Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I wonder which “Long” just closed their position this time lol
The “deals” remind me of Bigfoot, talked about a lot, some people are convinced it exists, but no one can really prove it’s real
I can’t see L2 but it’s always very thin due to the fact that insiders own over 900 million shares. When there’s any sort of buying pressure it moves very quickly
When this explodes it’s going to explode with power of the hammer of Thor. The thunder of it’s vengeance is going to echo through the corridors of the OTC like the gust of a thousand winds
If you check the company’s twitter followers you’ll see that the other board follows the company. There’s clearly a connection. I really don’t think this is something that should be taken lightly.
This doesn’t seem legal at all. However if I would’ve had a very hard time keeping a straight face if I was you
Just waiting on the final written decision on the IPR with Cisco. Should be big news and should be soon
Quick question for you, are you familiar with docsis, the patents involved in this case, any of the cable companies being sued, Cisco and rpx trying to cover for the cable companies, the initial IPR wins, really anything that people that have invested here care about? Or is it just a personal thing with ram?
This has all been explained. You choose to ignore it
How do you know?
It cannot go any later than February. Looking at the basic timeline compared to this particular case they seem to be about a month ahead of the deadlines. It is 100 percent due by February though. My view is similar to ram here I think you won’t see anything with the holidays coming up. BUT, I do expect to see it in January. It is not a long ways away that’s for sure.
I hope all the posters on here saying “congrats longs, we did it. Happy retirement!” When this was at 2 cents a few weeks back sold at that time lol
Negative value is still technically value
But this is good right? Mark Kay said it’s worth 8 billion!!!! That’s all the court will need right? Kay’s evaluation?
https://jumpshare.com/v/Ax9CGol3YW6YgUd1nJ0H
Does this mean I’m the new ZPaul?!
Really? No one is going to even mention the pacer from today saying they settled with centrify on the 17th?
We’ll most likely see the final written decision from the USPTO before we see anything in Pacer. I don’t have the link to see those updates anymore but someone here usually posts it.
She’s going to blow eventually. I don’t think it’ll take quite as long as some people think either
Okay sounds good, the fins will tell all. They always do
Really the 8-k filed through the SEC wasn’t enough for you?
Kay? Never! He said this would be a record revenue year! With multiple deals being closed!
I guess he still has like 40 days for that to happen though.
That’s what people get for listening to Kay and zpaul. Go back through the post history and see how many times his claims have been right. Maybe go through anything Kay has said publicly and see how accurate it ended up. It’s been happening for a long time.
As previously stated many, many times on the board, please read the 13D as it covers why they have not reported
History always repeats itself
I think investors just took an educated guess about the q. If you’ve been here a while then it’s not tough to guess that the numbers will be underwhelming.
No one wants to talk about the q? Lol
This gets said a lot, but the flippers continue to do it and have made a lot of money the last 18 months
Have you ever seen one of his video interviews? He sounds about as articulate as he writes
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134893485
Here's a good example of this lol
The time he told the board to expect 100 million plus from settlements ON OR BEFORE 10/14.
He even highlighted it was his strong belief
After the Q pal. Come on man, it’s not our first time
Based on the posts I don’t think critical thinking is involved at any point. No worries though. We’ll enjoy it like last quarter
He’s not a big reader
Not sure that’s PC, but hey, you said it not me
Hold on I’ll go find the messages lol
I’ll never forget the longs here congratulating each other and wishing each other a happy retirement after the entrust settlement run lol
I agree I don’t think it’s him either but why would a random person pretend to be him but something negative like that?
On the other board someone who claims to be Mark Kay said that the lawyers said they were not allowed to discuss the entrust agreement
If they really did do “very well” you’d think they’d want everyone to know about it? To say it’s to not give the other infringers leverage in their negotiations is ridiculous. The settlement should be based off of how much each company infringes not how much they can get to make sfor go away.
A lot of the ones who say “Long and strong” are the same ones who want the PR...
Wrong board. Opposite happens here