Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
it'll depends on the guts of our mg and the offers of nok,
time will tell.
tight lines
malko
UP TO NOW EVERYTHING WAS DANCING, BEFORE THE WAR,the waR will happen during the earings,NOK PUT PRESSURE ON IDCC TO SETTLE MAKING THE GAME LONGER AND COSTIER, nothing has changed in practice EXACTLY NOTHING!; the basic difference from the usa legal system and ica
is that the first is analytical the second very sinthetic,after the introduction skirmishes.
tight lines
malko
ot unfortunately not.you're right at the moment but i'm in italy just 2 month in a year.
tight lines
malko
IF idcc has filed for eventual damages,damages could be granted,the ica have no limits whatsoever,but they have to be convinced,if our case is properly presented and documented:THERE'S NO LIMIT.
tight lines
malko
if bin laden is one of the senior judges,(the arbitrators)THAT COULD HAPPEN :))
tight lines
malko
PLEASE DO REMEMBER THAT WHAT A PARTY CLAIM MEAN ZERO.
tight lines
malko
AND THE SALE FACTOR HUGELY DIFFERENT.
tight lines
malko
65 to 85 i suppose.
what about germany today?
tight lines
malko
they are squeezing cents out of $ tipically finnish.
tight lines
malko
YES,the ica court is the supreme judgment system on our planet,they're the court of icc,the body who estblish how bank payment and warrants and guaranties are made,in every l.c. you read done in conformity of icc 400,500,any 100's RULES,if we were the actor not the defendant probably we could PROBABLY have gained 10 to 30%, but the american legal coulture find hard to understand the logic and the power of ica,their sentences are executive(they actually can take directly monies from your bank acc.lol)even if usa is one of the founding gov, of the institution.
very tight lines
malko
for the ica one patent or one hundred is exactly the same,nok is counting on the stress icc can have,and counting the interest on the monies agaist the court's cost,thry can pay a lot of lawyer at 3% on 2- 300 kk,that's simply saving strategy by a corp carefull of any dime.
NATURALLY IDCC SHOULD'T APPEAL OR THEY'RE MAKING JORMA STRATEGY TO WORK AGAIST THEM.
THEY SHOUL SIMPLY AND PUBLICALLY STATE; WE DONT APPEAL NOT TO BE INVOLVED IN THE OPP. DELAYNG STRATEGY EVEN IF WE FILMELY BELEIVE WE'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!
very tight lines
malko
the form 8 follows
nothing wrong in mho
In connection with the arbitration involving Nokia Corporation's (Nokia) patentlicense agreement with InterDigital Communications Corporation (Company) andInterDigital Technology Corporation (ITC) (as most recently reported in theCompany's Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003), Nokia sought tohave reinstated certain reports, recommendations, and orders previously vacatedby the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas)in the now-settled litigation of Ericsson, Inc. v. InterDigital CommunicationsCorporation and InterDigital Technology Corporation. The Ericsson litigation wasresolved by the parties in March 2003.
On June 8, 2004, the United States District Court entered an order reinstatingcertain reports, recommendations, and orders (which remain under seal) relatingto, among other things, claim construction and non-infringement of certain ITCpatents by certain Ericsson products. As previously reported by the Company inits Form 8-K filed June 4, 2002, the Company believed that none of the rulingshad a material impact on the relief that the Company was seeking in the Ericssonlitigation.
Nokia's request to reinstate certain reports, recommendations, and orders wasbased on Nokia's assertion that such reports, recommendations, and orders arerelevant to the issues to be decided in the Nokia arbitration matter. Nokiaoriginally made claims in the Nokia arbitration requesting that the arbitrationpanel make specific findings of invalidity and/or non-infringement of ITCpatents (some of which were involved in the Ericsson litigation). Nokiasubsequently withdrew such claims. Nokia continues to maintain in the Nokiaarbitration, however, that both the validity and Nokia's infringement of the ITCpatents (including patents involved in the Ericsson litigation) are factors thearbitration panel should consider in determining Nokia's royalty liability underthe patent license agreement. The Company continues to assert in the Nokiaarbitration that issues of patent validity and infringement are not relevant tothe arbitrable royalty dispute. The Company intends to vigorously contest anyNokia position to the contrary in the arbitration.
The United States District Court's June 8, 2004 order does not have any effecton the March 2003 resolution of the litigation with Ericsson or the patentlicense agreements signed by Ericsson and Sony Ericsson in March 2003.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, theRegistrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by theundersigned hereunto duly authorized.
tight lines
malko
IN AN ARBITATION IDCC CAN'T LOOSE,i'm just sorry that it wasn't us to start it,i'm one of the best in arbitrations at ica,
i know how the sages think,i know it since 30 years,we could get a bit less,
LOOSING? FORGRT IT.
tighter lines
malko
if the statute dont forbid it i suppose they could,and that vould be genial!
tight lines
malko
old friend you're absolutely right.
tight lines
malko
to all
i usually try to think like the street because if you want to outsmart them you have to know them. i allready developed a "ceteris paribus budget" and based on my budget at 30 times projected income,plus cash, the street is right.
But,we do have 12 or 13 kkus in the bank not jet accounted for that will mouve our 04 income probably close to 70 cents per share,but interest rates will adjust to twice the projected inflation so 4 to 5 % by jan 2003,WE ARE LIQUID LIKE, OR MORE IN PROPORTION THAN, LU,we'll finally make some monet on our cash,that will be incremental for the year 04 : 3 to 4 per share probably.
tight lines
malko
your message is pretty clear,idcc trade in waves and usually april to september isn't funny at all for put sellers,this time i suppose (imho) provided the market dosn't correct wildly for the interest rate dinamic: we'll see some price increase next week,a mild suggestion will be in case to buy back some with the higher strike selling twice the number of contracts for october 20 then rolling them from october to march 2005.
anyhow(imho) idcc will be over 20 at dec.2004 end.
i know pretty well the lombard calculation at the base for margin calls and i keep on selling a lot more than a 1000 per year.
with simpaty
tight lines
malko
i suppose you misunderstood me a little,i will pay anything needed,in advance,i just need an invoice for 100 us as television eq. to get trough the customs in africa.
tight lines
malko
thanks Data,now we have coverage in the k band,
panamsat and hughes put up two birds one over nigeria one over seycelles i'm in both footprint,but i need the equipment sent as tv material as isn't legal there,anyhow i'll pay everything in advance.
thanks a million
malko
is a cheap satellite internet link www.hughes.com
thanks a million
malko
dear Jim if i could get a dualway system by hughes (gm) full with uploader and downloader sent to me as used television equipment invoice value 100 usd,shipped to nairobi kenya to me i'll be in contact a lot more.
naturally i'll pay in advance for all the costs.
thanks a million
malko
dear friend i made up a "ceteris paribus" tentative balance sheet ,just based on known facts and market trends for idcc 2004.
expenses 109 kkusd
income 134 kkusd
tight lines
malko
Verizon,
Jim
tight lines
malko
international chamber of arnitration c<off i.c.c.
international chamber of commerce
paris france
tight lines
malko
wed. next roll them over to oct.you'll get 10k for youìre expenses,then wed.14 october roll them all to nov.
20k to help your breakeven point
tight lines
malko
i'm happy you've seen the light.
the ica is the supreme commercial law body on the planet
a court injunction from any court in any country;will just irritate them as a infomercial on toilet paper.
tight lines
malko
dear Jim:in 7 months from now,approximation 16% the arbitrators will give a sentence,judge or no judge,they dont give a damn.
swiss bank guarantie.
tight lines
malko
to everybody
nok is simply doing what i insisted we should have done from the beginningusing the i.c.a.
the proper body for international commercial fine tuning or litigations,unfortunately we lost the advantage to file,but this is a case of fine tuning,not a case of litigation.
all the arbitrators in paris know that we are owned substantial amount of money and as they'll have the finger on the trigger and they respect IPR more than the courts in usa;it's also possible that nok could get an unpleasant surprise if theyr case is judged futile.
tight lines
malko
the only guy that will maybe nominated to the b.o.d is
holy Mickey, but still the number of shares isn't enough.
tight lines
malko
as i've been sayng many times,YOU can arbitrate at the icc-ica
about more or less anythingh
BUT ,what about asking to arbitrate against the so called "
INDEMNIFIER?" MAYBE FOR 10 BILLION $?
for present and prospective damages and fraud in depressing and or preventing legal IPR to be enforced on our planet.
tight lines
malko
i was expecting the news,basically in scandinavia the irs is toughfer than in usa, to pay large amount of $ to have a binding arbitration is far away better than an invoice,in the other case that could be treated as a voluntary donation and or contribution and taxed at 40%
tight lines
malko
for wild Bill carrot,just a checque to be signed,out of 46b
in the bank.
tight lines
malko
i've got some imput from laranger_2 at the yahoo board: fromModification and Termination. Trading plans should also address modifications and termination. The SEC has specifically indicated that an insider may modify a 10b5-1 trading plan only when the insider is not aware of material nonpublic information.
However, the SEC has indicated that an insider may terminate a 10b5-1 trading plan even if the insider is aware of material nonpublic information at the time. Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 give rise to liability in connection with the purchase or sale of any security and terminating a plan does not result in a purchase or sale. However, modifications or terminations, especially if made frequently or if immediately followed by implementation of a new trading plan, may raise concern that the insider did not enter into the initial trading plan in good faith. Rule 10b5-1 requires that trading plans be made in good faith and not as part of a plan or scheme to evade the insider trading laws.
so if good news are expected next week Harry had to sell now not to be charged with insider trading,
imho
tight lines
malko
if i was wild Bill,i'll take over both,idcc first and qcom later.
TIGHT LINES
Malko
thanks a million
tight lines
malko
ot,thanks a million
tight lines
malko
sorry,but what's RFID?
Tight lines
malko
ot
basher are holder than you could think,just for your fun:
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 15 tons."
* "Popular Mechanics," forecasting the relentless march of science, 1949.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
* Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked
with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a
fad that won't last out the year."
* The editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall, 1957.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"But what...is it good for?"
* Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM
commenting on the microchip, 1968.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home."
* Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977
-----------------------------------------------------------
"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered
as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us."
* Western Union internal memo, 1876.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would
pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?"
* David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment
in the radio in the 1920s.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn
better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible."
* A Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith's
paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service.
(Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?"
* Harry M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927.
very tight lines
malko
hi Mickey,old friend,was it you who sold the jan 2005 strike 30 leaps?i sold most of the other strikes but i didn't dare the 30ies,actually i have been too shy.:))
do you know if the old sec rule of max.5.000 contract per security denomination is still valid?
t.y.i.a
tight lines
malko
the operation i suppose vould be illegal!
there was a limit by the sec of 5.000 contacts per each call and put denomination,i'm not aware of any change in the rule,in case i would love to be informed :))
tight lines
malko