just reading....all ears...opps,...eyes too
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ya, but 2.5m is better than 10k @ ask. Not only that, think of how many times we have been painted on the bid with a 10k share
whack, right before close... After trading all day between the spread, or even @ ask. Take em' when you can get em'.
It's TOP!!
Nail on head
Brokster...
I would say paint if it were 100k
2.5 mill @ ask is a good quality PJ.IMO
I'll takes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By: slam_bang0
12 Dec 2006, 02:13 AM EST
Msg. 776 of 797
Jump to msg. #
Talked to the CEO. They have the JV agreement in hand (Chinese and English versions). A couple of minor issues to be sorted out. May be signed (by fax) before Christmas with formal ceremony in the new year or just the formal ceremnony in the new year.
On-going operations are being funded through small private placements.
Should have revenues coming in Q2 2007 at latest.
Insiders have a significant stake in the company through restricted shares.
Looks good to me.
Or at least not far behind.
Sooner
It wouldn't hurt to close strong going into the week that we feel JV announcement may happen......I'll hold onto my hat too.......................................
If we close strong going into the weekend.
Next week could be good.
Volume has remained consistent.
Sooner or later we
will move
up!!
OT: you need a hand I've got time. Only a two hour trip from here. Would do me some good to indulge in work like that.
We should feel strong about our positions in IPKL.
The amount of time that has been put into working this deal out,
is only more reassuring.
Because it's an untapped market, and the entire mining technology industry is still open for a huge percent of the market share.
In IPKL'S case maybe all.
Posted by: roach4091
In reply to: roach4091 who wrote msg# 14
Date:5/20/2006 8:00:30 PM
Post #of 9778
This is the best part for ipkl-
"Earlier this week, a key Senate committee endorsed a bill to make coal mining safer. The legislation would require miners to have at least two hours of oxygen available instead of one and would require mine operators to store extra oxygen packs along escape routes.
The bill also would require mines to have two-way wireless communications and tracking systems in place within three years. It now goes to the full Senate."
Rome wasn't built in a day.
This isn't Kanno's firts time around the block.
Nor is it his first picnic.
Good companies take time to build.
Not over an update or a pr.
I think we close the week out strong,
and move on from there.
I know. I was just trying to make light of this situation.
I was laughing at the picture of CEO in i-box, with his cell phone # posted. Honestly this thing took a slide of a life time.
Has anybody been able to contact CEO yet? o/s??
Down 1600... What was original investment. 10 grand?? LOL..
Just teasing you buddy. You'll take this lesson to the bank.
Nobody knew. If you look @ the 5 day chart on front of I'hub,
Nice looking summer water slide.
LOL!!
Sammy... The only thing I can say in regards to that, is many know the story of GZFX. IPKL is still a baby, GZFX has a story of its own, and could not really be compared with what IPKL has in the works. The growth from an investment in IPKL, @ this level,
has no limit. If you are thinking of it, don't think to long.
This pps level could be gone any time. You know enough about this company to put 2&2 together. Good luck with your decision. Just adding this in. Sammy, you need to distingish between to da mooners, and people that are speaking more about company progressions.
The story will start unfolding here.
We all know this is just the beginning.
Touching on what you just said here. IPKL does not need to have facility constructed, inorder to get systems out. That is more for the long haul. Bits and pieces of ipmine are being put together as we speak. Many components will be subbed out.
The manufacture facility will give IPKL much more control of the full world market, and more control of what they decide to manufacture or not. In China, its all at there finger tips.
FTG I agree.
Braden. This is our competition.
Posted by: portlander10
In reply to: None
Date:12/6/2006 2:23:54 AM
Post #of 9754
This is an older article, It shows how behind they are with this technology. They tested 7 other systems, and all sound like they came from the cave man era. ipmine was not tested through MSHA, but an interview with Kanno was included. Now you see why the World Market is still open. These people mean well, But as far as wireless technology, Kanno and crew are probably laughing at other attempts. These guys really are 20 years behind. Remember IPKL'S crew has many years of understanding, when it comes to wireless communications. All others, are just taking a stab at what they think could or should work. In reality, they are clueless. Within a year, there systems will be manufactured from China. On the Box, it will be labled I-Packets International.
Inside the box, will be ipmine, and it will be shipped from China. Simple enough. The Market belongs to Ipackets International. This article makes it perfectly clear.
Wireless devices allow communication with miners through ground
Friday, April 28, 2006
By Steve Twedt, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Deep inside Consol Energy Co.'s McElroy Mine in Marshall County, W.Va., a small group of men laid out two wire coils in loops yesterday.
The team from Transtek Inc. of Pittsburgh is one of seven field-testing prototype wireless two-way communication systems that, if successful, would enable working miners to talk with people on the surface in real time.
Transtek, for example, has one coil for transmitting and one for receiving, using the earth as a conductor. A company spokesman said the system was successful in a test this spring at 280 feet below the surface at the Lake Lynn Laboratory Experimental Mine in Fayette County.
Following this week's testing, David Chirdon of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration said each of the seven systems "had some positives and some negatives."
The wireless systems were tried at depths up to 700 feet underground, he said. While some got a through-the-earth signal at 200 feet, "we didn't see anything that goes above 300 feet."
With some U.S. mines reaching more than 2,000 feet beneath the surface, those results might seem discouraging -- yet Mr. Chirdon said he could foresee a viable two-way system becoming commercially available in a year or so.
The reason for his optimism: Since the death of 12 miners at Sago Mine No. 1 in Upshur County, W.Va., in January, MSHA officials have fielded more than 100 proposals for underground coal communications systems.
Mr. Chirdon, who heads MSHA's electrical safety division and would evaluate systems for safety, said 10 have formally applied for certification.
Before Sago, MSHA averaged two proposals annually.
Why the change?
Vendors have told Mr. Chirdon they believe mine operators will soon be required to have two-way wireless systems, although MSHA has not yet made such a proposal. Current federal law requires only that mines have "telephones or other two-way communication equipment with instructions for their use."
At Sago, a methane explosion behind a sealed portion of the mine trapped 13 miners. When rescuers reached them 41 hours later, only one miner, Randal McCloy Jr., had survived. Many believe the miners could have been directed to safety had there been a way to communicate with them. The phone line in place was disabled in the blast.
The tragedy has heightened interest in finding a workable system for talking to miners underground.
"Originally we didn't think there was a market for the product in North America. We thought safety was not an issue in North American mines," said Niles Kanno, president and CEO of iPackets International in Vancouver, British Columbia.
This spring, his company sold its first two systems for text message communication inside coal mines in China, where mines -- and mining deaths -- are far more prevalent than in the United States.
Mr. Kanno said his firm's device, called iPMine, was not among those field-tested by MSHA, but he has talked to MSHA officials about submitting it for certification later.
"It's no different than seat belts or air bags. Once it became mandated, you see a number of companies out there doing it."
Luke Popovich, spokesman for the National Mining Association representing the coal industry, said mine operators have not sought wireless two-way systems because "we really haven't found a product that works effectively in most underground coal mines in the United States."
"The reasons for this certainly include the fact that we're a small market for the technology provider and it's an unattractive market for them to make a device that meets our needs and recovers their costs," Mr. Popovich said.
"They're not responsible for mines, they're responsible for making a product. If it's your money, can you recover the investment you're going to make?"
Phil Smith, Mr. Popovich's counterpart at the United Mine Workers of America, said that if the market were there, the products would follow. "It will take the government telling the coal companies 'You must do it,' and therefore it creates a market. But if mine operators aren't required to put them in the mines, the mine operators won't do it."
Because of Sago, MSHA officials took the unusual step of setting up the field tests, and Mr. Chirdon said yesterday that "it's been a great learning process. We've gotten a lot of good information. We found there isn't any single great solution
Thanks for your efforts. Its good to hear from all angles.
Sounds solid.
bollies opening with chart trend moving upwards as we near JV announcement.
Sounds nice.
Maybe we make it to the North Pole just in time to
help Santa.
Bolliies opening, and we appear to be heading north.
I'll take it.
Thats from the old chart he posted.
Chart has been updated, but comment from
a week ago, was still on post, with chart.
All I like to see is a trend reversal.
We know JV is pretty much a done deal.
Let's move forth.
Nothing, just how the wording was. It is a done deal.
Next week we will see.
They'll suck them in for 0009, all day long.
Ready for production?? I think yes, if it is what your asking.
A great time to accumulate what isn't wanted.
FL we all get it... it wasn't worded well enough for people to understand. They would rather chase next week, when it's words
say done deal. Remember, many don't like a hint when it is handed to them.
Sounds good. Hippee ville. LOL
Hey look... Even RB is starting to see thing more clearly.
« IPKL Message list | Reply to msg. | Post new msg. « Older | Newer »
By: slam_bang0
12 Dec 2006, 02:13 AM EST
Msg. 776 of 786
Jump to msg. #
Talked to the CEO. They have the JV agreement in hand (Chinese and English versions). A couple of minor issues to be sorted out. May be signed (by fax) before Christmas with formal ceremony in the new year or just the formal ceremnony in the new year.
On-going operations are being funded through small private placements.
Should have revenues coming in Q2 2007 at latest.
Insiders have a significant stake in the company through restricted shares.
Looks good to me.
Sounds good. 6 hour trip from here. Your stay is on the house.
Look forward to it. Maybe Americano can head up from Eugene.
Should be fun. Have you ever been out to the West coast/Portland?
DC B... haven't talked in a while. How are you?
Just the beginning
Post 9568...MFridge said he talked to Kanno.
Thats all we need to hear. Yes