Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Better check the CEO and his success Rate with his other Companies...
bitcoiner7.com - Bitcoin exchange?
Domain Name: BITCOINER7.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1791692052_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Update Date: 2014-01-14 20:30:57
Creation Date: 2013-04-06 00:19:31
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2015-04-06 00:19:31
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Amy Chaffe
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 895 Pismo
Registrant City: San Luis Obispo
Registrant State/Province: California
Registrant Postal Code: 93401
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.8057049022
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: amy_swan@live.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Amy Chaffe
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 895 Pismo
Admin City: San Luis Obispo
Admin State/Province: California
Admin Postal Code: 93401
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.8057049022
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: amy_swan@live.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Amy Chaffe
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 895 Pismo
Tech City: San Luis Obispo
Tech State/Province: California
Tech Postal Code: 93401
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.8057049022
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: amy_swan@live.com
Name Server: NS47.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS48.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
Last update of WHOIS database: 2014-04-16T02:00:00Z
http://whois.stsoftware.biz/bitcoiner7-com.htm
Same Amy eh?
Domain incl Code Sold at Public Auction for $10,000
https://flippa.com/2999232-bitcoin-exchange-ready-to-launch-immediately-multi-currency-14-languages
was on sale twice, here the first attempt to sell it:
https://flippa.com/2912225-bitcoin-exchange-ready-to-launch-imediatelly-multi-currency-14-languages
GNEW - Name change on NVSOS to "Coin Citadel"
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=C9biUSI5xK90pQqv6BTIbA%253d%253d
New Company Webpage is here: http://coincitadel.com/
Per the latest Filing (June 17th)
OS : 15.3M
FLOAT: 265k shares
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=GNEW&id=122591
Listed CEO is Bill Schaefer.
Same one as for LGBS, SREH, GRDO, PAPT, GTLL and who knows what other Companies?
Par Value of Common Stock
People who own shares of common stock in a publicly traded entity or may be considering purchasing or issuing common stock from a small, private company need to understand its valuation. The actual common stock value and the par value of common stock inherently and fundamentally differ. The actual value of common stock is based on the market value of the business, whatever that market is. “Par value” is simply a legal term.
Par Value Definition
“Par value” is also referred to as face value, par or nominal value of common stock. Par value refers to the value written on the face of the common stock certificate or in the corporation’s organization or operating documents. In the formation of a corporation and registration with the secretary of state, many states mandate that the founders issue stock with a specified par value.
Legal Liability of Par Value
The par value mandate creates a subsequent legal liability that the shareholders of this stock contribute, at a minimum, this face value of the stock in order to fund the company. If the shareholders don't do so and the corporation requires the funds, these shareholders would be liable for the difference between the actual issue price and the face value, if the issue price is less than the face value, essentially “under par.”
Related Reading: How to Calculate the Cash Dividend Using Preferred Stock Market Value
No Par Value
To avoid this potential liability, most large companies issue stock at no par value or at a par value of $0.01 or less. However, a number of smaller corporations who intend to have a limited number of shareholders issue stock at $1.00 par value. In either scenario, par value becomes little more than an accounting item that is tracked in the shareholder’s section of the balance sheet. The actual value, or the amount that the shareholders actually pay for the stock, is tracked separately in the same section as the “paid-in capital in excess of par.”
Par Value Importance
Par value is an important term for any small business owner or aspiring entrepreneur to understand prior to forming a corporation, issuing stock or pursuing investors. Although it is primarily a legal and accounting term, improper understanding could lead to difficult consequences. For example, a business issuing 1,000 shares stock at a par value of $10.00 creates an immediate on paper capitalization, or book value, of $10,000.
Example
If the business fails six months later and owes creditors $5,000, the creditors could review the accounting statements to ensure the business was fully capitalized. If the creditors notice that the assets never matched the supposed capitalization, the creditors could legally force the shareholders to contribute the full amount of the par value to recoup what the business owes them.
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/par-value-common-stock-58170.html
GL
Name change on NVSOS to "Coin Citadel"
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=C9biUSI5xK90pQqv6BTIbA%253d%253d
New Company Webpage is here: http://coincitadel.com/
Per the latest Filing (June 17th)
OS : 15.3M
FLOAT: 265k shares
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=GNEW&id=122591
Let's see where this is going from here... my guess: opposite way from where it's now.
Stock Split filed with the NVSOS
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 70,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 5,000,000 Value: $ 0.01
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 120,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 3,500,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 5,000,000 Value: $ 0.01
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 53,500.00
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=VAxY61gL3A42eSWQ4tgDtA%253d%253d&CorpName=FTE+NETWORKS%2c+INC.
CEO pleads guilty (Stock Scam)
Indian American entrepreneur Shailesh Shah pleads guilty to stock scam
By The American Bazaar Staff
WASHINGTON, DC: The CEO of two publicly-traded companies in the US, Shailesh Shah, was convicted on charges that he paid kickbacks in return for purchases of his companies’ stock.
Shah, 48, of Chino, Calif., pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns to two counts of mail fraud and two counts of wire fraud, according to a press release issued by the FBI. His sentencing is scheduled for October 23 of this year.
Shah was the President and Chief Executive Officer of SOHM, Inc. and Costas, Inc. He agreed to pay secret kickbacks to an investment fund representative in exchange for having the investment fund buy stock in these two companies. The kickbacks were concealed through the use of sham consulting agreements and other fraudulent documents. In actuality, however, and unbeknownst to Shah, the purported investment fund representative was an undercover FBI agent.
Apart from Shailesh Shah, also charged in May was Sandip Shah, 40, in an indictment with nine counts of wire fraud. Sandip Shah is also from Chino, California, and was previously arrested on February 27th of this year.
Sandip Shah was in the business of promoting penny stocks and assisting public companies in finding sources of funding. He agreed to introduce the investment fund representative to executives of publicly traded companies so that those executives could enter into the kickback arrangement. In exchange for the introductions and for facilitating the kickback arrangements as they continued, Sandip Shah accepted a portion of the kickbacks paid by the executives. What the defendants did not know was that the purported investment fund representative was actually an undercover agent.
The plea by Shailesh Shah follows a lengthy investigation focusing on preventing fraud in the microcap stock markets. Microcap companies are small publicly-traded companies whose stock often trades at pennies per share.
Shah faces 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gain or loss on each count.
This case was brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.
http://www.americanbazaaronline.com/2014/07/21/indian-american-entrepreneur-shailesh-shah-pleads-guilty-stock-scam/
Indian American entrepreneur Shailesh Shah pleads guilty to stock scam
By The American Bazaar Staff
WASHINGTON, DC: The CEO of two publicly-traded companies in the US, Shailesh Shah, was convicted on charges that he paid kickbacks in return for purchases of his companies’ stock.
Shah, 48, of Chino, Calif., pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns to two counts of mail fraud and two counts of wire fraud, according to a press release issued by the FBI. His sentencing is scheduled for October 23 of this year.
Shah was the President and Chief Executive Officer of SOHM, Inc. and Costas, Inc. He agreed to pay secret kickbacks to an investment fund representative in exchange for having the investment fund buy stock in these two companies. The kickbacks were concealed through the use of sham consulting agreements and other fraudulent documents. In actuality, however, and unbeknownst to Shah, the purported investment fund representative was an undercover FBI agent.
Apart from Shailesh Shah, also charged in May was Sandip Shah, 40, in an indictment with nine counts of wire fraud. Sandip Shah is also from Chino, California, and was previously arrested on February 27th of this year.
Sandip Shah was in the business of promoting penny stocks and assisting public companies in finding sources of funding. He agreed to introduce the investment fund representative to executives of publicly traded companies so that those executives could enter into the kickback arrangement. In exchange for the introductions and for facilitating the kickback arrangements as they continued, Sandip Shah accepted a portion of the kickbacks paid by the executives. What the defendants did not know was that the purported investment fund representative was actually an undercover agent.
The plea by Shailesh Shah follows a lengthy investigation focusing on preventing fraud in the microcap stock markets. Microcap companies are small publicly-traded companies whose stock often trades at pennies per share.
Shah faces 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gain or loss on each count.
This case was brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.
http://www.americanbazaaronline.com/2014/07/21/indian-american-entrepreneur-shailesh-shah-pleads-guilty-stock-scam/
No Clue what it's needed for.
Just reported the changes on NVSOS.
It shows that the Amendment has 5 pages, dunno what's in it.
Company didn't report anything since 2008, so even the real SS is unknown. Just as a Note, i've recently seen at least two Reinstatement plays that went through big Reverse Splits and had even lower O/S (OCBM and MCCO now CLIS). Not sying it'll happen here too but it's always an Option.
GL to all
A/S raised to 650M shares per NVSOS
File Date: 7/23/2014
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 60,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 60,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 650,000,000 Value: $ 0.0001
Par Value Shares: 10,000,000 Value: $ 0.0001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 66,000.00
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=6KMe79fyS8x4FvsKWEjaIQ%253d%253d&CorpName=TEKNIK+DIGITAL+ARTS+INC.
Was there a "Patent" for the Healthcare SW?
IMO Charles was just placed as CEO by his former Employer Raymond Barton as said from the beginning.
Just look at the Filings who owned the debt and at what conversion rate.
Research Barton... not Charles.
A/S increased to 2B
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=MFp%252bS4OG6OR7cGmnKv%252fizQ%253d%253d&CorpName=PANEX+RESOURCES+INC.
as already outlined in the latest 10Q:
They aren't TSA "Approved"
Their Webpage clearly states:
Thanks !! Well done Sir
Only reported the changes and the obvious relation between the newly added Officers and to that shoe thing! It's the Company that should get an update out.
King Resources (the one with an Ihub Board) is not even a NV Entity. They are DE since years
NVSOS Status was updated yesterday and not a year ago.
Before that Charles was listed as Sole Officer for all positions.
Here the Cached Version of the NVSOS (prior to yesterdays Filing):
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jPxo2Nl0_OAJ:nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx%3Flx8nvq%3DDEUhE5iwuIfrZskPprSojg%25253d%25253d+&cd=1
Timestamp shows: It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 31 May 2014 00:54:33 GMT.
Since the Business that shows 1:1 the same Officers and the same Address is listed already in NV under "GOOD VIBRATIONS SHOES"
https://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=VW8BwRH1%252b3ZfKRDiD2s57g%253d%253d
there wouldn't be any need for a so called "Merge In" Filing.
Will BTCC change into that Business or not will have to be announced by the NEW Officers.
IMO the odds are against BTCC. Hate it or like it!
JMHO
R/S comin, imo
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 3,000,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 3,000,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 30,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 30,000.00
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=sCN4sPAH%252fAmMog3vVCFVeg%253d%253d&CorpName=BAYPORT+INTERNATIONAL+HOLDINGS%2c+INC.
No Clue what they plan.
No clue dude, just reporting the changes
seems odd!!
GL to all players here
Obviously it just happened...
Per NVSOS he's gone
Indeed i'm impressed LOL, Charles is gone
and Bitcoin Stuff too by the look of it.
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=DEUhE5iwuIfrZskPprSojg%253d%253d&nt7=0
NEW Director - WILLIAM JEFFERSON
NEW Secretary - CHARLOTTE B KOENIG
NEW President - RICHARD D KOENIG
NEW Treasurer - CLAIRE ZHULKE
NEW Company Address: 4190 RICHWOOD COURT, MERRITT ISLAND, FL, 32952
Possible Fit for the NewCo:
Overview of Good Vibrations Shoes in Merritt Island, FL
Good Vibrations Shoes filed as a Domestic Corporation in the State of Nevada on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 and is approximately one year old, as recorded in documents filed with Nevada Secretary of State. The filing is currently active as of the last data refresh which occured on Tuesday, September 17, 2013.
Key People
Richard Koenig serves as the President and has interests in other corporate entities including Koenig Implant LLC, Absoluchas LLC . Richard's past corporate affiliations include Good Vibrations LLC .
Charlotte Koenig is the Secretary of Good Vibrations Shoes.
The Treasurer of Good Vibrations Shoes is Claire Zulke.
The registered agent for the company is Ronald W. Christopher. Also known as a statutory or resident agent, the registered agent is responsible for receiving legal notifications regarding court summons, lawsuits, and other legal actions involving the corporate entity.
http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2bx2t9/good-vibrations-shoes
Webpage: http://goodvibrationshoes.com/
Just the first guess of what might come... lol
Did they recognize that they have changed the Company Name??
Wonder why they would Issue a PR with the OLD Name...
Since you are listed as IR on the New Page maybe you can clarify?
TIA
Namechange on NVSOS to: Panther Energy, Inc.
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=vmyopZOx4pXA3kY5S%252fVU0w%253d%253d&nt7=0
New Company Website: http://www.pantherenergyinc.com
I see a lot of PAID Alerts out there for this Co today.
Per the new Company Webpage QualityStocks (part of Dream Team Group) is the listed "IR Firm", just click on Investor Relations...
Let's check their Disclaimer:
A/S increased to 500M per NVSOS
Amendment
Document Number: 20140516783-07
File Date: 7/18/2014
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 125,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 125,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 500,000,000 Value: $ 0.01
Par Value Shares: 25,000,000 Value: $ 0.01
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,250,000.00
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=%252f9fW3JpP%252fO4ea18I6%252foh3g%253d%253d&CorpName=BLUE+EARTH%2c+INC.
New Name on NVSOS: TOTALLY HEMP CRAZY INC.
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=3snTp5bCu%252bhmber1ZsB%252bzA%253d%253d
according to NVSOS the A/S was reduced by 4.6B shares:
Highly likely to become the RDI Pick 2morrow
JMHO
$DGRI a paid Promotion today by "PennyStocks on Steroids" (POS)!
Disclaimer:
G6 Stocks of which PennyStocks on Steroids is a subsidiary, has been compensated 3,000 dollars for a 1 day advertising campaign on DGRI by 3rd party Media buyer BAS1 LLC.
Seems like somebody want's to sell shares of this Company...
Coincidence that it comes up right after the CO raised the A/S?
LMFAO -> Ironridge breathes LIFE into debt exchanges
By Dan Lonkevich Updated 02:15 PM, Apr-25-2014 ET
Being sued by Ironridge Global Partners LLC may be a good thing for some companies.
The filing of lawsuits is part of an innovative financing structure, offered by the investment manager, that turns liabilities such as debts for unsold inventory into equity.
San Francisco-based Ironridge, which is led by Richard Kreger, Brendan O'Neil and John Kirkland, launched the so-called Liability for Equity program, or LIFE program, in 2011 and has, since, completed more than 50 such transactions and put to work tens of millions of dollars.
The LIFE program allows public companies to satisfy trade payables, debts and other liabilities in exchange for unregistered common stock using a Section 3(a)(10) fairness hearing.
Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act is an exemption from requirements to register securities for sale in some exchange transactions. Unregistered securities can be issued under Section 3(a)(10) in exchange for other securities, claims or property interests. The fairness of the terms and conditions of a Section 3(a)(10) exchange must be approved by a court or other government entity.
In a LIFE program transaction, Ironridge acquires an outstanding debt owed to a microcap company vendor, files a lawsuit against the company and asks a judge to convert the debt into stock under Section 3(a)(10).
Sometimes Ironridge is approached by the creditor to initiate such transactions, and sometimes it is approached by the securities-issuing company, Kirkland told The Deal.
"In either case, we call the other side to see if it's workable," he said. "We only do consensual deals. We're the Warren Buffett of microcap financing."
Next, Ironridge sues the microcap company, usually in Los Angeles County Superior Court, and uses the Section 3(a)(10) fairness hearing process to get a judge to approve the transaction.
THE STRATEGY is controversial. Steve Winters, managing partner of Gemini Strategies LLC in Encinitas, Calif., has said that Ironridge is abusing the Section 3(a)(10) exemption and fairness hearing process at the expense of investors in more common forms of private investments in public equity, or PIPEs.
"They may be technically correct but we believe they're misapplying Section 3(a)(10)," he said.
Most PIPE investments, in which accredited investors buy unregistered shares in public companies, rely on the Securities and Exchange Commission's Rule 144. Securities issued under Rule 144 cannot be sold into the public market until certain conditions are met. The restrictions are meant to limit the risk to public market investors of issuing securities without the disclosures required in a registration statement.
Those restrictions include a six-month holding period for securities issued by companies that meet the SEC's reporting requirements.
Meanwhile, securities issued under Section 3(a)(10) are immediately freely tradable.
"When you invest in a convertible debt PIPE, the premise is you're taking risk by waiting for the six-month period for Rule 144 shares to be tradable," Winters said. "If you're going to misapply the rule, what you're doing is problematic."
Kirkland responded that such concerns are often raised by rivals who have unsuccessfully tried to copy Ironridge's strategy.
"I always say we are super compliance oriented," said Kirkland, a former attorney who led the securities law practice at Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps LLP and the securities group in the Los Angeles office of Greenberg Traurig LLP.
"We get a legal opinion on every transaction, plus a legal opinion from the transfer agent, the clearing service and the broker-dealer," he said. "Every deal clears six lawyers at minimum and as many as 12 at maximum."
Kirkland also said that Ironridge is not the only investment manager structuring financings using Section 3(a)(10), although he declined to identify rivals.
Section 3(a) (10) is "a deceptively simple statute," he said. "It's a very broad exception that, if used properly, can be a godsend to an issuer.
"As far as I can see, we're the only ones doing it right," he said. "Scores of attorneys tell me I'm doing it right. We think we're as compliant as compliance gets."
To be sure, Kirkland said Ironridge has never requested what is known as a "no-action letter" from the SEC. In transactions that raise regulatory questions, firms sometimes request such letters from the commission as confirmation that the SEC was aware of the deal and chose not to take regulatory action.
"The deals happen too quickly," Kirkland said. "The advantage of the LIFE Program is speed and cost. Instead of two months to file a registration, it takes two weeks, and instead of costing $200,000 in legal fees, it costs $20,000."
Most LIFE program transactions are done with the smallest of microcap companies and involve financing amounts of less than $3 million. They have ranged from as small as $250,000 to as large as $15 million.
Ironridge invested $1.27 million last May in Jammin Java Corp., which sells coffee under the Marley Coffee brand. In February 2013, Ironridge invested $800,000 in Axiologix Inc., a Sarasota, Fla.-based developer of cloud computing services.
In 2012, Ironridge invested $2.2 million in Rapid Fire Marketing Inc., a Carson City, Nev.-based maker of vapor inhalers. The firm also invested $2.5 million in Atlanta-based technology company East Coast Diversified Corp. In 2011, Ironridge invested $1.12 million in Gillette, Wyo.-based High Plains Gas Inc.
"We've done them literally overnight, though not typically," Kirkland said. "Usually it takes two or three weeks and up to a month. It depends on how much the issuer has its act together."
He said that Ironridge does considerable due diligence with both the issuer and the creditor.
"We need to see the note, evidence of the wire transfer, notation of the debt in financial statements, proof of delivery of a product," Kirkland said. "If it's a widget company, we need to see evidence the widgets were delivered."
WHILE IRONRIDGE gets contacted by issuers and creditor alike, typically it's the creditors who approach most frequently.
"We're often contacted by lawyers and auditors," Kirkland said. "They're our two most common creditors. Landlords also."
Typically, Ironridge pays creditors for their liabilities up front, he said.
"Normally, we wire the money after signing the agreement," Kirkland said.
To do other otherwise, as some rivals do, could raise questions about the legitimacy and legality of the claim on the liability and make such a transaction look more like underwriting, he said. And acting as an unlicensed underwriter is a sure way of getting into regulatory trouble.
"Just because you're exempt from registration doesn't mean you're exempt from everything else," Kirkland said. "If you've just been assigned a debt and are selling the shares you receive to pay the debt, it sounds a lot like what an underwriter does.
"We routinely pay ahead of time. We're out the money. We're naked. We frequently do it conditionally, however, which means if I can't get a court approval I can get out. Our obligation starts the moment the approval comes."
After Ironridge acquires stock, it treats it as a long investment, with an eye toward buying low and selling high, Kirkland said.
"We're like any long shareholders. We'll hold or sell depending on whether we think we should own it or sell it and buy Apple instead.
"The goal is to invest for the long term. We always sell some, but we rarely sell all. We try to break even on every transaction and hit a grand slam every now and then.
"We've had a few. Sometimes the stock explodes out the gate, sometimes we have to wait. Nothing we can do except write the checks and wait."
Kirkland said that Ironridge also has had a couple of "whackadoodle clients" who breached their duties and later threatened to complain to the SEC, although he declined to identify them.
"We think we do everything right," he said. "People say, 'We'll call the SEC.' We tell them, 'Go ahead. Call now. We'll wait on the line.' "
Kirkland noted that Ironridge has heard rumors that the SEC is investigating firms that take advantage of the Section 3(a)(10) exemption. He said that although such an investigation would be disruptive, it ultimately might be necessary to weed out bad actors. Many of those bad actors who are trying to copy Ironridge, he said, even going so far as to copy its transaction documents.
"In every case I've seen, they take our documents word for word," Kirkland said. "Even the typos are the same. They change two or three things and they always end up violating the law by making the changes. When you get a few bad apples it spoils it for everybody else."
http://ironridgeglobal.com/newsroom/Ironridge-breathes-LIFE-into-debt.html
How about the Float?
Didn't it doubled?
but i guess it doesn't matter if 1.3B or 2.5B shares are free tradable.
GL to the players here
The A/S got raised...
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=B1jTBt5epqCjUrq0EjtZOw%253d%253d&CorpName=DUTCH+GOLD+RESOURCES%2c+INC.
3.5B A/S is the new number
Dilution continues... A/S now 3.5B!!
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 2,750,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 20,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 2,770,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 3,500,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
Par Value Shares: 20,000,000 Value: $ 0.001
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 3,520,000.00
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=B1jTBt5epqCjUrq0EjtZOw%253d%253d&CorpName=DUTCH+GOLD+RESOURCES%2c+INC.
GL
Try 1-844-2NOVAMEX
Taken from their new Webpage...
http://192.155.192.179/~novamexe/index.php/about-us/our-vision
Yep, that's how i understood it too
New Officer List on NVSOS
President, Director and Treasurer now -> PETE IODICE (also President for ARTT)
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=XEJBh9UAAC4h17ImR8iEJg%253d%253d&nt7=0
More on Peter here:
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=9513710&privcapId=106529054
Very interesting read here:
http://www.islandpacket.com/2013/07/20/2587294/companies-owned-by-bluffton-man.html
and here:
http://savannahnow.com/bluffton-news/2012-07-04/prospective-business-owner-has-two-fraud-convictions-0#.U7pXEDHQC9Y