Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Does the old technology have the ability to look under a teredo crust and indicate what precious metals might be there? Or is it only the SeaSearcher? I'm pretty sure magnets, bottom feeder this or side eye that are not able to differentiate metals under a previously unknown teredo crust. I'm not saying indicate if it is ferrous or non-ferrous but indicate specifically which metal it is, i.e. gold, silver, copper, brass, etc.
Do you know why, after all the decades of searching on Juno, no one, other than Seafarer, noticed there is a huge teredo crust at the sight around the anchor and ballast stones?
Some people seem to think teredo crusts don't exist or simply fail to understand what they are and how they are created at wreck sites. You'd think experts would be familiar with such a thing.
BTW, I think research is vital to treasure salvage and will continue to be. Just like the old tech will still serve a purpose in the process.
Go SFRX!
Yes! and with proof of it working.
Which I think will be happening sooner rather than later. I don't think the successful inventor and multi-millionaire Tim Reynolds has been wasting his time these last few years. I think he knows exactly what he is doing.
Good things on the horizon for Seafarer.
Critics of SFRX continue to put their head in the sand.
It won't work.
https://www.inceptivemind.com/seasearcher-find-treasures-buried-seabed/25867/
Another article on Seafarer popped up.
Once again, out of the loop non-shareholders are using a straw man argument to put words in your mouth you did not say.
Research will be eternally important for wreck salvage operations. No one is saying it will not be. And other older tech equipment will also have a place in the process.
But of utmost important is the crucial element of determining whether a wreck has treasure or not. Instead of spending years hoping to come across treasure that you hope is located near iron hits from the mag survey, you will now be able to scan the area of the wreck and know in short order if there is treasure or other metals present at the wreck.
You no longer have to ID the ship and track down a manifest. Years of effort, time and money (possibly wasted), will now be saved.
Locate a wreck, scan it for treasure, get your answer. Act accordingly.
Archeology, history, state coffers and business profits will all benefit from the current and future activities of Seafarer.
Yes, SFRX is a tech and exploration company. Used to be just a treasure hunting company but times have changed. Now I guess it's all three.
Some find it hard to keep up. Same people who still think you must ID the ship in order to find out what is on it. Identification and manifest are no longer required to know what is on a wreck. Identification can be done later.
Now the SeaSearcher can scan a wreck and tell you what metals are on it, if any. And not just if it is ferrous/non-ferrous but which metal specifically – gold, silver, brass, iron, copper, etc. Magnetometers, sub bottom and side scan still have their place in the process, but times have changed. Or at least they will be changing very shortly.
That's why I own shares of SFRX. For the potential, based on recent developments with their technology. Those who think they have not been doing anything lately are clearly not paying attention.
#tonnagenottrinkets
So, yes. The answer is yes.
Micah paid people to attack Seafarer in the past.
$2,000 a month. Think he's still doing it?
I agree. SFRX has not failed.
EXPL for example. That's a colossal failure. From over a dollar to .0002, non-trading, non-reporting, fraud conviction, etc.
SFRX has not given up so they have not failed. In fact, what's the opposite of giving up? That's what they are doing.
Too bad not everyone does proper DD.
I but that multi-millionaire investor who owns 451 million shares does proper DD.
#tonnagenottrinkets
The future of Seafarer looks bright! ... and shiny!
So glad Micah didn't succeed in his plan to turn SFRX into a P&D like EXPL.
Thank's to Kennedy for stopping him.
Micah's EXPL was over a dollar a share and is now non-trading, non-reporting and stuck at .0002.
But Micah's minions say it's all okay, last summer's 19 counts of fraud conviction for Micah is no big deal.
I bet serious investors like Max, related parties and others who each own 100s of millions of shares of SFRX are putting their money behind SFRX for a reason.
I'll ignore the misdirection and go with the confidence of the people who are actually involved with the company, running it, have created the SeaSearcher and know what they are talking about vs. misguided guesses from the sidelines.
Looking forward to tonnage, not trinkets.
#tonnagenottrinkets
Yes, I think most sentient humans agree with my analysis.
Hey, just a question. If you hear someone say that a company's "BOD is selling shares," what comes to mind? The casual interpretation of that line is that the BOD is personally selling their personal shares. Which, in the case of SFRX, is clearly not happening. BOD members continue to collect shares — as do related parties.
Can you imagine tossing that line out and then trying to cover your bullshit misdirection by saying what you really meant was that the BOD "authorizes" the selling of shares for the company? But a much more clear way of saying that would be "the company is selling shares to raise money." You know, the way penny stock companies raise money for operations before they hit it big or accomplish their goals.
Two very different messages. What a crock.
I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000%
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99%
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0002 and non-trading, non-reporting. I'm sure those promised big TV deals are right around the corner.
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• Claims the SFRX BOD is selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary.
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
My position in SFRX has increased.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:
• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000%
• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99%
• Had the gaul to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0002 and non-trading, non-reporting. I'm sure those promised big TV deals are right around the corner.
• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.
• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.
• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one
• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water
• States that the SFRX BOD is selling shares when they are not.
• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time
• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits
• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!
• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary
• Brags about making money on a P&D
The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.
Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary.
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find treasure.
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.
My position in SFRX has increased.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
#tonnagenottrinkets
So, no. No other technology currently does what the SeaSearcher does.
Offered examples prove the SeaSearcher is in a class by itself.
Highly valuable to shareholders of SFRX.
#tonnagenottrinkets
Do other AUVs discriminate between silver, gold, copper, iron, bronze, lead, aluminum, stainless steel and other metals like the SeaSearcher does? Or do they just say if something is iron or not iron? Let me help. They do not. They can only indicate if something is ferrous or non-ferrous. And maybe provide very low resolution images of what they are able to show.
What resolutions are other AUVs scanning at? Does anyone here know the resolution of the SeaSearcher? How about the depth of both?
Seems it would be hard to say what one thing can and can not do if you are not familiar with the specs of each technology.
When offering an opinion on an evaluation, seems most significant to ignore the new and proprietary technology of the SeaSearcher that any other AUV does not have.
If I was to legitimately criticize the performance of a product in comparison to another product, knowing the specs of both would be pertinent information. And any comparison without those specs would be useless.
Tim Reynolds studied all other available technologies and their specs before creating the SeaSearcher. So he does know what is currently out there and the limitations of each.
When he says something about the SeaSearcher, understand that he has specs on all technologies and is making an informed evaluation, not guessing.
Amazing have many affiliates of the failing old tech companies continue to make wrong and false assumptions. No wonder some of those stocks have tanked to low trips and are no longer trading nor reporting their financials.
#tonnagenottrinkets
Sure hope so. I try not to worry too much about daily fluctuations.
Just as well could have been one of those days where someone dumps a few million and the price goes down.
We shall see if the buying continues. But green is always a lot more fun than red like the rest of the markets today.
What matters more to me is the buying that takes place after a big announcement of treasure found with help of the SeaSearcher. That will be the difference maker.
I'm looking for lots of treasure, not trinkets.
FTR, what matters with this company is, are they moving forward?
Yes, they are.
Progress is continuing.
Time to see some results!
And candlelight was just great until the light bulb came along.
I'll stick with Seafarer and the SeaSearcher over tech from 50 years ago.
And existing sub bottom and side scan scanners are crap as well. Resolution on those is terribly low. Very limited uses. They have their place but are very limited.
Bring on the next generation of equipment!
Thanks .0002.
I'll let you know if I want to invest in a non-reporting, non-trading scam company that has lost 99.99% of its value like EXPL.
From recent PR from Seafarer:
"We have found the Juno Beach site has a large and thick teredo crust in the vicinity of the ballast pile that previous salvors assumed was the seabed. Obviously, the crew is anxious to use the SeaSearcher to scan the crust and see what lies beneath it.”
So, Juno is a site that has been picked over for decades and decades, yet the "professionals" and "experts" who did all that work for all those decades didn't happen to notice that there was a huge teredo crust right around the ballast pile and anchor?
Sure glad the team at Seafarer figured this out. Combine that with shoddy, partial and "edited" mag surveys over the years and it may explain a few things.
I bet the crew is not the only group of people to be anxious to figure out what is below that crust. As a shareholder of SFRX, I'm very curious to see what the SeaSearcher can tell us about that area.
Glad Seafarer was able to take advantage of the very recent good weather and waves at Juno.
Am I the only shareholder (actual shareholder) of SFRX that can see many expanded uses for this SeaSearcher technology stretching across other industries.
A lot of uses for this tech on land and air (drone) for land areas that are hard to reach via roads, etc.
Obviously there will be many uses for it underwater in shallow and deep water. Currently shallow water but soon, I'm sure, deeper and deeper water. Treasure industry alone is plenty to make it a huge company.
But then it will expand to land and military uses, seems clear to see.
Lots of room for this to run in the future after the spark.
Must be why Kyle's family members own a billion shares, are up now, and are not selling nor converting notes.
Go SFRX!
You seem to be well informed on SFRX.
Why do you suppose 'related parties' own a billion shares of SFRX?
Company financials (because SFRX is a fully reporting company, unlike some others) show related parties, one also a board member, have been collecting shares for years and are not selling them even though they bought shares at prices far lower than the current price.
Some have complained about deposit options for shares. But if that was true, why continue buying huge amounts of shares, hundreds of thousands of $$ worth, over and over again?
Seems if related parties are that confident in the future of the company, it is a good sign for current shareholders.
In news actually regarding Seafarer and the SeaSearcher:
https://newatlas.com/drones/seasearcher-treasure-hunting-drone/
Who knew that people with no experience in tech development, creating products or starting tech companies, totally out of the loop and with no contact with the company would not know anything substantial about the company.
But there are over 6 years of useless attacks against the company. A constant drumbeat of info that is either true but not important or, if it sounds important, is false or a misleading half-truth.
Like you, I'm looking forward to undeniable, concrete proof of the tech working as well.
This anchor is the most defining characteristic of the $SFRX #JunoBeach shipwreck site! It measures more than 12.5ft long and 7ft wide. Stay tuned for a follow up dive video of the site soon! pic.twitter.com/y9PwJdWJ5b
— Seafarer Exploration (@SeafarerCorp) August 2, 2022
Do you like technical #archaeology? Because $SFRX does! This sketch was done by our exceptionally talented archaeology team at a recently discovered site past the 3 mile mark off the #Florida coast. pic.twitter.com/eNae6xraHP
— Seafarer Exploration (@SeafarerCorp) July 26, 2022
Why do you suppose FBAR withheld information on the Juno wreck from Seafarer? The information was, and is, in the state's master plan survey of the area.
It will be interesting to see what is under the massive teredo crust without having to chop through it to find out.
Mid 1500s wreck! Estimated 600-ton ship!
Happy SFRX shareholder here!
I'm liking all of this. Too bad there was no treasure at the Ring site but it sounds like the SeaSearcher is finally doing what it's suppose to do — tell us what metal is there that we can't see otherwise. No treasure at Ring site? Move on to HTQ. Then proceed from there depending on scan results. Either go after treasure or move on to the next site.
No more hunting and pecking for decades. May have taken over a decade to get here but we are there. Happy to be a shareholder.
So great we can just scan that teredo crust to see what's under it since gold and silver don't show up on a mag survey. Nothing? Move on.
Meanwhile, the SeaSearcher is just getting better.
Hopefully, they find what they, and we, actual shareholders, want on the next area scanned.
Either way, it's going to happen. When, not if.
Congrats! Thanks for clarifying!
Anyone hear the news about Parsons at FBAR?
Adios, MF!
LOL!
Thanks for the reminder that "objects were recovered under zero visibility conditions."
But I heard from so-called experts that SFRX divers were inexperienced 'clown show' divers who can't find anything and never will.
"You would be surprised at what I know."
Yes, you would be.
Sounds like a whole pile of things of which you know nothing.
Standard protocol.
.0002
LOL!
I am glad Kyle didn't let Micah turn SFRX into another one of Micah's P&D scams. Guilty of fraud for 19 companies. How many more out there?
Good luck to those wanting to "load the boat" after an announcement of treasure.
We all know Micah doesn't have any hesitation breaking the law. I see how Micah and his affiliates might see breaking the law as an easier option than fighting to do what's right.
.0002 says what?
Ah yes.
Seafarer is criticized:
When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.
When the price goes up and when the price goes down.
When the volume is high and when the volume is low.
When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.
When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.
When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.
When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.
When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.
When they hire someone or when they fire someone.
When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary.
When family buys shares and when large investors buy shares.
When... well, I guess it could be a long list.
Eventually it will be when they find treasure. "Not enough!"
Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.
Now we are being told share price does not matter, fully reporting financials do not matter, being found liable is not guilty, and running scam companies is all part of doing business. Oh, wait, those rules only apply to EXPL.
All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the SFRX crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.
The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.
Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!
Yes. yes we do.
It was ... "rhetorical" !
LOL!