Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Interesting. Melvin's posting at RB again:
By: halfstep3
13 Apr 2006, 11:15 AM EDT
Msg. 197202 of 199721
Jump to msg. #
ATT CMKX shareholders.
You may or maynot know who I am. My name is Melvin and I used to be employed with CMKX.
Over the last 6 or 7 months I have followed both the R/B board as well as the Paltalk rooms and Have watched the breakup of the shareholders due to RUMOURS and LIES.
I am not one for writing things so I will make this short and sweet. Regarding the info that has come from the
the people over seas. IMO this is all nonsence and should be treated as such. The 1.47 or whatever it is again is total nonsence. I do not know why they would say this and
and i really don't care. BUT, with that said if it is going to harm the well being of the share holder who I care for very much. Then I feel it is my right to speak up.
Are we [the shareholders} going to get a "PAYOUT" ? Heck If I know. Do I think we will? "YES". HOw much? Only the powers to be can would know that "NOT" somone sitting in a chat room or board. "NOT" somone who heard it from there broker who heard it from there banker who heard it from there son-in-law. get the picture hear?
I have said this over and over and will continue to say it. IF IT IS NOT IN A OFFICIAL P/R FROM THE COMPANY then I DO NOT belive it. Why is it that alot of you cant seem to get that? yes I know what your thinking. Your thinking why does the company not tell us anything ? If you were in there shoes would you ? I think not.
In conclusion may I say we all {me included} let cmkx play out and STOP all the rumors and lies that have come about. If I see or hear somthing that CAN NOT be backed up with """""""" FACT"""""""" then i'm sorry I will not listen.
thank you
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=197202
Okay, sorry. In any case, it's the shortsellers suing.
How many times did you hit the register on anything?
I think my all time favorite will always be.....when I was short the market on Grey Monday. I was the only person I knew who was deliriously happy that day.
Too damn funny!! I'm afraid YOU'RE the one who didn't do any research. I've been pulling Mario's chain for almost a year and a half now, and have no plans to stop, unless this little scheme collapses.
I sense you didn't entirely convince your friend.
If the article that you sent is true that "Electronic Trading Group LLC is suing NSS".
You have it backwards. Shortsellers are suing the Electronic Trading Group.
The real proof of Paychest Inc existance is the web site.
LOLOLOLOLOLISSIMO!!
I suppose that means FBN and Webnode exist, too.
In the Message Headers section, click Full.
Now they also have "advanced" as an option. That's better than "full".
I use Hotmail too. Of course you can get advanced headers. Go to "options", and then go here:
"Mail Display Settings"
That's where you'll find header settings.
Is this document a bunch of BS???
Yes, in considerable part. We've commented on it before. Note, for example, that Mario claims there've been no "related party transactions", and then shows that two of his own companies own large chunks of shares.
And so on.
It seems Lakers and Janice Shell have other intentions then investing in PayChest Inc.
No shit sherlock.
It's pretty obvious they have either been burned on this stock when it was Mellon Research (mlon) or had bad business dealings with Mario Pino.
On the contrary. I just think it's fun to go after Mario.
Somewhere at your email site you'll see "options". Go there and look for "headers". Click on "full" or "advanced"...as high as it goes. Click "okay" or whatever you need to do to save that setting. Now go to one of the emails you received. You'll now see a lot of header info.
Copy it and post it here.
Um, why should a site admin be an authority on what's happening with the company?
I don't recall anyone saying that. Maybe you're on the wrong board.
Maybe a few weeks before it's finalized. But the company would have to tell the TA to get the certs for cancellation to start the process. So the TA would know.
The company has to tell the TA if it retires shares. Those certs have to be cancelled, and all certs must go through the TA.
You're really very passive about doing research, aren't you?
Huh? Why shouldn't the divvy be distributed? It kinda HAS to be distributed, I'd say.
TAs are responsible for doing ALL stock transfers. So the company is obliged to keep the TA informed. I suppose there are cases in which a company issues stock without telling the TA (CMKX may be one of them), but that's illegal.
Well, if they ever actually try to submit that 211, someone with more authority than I will tell them they're lying.
We've been here before. Jim, I, and others pointed out what wasn't true in that document.
Her name appears at all three of the links I cited.
You're just not getting this. There is NO REASON, EVER, to believe a word Mario says.
What "private stockholders" agreed? Nobody agreed to anything, except for Mario. Go read the Form 211. The deal is spelled out there.
That one's certifiable. But then so many of 'em are.
Oooooohhhhh, where??
Didn't bash LOCH either, though it was always a stinker.
Never even heard of it. Yahoo tells me it's an "invalid symbol".
No. Though I should have.
Those certs are probably the "no record" certs. Presumably, the ones Urbie, Melvin, and DeSormeau flogged in Sask without bothering to tell the TA.
That's exactly what I meant. How "provable" are Mario's PRs? Not very, most of the time.
Thanks!
News? Well......I think Mario has to be VERY careful about what he puts in PRs. That's kinda limiting.
That's because it's trading unsolicited. MMs aren't paying much attention, because they're not making a market.
The end result is the
comany cannot raise capital from banks or from selling stock.
Banks don't lend to CMKX's kind of Pinkie anyway. And who says they can't raise capital from selling stock?
Urbie raised a helluva lot. The problem is that he kept it for himself.
Which ones?
We are seeing too much positive for that.
Huh? And what would that be?
Whatever information companies choose to give to individual shareholders, analysts, or anyone else must be made to ALL shareholders, analysts, and so on. Companies cannot hand out information selectively.
This is an SEC regulation, called Reg FD. FD stands for "full disclosure".
Jimmy. Your original comparison was of CMKX to Refco. THAT is what's apples to oranges.
IBZT and CMKX are both just penny stock scams. Apples to apples.
I have sent e-mails to paychest and have received feedback. The information, according to the responses, is confidential and may be legally privileged.
OOOPS!! That's a violation of Reg FD.
Does that mean they are primarily speaking of short selling that is being done in the Pinks, Greys or OTC?
No.