Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Only on stock speculation, not on performance!
I used to be a believer. Reading the docs in the court has been a real eye opener about this testing. The bottom line is that the only product Coates has sold is shares. R&D? Coates does not have a clue. Even with a positive test the army cannot just issue a purchase order. Testing like this which has not yet begun is the product of salesmanship and nothing else.
How many of those billion shares are left after paying for the latest vacation?
No HP the whole point is NOT to see if the Army will place an order. Coates previously admitted that a successful test would give the company some measure of credibility so that they could attract an investor to pay for the r&d to develop a new competative product. Clearly the existing product has to be adjusted for any variation in operation. That is worthless to the military and quite frankly could cost lives. The test can only prove the concept, not the product.
My goodness its quiet. Is everyone enjoying a vacation with Chaddie boy? Nice island?
How many of those billion shares have fallen to PIPE investments. Yup it is the shareholders that are paying thru dilution.
The fact of the trademarks being abandoned has been discussed on here many times since it was discovered. Curiously Coates has never offered any explanation of his incompetence on this issue.
And what you seem to have overlooked is that there are NO TRADEMARKS! HTI/AHS abandoned the trademark applications long ago. They all are dead!
Im not weeping at anything. The resume that was posted was Asa Sr. The Asa that is representing HLNT is III. They are not the same person. As to the rest of the advertising you posted, it is just that, advertising.
No, that is not Jethro but that is the Asa that is running for governor, not tge Asa that is representing HLNT. Two different people but it was a nice try to increase credibility. Too bad it did not work.
Is it the end of spring yet?
Well, lets find out..... If anyone made a deposit on a hoss and got it back PLEASE LET US KNOW!!!!
It is sort of like a spy novel where there is just enough fact to make one wonder if it is remotely possible but at the bottom of the last page it is still fiction!
The names may have changed but the game is the same.
And you think Highline is manufacturing hydrogen units under the expert dorection of Chad Coates? Not a chance. Nothing is being manufactured but shares of HLNT stock
Someone does not get it for sure... Coates told us that the reason it failed the test months ago was that they couldn't adjust it for various "load" conditions. I am told that an AC generator always runs at the same RPM. That is how it gets to 60 CPS. Any other speed would result in a different frequency being generated. As the load changes the amount of fuel required to keep the output steady also changes. It is not an rpm thing as much as it is a system-wide thing, which is so far beyond the hy-impact it is ridiculous. The thing that Coates has been touting as an "intelligent system" is as dumb as my x-wife's stupid dog.
$418,336.34? Was that HLNT stock? The better question is why would HLNT be investing that kind of money in risky stocks? Sounds to me like a clear case of breach of fiduciary duty and perhaps even criminal misappropriation. How is it that, with all of the crying about being under funded and no money to do R&D or manufacturing that Coates would take that kind of money and throw it away in that fashion? I used to wonder what he was thinking. I no longer wonder about that as the clear answer seems to be GREED and it has backfired. Just because he discloses it does not mean that he is off the hook to answer for it.
I totally agree with you. I do wonder how much we should charge to be able to ship a technician with each unit. The reality is that we have this thing we call artificial intelligence. Virtually everything that a person can do, a computer can be programmed to do. Coates has apparently never been introduced to this concept.
Remember the explanation Coates gave for the previous test failing? He said it worked at one load value but not at the others. Just because we refer to them as stationary generators does not mean that things stay the same. There are still variables to be accounted for and dealt with.
Even if they somehow still have a patent pending on the controller, what difference does it make? The controller they have now is obsolete and even still only works in a steady state after it has been set by trial and error. Without some smarts in the thing it is worthless imo.
Amazing. .... what goes up comes right back down again.
If not mass brain washing how do you explain investing in a company with no product no patent no trademarks a ton of debt and more litigation than they can deal with.
Well there is a difference between what Coates has told us in the past and reality. Supposedly it was tested on 10 different fleets. Apparently none of them worked well enough for the companies to buy.
It is not as self explanatory as one might think. Please tell us exactly what law you are referring to and where or how these results have to be published. Links will be helpful.
Come on people, read the pleadings, ALL OF THEM! Asa Hutchinsom filed a motion to send the case to binding arbitration. That takes it from this court to the American Arbitration Association. It is normal for the cpurt case to be dismissed because the order from the AAA is a final order. IOW it isn't over, it is just moved to a different tribunal.
Wishful rationalization. As time ges on each should either be granted or denied. In four years none have been granted. IMO we have been lied to yet again.
It is important because Coates has made it important. All over the hy-impact web site. Everywhere you look it has reference to "patent pending technology". who owns the "technology" is the subject of lawsuits. yet after 4 years there is no patent?
CREDIBILITY, that is why it is important!
wer, it is not a matter of having something to gripe about. It is a matter of finding something that Coates has not lied about so that we can rejoice. Obviously having a patent aint it now is it?
Looks to me like shareholders are running for the door.
You saying it is not fact. Prove it!
Bear, I am really getting tired of hearing about patents that I really do not believe exist. OK, lets say that you are correct and they have not been denied by the PTO office and no one has been honest enough to let us know. Just when will these "true owners" get off their a$$e$ and file something in court? The proof is in the doing not talking!
How many failed tests will pass before a successful test? Geeze guys!
Yeah right ... thats the ticket ...
several releases ago coates said that a positive test would not result in sales. It would allow them to attract an investor that would allow them to develope a marketable product. Did you forget about that?
jjj Shouldn't that numbrt on judgements be $664,000? they still have to pay pwc 400k! FACT
I wish that was true. At today's proce try 106 million shares but the people that do PIPEs do not invest at market price, they do it at deep discount so based on today's price it is more like 500 million shares.
In the "strictest sense" you are close. Reality is something different. I do appreciate that some really do want to defend Coates but the intent and execution of the plan takes everything into consideration not just the nuts and bolts in a vacuum as some would want.