Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Congrats longs! Just one of many coming our way over the next few years. 600 million a year in annual revenue? WOW! Can't wait to see the settlement number!
I agree, not to mention what this does to the float for us shareholders. They didn't dilute a single share as usual and insiders continue to increase their positions. I know there hasn't been a lot of action here lately but I think we're going to hear something big here soon and there won't be a lot of shares to go around. Very exciting stuff.
It's taken you several responses to get around to my question and then you send me a Reddit link? Sums up this board perfectly.
Maybe, if you answer the question I asked?
Why is it that any time someone brings up anything negative they automatically get accused of trying to get cheaper shares?
I really like your posts.
You're very bad at what you do. No one is fooled by you
Isn't that what you want? You said you have an order for 100 million at .0001. Flash all your shares on the ask richy rich and I'm sure you'll get your order, right?
your posts don't mean a hill of beans. read any of the documents ram has sent you. it's really not difficult. it'll probably make you feel better about your 100 million shares.
Are you really talking about fake facts? Lol
Lunchtime at agco is probably over so he'll be back around 4 or 5 ET or whenever the work day is over there
you would think someone with a series 7 AND been with the company since the iceweb days would understand the current structure of the company. Good news is I highly doubt any poster has ever taken him seriously
I'm trying to respond to your posts but they're all getting taken down, I assume for idiocy
Why don't you prove that you bought 100 million shares?
Not .000001? That's what you previously said. But thank you for your concern of our money! It's nice to know someone with so much knowledge cares.
Chapter 7 and you would apparently lose more shares than anyone?
So you have a series 7, and buy and hold 100 million shares of a scam?
What page of the q does it show the deals?
UCPA is currently just shy of $60 million in revenue through the first two quarters of 2017. The link to UCPA's OTC page with all fillings is provided at the bottom of this post. With this I would like to share an interesting article.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2012/04/29/how-much-revenue-does-it-take-to-be-a-1b-public-company/amp/
In this article it discusses what it takes for a public company to have a $1B market cap. Here is an interesting bit:
"Recurring Revenue is ‘worth more’ and is more predictable
For the last several years, the magic revenue number for going public was around $100M – but that seems to be changing. It appears that the market will be more tolerant of sub-$100M as long as the company’s metrics are healthy, and that the revenue that they do have is 1) growing and 2) recurring. With the recurring revenue that SaaS business models have, investors can better predict growth and model what trajectory the business is on. This makes them favorable bets.
Looking at recent S1 filings, you can see this in action: Jive Software filed its S1 with a revenue run rate of about $60M last summer. Eloqua filed with about $60M in revenue. ServiceNow looks more traditional with about $92M in 2011 revenue (filed earlier this month). Bazaarvoice filed in August with about $64M in revenue. When Yelp filed (sort of a SaaS play!) – it had $58.38M (first nine months of 2011). All of these companies had accumulated losses, and most of them were still losing money at the time of filing. That does not mean they are not good business models – with subscription businesses, the upfront investment in customer acquisition is relatively high, but the return from the customer takes a little bit longer than the old software licensing model (lifetime value is spread across the life of contract with SaaS, not upfront)."
This was an article discussing how a company going public (hence the S1 filings) has been evaluated by the market. I find it very interesting that Yelp was evaluated by the market at $1B when there S1 filings showed just shy of $60 million in revenue through 9 months. UOIP is bringing in revenue at 75% of the rate Yelp was at this time. What's even more interesting is they were operating at a LOSS at that time.
SO UCPA is operating with a NET PROFIT at 75% of the revenue of a company that was evaluated at $1B...
The numbers are also just as close with Eloqua, ServiceNow, Jive Software, and Bazaarvoice....
With the O/S being 1.618 billion shares and a market cap just shy of $4.9 million dollars it is safe to say this company is trading at an EXTREMELY undervalued price.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UCPA/profile
UCPA is currently just shy of $60 million in revenue through the first two quarters of 2017. The link to UCPA's OTC page with all fillings is provided at the bottom of this post. With this I would like to share an interesting article.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2012/04/29/how-much-revenue-does-it-take-to-be-a-1b-public-company/amp/
In this article it discusses what it takes for a public company to have a $1B market cap. Here is an interesting bit:
"Recurring Revenue is ‘worth more’ and is more predictable
For the last several years, the magic revenue number for going public was around $100M – but that seems to be changing. It appears that the market will be more tolerant of sub-$100M as long as the company’s metrics are healthy, and that the revenue that they do have is 1) growing and 2) recurring. With the recurring revenue that SaaS business models have, investors can better predict growth and model what trajectory the business is on. This makes them favorable bets.
Looking at recent S1 filings, you can see this in action: Jive Software filed its S1 with a revenue run rate of about $60M last summer. Eloqua filed with about $60M in revenue. ServiceNow looks more traditional with about $92M in 2011 revenue (filed earlier this month). Bazaarvoice filed in August with about $64M in revenue. When Yelp filed (sort of a SaaS play!) – it had $58.38M (first nine months of 2011). All of these companies had accumulated losses, and most of them were still losing money at the time of filing. That does not mean they are not good business models – with subscription businesses, the upfront investment in customer acquisition is relatively high, but the return from the customer takes a little bit longer than the old software licensing model (lifetime value is spread across the life of contract with SaaS, not upfront)."
This was an article discussing how a company going public (hence the S1 filings) has been evaluated by the market. I find it very interesting that Yelp was evaluated by the market at $1B when there S1 filings showed just shy of $60 million in revenue through 9 months. UOIP is bringing in revenue at 75% of the rate Yelp was at this time. What's even more interesting is they were operating at a LOSS at that time.
SO UCPA is operating with a NET PROFIT at 75% of the revenue of a company that was evaluated at $1B...
The numbers are also just as close with Eloqua, ServiceNow, Jive Software, and Bazaarvoice....
With the O/S being 1.618 billion shares and a market cap just shy of $4.9 million dollars it is safe to say this company is trading at an EXTREMELY undervalued price.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UCPA/profile
Again, you post very long thought out messages with a link. That's great. But once again I don't see the relevance to any of it. I also find it hilarious that you made those comments about following blindly given your other stock choices. If you want to have a debate about this ticker, I'm all for it. If you don't have anything besides "oh here's dilution" and "oh gonna get suspended" then you won't be taken seriously. Everyone here already knows those risks. How about you discuss the court rulings? How about how far along this ipr ruling is? It's very obvious you got your feelings hurt.
I struggle to find the relevance in any of your posts. The links you provide only give proof to points you've made that have nothing to do with anything involving this company. I get that you want to prove that Ram doesn't know what he's talking about but at least provide us some relevant stuff. Not just IMO
You seem like someone who would be friends with a lot of construction workers. Also, most companies who pay multiple employees 125-150k a year make more than 30k in revenue per quarter. I'm sure software engineers typically do make around that much. Kay isn't a software engineer though. Bring this argument back to the other board where they worship him. No one cares over here
And he pays his employees 10x more than his company makes! Sign me up!
I'd rather work for mark Kay
I appreciate the offer. I'm from Pakistan though...love the stereotyping though! Maybe stick to washing machines big guy
College kids have a lot of laundry so that's a good call
Thanks for the heads up. Now we can all wash ourselves of this scam
Thank you for your concern. 300 boards? You're a true ihub hero.
Agco finally gave you a break?
Pretty standard of you to drop it right before you get proven wrong
This is easily the most undervalued stock I've ever seen
It's pretty easy to not need to use credit when you're bringing in 60 plus mil in revenue
Especially especially after the PTAB validated the patents against two separate companies trying get it thrown out
We'll see how it all unfolds.
We'll see what the PTAB and courts think. I can see why someone thinks this is a scam, but it's no more of a scam than these other "legit" companies who have insiders that take a salary 3 times more than the revenue, then throw out some vague forward looking statements to keep support and then rinse and repeat the next quarter. To each their own.
Yeah you're not wrong. Ive seen some companies get a 9.7 million dollar settlement, netting about half after legal fees and blow through that money in less than 18 months...difference here is there isn't a bunch of executives taking out massive salaries. Literally all efforts here are focused on litigation. Plus you should check the scheduling of this as it's already been laid out and put that through the spin cycle and see that we aren't too far from a resolution here.
I agree very strongly with this. The revenue speaks for itself
Ropes and Gray might bother considering they just made 1.5 million...