Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh ok! I was just going to let you know that if you're logged into filingre.com while you are logged into the court platform I sent you, you can click on the doc symbol on filingre.com and it will open the document for viewing (still only see first page without purchasing the doc) immediately, without having to search by the case number. I can see where it might not be cost effective based on your trading availability. I decided to go ahead and post this info for those that do use it and don't already know this info.
Unfortunately, the court platform won't let you stay logged in for long time periods while not actively using the platform. So may have to log back in a few times during the day.
You're welcome!! I try to help as much as I can!
Do you use filingre.com?
I have a hunch Lazar is going to back off due to the opposition, unless he sees value in the ticker. Most oppositions, he has dropped the case. I have only seen him fight for 1 or 2 of them.
tk, I apologize, I have been out this morning.
Go here... https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/portal.
Click on register/sign in to create an account. It costs $0.50 per page and then they hit you with a $1 processing fee. You can view the first page or can download 1 page docs for free.
tk,
I just went with what the court minutes said. It states "Granted in Part".
When I look at the actual order, ( https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u5KVaoAt6kmZ4nScFl5D-jrpl3pmWcxK/view ) it doesn't state it is Granted in Part.
Some times the courts says granted in part in the minutes and sometimes they don't. I'm not sure if it is due to a specific reason or if it is just an inconsistency of wording, as I have seen many times before with this court...sometimes I think it depends on which clerk is entering data into the database.
Very true! Anything can happen in the world of OTC!!
I wasn't in it either. Someone shared with me that YYYH (frmly MSHFQ) submitted a filing that they are doing a 1:50 R/S.
I don't track them once both OTCMkts and SoS show company officers have changed and the name (especially ticker symbol also) has changed. If I see something significant, I will share it...otherwise, I'm unconcerned!
$NTAH R/S went into effect today!
The name change was also part of the R/S amendment.
I know. That’s why I thought it ended up not going through!
Now that you mention the 10K, I do remember seeing that. It doesn't make sense that nothing else (OTCMkts and SoS) has been updated almost 1 year later! I guess we continue to watch.
I'm thinking the CXCQ merger pretty much fizzled out! No new company info ever updated to OTCMkts and both OTCMkts and SoS still list Lazar as the only company officers almost one year later!
Thank you Kicko...I just figured out how to electronically download the doc and my assumption I had told someone that PM'd me earlier had asked me about was correct!
Ok I'll look a little deeper. I already have a login for the SoS site.
Thanks for posting the doc!
Where do you go to get it instantly? The only thing I found was the form you fill out and email it to process your request!
That's good news. Thank you. I could see the A/S and Preferred designation hadn't changed on SoS. I don't remember the O/S numbers ever jiving between what the filings stated and the TA was reporting. I can only go back to 1 Jun on my webpage scanner. So if the TA O/S numbers had changed prior to 1 Jun, I must have overlooked it if the webpage scanner caught it.
I figured it would take longer to get the requested doc back due to the process to request it. I wish it was set up like the court website is for obtaining court docs. Quick and easy!
Yes, it sucks that you can't attach anything to your posts while on the mobile app.
Without ordering a copy of the document, I don't know. I don't see anything obvious, such as A/S increase or designation updated on SoS.
Yes, it can. He currently has at least 8 tickers for sell that have already been terminated. A couple of them had a new CEO lined up or did have a name change conducted, but the deal ended up not going through.
$QUTR...7/14/2020, Motion to Terminate Custodianship submitted to the court. Hearing date pending.
Link to motion on my shared google drive...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1efuH2dRr2uoEuIasNCgTKB7Ab8mhxQJz/view
On watch for filings to bring current with OTC Markets/SEC.
$QUTR...7/14/2020, Motion to Terminate Custodianship submitted to the court. Hearing date pending.
Link to motion on my shared google drive...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1efuH2dRr2uoEuIasNCgTKB7Ab8mhxQJz/view
On watch for filings to bring current with OTC Markets/SEC.
$QUTR...7/14/2020, Motion to Terminate Custodianship submitted to the court. Hearing date pending.
Link to motion on my shared google drive...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1efuH2dRr2uoEuIasNCgTKB7Ab8mhxQJz/view
On watch for filings to bring current with OTC Markets/SEC.
Great analogy!
I treat every OTC stock as a scam. I do allow myself to be a bit more trusting with Lazar plays; meaning, I’ll hold them longer term. Otherwise, I’m in an out in a short time period. On my non-custodian plays, I’m a 1-3 tick flippin’ fool. I’m happy with 20-30% gains...they all add up quickly and safely.
Yeppers!! Without looking it up again...I'm thinking the one the court didn't allow was extremely old debt...probably old enough it should have just been written off as a loss already!!
Not at all! I know someone wrote an article on a blog trying to make it sound like the SEC was targeting him and other custodian seekers. I think they were fear mongering, to either get cheaper shares in other tickers that weren't suspended, or were short on the others, trying to create a sell off.
There is no telling what some of these fraudster's motives are, other than to try to make money off of other people's losses. Where there is money to be made; there will always be someone trying to take it illegally.
Exactly! The SEC suspended 57 tickers that day.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2020/34-88381.pdf
No he did not! He submitted and was approved for a Request for Voluntary Dismissal. TGCM, AIGI, XYNH and NHLI were the most recent. I don't recall the ticker that was SEC suspended in 2018. That was before I started tracking them in a spreadsheet.
He was awarded custodianship for TGCM and AIGI, the week before the SEC swooped in and zapped them. He didn't even have time to update anything prior to the suspensions as the signed orders weren't available until 3/16/2020 (TGCM) and 3/17/2020 (AIGI). The SEC suspended them on 3/16/2020.
It isn't so much that KNC, LLC is fake...it appears someone created a fake twitter account and fraudulently misrepresented themselves as KNC, LLC and claimed to be looking at a ticker (GCHK) to create interest and a run up.
These are the shells the real KNC, LLC are currently pursuing, all filed in 2019...
$CRGE...7/8/2020, CRGED, 1:1,000 R/S
$CRGE...7/8/2020, CRGED, 1:1,000 R/S
Thanks for the follow; I followed you back!
I don’t recall any of them being CE from late 2018 to present. He has done a few Q tickers. So far only one has dropped the Q. That was MSHFQ to MSHF; now YYYH. None of the Qs had a CE designator on them.
He did have a small handful that had a CE added to them due to the SEC suspending them during early stage of trying to get custodianship approved. I have only seen five of his tickers get SEC suspended since 2018...four were in March 2020.
I meant to say...I have played a few of the other non-Lazar custodian plays, but they have never followed through start to finish.
I was on my phone when I typed the replied to post and didn't catch my error until after I posted it. Unfortunately, cannot edit your post from the app and didn't get to the pc in time to correct it.