Subscription Expired 04/04/2024 10:40:56 AM
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
New court case against Dan and Skiershop.
http://www.vermontjudiciary.org/default.aspx
Click on "Vermont Courts Online" then register. From there you can find the following:
Case Name: CIT Commercial Services, Inc. vs. Skiershop.com LL
Docket Number : 111-3-06 Wmcv
Name Attorney
Plaintiff (s): CIT Commercial Services, Inc.
Ilerdon S. Mayer
Defendant(s):Barbara Roehm, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Skiershop.com LLC, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Daniel Burgess, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Case Filing Date: 03/02/06
Case Status: Active - Answer Due
Case Type: Civil Click here to see the codes
Next Hearing: 04/11/2006
=====================================================
03/02/06
2159220 - partyadd
CIT Commercial Services, Inc. Plaintiff, entered as party 1.
2159221 - partyadd
Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 2.
2159222 - partyadd
Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 3.
2159223 - partyadd
Barbara Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 4.
2159224 - cvfile - status set to aad
Collection case filed by Plaintiff CIT Commercial Services,
Inc. against Defendant Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com and
Defendant Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com and Defendant Barbara
Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com.
2159225 - document
1 document filed by Attorney Ilerdon S. Mayer for party 1:
Summons. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents
served: Summons & Complaint. Service complete on party(s) 3:
personal service. Documents served: Summons & Complaint. Service
complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: Summons &
Complaint.
03/03/06
2160156 - hrgset
Court Trial set for 04/11/06 at 02:30 PM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Printed Sat Mar 25 22:07:49 EST 2006 doc_id: 63849
- cvfile - status set to aad
Collection case filed by Plaintiff CIT Commercial Services,
Inc. against Defendant Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com and
Defendant Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com and Defendant Barbara
Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com.
2159225 - document
==================================================
What is CIT Commercial? Have a look for yourself:
http://www.citcommercialfinance.com/commcms/homeCmF/default.htm
If this is THE CIT COMMERCIAL company suing Skiershop, Dan and Bobby, something is up and it isn't good. This is the type of company that helps other companies solve problems. Check out the list of services offered by CIT Commercial. This is exactly the type of company you want Dan to be associated with to help him with what's wrong with Skiershop/SMMW.
http://www.citcommercialfinance.com/commcms/products_servicesCmF/default.htm
Hey...Richi......Time to check in with your cousin yet??????
When he sees no bid......he might keep falling...through the floor.
Ot: That CEO was useless as I recall................When he wasn't in court he was in a bar......had a habit of not paying taxes and was repeatedly sued. He had the worst record for returning phone calls.
That would never happen here.
JMN2HO
Translation.......................don't you dare sell before I do.
highwayman32
It could depend on the broker used, but I doubt at this point that many have been able to sell shares unless they are doing so at market.
You should get along well then.
Who ever he is........he's a whack job.
SMMW and Asstrom.....the cycle continues.
God....I need spell check.
Mugsy.............if half the shares that moved in the last 30 days from dilution or restricted......thats a lot of beer money.
Ben.........with limited revenues and no financing this company needs some cash.
Selling shares is the fastest and easiest way. He's not worried about the shareholders at this time.
JMHO
Ben................I can only wish you the best of luck on this, but by reading your last few posts I can see you know where it's heading. I got out last fall after spending a few hours examining where this company was going and attempting to detemine/guess at what revenues they could produce vs what costs they may incure. The idea of having a large base of stations to broadcast on is good. They are in a somewhat seasonal business, but that could change. Advertising income and larger accounts would increase with better viewer numbers, but that is months, if not years away.
The idea that Dan could run this anytime he wants is a joke. His latest round of PR's did what it was designed to do. It moved shares either by dilution, conversion of restricted or both. This reads like a classic Asstrom pump and dump and is playing out that way. Tere may be one or 2 more chances to get out if Dan hasn't dumped to the max of he A/S. If he has then it's clear what the next step will be. It will be for the benefit of the shareholders. I don't care how many Pr's say no RS...This is a pink and plans change. When the funds run short and money is needed, a rs and furter dilution is the norm.
All JMHO.....but hey...I've been right so far.
The reason I got out of this piggie is what I found that wasn't in any of the PR's. This one is like many other pinkies.
No financials ...just speculation. The down side is there is a certain amount of information that can be found and little to none of it is good.
"facilitating the Company's financing of up to $5.5 million in debt and equity. "
Um....I thought we had a Bank loan for that 5.5 million.
"A reverse split is not in our plan,"....Plans change...Dan's proved that.
No answer to that question yet ...eh Ben.
RJ...................
Their has been one person here that talks about the loan and is yet to show any proof. Their is some here that say the PPS must be .0005 or above for Skiers Shop to become a done deal.
Some say that Dan has a pile of PR's to release. If there is a loan it muct be PR's as a material fact. That would help get the PPS to where it's needed.
Now dan wants 5000 shareholders?....Why....What does the number of shareholders matter?
Read the lines and then read between them...It's the same.
A smart CEO pays the taxes......
A smart CEO pays the bills......
A smart CEO pays the rent.......
A smart CEO doesn't drink and drive.....
"If anything I've been buying all the way down."
All the way down?????????
Except for a couple of burps.........this compaeies been in the gutter since July of 2002.
.0001 is the last drop in an empty glass.
Buying all the way down? And now has 20 million shares.
Must pay a chitload in commish.
I wrote that in drunkaneese....just for dan.
Max...........correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't gorb say he was going to look up and post some info for Ben?
Something to do with a bank and a loc that doesn't exist.
The TA numbers will change when Dan gives the new numbers to him. Until then, there is no concrete proof of buy backs or dumping.
There is no concrete proof that SMMW has a bank line of credit.
There is proof that SMMW is delinquint on taxes and there is proof that Skiers shop is being sued.
MM's clearing the earlier dumps....errr...trades.
Stick a fork in it....it's done.
5 hours and 20 minutes....a lot can happen in 20 minutes.
Just ask my wife.....well ok...2 minutes.
He has stated that he intends to buy shares on the open market.
We will probably see some volume once he returns the empties for the deposit.
highwayman32....I did make a mistake in that statement as SMMW doesn't own skier shop yet.
I should have said that a company run by Dan is being sued.
Heck of a record...one is behind on taxes...the other is being sued. I guess things get forgotten whe one gets to drinking.
Market..............
I never said Dan was a crook.......
"I guess my past career makes me look at things differently than most would, but if it taught me one thing...It's how to spot a crook or con artist. I'll leave it at that."
I don't see Dans name there.
Market..........................
Except for the fluff Pr's, most of the available information on this company doesn't smell like roses. On one hand you have some who post about bank loans, revenues and great future business. On the other hand you have those like me that post the facts.
FACT ....This company is behind again in taxes.
FACT ....This company is once again being sued.
Fact ...This company has PR'd that they are looking for someone to assist in seeking financing. Some here post that it has happened when no PR exists to prove that.
Fact....I dislike pumpers who do it for personal gain either by PPS increase or from the company.
Fact.....I'm not going anywhere. I hold no hate for the company, or any of its officers. If a newbie to the board reads my posts, it is my hope that they would DD this company and make their own decision.
FACT!!!!!....the information about the court case and back taxes was tabled here last night and since then there has been a concentraited effort to bury ant post referencing those subjects. Why no discussion.
Fact!!!!....you guys hate facts...fiction is much easier.
Market....Out of respect, I left that bit of personal info for someone who asked a question . Your attempt at insulting me with PM's on a message board mean nothing. This board is about the company and I'll try to keep most posts that way.
Try adressing the facts and leave the insults to others.
Do you think it's good for this company to be behind in taxes and as well, what are your thoughts on the latest litigation.
BTW....closed my position last fall....when I saw the writing on the wall.
There has been no PR to the amount or name of a bank.
Until then, all that is BS!!!
I wonder if this was the company that was going to fund SMMW?
Dan and Skiershop. The case was filed only 19 days ago.
http://www.vermontjudiciary.org/default.aspx
Click on "Vermont Courts Online" then register. From there you can find the following:
Case Name: CIT Commercial Services, Inc. vs. Skiershop.com LL
Docket Number : 111-3-06 Wmcv
Name Attorney
Plaintiff (s): CIT Commercial Services, Inc.
Ilerdon S. Mayer
Defendant(s):Barbara Roehm, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Skiershop.com LLC, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Daniel Burgess, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Case Filing Date: 03/02/06
Case Status: Active - Answer Due
Case Type: Civil Click here to see the codes
Next Hearing: 04/11/2006
=====================================================
03/02/06
2159220 - partyadd
CIT Commercial Services, Inc. Plaintiff, entered as party 1.
2159221 - partyadd
Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 2.
2159222 - partyadd
Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 3.
2159223 - partyadd
Barbara Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 4.
2159224 - cvfile - status set to aad
Collection case filed by Plaintiff CIT Commercial Services,
Inc. against Defendant Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com and
Defendant Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com and Defendant Barbara
Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com.
2159225 - document
1 document filed by Attorney Ilerdon S. Mayer for party 1:
Summons. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents
served: Summons & Complaint. Service complete on party(s) 3:
personal service. Documents served: Summons & Complaint. Service
complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: Summons &
Complaint.
03/03/06
2160156 - hrgset
Court Trial set for 04/11/06 at 02:30 PM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Printed Sat Mar 25 22:07:49 EST 2006 doc_id: 63849
- cvfile - status set to aad
Collection case filed by Plaintiff CIT Commercial Services,
Inc. against Defendant Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com and
Defendant Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com and Defendant Barbara
Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com.
2159225 - document
==================================================
What is CIT Commercial? Have a look for yourself:
http://www.citcommercialfinance.com/commcms/homeCmF/default.htm
If this is THE CIT COMMERCIAL company suing Skiershop, Dan and Bobby, something is up and it isn't good. This is the type of company that helps other companies solve problems. Check out the list of services offered by CIT Commercial. This is exactly the type of company you want Dan to be associated with to help him with what's wrong with Skiershop/SMMW.
http://www.citcommercialfinance.com/commcms/products_servicesCmF/default.htm
Probably hiding from the baliff.......behind again in taxes and being sued.....I'd travel too.
Mugsy.......
I joined the police force at 17...right out of high school and would still be serving except for a near fatal accident in 1998. After a extended rehab I attempted to return but the old body couldn't take it. I passed on the desk job and took a package. I loved the job but realized that I could no longer give 100%. I still have one or two more surgeries in the future and make do the way I am for now.
I guess my past career makes me look at things differently than most would, but if it taught me one thing...It's how to spot a crook or con artist. I'll leave it at that.
Gem....your probably right about the garbage part, but I'd bet that Mtnman knew nothing about the law suit and back taxes.
He's yet to be right on anything and I believe that's because he knows nothing. Like a typical pumper that is just out to make a buck...He makes chit up. Sometimes you guess right and when you don't, you blame it on lawyers or funding.
5.5 million coming from a bank......lol...what bank would touch this company.
Behind in taxes again!!!
File Number: 3866564 Incorporation Date / Formation Date: 10/12/2004
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Entity Name: SUMMUS WORKS INC.
Entity Kind: CORPORATION Entity Type: GENERAL
Residency: DOMESTIC State: DE
Status: GOOD STANDING
TAX INFORMATION
Last Annual Report Filed: 2004
Annual Tax Assessment: $ 165,000.00 Tax Due: $ 167,576.50
Tax Status: DELINQUENT QUARTERLY Total Authorized Shares: 80,200,000,000
REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION
Name: DELAWARE CORPORATIONS LLC
Address: 800 DELAWARE AVENUE
City: WILMINGTON County: NEW CASTLE
State: DE Postal Code: 19801
Phone: (302)652-
New court case against Dan and Skiershop. The case was filed only 19 days ago.
http://www.vermontjudiciary.org/default.aspx
Click on "Vermont Courts Online" then register. From there you can find the following:
Case Name: CIT Commercial Services, Inc. vs. Skiershop.com LL
Docket Number : 111-3-06 Wmcv
Name Attorney
Plaintiff (s): CIT Commercial Services, Inc.
Ilerdon S. Mayer
Defendant(s):Barbara Roehm, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Skiershop.com LLC, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Daniel Burgess, d/b/a Skiershop.com
Case Filing Date: 03/02/06
Case Status: Active - Answer Due
Case Type: Civil Click here to see the codes
Next Hearing: 04/11/2006
=====================================================
03/02/06
2159220 - partyadd
CIT Commercial Services, Inc. Plaintiff, entered as party 1.
2159221 - partyadd
Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 2.
2159222 - partyadd
Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 3.
2159223 - partyadd
Barbara Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com, Defendant, entered as
party 4.
2159224 - cvfile - status set to aad
Collection case filed by Plaintiff CIT Commercial Services,
Inc. against Defendant Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com and
Defendant Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com and Defendant Barbara
Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com.
2159225 - document
1 document filed by Attorney Ilerdon S. Mayer for party 1:
Summons. Service complete on party(s) 2: personal service. Documents
served: Summons & Complaint. Service complete on party(s) 3:
personal service. Documents served: Summons & Complaint. Service
complete on party(s) 4: personal service. Documents served: Summons &
Complaint.
03/03/06
2160156 - hrgset
Court Trial set for 04/11/06 at 02:30 PM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Printed Sat Mar 25 22:07:49 EST 2006 doc_id: 63849
- cvfile - status set to aad
Collection case filed by Plaintiff CIT Commercial Services,
Inc. against Defendant Skiershop.com LLC d/b/a Skiershop.com and
Defendant Daniel Burgess d/b/a Skiershop.com and Defendant Barbara
Roehm d/b/a Skiershop.com.
2159225 - document
==================================================
What is CIT Commercial? Have a look for yourself:
http://www.citcommercialfinance.com/commcms/homeCmF/default.htm
If this is THE CIT COMMERCIAL company suing Skiershop, Dan and Bobby, something is up and it isn't good. This is the type of company that helps other companies solve problems. Check out the list of services offered by CIT Commercial. This is exactly the type of company you want Dan to be associated with to help him with what's wrong with Skiershop/SMMW.
http://www.citcommercialfinance.com/commcms/products_servicesCmF/default.htm
Questions:
Did CIT Commercial not perform as expected so Dan didn't pay his bill?
Is Dan out of money again?
The bottom line is that CIT Commercial wants its compensation and their suing for it. This has to put a delay in the plans of Dan folding Skiershop into SMMW.
On the next phone call, someone might want to ask Dan to come clean on this one. Ask him what made the deal go sour? Why hasn't Dan paid up?
Questions, questions questions. The mystery of SMMW grows deeper. Don't expect Skiershop to be part of SMMW anytime soon.
Suspicious....... both by nature and trade....43
Actually.......It stands for vodka and vermouth. Dan handles the volume part.
My accounts receivable are spotty at best in my business...
I still pay my taxes and make sure that all suppliers of products and services are paid. How many law suits have been mentioned now?....Is dan never a fault.
Good grief man......The company got locked out.....the Ceo's a lush, they keep getting sued and their behind again in taxes.
Where's the VVV in that?
JMHO.
Mugsy....I opened my small company about 5 years ago when I took early retirement....I have never has a suit filed against me for breach of contract or failing to pay. It sure as hell ain't a part of the way I do business.
Rut-ro