Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Unfortunately it's too late for me to buy more shares at those cheap prices. Oh well maybe I'll have better luck next time but there will be no next time. It's all uphill from here.
Yes, I most definitely agree. It's going to be a great summer indeed. And it's all going to start very soon as you have stated with the audited Q1 along with the Attorney letter. Then we are off to the races. Go GCGX.
Oh yeah because cashing in his shares at this price is so much more lucrative than cashing them in at $4 or more per share. LMAO
I agree, the CO is really the only real stumbling block preventing the company from making some serious money.
Nice post. I agree.
Even though I would love to load up on more shares if they got below a penny, with the stop sign and the dark/defunct symbols being removed shortly, I believe it will never go below 0.015 and if it does it will be short lived.
Yea, I agree. But once we get the CO by hopefully no later than the middle of August, we should be on very solid ground.
Well, I would have to say he is just based on the simple fact that if you go to the GCGX website, he is listed as a part of the team. The COO to be more exact.
Yep, and I can't wait until the stop sign and the dark/defunct symbols come down. Then the sparks are really gonna fly.
Agreed. LMAO
You're exactly right. And no, they aren't getting any of my shares anytime soon either.
Exactly. So for all you sellers out there, I can assure you that there are buyers just waiting in line to buy your shares. Especially at these prices.
Yeah, it is impossible to actually lose something that was never yours in the first place. Good point.
Nicely stated.
Nice post.
I don't agree with your statement but as for the statement itself you could probably send it to at least half the people on this board.
Drop in revenue and assets? LMAO. If the company never went to trips last year when for all practical purposes had no income and no assets do you really believe they are going to trips now that they have over 30 million in assets and just over 1 million in revenue. NOT HAPPENING.
Nice post. Also both statement you made in your post are absolutely correct.
Nice post. Also what most people should realize is that laws are being either updated or passed that are becoming more in favor and inline with the cannabis industry.
Thanks.
No one ever said they were going to be uplisted directly to the NASDAQ. First they will uplist to the OTCQB. Then once they meet just one of the requirements needed to uplist to the NASDAQ is when that will occur.
OCT traders wanting revenues in an unrealistic time frame...now that is an understatement if there ever was one.
Oh yes, you mean the license that specifically states Global Consortium Group LLC as in GCG and not GCGX. I know exactly the one your talking about. And I also remember the reason it is not under GCGX. I do remember something about a firewall being in place because if GCGX ever intends to be uplisted to the NASDAQ then one of the things they CANNOT do is touch the plant. Anybody that has followed this company for a while should know this.
Lol
Most likely---sounds like an educated guess not based on facts. But the facts are in the report if you read it. LMAO
Exactly, with truth and facts. People wanted truth and facts. Well they have it.
And imagine that in an unaudited report.
Nice post. Also, according to the report they should have the CO by no later than the 15th of August. So, literally another month and a half and some people are acting like its the end of the world.
Ok, that makes sense.
Very good point. As far as the hemp farm is concerned. I think it was a good business decision. Why should they stay with something if it wasn't in the best interest of the company. If anything, they will look for a better deal. These things happen all the time in business. I will post a most recent example below. Some will look at the example and say why in the world would FedEx be willing to give up almost 1 billion in revenue. To many it doesn't make any sense whatsoever but whether it makes sense or not doesn't matter. It's what the CEO believes is in the companies best interest.
FedEx decided to bail on renewing its contract with Amazon for U.S. domestic express deliveries. There’s no change in the agreements between the two companies for international services, but FedEx chose to walk away from nearly $850 million in annual revenue.
I agree considering all of the circumstances the company has been going through. It's just a part of the growing pains. For those of you that are upset, I do understand but if you are really trying to get the SEC to look into this they will most likely refer you to the "forward looking statements" because unless I am wrong, they are not guaranteed. That is why investing is a risk.
No, they just decided to use Prager Metis
instead. They are also a very well known and established firm. But if they plan on sticking with Prager Metis then they should update their website with that info. It's on page 19 of the report.
Oh yeah, Matthew Dwyer the liar. Give me a break. This is what I call being honest and transparent. If he were a liar then he should have never stated the 3.1 million in losses. Or would you prefer for him to have fudged the numbers and lied. If he were a liar then perhaps he should have stated that the report was audited when he is clearly stating it was not. And apart from all of that there is no law stating that it had to be audited. But the most important thing for us to know is that from here on out everything is going to be audited. LMFAO
Agreed
Exactly. Also, in order for GCGX to uplisted to the OTCQB I believe they have to be audited anyway.
ATTENTION ATTENTION. THE REPORT HAS JUST BEEN POSTED
Yes, there are very exciting times ahead for sure. Go GCGX
Yes indeed.
Yes, sounds good to me.
Yeah, but as far as I can tell the 2.1 million loss only has to do with the assets they have acquired but that is different than the actual revenue they have accumulated. We will find out soon enough though. But one thing for sure is that when they finally do post their financials that should do away with all of that dark/defunct signs regardless of how much money they have generated. But I am still hoping for great numbers.
So how would you know that ahead of any financials being released as of yet? But regardless, we will definitely find out very soon if they are on pace or not.