Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I was describing the behavior of an ex employee or partner or whatever you want to call it.
1)I did not say that she was a bitter ex wife... I said her behavior and actions were like those of and comparing them in terms of their behavioral elements, not attacking her as a person. Only her behavior.
2) I said I find her behavior pathetic... not her... again describing her actions and behavior, not the person
3) Again I was commenting on her actions coming on a message board and giving away insider details about the company. She came on to a public board and gave out information that only those working with or as part of the company would know.
4) Again, I did not say she is a stalker.. I was describing the appearance of her behavior.
Now compare that with your comment:
"the only truly pathetic thing on this board is you"
Personal attacks are against the TOS guidelines... you are in violation and will be reported.
James and Ken don't post on here. I like how you say you are trying to stay out of it, but then you proceed to get right into it again. All we hear is YOUR side of the story. James and Ken don't come on here and post their side.
It's been my experience, that like personal relationships, the one who spends their time complaining about the other partner and focused on it was the one who was "dumped". The reason is that the one that was dumped can't get over it while the other party has "moved on" to bigger and better things and doesn't have the time or desire to care about the other person anymore. The one that does the dumping usually has better things to do than complaining about their ex so to speak.
When I read your posts Cindy, you sound like an bitter ex wife. I am sure, just like any relationship, there are two sides to the story. Ken and James don't come on here and give their side, but it seems to me like you can't let it die. I must say that it is very entertaining to watch.
Now keep in mind, that I am a shareholder in this company. So your behind the scenes comments could have an effect on the price of the stock I own. While I am sure Jason and Ken own the company, everyone who holds shares is technically an owner, including myself.
I personally find it pathetic that you feel the need to air your feud with them in public. I don't buy the excuse about someone emailing you as the reason you had to do it. I am sure you are a big girl who makes her own choices. Even if what you tell is the truth, it is "your" truth and as I stated, there are two sides to every story. I am sure that James and Ken could come on here and say things about you, but it seems they are not as focused on you, as you seem to be on them.
A lot of investors read this board, and your words could have an impact on the share price...and since I own shares, that could effect MY share value. That is one of the reasons I don't bad mouth a company when I own it. Do you seriously have nothing better to do than to spend time writing about this company? If they were so bad to you, why don't you simply move on to bigger and better things and let it go? How many hours a day do you spend thinking about James and Ken and Imperia? How many hours a day do you think James and Ken spend thinking about you? If their thinking reflects how much they post about you, I would say very little. To me this just seems pathetic. As stated, I don't know if you were terminated or what the deal is, but it seems that James and Ken want nothing more to do with you. James wished you well on his myspace, and then I saw where he responded to you calling him a liar on here.. Other than that, I haven't seen them discuss you at all in public. Meanwhile I saw you post on here, I saw a thread you posted on about them on Sherdog and some other MMA websites. One word..."stalker" comes to mind...
Considering that the PR's about the fighters being in the movie were not only put out on the news wire but posted on most of the top MMA sites such as MMAweekly and Sherdog, I am sure that if the management or the fighters did not agree to the PR going out or to the fighters being in the movie, that Imperia would have been in serious trouble very fast after the announcements went out.
If you are a law fan, you should know that agreements don't necessarily have to be written or signed. There is such a thing as "verbal agreement". Whatever the agreement was, I am sure that the fighters and managers agreed to terms and to the PR or management of those fighters would deny their involvement and probably follow up with a lawsuit against Imperia.
Now you can go back to Law school...
"Contract 1) n. an agreement with specific terms between two or more persons or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for a valuable benefit known as consideration. Since the law of contracts is at the heart of most business dealings, it is one of the three or four most significant areas of legal concern and can involve variations on circumstances and complexities. The existence of a contract requires finding the following factual elements: a) an offer; b) an acceptance of that offer which results in a meeting of the minds; c) a promise to perform; d) a valuable consideration (which can be a promise or payment in some form); e) a time or event when performance must be made (meet commitments); f) terms and conditions for performance, including fulfilling promises; g) performance. A unilateral contract is one in which there is a promise to pay or give other consideration in return for actual performance. (I will pay you $500 to fix my car by Thursday; the performance is fixing the car by that date). A bilateral contract is one in which a promise is exchanged for a promise. (I promise to fix your car by Thursday and you promise to pay $500 on Thursday). Contracts can be either written or ORAL."
1) James has answered shareholder questions and questions from people who post on here but has not posted on here so your questions directly to him probably fall on deaf ears. Why don't you write him and ask him yourself if you are so interested? I'm pretty sure he can't tell you about who has or hasn't been signed unless it is PR'd. Wouldn't the other party be the fighter and their management, not the organization?
2) Do you know that the UFC and IFL control and have ownership over their fighters doing movies outside or projects that do not involve actual fighting? Most athletes other than those who are fictitious characters (such as the WWE) are governed by the organizations they work for only for what they do inside their sport. I highly doubt they can be told what movies they can have roles in or not have roles in. If you know something to the contrary in this situation, please provide proof. Do you have proof of Imperia's relationship with the IFL? Please provide.
3) How do you know that Imperia violated an agreement with the UFC? Did you hear that from the UFC? Did you see the agreement or contract or arrangement? Or are you just going by what Ms. Ortiz stated? If you are just taking her word, then her word is highly suspect to say the least. She is obviously disgruntled. She is no longer with the company. She was terminated, or at least it seems that Imperia made a decision that they want nothing more to do with her. She clearly has an agenda. So unless you hear directly from the UFC something like this, I think this is one person's statement. And a tainted person's statement. Don't you think you should have first account proof before making a statement as if it is a fact?
4) Do you own any shares?
Joro, are you back again? LOL... This has been posted about a million times on here... Yes, Kenny boy has had some problems in the past. This has been discussed in detail as has his lawsuit with Lang Eliot. Every two months or so some new idiot comes on here and drags up this same old crapola... Just to save you time, he was involved with this Lang Elliot guy who posted a nasty PR about Ken that you can find online.. Ken took the guy to court over it and won.. that's how he acquired the company that is now IPEI....
I personally don't care if he is late with child support, his bar fees or whatever from the past.. as long as he doesn't violate any laws with this company... I am however concerned about the recent stock decline.... Ken can screw his cat for all I care, as long as the stock price goes up..
You are concerned about your looks compared to James? You sound like a complete tool...
LOL... No company WANTS to hurt shareholders. They did an RS. No matter WHEN they did the RS whoever was holding at that time would be pissed, like playing musical chairs. The person caught standing when they announce the RS is screwed. Because of insider trading laws they cant tell you ahead of time when they are going to do an RS. And when they do announce it people are caught off guard. So those people got caught in bad timing. Obviously they just had a RS so they are not going to RS again anytime soon (plus they have stated no more RS for at least a year) They also can't sell shares till May at the earliest. The price has obviously bottomed, so what is the risk?
Lets call an RS the night, and releasing a movie the day (the time they released a movie there was an enormous run) So the sun rises and sets. Its not the company trying to HURT you anymore than it is the gods hurting you when the night comes. The night and day comes and it is superstitious to believe it is something that is happening to YOU. Rather it is something that happens and you decide when to buy in. Do you buy in when the sun is brightest (right before it starts going down) or when it is darkest (right before the sun starts to come out). Fools who buy with emotion buy when the sun is out. Smart investors buy when it is dark and know the sun will come..
The bitterness of many on this board shows they are emotional investors rather than intelligent investors. Same as the people who get mad at their computer when it freezes up, as if the computer did it to you on purpose. Think of it like this, something cant go up unless it goes down and vise versa. The sun has to set in order for it to rise. =)
Answers and intelligent discussion? You ask too much.
Well all indications are that this thing is just starting to run. SIIR finished and NS ready to film soon. Not our fault you bought at the wrong time. Now is the right time. Stop blamming others for your poor buying decisions.
brokestocker is right. Don't get desperate if this thing runs. All of you old longs who got caught are eager to sell at any movement. You might as well poop in your own soup if you are going to do that.
Obviously the restrictions are in place to save the broker's ass. It is either that they fear for hackers pumping and dumping the stock and then they have to pay to cover or it is them covering their own short position. Either way it is about them protecting themselves NOT protecting their clients even if that's what they want you to believe. If their clients accounts get hacked then the brokers pay up, not the clients. Think about it. I say call them on their bullchit.
If we keep getting news like we did today, then the restrictions wont matter. If SIIR or Never Submit is the next Napoleon Dynamite or Blair Witch then there will be a ton of attention on this stock. The low volume will only increase the pressure put on the price, and then if the restrictions are lifted, the proverbial dam will break in a good way. All just my opinion of course.
[ANNIE]
The sun'll come out
Tomorrow
Bet your bottom dollar
That tomorrow
There'll be sun!
Just thinkin' about
Tomorrow
Clears away the cobwebs,
And the joro
'Til there's none!
When I'm stuck a day
That's gray,
And lonely,
I just stick out my chin
And Grin,
And Say,
Oh!
The sun'll come out
Tomorrow
So ya gotta hang on
'Til tomorrow
Come what may
Tomorrow! Tomorrow!
I love ya Tomorrow!
You're always
A day
A way!
WWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Does this mean all the good people are coming back?
There is a god!
At least he stepped up in his position as moderator when everyone else including you wouldn't take up the job. He doesn't get paid for it either.
You are the biggest victim in the world. Everything happens to you. James screwed up your life and now Thermite.. Come on!!!!!!!!!!!! You ever heard of personal responsibility?
Want some cheese with that whine?
Did you read the part from the June 16th shareholder letter where it outlines specifically what they plan to do? Yes they said no hidden means of dilution. They also said and I quote:
“The company will sell only convertible restricted shares that CANNOT be sold for at least a year.”
This was completely telegraphed months ago. So the shares wont hit the market for a year or two starting from this month. How many here thought they had already sold their convertible restricted shares or were planning to start diluting right away after the RS? How many of you believe you will still be holding this stock a year or more from now when these shares hit the market? If you don’t think you will be holding IPEI till Nov of 07 then who gives a …..?
And anyone who has any knowledge of the film industry knows that the major film festivals and markets ARE where the companies sell their films. That is the point of the film festivals and markets in the first place. The film buyers go and watch all the films they are interested in. It’s the same as any market for any other product.
It is always easier to say that someone should just go and do something when they have no understanding of how the system works. I’ll tell you what Joro, in order to make your money back on IPEI why don’t you just write up a screenplay for a $40 million dollar movie and go sell it to Sony Pictures for a million? Should be no problem. Just go bust your ass and get out there and write it and sell it. If it were easy to just write a script or film a movie and sell it for millions, then everyone would do it. Your suggestions are similar to telling a quarterback to stop messing around and just get a bunch of touchdowns. Much easier said from your keyboard then doing in real life. Try doing some research into the film industry.
What does James' personal life have to do with the company? Arnold S is a Governor and there are a lot more pictures of him posing in a bikini... This is an entertainment company, not a guy running for office.
As stated, they are a fledgling company with delays, MANY companies have delays. Some movies have been filmed by major studio's and were never released. If you watched project green light on TV you would see that they had completed the movie Feast and conducted screenings years ago. It was finally released in theatres this fall.
The fact that this company actually films and completes projects rather than just talking about them is encouraging.
You're are changing the subject about myspace account rather than my argument that many major companies also have delays. And you are right, IPEI is no Microsoft, it is a fledgling company. My point is that major companies have delays all the time, and this company is a small fledgling company. It is a completely valid arguement.
There are over 100 million myspace users now including most politicians running for office. Again, this is off topic of the original argument over the delays in the projects. You're attempt to change the subject is a logical fallacy, meaning it is not a sound logical rebuttal:
Fallacy: Red Herring
Also Known as: Smoke Screen, Wild Goose Chase.
Description of Red Herring
A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:
Topic A is under discussion.
Topic B is introduced under the guise of being relevant to topic A (when topic B is actually not relevant to topic A).
Topic A is abandoned.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because merely changing the topic of discussion hardly counts as an argument against a claim.
Examples of Red Herring
"We admit that this measure is popular. But we also urge you to note that there are so many bond issues on this ballot that the whole thing is getting ridiculous."
"Argument" for a tax cut:
"You know, I've begun to think that there is some merit in the Republican's tax cut plan. I suggest that you come up with something like it, because If we Democrats are going to survive as a party, we have got to show that we are as tough-minded as the Republicans, since that is what the public wants."
"Argument" for making grad school requirements stricter:
"I think there is great merit in making the requirements stricter for the graduate students. I recommend that you support it, too. After all, we are in a budget crisis and we do not want our salaries affected."
And what is the date this statement of "near future" was made? The RS didn't go through till last week. He said no RS in the near future NOT no announcement of RS in the near future. Again, RS had already be announced and they simply announced that it would not go through AT THIS TIME... stating that they could still do it in the future. It was MONTHS later till it actually went through with plenty of warning in multiple PR's.
No shareholder tried to get restrictions lifted either before the rs because everyone knew the PPS probably wouldnt go up till after the RS anyway. This is your assumption about a lie on Ken's part, it is not proof.
Joro,
Slippery-slop is another logical fallacy. Seems you are just not good with debating with logic:
Fallacy: Slippery Slope
Also Known as: The Camel's Nose.
Description of Slippery Slope
The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. This "argument" has the following form:
Event X has occurred (or will or might occur).
Therefore event Y will inevitably happen.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another.
Examples of Slippery Slope
"We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they'll be charging $40,000 a semester!"
"The US shouldn't get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then send in thousands to die."
"You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they'll walk all over you."
"We've got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books!"
You are aware that companies and projects are delayed all the time right? Microsoft has delayed launching of some software for up to two years after it was projected to be available. Also movies such as "All The King's Men" were supposed to be released over six months before it was released. I guess Sony Pictures and Bill Gates are liars and scam artists because they didn't meet announced deadlines.
FALSE wweeaaz
Look at the date of the PR. Yes the reverse split AND symbol change occurred long after that PR. However the PR was made a week or two after the RS was announced and if you remember was in reaction to the fall out from the RS being announced. If you look at the tone it is defensive for this very reason. Every RS and Forward split I have been through this past year has been forced to change it's symbol as part of the RS or FS. The PR even states that there will not be ANOTHER RS. In other words it was all directed towards what would not happen AFTER the RS. Don't forget that in the context we all believed the RS would occur in just a few days. It was not expected that it would not occur for several months. Everything must be looked at in the context of the time that it occurred and the information available at that time. It was expected the RS would occur the next few days and these facts of what would not occur would be for the following year after that.
Also don't forget that you are looking at things through the filter of the constant bashing that has occured on here for months as a result of anger over the RS being announced in the first place.
Reddog,
Joro does not have a brain. He refuses to discuss anything on an intellectual level. If he disagrees with you then he claims you are James or Ken, especially when you bring up a valid point that he can not refute. I am all for one having free speech, the problem is that he makes statements but refuses to have an intellectual discussion to back up those statements.
He talks down a stock he owns, saying he is doing so in order to WARN new people coming in. Yet at the same time his strategy is to sell out on a company pump and get even. Well if that is true then he is selling his shares to some new bagholder because for every seller their is a buyer. He can not defend his bashing as an act of morality if selling shares to a new buyer at higher levels is just as immoral. His logic is completely flawed and hypocritical.
He also can not defend that he states that the stock will not go up and that the company is diluting and the stock will only go down, and yet he is planning to stick around in order to get even??
Joro, the tribe has spoken..
TMM
Joro,
Is it not true that if you had bought the stock on Monday and sold today that you would have made %40 return based on the stock’s increase this week? Is it also not true that the stock increased 2000% last May as per the PR from James that Faster just posted? I did some research and the stock went up huge this time of year last year and the same this time the year before. The conclusion I draw from this is that if you lost money on this stock it has more to do with your TIMMING. Certainly you could have sold your shares when Art and others suggested you should have, then purchased them cheaper on Monday and made some money back.
The last time you outlined the lies from the company the ONLY thing you came close to being able to back up factually is the symbol change. Of course you forgot to share with everyone that the will-not-do list was made AFTER the reverse split was announced. This list was to state that no other changes such as a second reverse split would take place in a year AFTER the reverse split.
If you wish to continue to call the company liars, wouldn’t it be good to actually have some proof to back up your claim?
So that settles it then. Seems Joro is fresh out of friends. That is at least 4 votes I see to be rid of Joro or for him to shut his mouth. Add my vote too... that's 5. Anyone else? The RS is over with. Nothing bad on the horizon and the stock is picking up steam. With no dilution going on nothing is sucking this down anymore. Very little downside.. HUGE upside IMO.
TapouT is hitting news stands this week per James' blog.
That's the thing about an RS. It's a pain in the ass till it's over, but now we are rid of the chit... all except for one last piece that wont flush...Joro... I'm sick of matching wits with a half wit. He should either kill himself and get it over with or get over his eternal sadness. He's like my neighbour's son who wears goth make up all day long and wears all black spouting off how life is all a big lie and mopping around that he has to use his dad's SUV to go to the mall. For god's sakes.. GET A LIFE and get over yourself!
I vote that Joro, while he has the right to speak should take vacation from this board for a while. The RS is over, blue skies ahead. 20% two days in a row. All in favor of Joro keeping his trap shut for the betterment of the stock say I agree.....
So I take it that you agree that you are not smart enough to discuss the points of my argument?
For all of your bitching and complaining the only thing you can come up with against me is to try and discredit me by claiming I am James? Is this board so devoid of intellectual thought that you would rather resort to accusations and name-calling then debate the assertions you put forward? Unless you can back up your arguments, then you are no better than the company.
I am NOT James and you have provided no evidence that I am other than you disagree with my opinion. BUT as described even if I WERE James then my argument would have no less merit. So I assert again than if you sell your shares when you break even you would be selling those shares to a BUYER.. that buyer would by your own admission be buying into a scam that will be diluted. So by selling your shares you are just as much of a scam artist as James. It is the same as having a car that you know wont make it down the street after you sell it yet you sell it to someone else in order to get out of owning it yourself.
If you do not have the brains to debate this logical debate with me then everyone else should see you for who you are. Which is you are full of hot air and a hypocrite.
Description of Fallacies
In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement (a sentence that is either true or false) that is offered in support of the claim being made, which is the conclusion (which is also a sentence that is either true or false).
There are two main types of arguments: deductive and inductive. A deductive argument is an argument such that the premises provide (or appear to provide) complete support for the conclusion. An inductive argument is an argument such that the premises provide (or appear to provide) some degree of support (but less than complete support) for the conclusion. If the premises actually provide the required degree of support for the conclusion, then the argument is a good one. A good deductive argument is known as a valid argument and is such that if all its premises are true, then its conclusion must be true. If all the argument is valid and actually has all true premises, then it is known as a sound argument. If it is invalid or has one or more false premises, it will be unsound. A good inductive argument is known as a strong (or "cogent") inductive argument. It is such that if the premises are true, the conclusion is likely to be true.
A fallacy is, very generally, an error in reasoning. This differs from a factual error, which is simply being wrong about the facts. To be more specific, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support. A deductive fallacy is a deductive argument that is invalid (it is such that it could have all true premises and still have a false conclusion). An inductive fallacy is less formal than a deductive fallacy. They are simply "arguments" which appear to be inductive arguments, but the premises do not provided enough support for the conclusion. In such cases, even if the premises were true, the conclusion would not be more likely to be true.
So let me get this straight, you want to continue to bash the stock in order to warn new people coming in because you think it is the moral thing to do. Now you believe 100% that James and Ken will start diluting come May, or in your words, even before then. You also state that the company is a scam. Your plan is to get even and leave. This is a market so for every seller their is a buyer. So if you get even and sell, aren't by your own logic selling to someone unsuspecting who is going to get caught in dilution and a scam company and then lose their money? So simply by selling when you get even you are selling at higher prices to a new "bag holder". Wouldn’t that be just as immoral??
BTW whenever I come up with a logical argument like this you NEVER answer and instead claim I am Ken or James. Seems you can’t have a sound logical argument other then name-calling. In debate terms that’s called “poisoning the well”:
This sort of "reasoning" involves trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it true or false) about the person. This "argument" has the following form:
0.
0. Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented.
0. Therefore any claims person A makes will be false.
This sort of "reasoning" is obviously fallacious. The person making such an attack is hoping that the unfavorable information will bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they will reject any claims he might make. However, merely presenting unfavorable information about a person (even if it is true) hardly counts as evidence against the claims he/she might make. This is especially clear when Poisoning the Well is looked at as a form of ad Homimem in which the attack is made prior to the person even making the claim or claims. The following example clearly shows that this sort of "reasoning" is quite poor.
Before Class: ?Bill: "Boy, that professor is a real jerk. I think he is some sort of eurocentric fascist." ?Jill: "Yeah."
During Class: ?Prof. Jones: "...and so we see that there was never any 'Golden Age of Matriarchy' in 1895 in America."
After Class: ?Bill: "See what I mean?" ?Jill: "Yeah. There must have been a Golden Age of Matriarchy, since that jerk said there wasn't."
In other words Joro you are not smart enough to have a reasonable debate with me based on logic so you resort to fallacy.
Man, this stock looks like a ski slope...arrgg
Put a fork in it.. this stock is done..
Total crap.. I agree with you.. slap some lipstic on it
What a total dog this stock is...
“You are an idiot”
That’s the best you can do? Resort to personal attacks my four year old would come up with? I guess that’s because you don’t have any logical reply about why you would state that you know that there is no way the stock is going to get to the price you need to get even, yet you are holding anyone.
I’m not the idiot who could have sold when you were close to even and Art and everyone else was telling you to sell. Nope. All you did was bash instead of taking action. Now the price is one eighth what it was then. Like I said weeks ago (when the stock was three times today’s price) enjoy watching it go down day-by-day, week-by-week. Of course you could have sold when Art and other’s told you to, or hell, even when I told you to and bought back in at these prices for MUCH cheaper, but what the hell do I know? I guess you didn’t see the RS coming since they mentioned it MONTHS ago… Don’t worry; I wont expect a logical response since you don’t have any. Please just continue the mindless personal attacks and name-calling.
"Does anybody here honestly think this thing will move to 1.25 or beyond"
You obviously do since you keep holding the bag trying to break even...LOL. Yup the house will pay out anytime.. I mean it hasn't in six months, but I'm sure it will any day now... Might as well sell me your shares nice and cheap. =]
Joro, since you have been right about everything this last few months and you think you will continue to be right then that means you have no hope of getting even again and it will continue to go down. The price is less than half of when I told you to sell. You might as well sell now while you can still buy a cup of coffee with your shares. In fact now that you sold half I don’t believe you have enough to still have shares after the RS and I think they probably will cash you out.
You have served your purpose and bashed the stock down so that us new people can get in. Thanks for your services. You can go now, you are no longer needed.
Goodfill, if you read my first message I stated that I had considered buying until things soured on this board completely. I made my intentions clear that I will wait expecting a another pound of flesh to be hacked off after the RS and then I will jump on board with the price nice and low after the bag holders leave. Again, all of this information was available in my five past posts since yesterday.
I also did not buy when the pumpers were talking all of the saps into coming on board at inflated prices. Now the same lemmings who got themselves talked into how great the stock is back then have let themselves get talked into how bad it is now. That’s why I know the price will drop even lower; there are a few loose hands ready to go now and the new blood to come in at the right time.
Don’t worry, the price will probably drop a lot more and it will be months before money is made IMO. Therefore plenty of time for guys likes me to wait on the sidelines till the sad sacs get fed up and leave giving me their cheap shares. It’s just a matter of time now.
To Joro trying to say I’m James you say the same thing about Faster and everyone else who disagrees with you. Go back and read what I wrote, it was not flattering to the company OR to you. It was just actually something impartial on this board for a change. Not bashing or pumping, just the reality. People will always hate the truth. My post said “all shareholders of RECORD” which to my understanding is the legal responsibility. I never said ALL SHAREHOLDERS. You seem to listen to the things, which are convenient to you. Enjoy playing the same slot machine. Let me know how that works out for you.
I’m sure the next spin of the wheel and you’ll make your money back. Keep playing… You probably wont get even till the middle of next year and I doubt you can wait that long. Enjoy watching your money go down the drain in the meantime while I pick up your cheap shares. Like I said, your plan at getting back at the company is ridiculous. Another 22% drop today. You should have gotten out when you had the chance. Everyday will probably be another butchering, and we haven’t even hit the RS. With no land in site till next may, everyone will either get back on the boat and call it a trip or will drown. If the price drops low enough again ken and James and the boys can RS it into oblivion.
Them making money and buying back shares is a better option for YOU. Not for THEM. They can RS when they want and have a printing press as well. They don’t need to worry about YOUR stock price. They have their angels and their myspace sluts.
Peace I'm out, but will be back when the time is right. Things will get more bloody in the meantime.
TMM