Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
all bogus, pr, and prop
they have more money than BOEING
big pharma trying to match their patent only in a slightly different way. If they fail, they buy out RGBP. timelines don't matter, you know, it's big business.
Lyden, I can guess a little bit it trades like ENZ-c before going current and not after. He put a number of patents through in the last two weeks. A lot of longs sold today fearing further lack of news.
onph stock is low. what patent exactly did they buy? the new one or the one they have no success of actualizing since april? mms? yeah, yeah...
well put. they use this software that does fantom trades on increments and makes it appear like there's a selling pressure. that software is called "we're alone in the universe". most of these people cant look at themselves straight in the mirror because the dumb fs shape shift.
them are called traders. not idiots. i did not sell, but don't plan on adding at any range.
not really. in a few months, probably.
haha, that's exactly what I did. I had one of them type dreams regarding RGBP. A very complicated dream I must say. Those never have a clear cut meaning.
The patent description is rather confusing. It's impossible to understand what the correct sequence of mixing is and sure enough it must be kept secret from others. Assuming there's an actual checkpoint discovered, it's done by multiples of resonance and does not mean anything unless tested in reality on actual subjects. In this case it means that Oncology Pharma must succeed in proving the checkpoint has any working parameters and until it does so no other pharma will be willing to blindly buy their deciphered numbers.
I still have my shares and go long term on this. ONPH is a ticker the price of which is going to reflect the worthiness of the patent. The current status will come when I'll be 100 years old and has no meaning but another 1.5 bump in pps.
almost 2018. I'm willing to reread this doc in full even though I'm not understanding 85% of it. What a weekend.
Protecting against a hostile take over. I've underestimated this point. Why did he sell 3700 shares of ONPH?
late mrna developments around the world do put their ip in unmatched territory. oncology pharma and regen can be bought out in a second. in fact, he may be not too far off with his target pps....as crazy as it may seem now and not on tuesday.
I had a feedback on this once in april. en-zc? can rgbp be that? i'm getting no intuition whatsoever, but botts was only one day short with his call...the weirdest stock market play i've been involved with. did they patent the correct entry to mrna activation scheme? Let me think...jeopardy guy, the corner store...you know what? onph isn't going ballistic. he sold 3700k for nothing. does he know what he's doing? not really. i can't connect the dots.
only one onph scientist knows if it's the one. apparently the patent office sees a distinct capability for the method used in the approach. joe botts is going to kill me.
technically sub penny money does not exist. none of this stuff is real game. i'm betting on crypto and maybe some exchange...he's known to talk about. it's a worthy gamble until it goes current and it's too expensive to buy in for a lot of retailers.
Well, since ceo spoke it fell about 1000 percent. if, and if, he doesn't post qs on time and not some japanese time, it can go to 0.006 where support 2 is. if they didn't have lux bank already, i'd call it a scam judging by how imprecise ceo handles the issues.
and day traders are selling into every spike til they have to buy higher and higher. i have the same feeling. debt paid, new tests results could be over the top. adding more.
it's consolidating on huge volume. buy.
my personal bet - crypto. if they get it going through Luxemburg funds somehow to back up asian crypto boom, especially in strict Vietnam, it could become a major player, their digital money. yet, big money bets on it further going down sub penny level....such a political stance.
the tie was off, no order in office. this guy was suspect. if they dont do qs for 21 in the next weeks, it has no chance but go further down.
It's either the best call ever or the biggest blunder...NR2F6. I've seen lots but never been through a buyout. Fascinating.
let's not average down you're saying. Whenever some pink pos announces a conference it's usually for nothing in 90% of the cases and designed to dilute. I fell for the trap myself and there's no cheese. Down only a few hundred bucks but will never buy this cowboy scam again. Buy SAVA, thank me later.
to 0.0017 for 0.0017 second LMAO
They did dilute on the same day. I don't know how many shares. Huge volume but no gains - dilution on every uptick. Nobody is buying anymore as this will go down to 0.0012 on Wednesday when they'll sell for another 100k in their pockets. Think about it, start a company, apply for stock, sell the s out of it every half a year on double printed slides. I'm going back to real stocks. F this hbilly scene.
in the voice of Reynolds: But Why? LMAO
they've shorted it again from 2.9 what a game
it's going to 10 cent lol
right*
IT'S A SCAM
OK...WOW
Well, it worked that way for everybody to see
no, not good.
Nobody knows exactly how many shares are trading for different causes. Stop saying these naïve early 2000s 90s stigmas. You'll get 8k when the pig is bloated enough....a flying piglet with 5 billion slides.
There's no end to the dilution it appears. First it was Zender bs from on koos hand to another koos and it took 4 days for you loonies to figure out, shame. Now it's some old toxic debt they're converting in hundreds of millions of shares and you're saying it's the bottom? You're lost.
That's why they've been only 1.5 pills approved by FDA based on mRNA. DNDN was one to a limit. No delivery system without toxicity, so vaccines are based primarily on DNA and not mRNA.
Not really. My bet was on ONPH but one poster said yesterday rgpb patterns are not complete San Diego way of shuffling them around local pharma. It's too scientific to prove otherwise. Nobody here on the board has any distant knowledge of the tech. It's sad in reality.
everybody is adding...10% lmao
it's kalled KOOS the p
a bunch of lonely people flipping pennies