping for a very informative interview.
I see...Thanks
So are you telling me that there has never been Ground Breaking "Material" Events announced via Interviews/Conference Calls, that have been LEGAL?
WNBD has ALL of the ingredients for a major run...We will soon see if they can pull it off...
Confirm the NA during the interview...and Release the PR in the AM?...sounds like a great plan to me....
Well...What do you know...HJS has confirmed that our IR Firm's DOES attract people to us...Great...Hopefully other will take the same risks you did...you could possibly be the luckiest person to have gotten in at this level...Most of us here are average above .005 mush higher...GL to you bud, WNBD could be a life changer if all comes together...3 NA's and great financials could make us do a S$%G like run IMO...But we will definitely need to sell more product with ramped up advertising and marketing for the PPS to hold...
How likely is it that Eric would confirm an NA in an After Hour Interview? I think he would definitely do it...He'd stick it to the sidelinners...with a great big smile on his face
WNBD is looking great...let's keep her going...
With the SDG firm backing us...and the fact that Eric has confirmed he will promote the company and product once an NA is achieved...I am starting to believe we may actually have a chance to rock again...WNBD could go Nuts...Confidence is coming back to WNBD Land...Let's see what Eric has in store for us closing out this month...
WNBD could go nuts in the next 2 weeks leading up to March 31st...Financials are due and rumor has it that last quarter was the best yet...Confiedence is coming back to WNBD and I like it.
0024 x .0025 UP @ 25% NOW!
HJS,
Did you find WNBD due to the email alerts from SDG?
TAKI...Do you think this is capable of making a SPNG like run if all NA's come on board, plus solid financials?...
I do..
WNBD
Camelion, We could really have something here. .0023 x .0024 UP @ 20% on very light volume
Dennis, I don't think it matters who hears that interview TOMORROW...did you read Eric's Blog Last night? He said...
How likely do you think we'd get more than one NA decision by the 1st? Wouldn't that be crazy?
NA decision...where art thou?
edit....1 week down...2 weeks to go...hopefully Eric PR'S superb financials combined with the NA's decision...let's hope it's a YES!
DirtyDave...People do not really care HOW MUCH the CEO gets paid...I think your missing the point....They, as do I, as should you, care about how much money the company brings in yearly compared to how much comes out. The CEO's pay is one of the main things brought to light because it can be slimmed down very easily...People keep mentioning the fact that 5% of CEO's get paid much much more...but what they are failing to include is the fact that those CEO's run companies worth millions upon millions and can afford to pay themselves a lot more. For a company who has not once produced ONE profitable year in 5-6 years, how can you agree the CEO deserves 120K? And from the sound of it, you seem like you'd back him if he dared to increase it from there....
120k is indeed cheap for the majority of CEO's, I agree....but it is expensive when you break it down further than simply "time on the job"...Your hourly breakdown is frightening IMO...If the CEO truly works 365 days a year and 16 hours a day, you should not be praising him for the productivity of this company. If your telling me he can't get in more than 5000 stores in 5 years working 5840 hours per year for 5 years (29200 hours) then your breakdown isn't a good thing like you make it out to be, it only helps prove that his productivity could use some revamping. Anyone can stay at their job a few extra hours a day, sit behind their desk, and call it "overtime"...The only thing is, he is the CEO, so if he lives in his office, there is no one higher to tell him, stop wasting your shareholders money. For example, I use to work at a supermarket in Wilmington, Delaware prior to joining the service. When it got really slow in the store and their were no more customers, my boss, even though I had 2-3 more hours left on my work schedule, would send me home. The reasons companies do this is obvious. Why pay a employee to sit there? At the time to me it looked like they were being a-holes and didn't want to give me all my hours...but it's clear to me now that all companies do this to in the long run save millions of dollars yearly...
Eric's productivity with the amount of hours he works should be the main concern to ALL shareholders...not just me...16 hours a day for 365 days? Plus the fact that he has a team of employees who works probably just as long? I'm not saying we should have 10 NA's at this point...what i'm saying is, We should be seeing a linear line of progress right now if they claim to work THAT hard. Winning accounts and losing them and winning accounts and product sitting on shelves should not be happening 5-6 years down the road IMO...Some consistency would do us wonders...and a NA will not magically give us that...
My breakdown months ago should be a better example for you on why we are where we are with the current PPS....You cannot pay your employee's salary with dilution forever...and it has been showing for over a year and a half now...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=56964026
We could get an NA next week and his pay may no longer be a concern to anyone...not because he deserves it or doesn't...works 16 hours a day or doesn't...it is because his company may then be in the position to tolerate that expense...
Nothing negative about my post...this is pure opinion and realistic views on the everyday trials and tribulations on what happens when CEO's want their cake but haven't produced the goods...(yet)